Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 75 references

This paper argues that even a small admixture of dark matter—a global particle fraction of 0.05% to 0.2%—can soften a neutron star's equation of state, lower its maximum mass by roughly 25–29%, and make the star more compact, all through a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 00:31 UTC pith:45GB2BPG

load-bearing objection The paper's mass–radius trends are probably fine, but its central claim that the Z′ vector channel drives the EOS softening is contradicted by its own numbers; the softening is really rest-mass dominated. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14979 v1 pith:45GB2BPG submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.HE hep-phhep-thnucl-th

A self-consistent Higgs-portal framework for dark matter--admixed neutron stars: Collider-motivated benchmarks meet multimessenger constraints

Adamu Issifu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE hep-phhep-thnucl-th
keywords dark matter admixed neutron starsHiggs portalZ′ vector mediatorequation of state softeningrelativistic mean fieldspeed of soundWIMP benchmarksmultimessenger constraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that even a tiny amount of dark matter inside a neutron star—a global particle fraction Fχ between 0.05% and 0.2%—can soften the nuclear equation of state, cut the maximum possible star mass by roughly 25–29%, and produce more compact configurations. The self-consistent device is to let the local dark-matter density follow the baryon density, nχ = Fχ nB, rather than treating the dark-matter Fermi momentum as an externally prescribed constant. With this coupling, a massive Z′ vector mediator generates a repulsive dark-matter–baryon interaction that dominates the scalar Higgs-portal term and drives the softening. The paper derives exact analytic expressions for the sound speed, its density derivative, and the adiabatic index, giving astrophysicists concrete thermodynamic signatures that future gravitational-wave and X-ray observations could use to tell whether a neutron star contains WIMP dark matter.

Core claim

The central claim is that a single-fluid description of dark-matter-admixed neutron stars becomes self-consistent when the local dark-matter number density is tied to the baryon density, nχ = FχnB, rather than prescribed through a fixed dark Fermi momentum. Solving the coupled baryon–dark-matter mean-field equations with this ansatz, the author finds that increasing Fχ systematically softens the equation of state, reduces the maximum gravitational mass by up to about 29% (from 2.76 to 2.08 M☉ for the stiffest model at Fχ = 0.2%, and from 2.05 to 1.45 M☉ for the softest), shrinks canonical 1.4-solar-mass radii, and suppresses the speed of sound at high density. The microscopic origin is the r

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the density-proportional dark-matter ansatz nχ = FχnB, which makes the dark Fermi momentum kχF = (3π²FχnB)^(1/3) a function of baryon density, together with the massive Z′ vector mean-field X0 that couples the two sectors through their chemical potentials. This combination lets the author derive exact analytical formulas for the adiabatic speed of sound, its density derivative, and the adiabatic index, and to decompose the interaction energy into scalar (Higgs) and vector (Z′) contributions, showing which channel dominates.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation rests on the assumption that, after capture and thermalization, the dark-matter-to-baryon ratio is exactly the same in every fluid element of the star, nχ = Fχ nB; if the actual dark-matter distribution is not proportional to the baryon density, the equations of state, maximum masses, and radii all change.

What would settle it

Compute the number of 200 GeV WIMPs a neutron star actually captures over, say, 10 billion years using the paper's benchmark cross-section (≈10^-47 cm²) and a standard halo density: if the accumulated Fχ falls orders of magnitude below 0.05%, the explored benchmarks are astrophysically unattainable. Conversely, a confirmed neutron star with mass above ~2.5 M☉ whose radius matches the DM-free models would directly contradict the predicted ~25–29% maximum-mass reduction at Fχ = 0.2%.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the maximum neutron-star mass becomes a direct probe of dark-matter content: an observed 2-solar-mass pulsar would already rule out Fχ ≥ 0.2% for the softest equation of state considered, and tighter mass measurements would shrink the allowed range.
  • The predicted ~2–3 km reduction in radius at fixed mass means combined mass–radius measurements from X-ray timing and gravitational-wave tidal deformability can distinguish a star with significant dark-matter admixture from one without.
  • Because the speed of sound and its density derivative shift measurably with Fχ, future gravitational-wave signals that encode the tidal response of neutron stars may carry a thermodynamic signature of dark matter.
  • The dominance of the repulsive Z′ channel implies that vector-mediated dark-matter interactions, not the scalar Higgs interaction, set the astrophysical signal for these benchmark parameters, so collider and direct-detection limits on the Z′ portal map directly onto neutron-star observables.
  • The framework gives a concrete way to translate multimessenger constraints into an upper bound on the amount of dark matter a neutron star can accumulate, without needing a full model of the capture history.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The local-ratio ansatz nχ = FχnB is an idealization; a full capture-and-thermalization calculation would generically produce a radially varying Fχ(r), so the paper's predictions are best read as an upper-envelope scenario for how strongly dark matter can affect the structure.
  • Editorial inference: If the vector channel dominates at these benchmark couplings, dark-matter self-interactions may also become significant at higher densities; the framework could be extended to ask whether Z′-mediated self-repulsion prevents DM from collapsing into a central core.
  • Editorial inference: The predicted strong softening suggests that dark-matter-admixed stars might leave a distinct imprint in neutron-star merger waveforms—not only through lower masses but through a characteristically different tidal deformability at the same mass, which dedicated parameter-estimation studies could test.
  • Editorial inference: The same self-consistency condition could be applied to asymmetric dark matter or mirror dark matter with a heavier mass hierarchy, where the rest-mass contribution would be even more dominant and the maximum-mass reduction correspondingly larger.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a single-fluid relativistic mean-field description of neutron stars admixed with a 200 GeV fermionic dark-matter particle, extending the Higgs portal with a massive Z′ vector mediator. The dark sector is characterized by a global particle fraction Fχ=Nχ/NB, and the local DM density is fixed by nχ=Fχ nB. Using the NL3ωρ, DD2, and FSU2R nuclear EOSs, the authors solve the TOV equations and report that increasing Fχ softens the EOS, lowers Mmax by up to ~29%, reduces radii, increases compactness, and changes the sound-speed and adiabatic-index profiles. They also derive closed-form expressions for c_s^2, dc_s^2/dnB, and Γ, and claim that the repulsive Z′ vector channel is the microscopic origin of the softening.

Significance. If the structural predictions are correct, the paper provides a simple bridge between collider-motivated WIMP benchmarks and neutron-star observables. The analytical thermodynamic identities are a useful benchmark, the three-EOS comparison is informative, and the connection to GW170817, NICER, and HESS J1731 gives a concrete constraint framework. However, the central microscopic narrative is not supported by the paper's own numerical magnitudes: the Z′ interaction energy is many orders of magnitude below the DM rest-mass contribution that actually drives the softening. This internal inconsistency must be resolved before the paper can be accepted; the framework may still be publishable after the interpretation is corrected.

major comments (2)
  1. [§IV.3 and §V, with Fig. 9 and Table III] The paper claims that the repulsive Z′ vector channel 'provid[es] the microscopic origin of the EOS softening' (Sec. V) and that the interaction-energy decomposition 'provides a microscopic explanation for the EOS softening' (Sec. IV.3). This is contradicted by the numbers in Fig. 9: ε_int^(X) ≈ 1×10^{-8} MeV fm^{-3}, with ε_int^(h) ≲ 5% of that, while the total central energy densities in Table III are ~900–2000 MeV fm^{-3}. The DM rest-mass contribution at Fχ=0.2% and nB≈1 fm^{-3} is Fχ mχ nB ≈ 0.002×200 GeV×fm^{-3} ≈ 400 MeV fm^{-3}, i.e. ~10 orders of magnitude larger. Thus the vector interaction is energetically irrelevant to the EOS; the 25–29% Mmax reduction is driven by the heavy DM rest mass, as the paper itself correctly states in Sec. IV.1. The abstract's final sentence and the conclusions must be revised to avoid attributing causal power to the Z′ channel.
  2. [§III.1, Eq. (35), and §V] The central device nχ=Fχ nB is introduced as a 'self-consistent' relation, but it is an external ansatz: a constant local-to-global ratio imposed at every fluid element, not a solution of the capture/thermalization problem or of the field equations. Since all macroscopic predictions (mass shift, radii, sound speed) depend on this profile, the claim to have 'eliminated the need to prescribe kχF' is overstated—one global parameter Fχ is prescribed, and the radial DM profile is fixed by fiat. The paper acknowledges this in the last paragraph, but the abstract and Sec. III.1 present it as a derived consequence. I recommend stating this limitation prominently and, where possible, testing sensitivity to a two-fluid or capture-motivated DM profile.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§III.2, text after Eq. (38)] Typo: 'subtitute' should be 'substitute'.
  2. [Fig. 9] The axis labels 'ε_int × 10^{-8} [MeV fm^{-3}]' are ambiguous; either multiply the plotted values or state the actual units (MeV fm^{-3}).
  3. [References] Reference [54] lacks volume/page information, and [52] is an auxiliary ATLAS note without collaboration or arXiv identifier. Please complete the bibliographic entries.
  4. [§III.3, Eq. (47)] The statement that fixed-kχF models have dPχ/dnB≃0 is not strictly correct if the vector and Higgs mean fields vary with nB. Clarify the comparison by stating the specific fixed-kχF models assumed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Supporting 'predictions' restate the imposed nχ=FχnB ansatz; central TOV results are not circular.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. III.1, Eq. (35); Sec. IV.2 (Fig. 6 discussion)]
    "This relation is imposed directly in the EOS calculation, allowing the local nχ and kχF to be determined self-consistently from nB rather than prescribing a fixed kχF. Consequently, the DM distribution follows the nB profile and is naturally concentrated toward the stellar core, where the gravitational potential is deepest."

    The radial concentration is not a derived prediction: it is exactly the content of the imposed ansatz nχ=FχnB (Eq. 35). No capture or thermalization calculation is performed (the paper defers it to future work), so presenting the nB-following profile as 'reproducing the expected outcome' of capture/thermalization and as a 'key improvement' turns the input relation into an output.

  2. self definitional [Sec. IV.3, Eq. (14) and Fig. 7]
    "Unlike single-fluid models, where kχF is prescribed as an external parameter, the present framework determines kχF self-consistently through kχF = (3π2FχnB)1/3, such that it increases monotonically with both nB and Fχ, reflecting the progressive accumulation of DM toward the stellar core."

    The formula is the definition of the Fermi momentum once nχ=FχnB is imposed (Eq. 14); its monotonic increase with nB is an automatic algebraic identity of the cube root. Calling this a 'self-consistent determination' and interpreting it as 'progressive accumulation' attributes dynamical meaning to the input ansatz rather than deriving a new result.

full rationale

The central calculation is a forward model: RMF Lagrangian (Eqs. 4, 9), mean-field equations (Eqs. 10-21), equilibrium conditions (Sec. III.1), EOS (Eqs. 27-28), and TOV integration. Fχ is a scanned input, not fitted to the output mass-radius curves, and the particle-physics benchmarks (mχ=200 GeV, mX=1.5 TeV, gN X=0.75, gχX=1) are taken from collider/direct-detection literature. The sound-speed identities (Eqs. 46, 57, 62) are definitions, not circular predictions. Self-citation [38] is not load-bearing because the nχ=FχnB relation is re-derived in Eqs. (29)-(35). The circularity is limited to presentation: the imposed ansatz is described as an emergent 'self-consistent' outcome (the radial profile and kFχ behavior), when it is in fact the input. Separately, and not as a circularity matter, the paper's claim that the vector channel is the microscopic origin of the softening is internally unsupported by its own magnitudes (ε_int ~ 1e-8 MeV fm^-3 versus ε_c ~ 900-2000 MeV fm^-3).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The model's phenomenology rests on hand-picked particle-physics benchmarks plus the imposed nχ=FχnB relation. The only scanned parameter is Fχ, and the claimed self-consistency is an assumption, not a derived consequence.

free parameters (6)
  • Fχ = 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%
    Global dark-matter particle fraction introduced in Eq. (29)/(35); all structural results are scanned over this parameter.
  • mχ = 200 GeV
    WIMP mass chosen in Sec. II.1; controls the rest-mass contribution driving EOS softening.
  • gh = 0.07
    Higgs–DM Yukawa coupling chosen from the phenomenologically allowed range 0.001–0.1; affects scalar interaction strength.
  • f = 0.35
    Effective Higgs–nucleon scalar form factor taken from lattice determinations; enters the scalar interaction.
  • mX = 1.5 TeV
    Z′ mediator mass chosen as a representative ATLAS benchmark; sets the tiny vector interaction scale.
  • gqX, gχX = 0.25, 1.0
    Vector couplings fixed to ATLAS simplified-model benchmarks, with gNX ≈ 3 gqX = 0.75 in the additive quark model.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption RMF models NL3ωρ, DD2, FSU2R with published parameters correctly describe baryonic matter.
    The BM sector is taken from Refs. [42–45] without re-derivation; all macroscopic results inherit these models' assumptions.
  • standard math Mean-field approximation for meson, Higgs, and Z′ fields.
    Used throughout Secs. II–III to replace field operators by classical expectation values.
  • domain assumption Single-fluid co-movement: DM and BM are fully thermalized and occupy the same fluid element.
    Invoked in Sec. III.1 to justify dNχ/dNB = Fχ and nχ = Fχ nB.
  • ad hoc to paper Local-to-global ratio equality nχ = Fχ nB at every point.
    Eq. (35) imposes the local DM density from the global particle fraction; this is the paper's key ansatz, not a derived result.
  • domain assumption β-equilibrium and charge neutrality in the baryon sector, with DM not participating in weak equilibrium.
    Standard NS matter assumption stated in Sec. III.1.
  • domain assumption Hidden U(1)X gauge symmetry with a massive Z′ mediator coupling to quarks through the additive quark model.
    The particle-physics sector is adopted from collider simplified-model literature rather than derived in this paper.
invented entities (2)
  • Massive Z′ vector mediator Xμ from hidden U(1)X no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides a density-dependent repulsive BM–DM coupling intended to justify dynamical dark-matter accumulation.
    It is a standard simplified-model ingredient; the paper fixes mX=1.5 TeV and couplings but gives no new falsifiable prediction unique to this work, and its dynamical effect is numerically negligible at the chosen benchmark.
  • Dark fermion χ (200 GeV WIMP, neutralino-like) no independent evidence
    purpose: Acts as the dark-matter component whose rest-mass energy softens the EOS.
    The WIMP is a standard DM candidate; no new independent evidence is provided, and direct-detection limits only motivate the benchmark choice.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22366 in / 15596 out tokens · 163950 ms · 2026-08-02T00:31:46.341761+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate dark matter (DM)-admixed neutron stars (NSs) within a self-consistent single-fluid relativistic mean-field framework by extending the Higgs-portal model with a massive $Z^\prime$ vector mediator. The resulting density-dependent repulsive interaction dynamically couples the baryonic matter (BM) and DM sectors, allowing the DM content to be characterized by the global particle fraction, $F_\chi=N_\chi/N_B$, with the local DM density determined self-consistently as $n_\chi=F_\chi n_B$, thereby eliminating the need for the externally prescribed DM Fermi momentum adopted in previous single-fluid models. Using the NL3$\omega\rho$, DD2, and FSU2R EOSs, we show that increasing $F_\chi$ systematically softens the nuclear equation of state (EOS), reduces the maximum NS mass by up to $\sim29\%$, increases stellar compactness, and modifies the thermodynamic response of dense matter. We further derive exact analytical expressions for the adiabatic speed of sound, its density derivative, and the adiabatic index, providing a rigorous benchmark for assessing the causality and thermodynamic stability of DM-admixed EOSs. At the microscopic level, the BM--DM interaction is shown to be dominated by the repulsive $Z^\prime$ vector channel. Our framework establishes a direct connection between collider-motivated WIMP models and the multimessenger phenomenology of NSs, with potential implications for future gravitational-wave and X-ray observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14979 by Adamu Issifu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the Ptot as a function of the εtot for the NL3ωρ, DD2, and FSU2R EOSs. Increasing Fχ system- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the c 2 s as a function of nB for the three RMF EOSs. Increasing Fχ systematically suppresses c 2 s , with the largest deviations occurring at high densities where the BM–DM coupling is strongest, reflecting the progressive softening of the EOS. The reduction is most pronounced for the softer FSU2R EOS and weakest for the stiffer NL3ωρ EOS. Unlike the single-fluid approaches that prescribe a fixed k … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the mass–radius relations predicted by the three RMF EOSs for different Fχ. Increasing Fχ systematically shifts the stellar sequences toward lower masses and smaller radii, consistent with the progressive softening of the EOS induced by the BM–DM coupling. The effect is strongest for the softer FSU2R EOS and weakest for the stiffer NL3ωρ EOS, demonstrating that DM-induced softening is amplified in so… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the baryon density profiles [59] of canon￾ical 1.4 M⊙ DANSs for the three RMF EOSs at different Fχ. Increasing Fχ systematically shifts the profiles toward smaller radii and higher central densities, reflecting the progressive compaction of the star induced by the BM– DM coupling. For the stiff NL3ωρ EOS, R1.4 decreases from 14.05 to 11.12 km, while nc,1.4 increases from 0.29 to 0.38 fm−3 as Fχ incre… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 56 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., and N. Thonnard, Rota- tional properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc)., Astrophys. J.238, 471 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    Bosma, 21-cm line studies of spiral galaxies

    A. Bosma, 21-cm line studies of spiral galaxies. II. The distribution and kinematics of neutral hydrogen in spiral galaxies of various morphological types., ApJ86, 1825 (1981)

    1981

  3. [3]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, A direct empir- ical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L109 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608407

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Springelet al., Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution, Nature435, 629 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504097

    V. Springelet al., Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution, Nature435, 629 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504097

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(Planck), Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 111302 (2018), arXiv:1805.12562 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search Using a 3.1 Tonne-Year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), WIMP Dark Matter Search Using a 3.1 Tonne-Year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 221003 (2025), arXiv:2502.18005 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Aalberset al.(LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys

    J. Aalberset al.(LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 011802 (2025), arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys

    Z. Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025), arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Kouvaris, WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars, Phys

    C. Kouvaris, WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D77, 023006 (2008), arXiv:0708.2362 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Issifu, P

    A. Issifu, P. Thakur, F. M. da Silva, K. D. Marquez, D. P. Menezes, M. Dutra, O. Louren¸ co, and T. Frederico, Supernova remnants with mirror dark matter and hyper- ons, Phys. Rev. D111, 083026 (2025), arXiv:2412.17946 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    L. L. Lopes and A. Issifu, XTE J1814-338 as a dark mat- ter admixed neutron star, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101922 (2025), arXiv:2411.17105 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    de Lavallaz and M

    A. de Lavallaz and M. Fairbairn, Neutron Stars as Dark Matter Probes, Phys. Rev. D81, 123521 (2010), arXiv:1004.0629 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Bramante and N

    J. Bramante and N. Raj, Dark matter in compact stars, Phys. Rept.1052, 1 (2024), arXiv:2307.14435 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Del Popolo, M

    A. Del Popolo, M. Le Delliou, and M. Deliyergiyev, Neu- tron Stars and Dark Matter, Universe6, 222 (2020), arXiv:2410.06078 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Grippa, G

    F. Grippa, G. Lambiase, and T. K. Poddar, Searching for New Physics in an Ultradense Environment: A Review on Dark Matter Admixed Neutron Stars, Universe11, 74 (2025), arXiv:2412.09381 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Shakeri and D

    S. Shakeri and D. R. Karkevandi, Bosonic dark matter in light of the NICER precise mass-radius measurements, Phys. Rev. D109, 043029 (2024), arXiv:2210.17308 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Issifu, P

    A. Issifu, P. Thakur, D. Rafiei Karkevandi, F. M. da Silva, D. P. Menezes, Y. Lim, and T. Frederico, Dark matter heating in evolving protoneutron stars: A two-fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D113, 103042 (2026), arXiv:2511.07567 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Thakur, T

    P. Thakur, T. Malik, A. Das, T. K. Jha, and C. Providˆ encia, Exploring robust correlations between fermionic dark matter model parameters and neutron star properties: A two-fluid perspective, Phys. Rev. D109, 043030 (2024), arXiv:2308.00650 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Issifu, A

    A. Issifu, A. Konstantinou, P. Thakur, and T. Frederico, Rotating protoneutron star admixed with mirror dark matter: A two-fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D112, 103026 (2025), arXiv:2507.20823 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys

    B. Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D103, 043009 (2021), arXiv:2102.08257 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Biesdorf, J

    C. Biesdorf, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and L. Tolos, Masquerad- ing hybrid stars with dark matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 083038 (2025), arXiv:2412.05207 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Rezaei, Study of Dark-Matter Admixed Neutron Stars using the Equation of State from the Rotational Curves of Galaxies, Astrophys

    Z. Rezaei, Study of Dark-Matter Admixed Neutron Stars using the Equation of State from the Rotational Curves of Galaxies, Astrophys. J.835, 33 (2017), arXiv:1612.02804 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Bertoni, A

    B. Bertoni, A. E. Nelson, and S. Reddy, Dark Matter Thermalization in Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D88, 123505 (2013), arXiv:1309.1721 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  25. [25]

    Bramante, K

    J. Bramante, K. Fukushima, J. Kumar, and E. Stopnitzky, Bounds on self-interacting fermion dark matter from ob- servations of old neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D89, 015010 (2014), arXiv:1310.3509 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Issifu, D

    A. Issifu, D. P. Menezes, and T. Frederico, Proto-neutron stars with dark matter admixture: A single-fluid approach, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102149 (2025), arXiv:2506.21378 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    H. C. Das, A. Kumar, B. Kumar, S. Kumar Biswal, T. Nakatsukasa, A. Li, and S. K. Patra, Effects of dark matter on the nuclear and neutron star matter, Mon. Not. 15 Roy. Astron. Soc.495, 4893 (2020), arXiv:2002.00594 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    M. I. Gresham and K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Stars and Neutron Star Stability, Phys. Rev. D99, 083008 (2019), arXiv:1809.08254 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Sahoo, S

    R. Sahoo, S. Mukhopadhyay, and M. Bhuyan, Dark matter admixed white dwarfs: A single-fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D113, 123005 (2026), arXiv:2511.17120 [astro-ph.SR]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    A. Das, P. Jaikumar, A. Karekkat, and T. Mandal, Ob- servables and conformal properties of dark matter ad- mixed isentropic neutron stars (2026), arXiv:2606.23620 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    S. A. Bhat and A. Paul, Cooling of Dark-Matter Admixed Neutron Stars with density-dependent Equation of State, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 544 (2020), arXiv:1905.12483 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    L. L. Lopes, Macroscopic properties of the XTE J1814-338 as a dark matter admixed strange star, Astrophys. Space Sci.370, 79 (2025), arXiv:2501.06379 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Langacker, The Physics of Heavy Z ′ Gauge Bosons, Rev

    P. Langacker, The Physics of Heavy Z ′ Gauge Bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1199 (2009), arXiv:0801.1345 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    D. P. Menezes, A Neutron Star Is Born, Universe7, 267 (2021), arXiv:2106.09515 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Vretenar, A

    D. Vretenar, A. V. Afanasjev, G. A. Lalazissis, and P. Ring, Relativistic Hartree Bogoliubov theory: static and dynamic aspects of exotic nuclear structure, Phys. Rept.409, 101 (2005)

    2005

  36. [36]

    Oertel, M

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015007 (2017), arXiv:1610.03361 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Hajkarim, J

    F. Hajkarim, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and L. Tolos, Thermody- namic consistent description of compact stars of two inter- acting fluids: the case of neutron stars with Higgs portal dark matter, JCAP2025, 070 (2025), arXiv:2412.04585 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Issifu, C

    A. Issifu, C. Providˆ encia, F. M. da Silva, D. P. Menezes, and T. Frederico, A self-consistent single-fluid framework for neutron stars admixed with mirror dark matter (2026), arXiv:2607.00888 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search for resonant production of strongly coupled dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, JHEP06, 156, arXiv:2112.11125 [hep-ex]

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search for resonant production of strongly coupled dark matter in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, JHEP06, 156, arXiv:2112.11125 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Search for dark matter produced in association with a leptonically decaying Z boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 13 (2021), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 81, 333 (2021)], arXiv:2008.04735 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Constraints on simplified dark matter models involving an s-channel mediator with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Constraints on simplified dark matter models involving an s-channel mediator with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1102 (2024), arXiv:2404.15930 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Providencia and A

    C. Providencia and A. Rabhi, Interplay between the sym- metry energy and the strangeness content of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C87, 055801 (2013), arXiv:1212.5911 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    Tolos, M

    L. Tolos, M. Centelles, and A. Ramos, Equation of State for Nucleonic and Hyperonic Neutron Stars with Mass and Radius Constraints, Astrophys. J.834, 3 (2017), arXiv:1610.00919 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Tolos, M

    L. Tolos, M. Centelles, and A. Ramos, The Equation of State for the Nucleonic and Hyperonic Core of Neu- tron Stars, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.34, e065 (2017), arXiv:1708.08681 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Typel, G

    S. Typel, G. Ropke, T. Klahn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear mat- ter with light clusters, Phys. Rev. C81, 015803 (2010), arXiv:0908.2344 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    Czarnecki, J

    A. Czarnecki, J. G. Korner, and J. H. Piclum, Helicity fractions of W bosons from top quark decays at NNLO in QCD, Phys. Rev. D81, 111503 (2010), arXiv:1005.2625 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  47. [47]

    Toussaint and W

    D. Toussaint and W. Freeman (MILC), The Strange quark condensate in the nucleon in 2+1 flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 122002 (2009), arXiv:0905.2432 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Constraints on new phenomena via Higgs boson couplings and invisible decays with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11, 206, arXiv:1509.00672 [hep- ex]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Constraints on new phenomena via Higgs boson couplings and invisible decays with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11, 206, arXiv:1509.00672 [hep- ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Panotopoulos and I

    G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, Dark matter effect on realistic equation of state in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083004 (2017), arXiv:1709.06312 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Hardy and N

    E. Hardy and N. Song, Listening for dark photon radio sig- nals from the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D107, 115035 (2023), arXiv:2212.09756 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Capanelli, L

    C. Capanelli, L. Jenks, E. W. Kolb, and E. McDonough, Runaway Gravitational Production of Dark Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 061602 (2024), arXiv:2403.15536 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Dark matter summary plots for s-channel mediators (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron star structure and the neutron radius of Pb-208, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5647 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010227

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  54. [54]

    Kumar, R

    D. Kumar, R. K. Mohapatra, H. Mishra, and S. Patra, Neutron star with dark matter using vector portal, Phys. Rev. D (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Sotani and A

    H. Sotani and A. Kumar, Universal relation involving fun- damental modes in two-fluid dark matter admixed neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1438 (2025), arXiv:2512.07105 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Guha and D

    A. Guha and D. Sen, Feeble DM-SM interaction via new scalar and vector mediators in rotating neutron stars, JCAP09, 027, arXiv:2106.10353 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    C. C. Moustakidis, The stability of relativistic stars and the role of the adiabatic index, Gen. Rel. Grav.49, 68 (2017), arXiv:1612.01726 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    P. S. Koliogiannis and C. C. Moustakidis, Constraints on the equation of state from the stability condition of neutron stars, Astrophys. Space Sci.364, 52 (2019), arXiv:1806.09999 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    N. K. Glendenning,Compact Stars: Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics, and General Relativity(Springer, 2000)

    2000

  60. [60]

    Sen and A

    D. Sen and A. Guha, Implications of feebly interacting dark sector on neutron star properties and constraints from GW170817, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.504, 3354 (2021), arXiv:2104.06141 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    G. Baym, D. H. Beck, P. Geltenbort, and J. Shelton, Testing dark decays of baryons in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061801 (2018), arXiv:1802.08282 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Narain, J

    G. Narain, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and I. N. Mishustin, Com- pact stars made of fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 74, 063003 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0605724

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  63. [63]

    Koehn, E

    H. Koehn, E. Giangrandi, N. Kunert, R. Somasundaram, V. Sagun, and T. Dietrich, Impact of dark matter on tidal signatures in neutron star mergers with the Einstein Tele- scope, Phys. Rev. D110, 103033 (2024), arXiv:2408.14711 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Shirke, D

    S. Shirke, D. Chatterjee, and P. Jaikumar, g-mode oscil- lations of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.544, 3549 (2025), arXiv:2506.18892 16 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    I. Tews, J. Margueron, and S. Reddy, Confronting gravitational-wave observations with modern nuclear physics constraints, Eur. Phys. J. A55, 97 (2019), arXiv:1901.09874 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Mroczek, M

    D. Mroczek, M. C. Miller, J. Noronha-Hostler, and N. Yunes, Nontrivial features in the speed of sound in- side neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D110, 123009 (2024), arXiv:2309.02345 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese,et al., GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    Doroshenko, V

    V. Doroshenko, V. Suleimanov, G. P¨ uhlhofer, and A. San- tangelo, A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant, Nature Astronomy6, 1444 (2022)

    2022

  69. [69]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann,et al., The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM- Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L28 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray,et al., A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+6620 informed by radio tim- ing and xmm-newton spectroscopy, Astrophysical Journal Letters918, L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  71. [72]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov,et al., A nicer view of psr j0030+0451: Millisecond pulsar parameter estimation, Astrophysical Journal Letters887, L21 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [73]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Neutron star structure and the equation of state, Astrophys. J.550, 426 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0002232

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  73. [74]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky,Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars(Wiley, 1983)

    1983

  74. [75]

    Abacet al.(ET), The Science of the Einstein Telescope, JCAP03, 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    A. Abacet al.(ET), The Science of the Einstein Telescope, JCAP03, 081, arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [76]

    A. L. Watts, W. Yu, J. Poutanen, S. Zhang, S. Bhat- tacharyya, S. Bogdanov, L. Ji, A. Patruno, T. E. Riley, P. Bakala,et al., Dense matter with extp, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy62, 29503 (2019)

    2019