Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Interface with WTe2 turns MnSe2 half-metallic and flips its magnetic easy axis out of plane while FeSe2/WTe2 adds spin-resolved type-II alignment.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 05:44 UTC pith:DSRG4ZO3

load-bearing objection Useful DFT survey of MSe2/WTe2 stacks with a real Mn MAE flip and Fe half-metal + spin-resolved type-II combo; Co Tc ranking is the softest load-bearing number. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08926 v1 pith:DSRG4ZO3 submitted 2026-07-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.comp-ph

Interface-induced spin-resolved type-II band alignment and enhanced magnetic anisotropy in MSe2/WTe2 (M = V, Cr, Mn, Fe and Co) van der Waals heterobilayers

Paras Poswal , Ranjit Pati , Neeraj Shukla This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.comp-ph
keywords van der Waals heterobilayershalf-metallicitytype-II band alignmentmagnetic anisotropy energyinterface engineeringspintronicstransition-metal dichalcogenidesbuilt-in electric field
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses first-principles calculations to show that stacking magnetic MSe2 monolayers (M = V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co) on WTe2 creates a built-in electric field that reconstructs the spin-dependent electronic structure and magnetic anisotropy. Pristine WSe2/WTe2 already forms a type-II semiconductor with a 0.70 eV gap; replacing W by 3d metals induces magnetism, half-metallicity in the Mn and Fe cases, and a large jump in perpendicular magnetic anisotropy for MnSe2 (from ~1 meV in-plane to 20.8 meV out-of-plane). CoSe2/WTe2 reaches the highest Curie temperature in the series (~274 K). The central claim is that this interface engineering simultaneously delivers spin-polarized transport, spin-selective carrier separation, and thermally more stable magnetism, making the heterobilayers candidates for low-dimensional spintronic devices.

Core claim

Forming MSe2/WTe2 van der Waals heterobilayers generates interfacial charge redistribution and a built-in electric field that reconstructs the spin-resolved bands, producing half-metallicity (Mn, Fe), simultaneous half-metallicity plus spin-resolved type-II alignment (Fe), and a large enhancement of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy that reorients MnSe2 from in-plane to out-of-plane easy axis (MAE 20.8 meV).

What carries the argument

Interface-induced built-in electric field (1.19–1.37 eV Å⁻¹) arising from Se–Te charge redistribution, which modifies crystal-field splitting and 3d–4p hybridization and thereby drives the spin-dependent band reconstruction and magnetic anisotropy.

Load-bearing premise

Magnetic ground states and Curie temperatures are obtained by mapping only nearest-neighbor exchange from a small supercell onto a classical Heisenberg model and then running Monte Carlo, ignoring longer-range and anisotropic couplings on a triangular lattice.

What would settle it

Measure the magnetic easy-axis orientation and Curie temperature of an experimentally grown MnSe2/WTe2 or FeSe2/WTe2 bilayer and compare with the predicted out-of-plane MAE of 20.8 meV and half-metallic spin polarization.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • MnSe2/WTe2 and FeSe2/WTe2 can serve as fully spin-polarized sources with out-of-plane magnetization for spin-injection or spin-filter contacts.
  • The spin-resolved type-II alignment in FeSe2/WTe2 enables devices that simultaneously filter spin and spatially separate carriers (spin-selective diodes or photodetectors).
  • CoSe2/WTe2 offers the highest thermal stability of magnetic order in the series (~274 K), approaching room-temperature operation.
  • Interface engineering with heavy TMDs such as WTe2 becomes a general route to raise magnetic anisotropy and flip easy axes in 2D magnets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • WTe2’s large spin-Hall and Rashba–Edelstein response could convert an in-plane current into spin–orbit torque that switches the out-of-plane Mn or Fe moments, enabling current-driven writing without an external field.
  • If longer-range exchange or frustration on the triangular lattice proves significant, the Monte-Carlo Curie temperatures would shift; mapping multi-neighbor J’s would be the natural next calculation.
  • The same built-in-field mechanism may generalize to other Se/Te TMD pairs, suggesting a materials-design rule for engineering half-metallic type-II heterostructures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports first-principles (PBE+U+D3, SOC) calculations of MSe2/WTe2 (M = V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co) van der Waals heterobilayers. The pristine WSe2/WTe2 AA' stack is type-II with a 0.70 eV gap. 3d substitution at the W site of the Se layer induces magnetism (AFM for V; FM for Cr–Co), interfacial charge redistribution and a built-in field (~1.2–1.4 eV/Å). MnSe2/WTe2 is half-metallic; FeSe2/WTe2 is half-metallic with spin-resolved type-II alignment in the minority channel. Interface formation flips MnSe2 MAE from in-plane (~1.1 meV) to out-of-plane (20.8 meV) and enhances Fe MAE. Nearest-neighbor Heisenberg J from 2×2 FM/AFM energy mapping is fed to classical Monte Carlo, yielding a series-maximum Tc of 273.87 K for CoSe2/WTe2. The authors conclude that interface engineering makes these heterobilayers promising for 2D spintronics.

Significance. If the electronic and MAE results hold, the work supplies a concrete interface-engineering route to half-metallicity, spin-selective type-II alignment, and large perpendicular MAE in a single TMD-based platform—properties that are rarely combined and are directly relevant to spin filters, STT devices, and spin-selective optoelectronics. The linear-response U protocol, layer-projected bands, CDD/PAEP analysis, and SOC MAE angular scans are standard and largely well documented. The Co Tc ranking is a secondary, more fragile claim; the primary value of the paper lies in the half-metallicity + PMA results for Mn and Fe, which would remain of interest even if the absolute Tc numbers are revised.

major comments (3)
  1. Sec. II.B–C, Eqs. (1)–(4), Table III, Fig. 7: The series-maximum Tc claim for CoSe2/WTe2 (273.87 K) rests on a single nearest-neighbor isotropic J extracted from collinear FM/AFM total energies in a 2×2 supercell, then fed to classical Metropolis MC. On the triangular metal lattice the chosen collinear AFM is not the classical ground state for AFM J (120° order is), so the V mapping is already approximate. For the metallic FM members (especially Co, both spins at EF) longer-range/RKKY-type couplings are expected; the text itself notes possible itinerant contributions (Sec. III.C). Critically, although the introduction and MAE section emphasize that anisotropy is required to open a spin-wave gap and evade Mermin–Wagner, the MC Hamiltonian is not stated to include the uniaxial term whose magnitude is computed for Mn/Fe. The absolute Tc values and the Co ranking are therefore not robustly e
  2. Sec. III.A and Table SI: A ~7.2% lattice mismatch between WSe2 and WTe2 is asserted to be “effectively accommodated … without inducing significant structural distortion,” yet no strain-resolved comparison (common lattice vs. strained monolayers, or larger commensurate supercells) is provided. Because the half-metallic gaps, layer projections, and MAE are sensitive to the local crystal field and interlayer spacing, a short strain-sensitivity check (or explicit statement of the common lattice used for each M) is needed to support the claim that the interface reconstruction, not residual strain, is the dominant driver.
  3. Sec. III.D and Fig. 8: MAE is reported only for Mn and Fe heterobilayers (and their isolated monolayers). The abstract and conclusions present “enhanced magnetic anisotropy” as a general interface effect across the MSe2/WTe2 series. Either MAE should be computed for V, Cr, and Co as well, or the claim should be restricted to the two systems for which data exist. In addition, the isolated-monolayer MAE values used for comparison should be obtained under the same lattice constant (or with the same strain) as the heterobilayer to isolate the interface contribution.
minor comments (6)
  1. Throughout: consistent spelling of “heterobilayer” / “hetrobilayer” and “temperature” / “tempertaure”; several figure captions and section headings retain the latter forms.
  2. Eq. (5): formation-energy formula is written with concatenated symbols (EMSe2/WTe2 − EM − NW EW …); parentheses and multiplication signs would improve readability.
  3. Table III header and text: “CrMSe2” and “MSe2” appear as typos for CrSe2 and MnSe2; “θM-Se-M” ranges quoted in the text (87.74°–92.96°) do not match the table values (82.96°–87.74°).
  4. Fig. S1 / Sec. II.B: the AFM spin pattern used for the 2×2 mapping should be stated explicitly (collinear stripe vs. other) so that the factor 16S^{2} in Eq. (4) can be verified.
  5. Abstract and conclusions: “makes MSe2/WTe2 heterobilayers as a promising candidates” — grammar; also the MAE of isolated MnSe2 is given as 1.10 meV in the abstract and −1.12 meV in Sec. III.D.
  6. Reference list: several entries appear with incomplete or future-dated bibliographic data (e.g., Phys. Rev. Appl. 25, 044028 (2026); Phys. Rev. B 113, 195434 (2026)); these should be checked for accuracy before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: all headline electronic/magnetic results are forward DFT outputs; J o MC Tc is a standard model prediction, not a fit or self-definitional loop.

full rationale

The paper’s central claims (type-II alignment of the pristine bilayer, half-metallicity of MnSe2/WTe2, simultaneous half-metallicity + spin-resolved type-II of FeSe2/WTe2, MAE reorientation of Mn from −1.1 meV in-plane to +20.8 meV out-of-plane, and the Tc ranking culminating at 273.87 K for Co) are obtained by direct DFT(+U+SOC) total-energy and band-structure calculations on the heterobilayers. Hubbard U is computed by linear response, not tuned to any target property. Magnetic exchange J is extracted once from the collinear FM–AFM energy difference inside a 2 imes2 cell (Eqs. 2–4) and then inserted into a classical Heisenberg Monte-Carlo run; the resulting Tc is therefore a model prediction, not a quantity that was fitted or defined in terms of itself. The single self-citation to the authors’ related MSe2/WSe2 study is background and does not supply a uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or numerical value that forces the present band structures, MAE values, or Tc ordering. No step reduces by construction to its own input; the derivation chain is self-contained first-principles work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard DFT materials practice plus classical spin models. No new particles or forces are invented. Load-bearing modeling choices are Hubbard U (linear-response values), NN Heisenberg mapping on a frustrated lattice, classical MC for Tc, and PBE-level band topology for half-metallicity/type-II assignment. Free parameters are mostly numerical settings and the derived U/J values rather than hand-tuned targets.

free parameters (4)
  • Hubbard U (per M) = V 5.08; Cr 5.90; Mn 4.84; Fe 5.06; Co 7.77 eV
    U values (Table I: 5.08–7.77 eV) from linear response enter all magnetic moments, half-metal gaps, and exchange; they are not fit to experiment but still control the headline electronic/magnetic outcomes.
  • Nearest-neighbor exchange J = Table III: −18.46 to +10.46 meV
    J is mapped from FM–AFM total-energy differences in a 2×2 cell (Eq. 4) and is the sole interaction driving Monte Carlo Tc/TN; longer-range J and anisotropy in the Hamiltonian are omitted.
  • Plane-wave / charge cutoffs and k-meshes = as stated in Sec. II.A
    70–80 Ry wavefunction, 700–800 Ry charge, 9×9×1 opt / 12×12×1 electronic / 49×49×1 MAE meshes are chosen settings that can shift small energy differences (MAE, ΔE).
  • MC equilibration and averaging steps = 10000 + 5000 steps
    10k equilibration + 5k averaging steps on a 15 nm cell set the reported Tc peak positions without published convergence tests.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption PBE+U+D3 DFT with PAW pseudopotentials adequately ranks stacking, magnetism, half-metallicity, and interface charge transfer for these TMDs.
    Sec. II.A; no hybrid/GW or experimental band benchmarks for the heterostructures.
  • domain assumption Magnetic interactions are captured by a classical isotropic Heisenberg model with only nearest-neighbor J from total-energy mapping.
    Sec. II.B Eqs. (1)–(4); used for all coupling labels and Tc.
  • domain assumption Magnetic anisotropy energy from fully relativistic noncollinear SOC total energies determines the easy axis and stabilizes 2D order against Mermin–Wagner fluctuations.
    Introduction and Sec. III.D Eq. (8).
  • ad hoc to paper AA′ stacking of the pristine bilayer remains the relevant template after 3d substitution at the W site in the Se layer.
    Only AA vs AA′ compared for WSe2/WTe2; substituted stacks inherit AA′ without a full stacking survey (Sec. III.A–B).
  • domain assumption Classical Metropolis Monte Carlo on the mapped J yields meaningful Curie/Néel temperatures for these monolayers/bilayers.
    Sec. II.C and Fig. 7; quantum fluctuations and multi-J models neglected.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 20555 in / 3779 out tokens · 45299 ms · 2026-07-13T05:44:18.497416+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional van der Waals heterobilayers provide an attractive platform for the development of next-generation spintronic devices. Here, first-principles calculations are performed to investigate the structural, electronic and magnetic properties of MSe2/WTe2 (M = V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co) van der Waals heterobilayers. The pristine WSe2/WTe2 heterobilayer in AA'-configuration is found to be energetically favorable and exhibits type-II band alignment with a band gap of 0.70 eV, and this provides an ideal platform for controlling carrier transport. Substituting W with 3d transition metal atoms, induces long-range magnetic ordering and reconstructs the spin-resolved electronic band structure. The formation of the heterointerface generates pronounced charge redistribution and an intrinsic built-in electric field, leading to interface-induced electronic reconstruction. MnSe2/WTe2 heterobilayer exhibits half-metallicity, whereas FeSe2/WTe2 heterobilayer simultaneously exhibits half-metallicity and spin-resolved type-II band alignment. Interfacial electronic reconstruction further produces a substantial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, driving MnSe2 from an in-plane easy axis with MAE value of 1.10 meV in the isolated monolayer to a robust out-of-plane easy axis with MAE value of 20.8 meV in the heterobilayer. Among all the structures, CoSe2/WTe2 heterobilayer exhibits maximum Curie temperature (273.87 K). The combined results establish that interface engineering makes MSe2/WTe2 heterobilayers as a promising candidates for next-generation low-dimensional spintronic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08926 by Neeraj Shukla, Paras Poswal, Ranjit Pati.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG 1. Stacking sequences of WSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references

  1. [1]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  2. [2]

    J. L. Lado and J. Fernández-Rossier, On the origin of magnetic anisotropy in two dimensional CrI 3, 2D Mater. 4, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Hou and R

    Y. Hou and R. Wu, Magnetic Anisotropy in 2D van der Waals Magnetic Materials and their Heterostructures: Importance, Mechanisms, and Opportunities, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 1 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    Huang et al., Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature 546, 270 (2017)

    B. Huang et al., Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature 546, 270 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Gong et al., Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature 546, 265 (2017)

    C. Gong et al., Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature 546, 265 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Fei et al., Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2, Nat

    Z. Fei et al., Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2, Nat. Mater. 17, 778 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Deng et al., Gate-tunable room- temperature ferromagnetism in two- dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature 563, 94 (2018)

    Y. Deng et al., Gate-tunable room- temperature ferromagnetism in two- dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature 563, 94 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    D. Pant, S. Aryal, S. Mandal, and R. Pati, Emergence of Ferromagnetism Due to Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in a Twisted Bilayer Graphene Nanoflex, Nano Lett. 21, 7548 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    S. J. Shah, J. Chen, X. Xie, X. Oyang, F. Ouyang, Z. Liu, J.-T. Wang, J. He, and Y. Liu, Progress and prospects of Moiré superlattices in twisted TMD heterostructures, Nano Res. 17, 10134 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17033 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    J. E. Zimmermann, M. Axt, F. Mooshammer, P. Nagler, C. Schüller, T. Korn, U. Höfer, and G. Mette, Ultrafast Charge-Transfer 14 Dynamics in Twisted MoS 2/WSe2 Heterostructures, ACS Nano 15, 14725 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Barré, J

    E. Barré, J. A. C. Incorvia, S. H. Kim, C. J. McClellan, E. Pop, H.-S. P. Wong, and T. F. Heinz, Spatial Separation of Carrier Spin by the Valley Hall Effect in Monolayer WSe2 Transistors, Nano Lett. 19, 770 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    Icking, F

    E. Icking, F. Wörtche, A. W. Cummings, A. Wörtche, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Volk, B. Beschoten, and C. Stampfer, Weak localization as a probe of spin-orbit-induced spin-split bands in bilayer graphene proximity coupled to WSe2, Phys. Rev. Appl. 25, 044028 (2026)

    2026

  14. [14]

    Poswal, S

    P. Poswal, S. Singh, A. Suman, R. Kumar, and N. Shukla, Modulation of Spin Polarization and Magnetic Ordering in MSe2 /WSe2 (M= 3d Transition Metal Atom) Structure: A First-Principles Study, J. Phys. Chem. C 2, (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    P. Li, Y. Wen, X. He, Q. Zhang, C. Xia, Z.- M. Yu, S. A. Yang, Z. Zhu, H. N. Alshareef, and X.-X. Zhang, Evidence for topological type-II Weyl semimetal WTe2, Nat. Commun. 8, 2150 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    Okazaki and T

    S. Okazaki and T. Sasagawa, Extremely large magnetoresistance and quantum oscillations in ultra-high-quality single crystals of the Weyl semimetal WTe2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 10, L051202 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    Wu et al., Néel-type skyrmion in WTe2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure, Nat

    Y. Wu et al., Néel-type skyrmion in WTe2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure, Nat. Commun. 11, 3860 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    M. A. Mohebpour, P. C. Sherrell, C. Stampfl, C. Autieri, and M. B. Tagani, PHYSICAL REVIEW B 113 , 195434 ( 2026 ) Long-lived interlayer excitons and type-II band alignment in Janus MoTe2/CrSBr van der Waals heterostructures, 195434, 1 (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    Giannozzi et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J

    P. Giannozzi et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  21. [21]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  22. [22]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  23. [23]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  24. [24]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Timrov, N

    I. Timrov, N. Marzari, and M. Cococcioni, HP – A code for the calculation of Hubbard parameters using density-functional perturbation theory, Comput. Phys. Commun. 279, 108455 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    R. F. L. Evans, W. J. Fan, P. Chureemart, T. A. Ostler, M. O. A. Ellis, and R. W. Chantrell, Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 103202 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    Horne, M

    A. Horne, M. D. Sisson, Y. M. Jin, and R. Pati, Unveiling a New Class of Quasi-One- Dimensional van der Waals Crystal with Tunable Electronic and Magnetic Properties, J. Phys. Chem. C 129, 11724 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953)

    1953

  29. [29]

    R. J. Soulen et al., Measuring the Spin Polarization of a Metal with a Superconducting Point Contact, Science 282, 85 (1998)

    1998

  30. [30]

    P. W. Anderson, New Approach to the Theory of Superexchange Interactions, Phys. Rev. 115, 2 (1959)

    1959

  31. [31]

    Kanamori, Superexchange interaction and symmetry properties of electron orbitals, J

    J. Kanamori, Superexchange interaction and symmetry properties of electron orbitals, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 87 (1959)

    1959

  32. [32]

    Huang, J

    C. Huang, J. Guan, Q. Li, F. Wu, P. Jena, and E. Kan, Built-in electric field control of magnetic coupling in van der Waals semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 103, L140410 (2021). 15

    2021

  33. [33]

    W. Zhu, C. Song, L. Han, H. Bai, C. Chen, and F. Pan, Interface-enhanced room- temperature Curie temperature in CrP S4/graphene van der Waals heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B 108, 1 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    A. S. Rajawat et al., Substrate-bias driven sputter deposited β-phase dominated tungsten film for spintronic applications, Thin Solid Films 828, 140795 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    J. Dang, T. Wu, S. Yan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Lei, and X. X. Zhang, Electrical switching of spin-polarized light- emitting diodes based on a 2D CrI3/hBN/WSe2 heterostructure, Nat. Commun. 15, 1 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Şaşıoğlu, W

    E. Şaşıoğlu, W. Beida, S. Ghosh, M. Tas, B. Sanyal, S. Lounis, S. Blügel, I. Mertig, and I. Galanakis, Itinerant versus localized magnetism in spin-gapped metallic half- Heusler compounds: Stoner criterion and magnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. B 112, 184420 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    D. Wang, R. Wu, and A. J. Freeman, First- principles theory of surface magnetocrystalline anisotropy and the diatomic-pair model, Phys. Rev. B 47, 14932 (1993)

    1993

  38. [38]

    L. Tang, Y. Zhou, C. Kang, B. Wen, J. Tian, and W. Zhang, Enhancing magnetocrystalline anisotropy through interface coupling in a 2D ferromagnetic Fe3GeTe2/VI3 heterostructure, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, (2024). 16 Supporting Information FIG S1. Spin arrangement in ferromagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic configuration, rectangular box represent the unit-cell use...

    2024