Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 81 references

Biased energy collisions produce programmable time-crystal phases

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-09 14:07 UTC pith:S6VUA4TP

load-bearing objection Solid derivation of bulk-driven nonlinear KMP hydrodynamics with parameter-free transport coefficients; time-crystal application is a proof of concept on prior framework. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07325 v1 pith:S6VUA4TP submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.softmath-phmath.MPnlin.PSphysics.flu-dyn

Taming nonlinear energy diffusion: The case of time-crystal energy condensates

P.I. Hurtado , G. Cort\'es-Guill\'en This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.softmath-phmath.MPnlin.PSphysics.flu-dyn
keywords energynonlineardiffusionlocaltransportbulk-drivencondensatesinduce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors generalize the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti (KMP) model of stochastic energy diffusion by replacing its uniform energy redistribution rule with one that is (a) biased by an external field via local detailed balance, and (b) controlled by an energy-dependent collision kernel. Starting from the exact master equation, they derive the hydrodynamic constitutive relation j = -D(ρ)∂_xρ + σ(ρ)E using a local equilibrium approximation, obtaining closed-form expressions for the diffusivity D(ρ) and mobility σ(ρ) as integrals over the collision kernel. For power-law kernels π(ν) ∝ ν^β, both coefficients reduce to simple power laws satisfying an Einstein relation σ = 2ρ²D. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations confirm these predictions quantitatively. As a proof of concept, the authors then apply a packing field — a spatially structured feedback field that pushes energy lagging behind the instantaneous center of mass and restrains energy moving ahead — to show that this bulk driving mechanism can induce a continuous phase transition to a time-crystal phase. Above a critical coupling λ_c = 2πm/ρ₀, the homogeneous state becomes unstable and traveling energy condensates emerge, breaking continuous time-translation symmetry. Multiple packing fields can be superposed and modulated in time to create programmable spatiotemporal patterns. The central object is the bulk-driven nonlinear KMP model, and the central mechanism is the biased redistribution rule that converts an external field into a bulk drift while preserving local energy conservation.

Core claim

The paper shows that biasing the stochastic energy redistribution in a KMP-type lattice model — while preserving local energy conservation — produces a bulk drift term in the hydrodynamic equation, with transport coefficients that are explicitly computable nonlinear functions of the local energy density. Furthermore, coupling this bulk drive to a packing field that selectively amplifies density fluctuations around the energy field's center of mass triggers a second-order phase transition to a time-crystal phase: a state with traveling energy condensates that break continuous time-translation symmetry. The critical coupling for this transition is λ_c^(m) = 2πm/ρ₀, independent of the nonlinear

What carries the argument

Bulk-driven nonlinear KMP model: a 1D lattice where nearest-neighbor energy collisions conserve total pair energy but are biased by an external field χ through an asymmetric redistribution distribution f_χ(α|ν) derived from local detailed balance. The hydrodynamic limit yields a constitutive relation j = -D(ρ)∂_xρ + σ(ρ)E with D(ρ) and σ(ρ) given by integrals over the microscopic collision kernel π(ν). A packing field E_x^(m)[ρ] = |z_m|sin(φ_m - 2πmx), coupled to the mth Fourier mode of the energy density, provides nonlinear feedback that amplifies density packing and drives the time-crystal transition.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the hydrodynamic constitutive relation assumes that the system rapidly relaxes to a locally Gibbsian measure — a product of exponential distributions controlled by instantaneous local averages — which is standard for weakly interacting systems but is here assumed rather than rigorously proven for the strongly nonlinear, driven regime.

What would settle it

Measure the mobility σ(ρ₀) = ⟨j⟩_st / E in kinetic Monte Carlo simulations for various densities and nonlinearity exponents β. If the power-law scaling σ(ρ) ∝ ρ^(β+2) fails, or if the Einstein relation σ = 2ρ²D is violated, the local equilibrium approximation underlying the hydrodynamic derivation does not hold. Separately, if the packing order parameter |z₁| does not show a continuous onset above λ_c = 2π/ρ₀ with finite-size scaling consistent with a second-order transition, the time-crystal mechanism fails for this model class.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a bulk-driven nonlinear generalization of the KMP model of stochastic energy diffusion. The microscopic dynamics is modified in two ways: (i) the collision kernel depends on the total pair energy via a function π(ν), and (ii) the redistribution parameter α is drawn from a biased distribution f_χ(α|ν) derived from a local detailed balance condition, inducing a net energy current. Starting from the exact master equation, the authors derive the hydrodynamic constitutive relation j = −D(ρ)∂_xρ + σ(ρ)E using a local equilibrium (LE) approximation, obtaining closed-form expressions for D(ρ) and σ(ρ) in terms of π(ν). For power-law kernels π(ν) ∝ ν^β, these yield D(ρ) = (β+3)/6 · ρ^β and σ(ρ) = (β+3)/3 · ρ^{β+2}, satisfying an Einstein relation σ = 2ρ²D. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations validate the mobility prediction across multiple β and E values. As a proof of concept, the authors apply a packing field coupled to energy-field fluctuations and demonstrate a second-order phase transition to a time-crystal phase with traveling energy condensates, consistent with the predicted critical coupling λ_c = 2πm/ρ₀.

Significance. The paper makes a solid contribution to the nonequilibrium statistical mechanics of transport models. The derivation of the transport coefficients (Eqs. 24–25) is parameter-free given the microscopic kernel π(ν), and the Einstein relation σ = 2ρ²D provides an internal consistency check. The numerical validation in Fig. 1 is quantitative, testing the predicted mobility σ(ρ) = (β+3)/3 · ρ^{β+2} across three β values and three field strengths. The critical coupling λ_c = 2πm/ρ₀ (Eq. 31) is a nontrivial, β-independent prediction confirmed by finite-size scaling in Fig. 2. The programmable time-crystal phases (Fig. 4) serve as an effective demonstration of the control afforded by the bulk-driving mechanism. The framework is clearly situated within the established KMP/hydrodynamic literature.

major comments (3)
  1. §III, Eqs. (19)–(22): The derivation of the gradient and drift contributions to the current relies on expanding the LE measure to O(L⁻¹) (Eq. 18) and computing two integrals. The O(L⁰) term is stated to vanish by symmetry. However, the manuscript does not explicitly show or verify that the O(L⁻¹) corrections to the LE measure itself (which arise from the weak field χ = E/L and are distinct from the spatial gradient correction already in Eq. 18) do not contribute additional terms at the same order. The text argues that subleading corrections are O(L⁻¹) and do not affect leading hydrodynamics, but the drift term being computed is itself O(L⁻¹), so this argument requires more care. A brief justification that field-induced corrections to the product measure are absent at the order retained would strengthen the derivation.
  2. §IV.B, Eq. (31): The critical coupling λ_c^{(m)} = 2πm/ρ₀ is stated to be β-independent, which is presented as a nontrivial prediction confirmed by the inset of Fig. 2. However, the inset shows ⟨|z₁|⟩ vs. λ/λ_c^{(1)} for different β, and since λ_c itself is β-independent, plotting against the reduced coupling λ/λ_c by construction removes the β-dependence from the horizontal axis. The β-dependence visible in the inset reflects differences in the order parameter growth above criticality, not in λ_c itself. The claim that this 'confirms' the β-independence of λ_c would be more convincing with an explicit measurement of the critical point as a function of β (e.g., via a Binder-type crossing analysis), rather than relying on the reduced-coupling plot. This is a moderate concern because the β-independence follows analytically from Eq. (31) and the transport coefficients (28), so the claim is,
  3. §IV.B, Fig. 2 (main panel): The finite-size scaling shows curves for L = 100–1600 converging toward a step-like transition, but the data near the critical point (λ/λ_c ≈ 1) do not show a clear crossing or data-collapse analysis that would quantitatively locate the critical coupling. Given that the paper claims to 'confirm the predicted critical threshold λ_c^{(1)}' (Eq. 31), a more rigorous finite-size scaling analysis (e.g., plotting L^{1/ν}⟨|z₁|⟩ vs. (λ−λ_c)L^{1/(νβ_c)} or a Binder cumulant crossing) would substantially strengthen this claim. As it stands, the visual agreement between the apparent transition region and the predicted λ_c is suggestive but not quantitatively decisive.
minor comments (7)
  1. §III, Eq. (16): The LE approximation is identified as the weakest assumption. The paper acknowledges this is a proof-of-concept study, but a brief discussion of the conditions under which LE is expected to hold for the driven case (beyond the O(L⁻¹) argument) would help the reader.
  2. §IV.A: Only the mobility σ(ρ) is validated numerically; the diffusivity D(ρ) is stated to have been validated in prior boundary-driving work [55]. A brief note on the expected accuracy of D(ρ) in the driven case, or a cross-check via the Einstein relation using the measured σ(ρ), would improve transparency.
  3. §IV.B, Eq. (31): The β-independence of λ_c is a striking result. A sentence explaining physically why the β-dependence of D and σ cancels exactly in the ratio would help the reader understand the mechanism.
  4. Fig. 4: The raster plots are effective but the color scale and axis labels could be more clearly annotated. In particular, panel (c) shows a dynamic superposition of packing fields, but the connection between the modulation in panel (d) and the observed pattern is not immediately obvious from a casual reading of the text.
  5. §V: The connection to the Doob transform and rare-event physics is mentioned as a future direction. This is an interesting idea but is currently undeveloped; a brief sentence on the specific scenario envisioned would help readers unfamiliar with that connection.
  6. The paper builds substantially on the authors' prior work on packing fields and time crystals [64–67]. While the novelty of the time-crystal results per se is limited (the mechanism is transferred from prior work on other models), the application to the nonlinear KMP framework with bulk driving is a legitimate extension. The authors should ensure that the incremental nature of this contribution relative to [64–67] is clearly stated.
  7. Typo: §II, the sentence containing 'the normalization factor Ω(ϵ_n) ≡ L⁻¹ Σ π(ν_{l,n})' could benefit from clarifying that the L⁻¹ is part of the definition of Ω (making it an average), not the sum itself.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity found; derivation is parameter-free and self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. The transport coefficients D(ρ) and σ(ρ) (Eqs. 24-25) are derived from the microscopic collision kernel π(ν) via the local equilibrium approximation (Eq. 16), with no fitted parameters. For the power-law kernel π(ν) ∝ ν^β (Eq. 27), the coefficients evaluate to closed-form expressions D(ρ) = (β+3)/6 · ρ^β and σ(ρ) = (β+3)/3 · ρ^{β+2} (Eq. 28), which are then independently validated against kinetic Monte Carlo simulations (Fig. 1) across multiple β and E values — the simulation data is not used as input to the derivation. The Einstein relation σ = 2ρ²D emerges as an internal consistency check, not as an input. The critical coupling for the time-crystal transition λ_c = 2πm/ρ₀ (Eq. 31) is derived from the transport coefficients and is β-independent, a nontrivial prediction confirmed by finite-size scaling (Fig. 2) rather than fitted. The paper does cite prior work by the same authors on packing fields [64-67], but these citations provide the framework (the packing field mechanism and its general properties) that is applied to a new model here; the central results of the present paper (the driven nonlinear KMP hydrodynamics and its transport coefficients) are derived from first principles within the paper itself. The local equilibrium approximation (Eq. 16) is a standard hydrodynamic closure assumption, not a circular input. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model is defined by the choice of collision kernel π(ν) (parameterized by β) and the external field E. The hydrodynamic derivation relies on the local equilibrium approximation and weak-field scaling. The packing field is a control mechanism, not an invented physical entity.

free parameters (2)
  • Nonlinearity exponent β = 0, 0.5, 1.0
    The power-law collision kernel π(ν) ∝ ν^β introduces β as a parameter defining the model class. It is not fitted to data but chosen to study different transport regimes.
  • External field E = 1, 3, 5, 10, 20
    The constant external field E and the packing field coupling λ are control parameters varied in simulations, not fitted constants.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Local equilibrium approximation
    The derivation of the hydrodynamic constitutive relation (Eq. 23) assumes that the configuration probability can be approximated by a locally Gibbsian measure (Eq. 16) on hydrodynamic timescales.
  • domain assumption Weak field scaling
    The external field χ must scale as E/L to maintain a balanced drift-diffusion competition in the hydrodynamic limit (Sec. III).
  • standard math Local detailed balance
    The form of the biased collision parameter distribution (Eq. 5) is derived by imposing local detailed balance (Eq. 2).
invented entities (1)
  • Packing field independent evidence
    purpose: A spatially-structured external field coupled to the energy field fluctuations to trigger time-crystal phase transitions.
    The packing field is a control protocol, not a new physical entity. Its effects are verified in simulations (Figs. 2-4) and its critical coupling is predicted analytically (Eq. 31).

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 19487 in / 2126 out tokens · 216040 ms · 2026-07-09T14:07:21.856471+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a bulk-driven nonlinear variant of the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti model of stochastic energy diffusion in which local collisions are biased to induce a net energy flow, resembling the effect of an external field. Starting from the microscopic master equation, we derive the hydrodynamic description of the driven system via a local equilibrium approximation, obtaining explicit expressions for the energy current and the associated diffusivity and mobility transport coefficients, which are nonlinear functions of the local energy density. We test our findings in kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of the model and, as a proof of concept, we demonstrate the versatility of this driving mechanism to control nonlinear energy transport by inducing time-crystalline phases. In particular, we show that appropriately designed packing fields induce the spontaneous formation of traveling energy condensates, exhibiting robust long-range temporal order reminiscent of continuous time crystals. Our results provide a simple yet powerful framework to study bulk-driven nonlinear energy diffusion in stochastic many-body systems, offering a bridge between microscopic dynamics, macroscopic transport, and controlled spatiotemporal order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07325 by G. Cort\'es-Guill\'en, P.I. Hurtado.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Main panel: Mobility transport coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Main: Packing order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spatiotemporal raster plots illustrating the dy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Top panel: Average energy density field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    More is different,

    P. W. Anderson, “More is different,” Science177, 393 (1972)

    work page 1972

  2. [2]

    Model-making in physics,

    R. Peierls, “Model-making in physics,” Contempo- rary Physics21, 3 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Simple lessons from complexity,

    N. Goldenfeld and L. P. Kadanoff, “Simple lessons from complexity,” Science284, 87 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    What is a model?

    B. Widom, “What is a model?” Science183, 305 (1974)

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences,

    E. P. Wigner, “The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences,” Comm. Pure 10 Appl. Math.13, 1 (1960)

    work page 1960

  6. [6]

    Microscopic origins of irreversible macroscopic behavior,

    J. L. Lebowitz, “Microscopic origins of irreversible macroscopic behavior,” Physica A:263, 516 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    R. J. Baxter,Exactly solved models in statistical me- chanics(Elsevier, 2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Marro and R

    J. Marro and R. Dickman,Nonequilibrium phase transitions in lattice models(Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Heat- flow in an exactly solvable model,

    C. Kipnis, C. Marchioro, and E. Presutti, “Heat- flow in an exactly solvable model,” J. Stat. Phys. 27, 65–74 (1982)

    work page 1982

  10. [10]

    Mathematical physics 2000,

    F. Bonetto, J. L. Lebowitz, and L. Rey-Bellet, “Mathematical physics 2000,” (Imperial College Press, London, 2000) Chap. Fourier’s law: A chal- lenge for theorists, p. 128

    work page 2000

  11. [11]

    Thermal con- duction in classical low-dimensional lattices,

    S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, “Thermal con- duction in classical low-dimensional lattices,” Phys. Rep.377, 1–80 (2003)

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    Heat transport in low-dimensional sys- tems,

    A. Dhar, “Heat transport in low-dimensional sys- tems,” Adv. Phys.57, 457 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    921 (Springer, 2016)

    Stefano Lepri, ed.,Thermal Transport in Low Di- mensions: From Statistical Physics to Nanoscale Heat Transfer, Lectures Notes in Physics, Vol. 921 (Springer, 2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Exact large devia- tion function in the asymmetric exclusion process,

    B. Derrida and J. L. Lebowitz, “Exact large devia- tion function in the asymmetric exclusion process,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 209–213 (1998)

    work page 1998

  15. [15]

    Free energy functional for nonequilibrium systems: An exactly solvable case,

    B. Derrida, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer, “Free energy functional for nonequilibrium systems: An exactly solvable case,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 150601 (2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    Large deviations for the boundary driven symmetric simple exclusion process,

    L.Bertini, A.DeSole, D.Gabrielli, G.Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, “Large deviations for the boundary driven symmetric simple exclusion process,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 040601 (2001)

    work page 2001

  17. [17]

    Large deviations for a stochastic model of heat flow,

    L. Bertini, D. Gabrielli, and J. L. Lebowitz, “Large deviations for a stochastic model of heat flow,” J. Stat. Phys.121, 843 (2005)

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    Macroscopic fluctuation theory,

    L.Bertini, A.DeSole, D.Gabrielli, G.Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, “Macroscopic fluctuation theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 593–636 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    The large deviation approach to sta- tistical mechanics,

    H. Touchette, “The large deviation approach to sta- tistical mechanics,” Phys. Rep.478, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Current fluctuations in stochastic lattice gases,

    L.Bertini, A.DeSole, D.Gabrielli, G.Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, “Current fluctuations in stochastic lattice gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 030601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    Nonequilibrium current fluctua- tions in stochastic lattice gases,

    L.Bertini, A.DeSole, D.Gabrielli, G.Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, “Nonequilibrium current fluctua- tions in stochastic lattice gases,” J. Stat. Phys.123, 237–276 (2006)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Non-equilibrium steady states: fluctu- ations and large deviations of the density and of the current,

    B. Derrida, “Non-equilibrium steady states: fluctu- ations and large deviations of the density and of the current,” J. Stat. Mech. P07023 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Thermodynamics of currents in nonequilibrium diffusive systems: theory and simu- lation,

    P. I. Hurtado, C. P. Espigares, J. J. del Pozo, and P. L. Garrido, “Thermodynamics of currents in nonequilibrium diffusive systems: theory and simu- lation,” J. Stat. Phys.154, 214–264 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Sampling rare events across dynamical phase transitions,

    C. Pérez-Espigares and P. I. Hurtado, “Sampling rare events across dynamical phase transitions,” Chaos29, 083106 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Optimal paths and dynamical symmetry breaking in the current fluctuations of driven diffusive media

    P. I. Hurtado, “Optimal paths and dynamical sym- metry breaking in the current fluctuations of driven diffusive media,” (2025), arXiv:2501.09629 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Current Fluctu- ations in One Dimensional Diffusive Systems with a Step Initial Density profile,

    B. Derrida and A. Gerschenfeld, “Current Fluctu- ations in One Dimensional Diffusive Systems with a Step Initial Density profile,” J. Stat. Phys.137, 978–1000 (2009)

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Fluctuations of current in nonstationary diffusive lattice gases,

    P. L. Krapivsky and B. Meerson, “Fluctuations of current in nonstationary diffusive lattice gases,” Phys. Rev. E86, 031106 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Extreme cur- rent fluctuations in a nonstationary stochastic heat flow,

    B. Meerson and P. V. Sasorov, “Extreme cur- rent fluctuations in a nonstationary stochastic heat flow,” J. Stat. Mech. P12011 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Inverse scattering method solves the problem of full statistics of nonstationary heat transfer in the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti model,

    E. Bettelheim, N. R. Smith, and B. Meerson, “Inverse scattering method solves the problem of full statistics of nonstationary heat transfer in the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 130602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Weak additivity principle for current statis- tics ind-dimensions,

    C. Pérez-Espigares, P. L. Garrido, and P. I. Hur- tado, “Weak additivity principle for current statis- tics ind-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. E93, 040103(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Structure of the optimal path to a fluctua- tion,

    N. Tizón-Escamilla, P. I. Hurtado, and P. L. Gar- rido, “Structure of the optimal path to a fluctua- tion,” Phys. Rev. E95, 002100 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Infinite family of universal profiles for heat current statistics in Fourier’s law,

    P. L. Garrido, P. I. Hurtado, and N. Tizón- Escamilla, “Infinite family of universal profiles for heat current statistics in Fourier’s law,” Phys. Rev. E99, 022134 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Current fluctuations in nonequilibrium diffusive systems: An additivity principle,

    T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, “Current fluctuations in nonequilibrium diffusive systems: An additivity principle,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 180601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    Test of the addi- tivity principle for current fluctuations in a model of heat conduction,

    P. I. Hurtado and P. L. Garrido, “Test of the addi- tivity principle for current fluctuations in a model of heat conduction,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 250601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Large fluctua- tionsofthemacroscopiccurrentindiffusivesystems: A numerical test of the additivity principle,

    P. I. Hurtado and P. L. Garrido, “Large fluctua- tionsofthemacroscopiccurrentindiffusivesystems: A numerical test of the additivity principle,” Phys. Rev. E81, 041102 (2010)

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Current large devia- tions for asymmetric exclusion processes with open boundaries,

    T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, “Current large devia- tions for asymmetric exclusion processes with open boundaries,” J. Stat. Phys.123, 277–300 (2006)

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Spontaneous sym- metry breaking at the fluctuating level,

    P. I. Hurtado and P. L. Garrido, “Spontaneous sym- metry breaking at the fluctuating level,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 180601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Dynamicalphasetransitionforcurrentstatis- tics in a simple driven diffusive system,

    C. Pérez-Espigares, P. L. Garrido, and P. I. Hur- tado,“Dynamicalphasetransitionforcurrentstatis- tics in a simple driven diffusive system,” Phys. Rev. E87, 032115 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Statistics of large cur- rents in the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti model in a ring geometry,

    L. Zarfaty and B. Meerson, “Statistics of large cur- rents in the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti model in a ring geometry,” J. Stat. Mech. P033304 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Probability of 2nd law violations in shear- ing steady-states,

    D. J. Evans, E. G. D. Cohen, and G. P. Mor- riss, “Probability of 2nd law violations in shear- ing steady-states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 2401–2404 (1993)

    work page 1993

  41. [41]

    Equilibrium mi- crostates which generate second law violating steady-states,

    D.J. Evans and D.J. Searles, “Equilibrium mi- crostates which generate second law violating steady-states,” Phys. Rev. E50, 1645 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [42]

    Dynamical en- 11 sembles in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics,

    G. Gallavotti and E. G. D. Cohen, “Dynamical en- 11 sembles in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2694 (1995)

    work page 1995

  43. [43]

    Dynamical en- sembles in stationary states,

    G. Gallavotti and E. G. D. Cohen, “Dynamical en- sembles in stationary states,” J. Stat. Phys.80, 931 (1995)

    work page 1995

  44. [44]

    Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dy- namics,

    J. Kurchan, “Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dy- namics,” J. Phys. A31, 3719–3729 (1998)

    work page 1998

  45. [45]

    A Gallavotti-Cohen- type symmetry in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics,

    J. L. Lebowitz and H. Spohn, “A Gallavotti-Cohen- type symmetry in the large deviation functional for stochastic dynamics,” J. Stat. Phys.95, 333–365 (1999)

    work page 1999

  46. [46]

    Symmetries in fluctuations far from equilibrium,

    P. I. Hurtado, C. Pérez-Espigares, J. J. del Pozo, and P. L. Garrido, “Symmetries in fluctuations far from equilibrium,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108, 7704–7709 (2011)

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    Spatial fluctuation theorem,

    C. Pérez-Espigares, F. Redig, and C. Giardinà, “Spatial fluctuation theorem,” J. Phys. A48, 35FT01 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Duality and exact correlations for a model of heat conduc- tion,

    C. Giardinà, J. Kurchan, and F. Redig, “Duality and exact correlations for a model of heat conduc- tion,” J. Math. Phys.48, 033301 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Duality and hidden symmetries in interacting par- ticle systems,

    C. Giardinà, J. Kurchan, F. Redig, and K. Vafayi, “Duality and hidden symmetries in interacting par- ticle systems,” J. Stat. Phys.135, 25 (2009)

    work page 2009

  50. [50]

    Duality for stochastic models of transport,

    G. Carinci, C. Giardina, C. Giberti, and F. Redig, “Duality for stochastic models of transport,” J. Stat. Phys.152, 657 (2013)

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Mapping nonequilibrium onto equilibrium: The macroscopic fluctuations of simple transport models,

    J. Tailleur, J. Kurchan, and V. Lecomte, “Mapping nonequilibrium onto equilibrium: The macroscopic fluctuations of simple transport models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 150602 (2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [52]

    Compact waves inmicroscopicnonlineardiffusion,

    P. I. Hurtado and P. L. Krapivsky, “Compact waves inmicroscopicnonlineardiffusion,” Phys.Rev.E85, 060103 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    The kinetic exclusion process: a tale of two fields,

    C. Gutiérrez-Ariza and P. I. Hurtado, “The kinetic exclusion process: a tale of two fields,” J. Stat. Mech. 103203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Large fluctuations in driven dissipative media,

    A. Prados, A. Lasanta, and P. I. Hurtado, “Large fluctuations in driven dissipative media,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 140601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Nonlin- ear driven diffusive systems with dissipation: Fluc- tuating hydrodynamics,

    A. Prados, A. Lasanta, and P. I. Hurtado, “Nonlin- ear driven diffusive systems with dissipation: Fluc- tuating hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. E86, 031134 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    Typical and rare fluctuations in nonlinear driven diffusive systems with dissipation,

    P. I. Hurtado, A. Lasanta, and A. Prados, “Typical and rare fluctuations in nonlinear driven diffusive systems with dissipation,” Phys. Rev. E88, 022110 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Fluctuating hydrodynamics and meso- scopic effects of spatial correlations in dissipative systems with conserved momentum,

    A. Lasanta, A. Manacorda, A. Prados, and A. Puglisi, “Fluctuating hydrodynamics and meso- scopic effects of spatial correlations in dissipative systems with conserved momentum,” New J. Phys. 17, 083039 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Lattice models for granular-like ve- locity fields: hydrodynamic description,

    A. Manacorda, C. A. Plata, A. Lasanta, A. Puglisi, and A. Prados, “Lattice models for granular-like ve- locity fields: hydrodynamic description,” J. Stat. Phys.164, 810 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Lattice models for granular-like velocity fields: finite-size effects,

    C. A. Plata, A. Manacorda, A. Lasanta, A. Puglisi, and A. Prados, “Lattice models for granular-like velocity fields: finite-size effects,” J. Stat. Mech. 093203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Quantum time crystals,

    F. Wilczek, “Quantum time crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    Crystals of time,

    J. Zakrzewski, “Crystals of time,” Physics5, 116 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Time crystals: a re- view,

    K. Sacha and J. Zakrzewski, “Time crystals: a re- view,” Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 016401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Sacha,Time crystals, Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, Vol

    K. Sacha,Time crystals, Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, Vol. 114 (Springer, 2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Building continu- ous time crystals from rare events,

    R. Hurtado-Gutiérrez, F. Carollo, C. Pérez- Espigares, and P. I. Hurtado, “Building continu- ous time crystals from rare events,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 160601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Spectral signatures of symmetry- breaking dynamical phase transitions,

    R. Hurtado-Gutiérrez, P. I. Hurtado, and C. Pérez- Espigares, “Spectral signatures of symmetry- breaking dynamical phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. E108, 014107 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Programmable time crystals from higher- order packing fields,

    R. Hurtado-Gutiérrez, C. Pérez-Espigares, and P. I. Hurtado, “Programmable time crystals from higher- order packing fields,” Phys. Rev. E111, 034119 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Critical behavior of a programmable time-crystal lattice gas,

    R. Hurtado-Gutiérrez, C. Pérez-Espigares, and P. I. Hurtado, “Critical behavior of a programmable time-crystal lattice gas,” Phys. Rev. E112, 044135 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    Asymmetric stochastic transport models withU q(su(1,1))symmetry,

    G. Carinci, C. Giardina, F. Redig, and T. Sasamoto, “Asymmetric stochastic transport models withU q(su(1,1))symmetry,” J. Stat. Phys. 163, 239 (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    Spohn,Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    H. Spohn,Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, North-Holland Personal Library (Elsevier Science, 2011)

    N.G. Van Kampen,Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, North-Holland Personal Library (Elsevier Science, 2011)

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    De Groot and P

    S.R. De Groot and P. Mazur,Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, New York, 2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Ortiz de Zarate and J.V

    J.M. Ortiz de Zarate and J.V. Sengers,Hydrody- namic fluctuations in fluids and fluid mixtures(El- sevier, Amsterdam, 2006)

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    In particular, while the convergence of the inte- grals (24)-(25) for the diffusivity and mobility trans- port coefficients in terms of the microscopic collision kernelπ(ν)demandsβ >−4, the convergence of the energy-dissipation coefficient for the granular or dis- sipative generalization of the nonlinear KMP model impose the stiffer restrictionβ >−3, see ...

    work page

  74. [74]

    Distribution of cur- rent in nonequilibrium diffusive systems and phase transitions,

    T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, “Distribution of cur- rent in nonequilibrium diffusive systems and phase transitions,” Phys. Rev. E72, 066110 (2005)

    work page 2005

  75. [75]

    Conditional Brownian motion and the boundary limits of harmonic functions,

    J. L. Doob, “Conditional Brownian motion and the boundary limits of harmonic functions,” Bull. Soc. Math. Fr.85, 431 (1957)

    work page 1957

  76. [76]

    Variational and op- timal control representations of conditioned and driven processes,

    R. Chetrite and H. Touchette, “Variational and op- timal control representations of conditioned and driven processes,” J. Stat. Mech. P12001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  77. [77]

    Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations,

    R. Chetrite and H. Touchette, “Nonequilibrium Markov processes conditioned on large deviations,” Ann. Henri Poincare16, 2005 (2015)

    work page 2005

  78. [78]

    Making rare events typical in Markovian open quantum systems,

    F. Carollo, J. P. Garrahan, I. Lesanovsky, and 12 C. Pérez-Espigares, “Making rare events typical in Markovian open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 010103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [79]

    Construction of a coordinate Bethe ansatz for the asymmetric simple exclusion pro- cess with open boundaries,

    D. Simon, “Construction of a coordinate Bethe ansatz for the asymmetric simple exclusion pro- cess with open boundaries,” J. Stat. Mech. P07017 (2009)

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    Large deviations and en- sembles of trajectories in stochastic models,

    R. L. Jack and P. Sollich, “Large deviations and en- sembles of trajectories in stochastic models,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Supp.184, 304 (2010)

    work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.