Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 125 references

The same zero-point length that regularizes a self-energy black hole leaves related imprints in massive scalar ringing, shadows, and circular orbits.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 14:45 UTC pith:XP7G7FQD

load-bearing objection Solid incremental tables on a known regular metric; the geodesic half is clean, the long-lived-mode claim is only as strong as the WKB barrier near peak disappearance. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.07955 v1 pith:XP7G7FQD submitted 2026-07-08 gr-qc

Wave and particle probes of a regular T-duality-inspired black hole with gravitational self-energy

Alexey Dubinsky This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s04.30.Nk04.50.Kd04.25.Nx
keywords regular black holezero-point lengthgravitational self-energymassive scalar quasinormal modesphoton sphereshadow radiusISCO binding energyT-duality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper takes a nonsingular black-hole geometry built from a T-duality-inspired zero-point length and a finite gravitational self-energy, and asks how that short-distance correction shows up in two everyday probes: the ringing of a massive scalar field and the motion of particles and light near the horizon. In ADM units the deformation parameter is the zero-point length over physical mass. On the wave side, raising the scalar mass increases the oscillation frequency and steadily weakens the damping, driving the modes toward long-lived, quasiresonant ringing. On the particle side, larger zero-point length pulls the photon orbit and the innermost stable circular orbit inward, shrinks the shadow, raises the photon-ring frequency, and increases the orbital binding energy. The author argues that both sets of observables are reading the same deformed strong-field potential, so the regularizing correction leaves related, potentially observable fingerprints in ringdown, shadows, and accretion efficiency.

Core claim

The same regularizing zero-point-length correction that smooths the center of a self-energy black hole deforms the exterior effective potentials in a coherent way: heavier scalars raise the real part of the quasinormal frequency and suppress damping (long-lived ringing), while larger zero-point length in ADM units makes the photon sphere and ISCO more compact, shrinks the shadow, raises the photon-ring frequency, and increases ISCO binding energy.

What carries the argument

The static, spherically symmetric metric whose mass function includes both the T-duality-smeared bare density and the regularized Newtonian gravitational self-energy, together with the ADM-normalized massive-scalar potential and the null/timelike geodesic potentials derived from the same metric function f(r).

Load-bearing premise

The paper treats the given regular metric as a trustworthy fixed background for test waves and geodesics without re-solving the underlying non-local field equations that produced it.

What would settle it

A high-accuracy direct integration or spectral calculation of the massive scalar quasinormal spectrum on the same metric that fails to show rising real frequency and falling damping with scalar mass, or geodesic measurements that show the photon sphere and ISCO expanding rather than contracting as zero-point length grows in ADM units.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies massive scalar quasinormal modes and geodesic observables on the regular T-duality-inspired black hole of Jusufi & Singleton, whose metric is sourced by a zero-point-length-smeared density plus a regularized Newtonian self-energy density. After reviewing the metric and ADM mass (Sec. II, Eqs. (2)–(4)), it derives the massive Klein–Gordon radial equation and potential (Sec. III, Eqs. (11)–(12)), the null and timelike circular-orbit conditions (Sec. IV, Eqs. (22)–(32)), and computes fundamental and overtone frequencies with high-order Padé-resummed WKB under explicit reliability cuts (Δ ≤ 1 % between 14th- and 16th-order, presence of a barrier peak). In ADM units, increasing the scalar mass raises Re(Ω) and lowers the damping rate along reliable branches, while increasing l0/MADM makes the photon sphere and ISCO more compact, shrinks the shadow, raises the photon-ring frequency, and increases ISCO binding energy. The central claim is that the same regularizing deformation leaves related imprints in wave and particle probes.

Significance. If the reported trends hold, the work supplies a clean, side-by-side comparison of massive-scalar ringdown and geodesic observables for a concrete regular black-hole model that already appears in the recent literature. The geodesic half (Table VI) is standard, reproducible, and immediately usable for shadow/ISCO phenomenology; the wave half documents the expected quasiresonant tendency of massive scalars on this background with transparent reliability criteria and dual-order WKB tables. The paper does not claim to re-derive the non-local field equations, nor does it over-sell the linear extrapolations to zero damping; the joint “related imprints” statement is therefore a useful phenomenological contribution rather than a foundational one. Strengths include explicit ADM normalization, tabulated dual-order WKB data, and a clear separation of free parameters (l0, μs).

major comments (2)
  1. The strongest wave claim—approach to long-lived/quasiresonant ringing—rests on the reliable WKB branches of Tables I–III and the linear extrapolations of Γ → 0 in Table IV / Fig. 2. Section VI and Fig. 3 correctly note that raising μ̂ washes out the barrier peak (first for ℓ = 0), after which the barrier WKB condition (Eq. (33)) is no longer justified; the paper itself labels μ̂_lin^c “local indicators … rather than exact eigenfrequencies.” Because the joint “related imprints” conclusion treats the wave and particle sides as complementary, the manuscript should either (i) replace or cross-check the near-termination points with a direct-integration or spectral method for at least one representative (ℓ, l0) branch, or (ii) clearly demote the zero-damping extrapolations to a qualitative trend and base the wave claim only on the interior of the reliable interval where Δ ≤ 1 % and a clean pea
  2. The background metric (Sec. II, Eqs. (2)–(3)) is imported from Jusufi & Singleton without re-solving the underlying non-local equations. While this is acceptable for a phenomenological probe paper, the central claim that the deformation “leaves related imprints” assumes that the same f(r) governs both test massive scalars and geodesics. A short, explicit statement of the domain of validity (e.g., that the effective geometry is treated as fixed and that back-reaction or non-local corrections to the wave operator are neglected) would make the load-bearing assumption transparent and protect the joint interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. In Sec. V the reliability cut is stated as Δ ≤ 1 % between 16th- and 14th-order Padé; Tables I–III occasionally list entries with Δ slightly above that threshold (e.g., a few ℓ = 0 rows). Either tighten the tables to the stated cut or note the exceptions.
  2. Fig. 3 (lower-right panel) compares potentials at fixed ℓ = 2, μ̂ = 0.40 for different l0; a brief remark on how the peak height and location scale with l0/MADM would help the reader connect the figure to the ADM-scaled frequency trends in Figs. 1–2.
  3. The eikonal correspondence (Eq. (27)) is correctly caveated, but a one-sentence check that the high-ℓ massless limit of the WKB data approaches Ωph and λ from Table VI would strengthen the “related imprints” language.
  4. Typographical consistency: “W A VE EQUA TION”, “P AR TICLE MOTION”, “OBSER V ABLES”, “STRA TEGY” in section headings should be corrected; likewise a few missing spaces around commas in the abstract and introduction.
  5. The illustrative EHT shadow bound in Sec. VII (δsh ≲ 0.1 implying l0/MADM ≲ 0.35) is useful but should be labeled more clearly as order-of-magnitude only, given the static, non-spinning assumption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: QNM and geodesic results are independent numerical probes of an externally imported metric, not forced by definition or fit.

full rationale

The paper takes the regular self-energy metric (mass function m(r) and f(r) of Sec. II, Eqs. (2)–(3)) as a fixed background from Jusufi & Singleton [83] and does not re-derive or re-solve the non-local field equations. Once f(r) is given, the massive scalar potential (Eq. (12)), WKB frequencies (Eq. (33) with Padé), and geodesic observables (photon sphere Eq. (22), ISCO Eq. (31), shadow, binding energy) are computed by standard, independent methods. Parameters l0/MADM and μ̂ are scanned, not fitted to produce the reported trends; the tables retain only entries satisfying an a-priori reliability cut (Δ ≤ 1 % and existence of a barrier peak). The joint statement that the same deformation leaves related imprints in waves and particles is simply the observation that both probes depend on the same f(r) and its derivatives; it is not a prediction that reduces to its inputs by construction. Self-citations appear in the broader literature survey but are not load-bearing for the numerical spectra or geodesic table. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the imported metric and free of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on an imported regular metric (itself built from a T-duality-inspired zero-point length and a Newtonian self-energy density), standard test-field and geodesic assumptions, and the reliability of high-order WKB–Padé for massive barriers. No free parameters are fitted to data; l0 and μs are scanned. The only invented entity is the background geometry itself, which is taken from prior literature rather than re-derived here.

free parameters (2)
  • l0 (zero-point length) = scanned; representative values 0.1, 0.5, 0.8
    Short-distance cutoff that sets the deformation; scanned over 0.1–0.85 (M=1) but not fitted to any observational data set in this paper.
  • μs (scalar field mass) = scanned per multipole
    Test-field mass parameter scanned until the potential barrier disappears or WKB reliability fails; not fitted.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The static spherically symmetric metric of Jusufi & Singleton (mass function m(r) including bare density plus gravitational self-energy density) is a valid effective background for test fields and geodesics.
    Sec. II explicitly states the paper does not re-solve the non-local field equations and takes the metric as given.
  • domain assumption Minimally coupled massive Klein–Gordon equation on a fixed curved background yields the correct linear ringdown spectrum.
    Standard test-field assumption used to derive Eq. (12) in Sec. III.
  • domain assumption High-order Padé-resummed WKB around the potential peak, with a 1 % relative-difference cut between 14th and 16th order, reliably approximates the fundamental and low overtones while a single barrier exists.
    Sec. V; the method is standard but known to degrade when the massive plateau washes out the peak.
  • standard math Circular null and timelike geodesics are controlled by the extrema of the optical and effective potentials derived from f(r).
    Sec. IV; classical geodesic theory on a static spherical metric.
invented entities (1)
  • Regular T-duality-inspired black hole with gravitational self-energy (zero-point length l0 plus self-energy density as source) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the nonsingular background whose wave and particle observables are computed.
    Introduced in the cited construction [83]; the present paper does not re-derive it and treats it as an effective classical geometry. Independent evidence outside that construction is not supplied here.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 28053 in / 3015 out tokens · 26894 ms · 2026-07-10T14:45:51.518620+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently it was shown that a non-local T-duality-inspired smearing of the point mass introduces a finite zero-point length, while the regularized Newtonian gravitational self-energy is promoted to an additional source for the spacetime. The result is a nonsingular black-hole geometry whose ADM mass contains a finite self-energy contribution and whose extremal Planck-scale remnant sector has been proposed as a possible dark-matter component. We study how this spacetime would affect two familiar physical signals: the ringing of a massive scalar field and the motion of particles and light near the horizon. The zero-point length smooths the central region and changes the strong-field potential outside the horizon. On the wave side, we find that making the scalar field heavier increases the oscillation frequency and makes the damping weaker, a behavior associated with long-lived ringing. On the particle side, increasing the zero-point length makes the photon orbit and the innermost stable circular orbit more compact in physical mass units. The corresponding shadow becomes smaller, the photon-ring frequency becomes larger, and the orbital binding energy increases. These results show that the same regularizing correction leaves related imprints in wave propagation, black-hole shadows and circular-orbit physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07955 by Alexey Dubinsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Real parts of the massive scalar quasinormal frequencies in ADM units. The horizontal axis is the ADM-scaled scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Damping rates of the massive scalar quasinormal modes in ADM units. The plotted quantity is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Typical ADM-scaled massive-scalar effective potentials. The first three panels use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. ADM-scaled first and second overtones for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · 99 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. A. Konoplya, JCAP07, 001 (2023), arXiv:2305.09187 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    J. Li, K. Lin, and N. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 131 (2015), arXiv:1409.5988 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Quasinormal modes for non-minimally coupled scalar fields in regular black hole spacetimes: Grey-body factors, Area spectrum and Shadow radius

    D. Mahdavian Yekta, M. Karimabadi, and S. A. Alavi, Annals Phys.434, 168603 (2021), arXiv:1912.12017 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Al-Badawi and A

    A. Al-Badawi and A. Kraishan, Chin. J. Phys.87, 59 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B856, 138945 (2024), arXiv:2404.09063 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Thermodynamics for regular black holes as intermediate thermodynamic states and quasinormal frequencies

    B.-H. Huang, H.-W. Hu, and L. Zhao, JCAP03, 053 (2024), arXiv:2311.12286 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    K. Lin, J. Li, and S. Yang, Int. J. Theor. Phys.52, 3771 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Y. Guo, H. Xie, and Y.-G. Miao, Phys. Lett. B855, 138801 (2024), arXiv:2402.10406 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Quasinormal modes and shadows of a new family of Ay\'{o}n-Beato-Garc\'{\i}a black holes

    X.-C. Cai and Y.-G. Miao, Phys. Rev. D103, 124050 (2021), arXiv:2104.09725 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D109, 104005 (2024), arXiv:2403.07848 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, Z. Xu, Y. Xing, S. Wu, and Z.-W. Long, Phys. Rev. D104, 104021 (2021), arXiv:2107.06554 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Quasinormal Modes from EFT of Black Hole Perturbations with Timelike Scalar Profile

    S. Mukohyama, K. Takahashi, K. Tomikawa, and V. Yingcharoenrat, JCAP07, 050 (2023), arXiv:2304.14304 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    D. M. Gingrich, Phys. Rev. D110, 084045 (2024), arXiv:2404.04447 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    A. Held, R. Gold, and A. Eichhorn, JCAP06, 029 (2019), arXiv:1904.07133 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D113, 043011 (2026), arXiv:2511.03066 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    L. A. López and V. Ramírez, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 120 (2023), arXiv:2205.10166 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Quasinormal modes of the Hayward black hole surrounded by quintessence: scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations

    O. Pedraza, L. A. López, R. Arceo, and I. Cabrera- Munguia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A37, 2250057 (2022), arXiv:2111.06488 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Jawad, M

    A. Jawad, M. Yasir, and S. Rani, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050298 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko, Phys. Rev. D111, 084031 (2025), arXiv:2502.05689 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Quasinormal modes of a regular black hole with sub-Planckian curvature

    D. Zhang, H. Gong, G. Fu, J.-P. Wu, and Q. Pan, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 564 (2024), arXiv:2402.15085 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Quasinormal modes of regular black holes

    A. Flachi and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D87, 024034 (2013), arXiv:1211.6212 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, Phys. Rev. D107, 104050 (2023), arXiv:2303.01987 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Quasinormal modes, quasiperiodic oscillations and shadow of rotating regular black holes in non-minimally coupled Einstein-Yang-Mills theory

    K. Jusufi, M. Azreg-Aïnou, M. Jamil, S.-W. Wei, Q. Wu, and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D103, 024013 (2021), arXiv:2008.08450 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Quasinormal Modes of Bardeen Black Hole: Scalar Perturbations

    S. Fernando and J. Correa, Phys. Rev. D86, 064039 (2012), arXiv:1208.5442 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Generalised Hayward spacetimes: Geometry, matter and scalar quasinormal modes

    P. Dutta Roy and S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D106, 044028 (2022), arXiv:2206.04505 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. F. Zinhailo, J. Kunz, Z. Stuch- lik, and A. Zhidenko, JCAP10, 091 (2022), arXiv:2206.14714 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    S. V. Bolokhov, (2026), arXiv:2605.03137 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    S. V. Bolokhov, (2026), arXiv:2603.22310 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Ringing of the Extreme Regular Black Holes

    M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol.30, 279 (2024), arXiv:2405.15807 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E.Berti, V.Cardoso, andA.O.Starinets,Class.Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  32. [32]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  33. [33]

    Nollert, Class

    H.-P. Nollert, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol.31, 423 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek, and V. T. Zanchin, Phys. Rev. D79, 064016 (2009), arXiv:0812.1806 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Phys. Rept.947, 1 (2022), arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    S. S. Seahra, C. Clarkson, and R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 121302 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0408032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B853, 138685 (2024), arXiv:2307.01110 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)], arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B666, 283 (2008), arXiv:0801.0846 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Decay of massive scalar field in a black hole background immersed in magnetic field

    C. Wu and R. Xu, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 391 (2015), arXiv:1507.04911 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Massive quasi-normal mode

    A. Ohashi and M.-a. Sakagami, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 3973 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  43. [43]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. V. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B609, 377 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0411059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  44. [44]

    M. S. Churilova, Phys. Rev. D102, 024076 (2020), arXiv:2002.03450 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Charged scalar perturbations on charged black holes in dRGT massive gravity

    P. Burikham, S. Ponglertsakul, and L. Tannukij, Phys. Rev. D96, 124001 (2017), arXiv:1709.02716 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D97, 084034 (2018), arXiv:1712.06667 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Quasinormal modes of massive vector fields on the Kerr spacetime

    J. Percival and S. R. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D102, 104055 (2020), arXiv:2008.10621 [gr-qc]. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, J. Saavedra, and Y.Vásquez,JHEP06,150(2022),arXiv:2204.01570[gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    A. F. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 992 (2018), arXiv:1809.03913 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Zhidenko, Phys

    A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D74, 064017 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0607133

    work page arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D98, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1808.03346 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Massive Dirac quasinormal modes in Schwarzschild-dS black holes: anomalous decay rate and fine structure

    A. Aragón, R. Bécar, P. A. González, and Y. Vásquez, Phys. Rev. D103, 064006 (2021), arXiv:2009.09436 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    T. V. Fernandes, D. Hilditch, J. P. S. Lemos, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D105, 044017 (2022), arXiv:2112.03282 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    S. V. Bolokhov, (2026), arXiv:2605.21533 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Massive scalar quasinormal modes of an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by a phantom Dirac--Born--Infeld field

    M. Skvortsova, (2026), arXiv:2604.25471 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Fortsch. Phys.74, e70074 (2026), arXiv:2510.10579 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, JCAP06, 057 (2025), arXiv:2504.09323 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Long-lived quasinormal frequencies for regular black hole supported by the Einasto pro- file in the presence of the magnetic field,

    M. Skvortsova, “Long-lived quasinormal frequencies for regular black hole supported by the Einasto pro- file in the presence of the magnetic field,” (2026), arXiv:2603.28415 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Bolokhov, Eur

    S. Bolokhov, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1166 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Skvortsova, EPL154, 49001 (2026), arXiv:2509.18061 [gr-qc]

    M. Skvortsova, EPL154, 49001 (2026), arXiv:2509.18061 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1076 (2025), arXiv:2508.19194 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Phys. Lett. B872, 140082 (2026), arXiv:2510.25969 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 76, 084018 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 029901 (2014)], arXiv:0707.1890 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  64. [64]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, J. Rayimbaev, B. Rahmatov, F. Shayi- mov, andI.Davletov,Phys.Lett.B876,140392(2026), arXiv:2601.17906 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black hole

    S. V. Bolokhov, “Quasi-resonances in the vicin- ity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black hole,” (2026), arXiv:2604.11845 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Phys. Lett. B871, 140026 (2025), arXiv:2508.13361 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Long Lived Quasinormal Modes of Regular and Extreme Black Holes

    M. Skvortsova, EPL149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 486 (2025), arXiv:2503.16087 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D110, 024010 (2024), arXiv:2311.05503 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D109, 064017 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    S. V. Bolokhov, (2026), arXiv:2605.11013 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    G. W. Gibbons and M. Rogatko, Phys. Rev. D77, 044034 (2008), arXiv:0801.3130 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  73. [73]

    Telling late-time tails for a massive scalar field in the background of brane-localized black holes

    A. Dubinsky, EPL147, 19003 (2024), arXiv:2403.01883 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Jing, Phys

    J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D72, 027501 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0408090

    work page arXiv 2005

  75. [75]

    Late-time evolution of a self-interacting scalar field in the spacetime of dilaton black hole

    R. Moderski and M. Rogatko, Phys. Rev. D64, 044024 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0105056

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  76. [76]

    H.KoyamaandA.Tomimatsu,Phys.Rev.D64,044014 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  77. [77]

    H.KoyamaandA.Tomimatsu,Phys.Rev.D65,084031 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0112075

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  78. [78]

    Rogatko and A

    M. Rogatko and A. Szyplowska, Phys. Rev. D76, 044010 (2007)

    work page 2007

  79. [79]

    G. W. Gibbons, M. Rogatko, and A. Szyplowska, Phys. Rev. D77, 064024 (2008), arXiv:0802.3259 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  80. [80]

    H.KoyamaandA.Tomimatsu,Phys.Rev.D63,064032 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0012022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

Showing first 80 references.