pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30715 · v1 · pith:7UIJ37ZEnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Hunting Wandering 3<z<8 Black Holes: via Spatial Offsets in Ionization Ratio and Continuum Emission

Urvi Thakurdesai , Anthony J. Taylor , Steven L. Finkelstein , Gene C. K. Leung , Oscar A. Chavez Ortiz , Jonathan R. Trump , Bren E. Backhaus , Nikko J. Cleri
show 9 more authors
Francesco D'Eugenio Fabio Pacucci Anton M. Koekemoer Pablo Arrabal Haro Micaela Bagley Mark Dickinson Jeyhan Kartaltepe Casey Papovich Nor Pirzkal
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords high-redshift galaxiessupermassive black holesactive galactic nucleiJWST spectroscopyionization ratiosspatial offsetsgalaxy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spatial offsets between [OIII]/Heta peaks and stellar centers in 12 of 26 high-redshift galaxies may indicate off-center AGN activity from wandering supermassive black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether supermassive black holes in the early universe can temporarily sit off-center in their host galaxies, as predicted by models involving minor mergers and asymmetric gas inflows. Using JWST NIRSpec PRISM data on 90 galaxies at 3 < z < 8, the authors map the [OIII]/Heta ratio across each galaxy as a tracer of high-ionization gas. They detect significant localized peaks in this ratio in 26 galaxies and find that 12 of those show clear spatial offsets from the peak of the stellar continuum light. Six of the offsets exceed 1.5 pixels. This mismatch between ionization structure and stellar center is presented as a potential signature of active galactic nuclei displaced from the galaxy center.

Core claim

Out of 26 galaxies with significant localized peaks in [OIII]/Heta, 12 sources exhibit significant spatial offsets between the peak [OIII]/Heta ratio and the stellar continuum center. Six of these sources show the highest amount (> 1.5) pixel spatial offsets. This spatial offset between ionization structure and stellar centers offers a promising avenue to probe early SMBH evolution and its connection to galaxy formation.

What carries the argument

The spatial offset between the location of the peak [OIII]/Heta ionization ratio and the center of the stellar continuum emission, interpreted as a tracer of off-center high-ionization sources such as AGN.

If this is right

  • This spatial-offset method can be applied to larger high-redshift samples to search for wandering SMBHs.
  • A substantial fraction of early AGN activity may occur away from the stellar centers of galaxies.
  • Models of SMBH-galaxy co-evolution must account for temporary off-center phases driven by minor mergers.
  • The six sources with the largest offsets (>1.5 pixels) represent the strongest candidates for follow-up study.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the offsets trace AGN, then a measurable fraction of black-hole growth at z>3 occurs in non-nuclear locations.
  • Multi-wavelength follow-up at X-ray or radio wavelengths could test whether the offset regions host accreting black holes.
  • The same offset technique could be tested on lower-redshift samples where AGN can be confirmed independently.

Load-bearing premise

That significant spatial offsets in [OIII]/Heta peaks relative to the continuum center indicate the presence of off-center AGN activity rather than other physical processes such as star formation or shocks.

What would settle it

High-resolution spectroscopy of the offset regions showing emission-line ratios and line widths fully consistent with star formation or shocks and lacking any AGN indicators such as broad lines or very high ionization states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30715 by Anthony J. Taylor, Anton M. Koekemoer, Bren E. Backhaus, Casey Papovich, Fabio Pacucci, Francesco D'Eugenio, Gene C. K. Leung, Jeyhan Kartaltepe, Jonathan R. Trump, Mark Dickinson, Micaela Bagley, Nikko J. Cleri, Nor Pirzkal, Oscar A. Chavez Ortiz, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Steven L. Finkelstein, Urvi Thakurdesai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Intra-shutter position of 195 sources from the visually inspected CEERS sample in the redshift range 3 < z < 8, shown in corrected slit-based coordinates using JWST slit positions (in arcseconds). We apply a positional cut of ∼ 0.1 ′′ along the y-axis to retain sources centrally lo￾cated within the slit. Grey regions indicate sources excluded by this criterion. This cut results in a sample of 90 galax￾ies … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the redshift distribution of the final se￾lected targets. A known artifact of the NIRSpec MSA observations when non-nodded background subtraction is used is the appearance of regions of negative flux, which result from the bar-shadow—the occluding of the detector by the bars that separate the micro-shutters in the MSA. (P. Jakobsen et al. 2022). While the JWST Calibration Pipeline offers a bar-shadow… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: The colormap shows the 2D spectrum of a source from our sample, CEERS MSA ID: 1334. The y-axis represents the spatial dispersion of the galaxy. The x-axis represents the spectral dispersion of the galaxy (in units of µm; converted to rest-frame using the known spectroscopic redshift) which highlights emission features of the galaxy. Bottom: The black line represents the extracted 1D spectrum of the sa… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: An example 2D spectrum of source MSA ID: 1334. The blue lines represent the row by row region that we perform MCMC fits on to include central regions of the galaxy. Middle: 1D spectra for each of the five central row by row pixels. Bottom: An example of an MCMC fit applied to emission lines of the flux in the 1D spectrum. We model the [Oiii]λ5007, [Oiii]λ4959, and Hβλ4861 lines with a triple Gaussian … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of flux ratio spatial profiles, with fits (on the left) and their posterior distributions with NIRCam images (on the right) for three sources in our sample. Left column: The yellow distributions show the spatial variation of the [Oiii]/Hβ ionization ratio derived from MCMC fitting, while the orange distributions represent the corresponding continuum flux. The dashed lines for each color indicate t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top: Histogram showing the distribution in the maximum [Oiii]/Hβ flux ratio value for all the sources with significant offsets. This captures the peak of the ionization ratio of each galaxy. Bottom: Scatter plot illustrating the correlation between the maximum [OIII]/Hβ ionization ra￾tio and the spatial offset in fractional pixels between the [OIII]/Hβ peak and the stellar continuum peak. The color￾bar sho… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: Histogram showing the variation in the [Oiii]/Hβ flux ratio, defined as the difference between the maximum [Oiii]/Hβ value and the value at the location of the stellar continuum peak ( ([Oiii]/Hβ)peak ([Oiii]/Hβ)continuum ). This metric, computed using Equation 1, captures the ionization ratio variation across the central five spatial pixels of each galaxy in the 12 sources with significant spatial of… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: OHNO Diagnostic Plot which shows emission lines ratios of log([Oiii]/Hβ) and log([Neiii]/[Oii]). The dashed line represents the OHNO diagnostic boundary from B. E. Backhaus et al. (2022), which separates AGN-domi￾nated sources from those dominated by star formation (SF). Top: The colorbar encodes the spatial offset in pixel units between the peaks of the ionization ratio and the stellar continuum. Bottom: … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The early growth and assembly of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) remain key topics of interest in galaxy evolution. One of the scenarios predicted by theoretical models is that frequent minor mergers and asymmetric gas inflows may cause SMBHs to temporarily reside off-center within their host galaxies in the early universe. To observationally test this scenario, we investigate whether spatially offset ionization signatures-which may be indicative of active galactic nuclei (AGN)-can be identified. Using JWST NIRSpec PRISM spectroscopy from the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) survey, we analyze the 2D spectra of 90 high-redshift galaxies (3 < z < 8), including two known broad-line AGN. By measuring key emission lines such as H{\alpha}, H\b{eta}, [OIII]{\lambda}5007, [NeIII]{\lambda}3868, and [OII]{\lambda}{\lambda}3727, 3729 we derive spatial flux ratio profiles, and focus on [OIII]/H{\beta} as a tracer of high-ionization mechanisms that may indicate AGN activity. We identify 26 galaxies (~30% of the sample) with significant localized peaks in [OIII]/H{\beta}. Out of these 26 galaxies, 12 sources (~46%) exhibit significant spatial offsets between the peak [OIII]/H{\beta} ratio and the stellar continuum center. Six of these sources show the highest amount (> 1.5) pixel spatial offsets. This spatial offset between ionization structure and stellar centers offers a promising avenue to probe early SMBH evolution and its connection to galaxy formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes JWST NIRSpec PRISM spectra of 90 galaxies at 3<z<8 from the CEERS survey, measuring spatial profiles of emission-line ratios including [OIII]/Hβ. It reports 26 galaxies (~30%) with significant localized peaks in [OIII]/Hβ and, among these, 12 sources (~46%) with significant spatial offsets between the [OIII]/Hβ peak and the stellar continuum center (six with >1.5 pixel offsets), interpreting the offsets as potential signatures of wandering supermassive black holes.

Significance. If the offsets can be shown to trace off-center AGN rather than other ionization mechanisms, the result would supply a new observational constraint on early SMBH assembly via minor mergers and asymmetric inflows, complementing existing broad-line AGN searches. The approach is data-driven and uses public CEERS observations, but its impact is currently limited by the lack of supporting diagnostics for the ionization source.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and implied Results: The counts (26 galaxies with peaks; 12 with offsets) are presented without quantitative definitions of the 'significant localized peaks' threshold, the offset significance threshold, or the error analysis on the spatial profiles, leaving the headline fractions vulnerable to unquantified systematics.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (method description): The analysis uses only the [OIII]/Hβ ratio from low-resolution PRISM spectra to identify high-ionization regions; no spatially resolved BPT diagrams, [NeIII]/[OII] maps, or velocity-dispersion measurements are reported to discriminate AGN ionization from shocks or dense star-forming clumps that can also produce [OIII]/Hβ > 3–5.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract (interpretation): The claim that the 12 offset sources indicate wandering SMBHs rests on the assumption that localized high [OIII]/Hβ peaks trace AGN activity, yet the manuscript does not describe tests that would rule out alternative physical processes in the offset peaks.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains minor LaTeX rendering artifacts in line notations (H{\alpha}, H\b{eta}, [OIII]{\lambda}5007) that should be standardized for publication.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which identify key areas where the presentation of our analysis can be strengthened. We respond point-by-point to the major comments and indicate the revisions that will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and implied Results: The counts (26 galaxies with peaks; 12 with offsets) are presented without quantitative definitions of the 'significant localized peaks' threshold, the offset significance threshold, or the error analysis on the spatial profiles, leaving the headline fractions vulnerable to unquantified systematics.

    Authors: We agree that the thresholds and error analysis must be defined quantitatively for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated Methods subsection that specifies the criteria used to identify significant localized peaks in the [OIII]/Hβ profiles, the definition of significant spatial offsets (including how positional uncertainties are estimated), and the procedure for error analysis on the extracted spatial profiles. These additions will allow readers to evaluate the reported fractions directly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (method description): The analysis uses only the [OIII]/Hβ ratio from low-resolution PRISM spectra to identify high-ionization regions; no spatially resolved BPT diagrams, [NeIII]/[OII] maps, or velocity-dispersion measurements are reported to discriminate AGN ionization from shocks or dense star-forming clumps that can also produce [OIII]/Hβ > 3–5.

    Authors: The low spectral resolution of NIRSpec PRISM data limits the construction of spatially resolved BPT diagrams because of line blending and per-spaxel signal-to-noise. We do extract [NeIII] and [OII] fluxes as stated in the text, but focused the primary analysis on [OIII]/Hβ. In revision we will include [NeIII]/[OII] ratio profiles for sources where the lines are detected at sufficient S/N and will add an explicit discussion of the diagnostic limitations imposed by PRISM resolution, noting that full BPT or velocity-dispersion maps would require higher-resolution grating observations not available in the current public CEERS PRISM dataset. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (interpretation): The claim that the 12 offset sources indicate wandering SMBHs rests on the assumption that localized high [OIII]/Hβ peaks trace AGN activity, yet the manuscript does not describe tests that would rule out alternative physical processes in the offset peaks.

    Authors: The abstract and discussion present the offsets as potential signatures rather than definitive proof. We will expand the interpretation section to discuss alternative ionization sources (shocks, dense star-forming clumps) that can elevate [OIII]/Hβ, cite relevant literature, and explain why a spatial offset between the ionization peak and the stellar continuum may favor a displaced AGN over distributed star formation. We will also state clearly that definitive discrimination requires additional multi-wavelength data beyond the present PRISM observations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; analysis is direct observational measurement

full rationale

The paper reports empirical measurements of [OIII]/Hβ spatial profiles from JWST NIRSpec PRISM 2D spectra across 90 galaxies, identifying localized peaks and comparing their positions to stellar continuum centers. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations are presented that reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The central result (12/26 offset sources) follows directly from the data reduction steps described, without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The interpretation relies on standard assumptions about emission line diagnostics in astrophysics and the link between spatial offsets and wandering black holes, with some free parameters in defining significance.

free parameters (2)
  • threshold for significant localized peaks
    The criteria for identifying 'significant' peaks in [OIII]/Hβ are not specified in the abstract.
  • offset significance threshold
    Definition of 'significant spatial offsets' is not detailed.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption [OIII]/Hβ ratio serves as a reliable tracer of AGN ionization
    The paper focuses on this ratio as indicative of high-ionization mechanisms from AGN.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5923 in / 1476 out tokens · 65130 ms · 2026-07-01T02:20:31.515092+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Kartaltepe, J., et al. 2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 241, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 149.06

    2023

  2. [2]

    2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Backhaus, B., Trump, J., Finkelstein, S., et al. 2023, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 241, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #241, 149.07

    2023

  3. [3]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Cleri, N. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3919

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3919 2022

  4. [4]

    E., Bridge, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Bridge, J. S., Trump, J. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca668

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca668 2023

  5. [5]

    E., Trump, J

    Backhaus, B. E., Trump, J. R., Pirzkal, N., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1520 2024

  6. [7]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981b, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766

  7. [8]

    S., Dubois, Y., Volonteri, M., et al

    Beckmann, R. S., Dubois, Y., Volonteri, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5610, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1544

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1544 2023

  8. [9]

    M., Hayoune, S., Chafla, K., et al

    Bellovary, J. M., Hayoune, S., Chafla, K., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 5129, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1665

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1665 2021

  9. [10]

    Malkan, M. A. 2011, ApJ, 742, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/107

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/107 2011

  10. [11]

    J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al

    Boyett, K., Bunker, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 1796, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2430

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2430 2024

  11. [12]

    J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A

    Cameron, A. J., Saxena, A., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A115, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346107

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346107 2023

  12. [13]

    2024, in EAS2024, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 2294

    Chen, N., Di Matteo, T., Ni, Y., et al. 2024, in EAS2024, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 2294

    2024

  13. [14]

    M., et al

    Chen, N., Ni, Y., Holgado, A. M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 2220, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1432

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1432 2022

  14. [15]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 1895, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad834

    Chen, N., Di Matteo, T., Ni, Y., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1895, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad834

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad834 2023

  15. [16]

    , keywords =

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Hutchison, T. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acde55

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acde55 2023

  16. [17]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Backhaus, B. E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.21660, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.21660

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.21660 2025

  17. [18]

    M., & Greene, J

    Comerford, J. M., & Greene, J. E. 2014, ApJ, 789, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/112

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/2/112 2014

  18. [19]

    T., Zhang, B., et al

    Decarli, R., Falomo, R., Treves, A., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2453, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16049.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16049.x 2010

  19. [20]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 11766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3084

    DeGraf, C., Chen, N., Ni, Y., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 11766, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3084

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3084 2024

  20. [21]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Dekel, A., Sari, R., & Ceverino, D. 2009, ApJ, 703, 785, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/785 Di Matteo, T., Angles-Alcazar, D., & Shankar, F. 2023a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.11541, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.11541 Di Matteo, T., Colberg, J., Springel, V., Hernquist, L., &

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/785 2009

  21. [22]

    2008, ApJ, 676, 33, doi: 10.1086/524921 Di Matteo, T., Ni, Y., Chen, N., et al

    Sijacki, D. 2008, ApJ, 676, 33, doi: 10.1086/524921 Di Matteo, T., Ni, Y., Chen, N., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 525, 1479, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2198

    work page doi:10.1086/524921 2008

  22. [23]

    2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 539, L9, doi: 10.1086/312838

    Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 539, L9, doi: 10.1086/312838

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/312838 2000

  23. [24]

    L., Leung, G

    Finkelstein, S. L., Leung, G. C. K., Bagley, M. B., et al. 2024, ApJL, 969, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495 2024

  24. [25]

    L., Bagley, M

    Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2025, ApJL, 983, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbbd3 2025

  25. [26]

    2023, Data from The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/Z7P0-8481

    Finkelstein, Steven, Bagley, Micaela, & Yang, Guang. 2023, Data from The Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS), STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/Z7P0-8481

    work page doi:10.17909/z7p0-8481 2023

  26. [27]

    W., Lang, D., et al.\ 2013, , 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  27. [28]

    Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., & Bower, Gary, e. a. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 539, L13, doi: 10.1086/312840

    work page doi:10.1086/312840 2000

  28. [29]

    Koekemoer, A. M. 2012, ApJ, 757, 120, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/120

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/2/120 2012

  29. [30]

    The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142663 2022

  30. [31]

    Jeon, J., Liu, B., Bromm, V., & Finkelstein, S. L. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 176, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1877

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1877 2023

  31. [32]

    , keywords =

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  32. [33]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Leitherer, C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/100

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/2/100 2013

  33. [34]

    Theoretical Modeling of Starburst Galaxies

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545 Hunting Wandering SMBHs using Emission Line Diagnostics15

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  34. [35]

    J., Nicholls, D

    Kewley, L. J., Nicholls, D. C., & Sutherland, R. S. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 2019

  35. [36]

    T., Tanvir, N

    Kisaka, S., & Kojima, Y. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1285, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16530.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16530.x 2010

  36. [37]

    Celotti and G

    Malbon, R. K., Baugh, C. M., Frenk, C. S., & Lacey, C. G. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1394, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12317.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12317.x 2007

  37. [38]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/137

    Merloni, A., Bongiorno, A., Bolzonella, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/137

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/137 2010

  38. [39]

    Pacucci, F., Ferrara, A., & Kocevski, D. D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14368, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14368

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.14368 2026

  39. [40]

    2024, ApJ, 964, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3044

    Pacucci, F., & Loeb, A. 2024, ApJ, 964, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3044

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3044 2024

  40. [41]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 4681, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1712

    Partmann, C., Naab, T., Rantala, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 4681, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1712

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1712 2024

  41. [42]

    Y., Impey, C

    Peng, C. Y., Impey, C. D., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 616, doi: 10.1086/506266

    work page doi:10.1086/506266 2006

  42. [43]

    2021a, ApJL, 916, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac1170

    Ricarte, A., Tremmel, M., Natarajan, P., & Quinn, T. 2021a, ApJL, 916, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac1170

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac1170 2041

  43. [44]

    2021b, MNRAS, 503, 6098, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab866

    Quinn, T. 2021b, MNRAS, 503, 6098, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab866

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab866

  44. [45]

    , eprint =

    Robertson, B., Bullock, J. S., Cox, T. J., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 986, doi: 10.1086/504412

    work page doi:10.1086/504412 2006

  45. [46]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 265, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7a6f

    Saeedzadeh, V., Babul, A., Mukherjee, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 265, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7a6f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7a6f 2024

  46. [47]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2023, ApJ, 955, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acedad

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acedad 2023

  47. [48]

    Celotti and G

    Sijacki, D., Springel, V., Di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 877, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12153.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12153.x 2007

  48. [49]

    2015, MNRAS, 452, 575, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1340

    Sijacki, D., Vogelsberger, M., Genel, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 575, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1340

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1340 2015

  49. [50]

    A., Boyle, B

    Storey, P. J., & Zeippen, C. J. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 813, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03184.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03184.x 2000

  50. [51]

    J., Finkelstein, S

    Taylor, A. J., Finkelstein, S. L., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add15b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add15b 2025

  51. [52]

    , keywords =

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3301, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae682

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae682 2024

  52. [53]

    2017, ApJ, 836, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/8

    Trakhtenbrot, B., Lira, P., Netzer, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/8 2017

  53. [54]

    2010, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Trakhtenbrot, B., Netzer, H., Lira, P., & Shemmer, O. 2010, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 267, Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Galaxies, ed. B. M. Peterson, R. S. Somerville, & T. Storchi-Bergmann, 269–269, doi: 10.1017/S1743921310006460

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921310006460 2010

  54. [55]

    Quinn, T. R. 2018a, ApJL, 857, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aabc0a

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aabc0a 2041

  55. [56]

    Tremmel, M., Governato, F., Volonteri, M., & Quinn, T. R. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475, 4967, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty117

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty117 2018

  56. [57]

    R., & Pontzen, A

    Tremmel, M., Governato, F., Volonteri, M., Quinn, T. R., & Pontzen, A. 2018b, MNRAS, 475, 4967, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty139

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty139

  57. [58]

    R., Weiner, B

    Trump, J. R., Weiner, B. J., Scarlata, C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/144

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/144 2011

  58. [59]

    R., Sun, M., Zeimann, G

    Trump, J. R., Sun, M., Zeimann, G. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 811, 26, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/1/26

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/26 2015

  59. [60]

    R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R

    Trump, J. R., Arrabal Haro, P., Simons, R. C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acba8a ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 355, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae943

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acba8a 2023

  60. [61]

    2010, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 18, 279, doi: 10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x

    Volonteri, M. 2010, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 18, 279, doi: 10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-010-0029-x 2010

  61. [62]

    2008, ApJL, 687, L57, doi: 10.1086/593353

    Volonteri, M., & Madau, P. 2008, ApJL, 687, L57, doi: 10.1086/593353

    work page doi:10.1086/593353 2008

  62. [63]

    J., Pacucci, F., Hernquist, L., & Bose, S

    Weller, E. J., Pacucci, F., Hernquist, L., & Bose, S. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2229, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac179

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac179 2022

  63. [64]

    Wyithe, J. S. B., & Loeb, A. 2003, ApJ, 595, 614, doi: 10.1086/377475

    work page doi:10.1086/377475 2003