Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 63 references

This paper constructs the unitary evolution operator that generates the soft-gluon light-cone wave function of a fast hadron through O(g²) in pure Yang-Mills theory, and shows it diagonalizes the soft Hamiltonian leaving only the ρ² backgro

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:36 UTC pith:KXPJC5YL

load-bearing objection Solid technical extension of Lublinsky–Mulian; central diagonalization claim rests on an unshown cancellation that a referee should check. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18373 v2 pith:KXPJC5YL submitted 2026-07-20 hep-ph hep-thnucl-th

Soft Gluon Wave Function and Evolution Operator in the CGC at Next-to-Leading Order

Ramkumar Radhakrishnan This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-thnucl-th MSC 81T1381T1881V05 PACS 12.38.-t12.38.Bx
keywords Color Glass Condensatelight-cone wave functionevolution operatorlight-cone perturbation theorysoft gluonsYang-Mills Hamiltonian diagonalizationeikonal approximationnext-to-leading order
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to construct the unitary evolution operator Ω that generates the soft-gluon light-cone wave function of a fast-moving hadron through order g² in pure Yang–Mills theory (Nf=0), within the Color Glass Condensate approach. Its central claim is that Ω, written as a fully normal-ordered series with operator-valued coefficients, can be fixed completely by unitarity plus matching to light-cone perturbation theory on vacuum, one-, two-, and three-gluon incoming states. If correct, this gives the complete O(g²) soft-gluon wave function and boost operator, extending partial results and supplying the operator input needed for next-to-leading-order single-inclusive gluon production at mid-rapidity. The payoff is a concrete diagonalization: Ω†HΩ reduces to the free Hamiltonian plus the coherent ρ² background-field energy, so all off-diagonal Fock-sector mixings cancel through O(g²).

Core claim

The paper's result is the explicit O(g²) evolution operator and the identity Ω†HΩ = H0 − ∫ d³p/(2π)³ g²ρ^b(p)ρ^b(−p)/p⁺² (Eq. 6.10). The author argues that every off-diagonal matrix element of the light-cone Yang–Mills Hamiltonian between different soft-gluon Fock sectors is cancelled order by order by Ω: at order g the cancellation is complete, and at order g² the only surviving diagonal correction is the coherent background-field energy of the valence color charges. Along the way, the coefficients A, B, C, D, E in the normal-ordered ansatz are fixed: A and C by matching real emission and splitting amplitudes, B and D by a combination of matching and unitarity, and E₂ by the three-gluon inc

What carries the argument

The central object is the normal-ordered ansatz for Ω (Eq. 4.1): Ω = N + A a + A† a† + B aa + B a†a† + B a†a + C a†a†a + D a†a†a†a + E a†...a, with coefficients that are functionals of the non-commuting valence color charge density ρ. The ansatz organizes every O(g²) effect into a limited set of operator structures, which are fixed sector by sector: the vacuum, one-, two-, and three-gluon incoming states probe coefficients with increasing annihilation and creation content, while unitarity Ω†Ω=1 determines the diagonal and vacuum coefficients that LCPT matching cannot see. A supporting identity is the decomposition ρρ = ½[ρ,ρ] + ½{ρ,ρ}, which separates two-source emission from single-source c

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the normal-ordered ansatz (4.1) lists every operator structure that can contribute at O(g²), and that the two diagrams selected in Sec. 4.4 are all that probe E₂; if a structure visible only in higher-Fock sectors is missing, the matching is incomplete and the diagonalization claim fails.

What would settle it

Compute the O(g²) light-cone wave function for a four-gluon incoming state and compare it to Ω acting on that state with the coefficients fixed here; any mismatch — or any nonzero off-diagonal matrix element of Ω†HΩ in that sector — would falsify the claimed complete diagonalization.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The complete O(g²) soft-gluon light-cone wave function becomes available for computing physical observables, in particular single-inclusive gluon production at next-to-leading order at mid-rapidity.
  • The soft-sector Yang–Mills Hamiltonian is diagonal in the dressed Fock basis through O(g²), with only the classical ρ² background energy surviving; coherent-state emission therefore remains the complete picture at this order.
  • The operator Ω provides the input for gluon multiplicity moments and particle-number fluctuations at O(g⁴), which the author states are planned.
  • Probability conservation holds order by order through the unitarity constraints, so the dressed states have correct normalization to the computed order.
  • The construction extends the partial O(g²) and O(g³) coefficients obtained previously, completing the missing g² structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural stress test the paper does not perform: act with Ω on a four-gluon incoming state and compare with the O(g²) light-cone wave function; because E₂ was fixed from the three-gluon sector, this would probe whether the ansatz is truly complete.
  • The vanishing of the two-C†C term (Eq. 6.8) is a nontrivial cancellation; if it survives regulator and cutoff variations, it suggests the three-gluon vertex leaves no imprint on the diagonal soft Hamiltonian at O(g²), a structural simplification for NLO evolution.
  • The exponentiated form Ω=exp(iG) invites interpreting G as a finite boost generator; comparing G's matrix elements with next-to-leading-order high-energy evolution kernels would be a consistency check connecting wave-function and evolution-equation approaches.
  • The normalization of the single-gluon state uses a scaleless transverse integral set to zero; adopting an explicit IR/UV regulator would test whether the diagonalization and the normalization N depend on scheme choices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper constructs, in pure Yang–Mills theory (N_f=0) within the CGC framework, the soft-gluon light-cone wave function and the associated unitary evolution operator Ω through O(g²). Ω is parameterized as a fully normal-ordered series in soft-gluon creation/annihilation operators with operator-valued coefficients depending on the valence color charge density ρ; the coefficients are fixed by imposing unitarity order by order and by matching the action of Ω on vacuum, one-, two-, and three-gluon Fock states to explicit LCPT wave functions. As the main application, the author computes Ω†HΩ through O(g²) and claims that all off-diagonal Fock-sector mixings cancel, leaving only the free Hamiltonian plus a negative ρ² background-field energy (Eq. (6.10)). The paper also derives explicit expressions for the coefficients A, B, C, D, E and provides extensive LCPT matrix elements in Appendix D.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper supplies the complete O(g²) soft-gluon LCWF and the corresponding boost operator in the CGC, going beyond the partial results of Ref. [19] and providing a necessary ingredient for NLO single-inclusive gluon production at mid-rapidity. The manuscript has concrete strengths: the LCPT matrix elements are explicitly listed, the unitarity constraints are systematically imposed, the scaleless-integral argument for the vanishing of the two-gluon overlap (Sec. 4.2.5) is appropriate, and the general strategy of fixing operator coefficients by matching sectors is well defined. However, the diagonalization claim — the paper's central result — rests on an asserted cancellation in Eq. (6.8) that is not demonstrated. Since the operator Ω is defined to map free states onto dressed eigenstates, the statement that the transformed Hamiltonian is diagonal is not by itself a derivation; the nontrivial content is precisely that the coefficients fixed by matching also cancel the higher-sector mixing, and this is exactly what needs to be shown explicitly.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Eq. (6.8)] The decisive step in the paper is the assertion 'Evaluating the second term explicitly, one finds = 0' for the C†C term in Eq. (6.7). No evaluation is shown. This term is a number-conserving one-body operator whose coefficient is an integral over the energy factor (r²/2r+ + s²/2s+ − p²/2p+) times C†C. Using the explicit C in Eq. (5.5), the delta functions constrain q = p and s = p − r, but the energy factor is not identically zero for generic p, r. Vanishing therefore requires a nontrivial cancellation among the color sums, polarization sums, and the remaining integrals. If this term is nonzero, Ω†HΩ retains an O(g²) one-body operator and Eq. (6.10) is false. The author should provide the full evaluation or a rigorous symmetry/momentum-space argument; this is load-bearing and cannot be left as an assertion.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (4.1) and Sec. 4.4] The normal-ordered ansatz for Ω is stated to contain 'only those operator structures that can contribute up to O(g²)', but no systematic counting or proof of completeness is given. In particular, Sec. 4.4 says the three-gluon incoming-state calculation keeps only 'the diagrams that are actually needed' and evaluates just two diagrams, with no argument that omitted diagrams do not contribute to the coefficient E₂ at O(g²). Since E₂ is part of the claimed complete O(g²) evolution operator, this is a gap in the construction. The author should either prove the selection rule or explicitly list and discard the omitted diagrams with reasons.
  3. [Section 6, Eq. (6.5)] The same pattern appears at O(g): it is stated that after substituting the explicit values of H_g, H_ggg, A and C, 'all off-diagonal contributions cancel identically', but no cancellation is shown. This is less severe than Eq. (6.8) because fewer structures are involved, but it is still part of the claimed diagonalization. A compact derivation or a reference to where it is performed would be needed to make the result verifiable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (6.4)] The first term in Eq. (6.4) integrates over d³p d³q but the coefficient C(p,q,r) and operator a†(r) contain a variable r that is not integrated; presumably this should be d³r. Please correct the typo.
  2. [Sec. 4.2.5, Eq. (4.68)] The statement that the overlap combination ⟨(Ψ_{ggρ})|(Ψ_{gg})⟩ + ⟨(Ψ_{gg})|(Ψ_{ggρ})⟩ vanishes identically 'due to the symmetry properties' is asserted without derivation. This enters the normalization of the single-gluon state, so a one-line explanation of the symmetry would improve clarity.
  3. [Sec. 3.3 and Sec. 4] The symbol C is used both for the leading coherent operator (Eq. (3.8)) and for the three-gluon coefficient C^{dcb}_{lkj} (Eq. (4.1) and later). This is potentially confusing; a different symbol for one of them would help.
  4. [Eq. (5.3)] The expression for B^{cb}_{2kj}(p,q) is very long and contains several places where the index structure is difficult to follow (e.g., terms with (p_i+k_i) where k is not an argument). A derivation or an appendix organizing the color/momentum structures would improve verifiability.
  5. [Throughout] There are a number of small typographical issues: the use of |k+| in Eq. (2.20) is unnecessary for positive k+; the 'h.c.' placement in Eq. (2.21) is ambiguous; and some momentum arguments in later equations are not typeset consistently (e.g., Eq. (4.59) contains what appears to be a spurious f^{a′ab} factor in the first line). These do not affect the physics but should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Diagonalization claim is largely a restatement of Ω's defining property; the O(g²) cancellation in Eq. (6.8) is asserted rather than demonstrated.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 3.3, Eqs. (3.6)–(3.9); used in Section 6, Eq. (6.1)]
    "The interacting eigenstates are related to the free Fock states by a unitary transformation, |Ψn⟩ = Ω|n⟩ ... The evolution operator can equivalently be viewed as the operator that diagonalizes the interacting Hamiltonian. Indeed, acting with H on Eq. (3.6) and using H|Ψn⟩ = En|Ψn⟩, one finds Ω†HΩ|n⟩ = En|n⟩. The transformed Hamiltonian Hdiag ≡ Ω†HΩ is therefore diagonal in the free Fock basis."

    Ω is defined as the operator mapping free Fock states onto dressed eigenstates. Therefore Ω†HΩ = diag is true by definition for any such Ω. Section 6's diagonalization is not an independent derivation; its only nontrivial part is whether coefficients fixed by matching low Fock sectors also remove higher-sector mixings, which is deferred to Eq. (6.8).

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 5, Eq. (5.2); Section 6, Eqs. (6.9)–(6.10)]
    "A^b_j(p) = −(√2 g p_j ρ^b(−p)√(p^+))/p^2 ... The remaining coherent term evaluates to ∫ d³p/(2π)³ A†b_j(p)A^b_j(p) p²/(2p^+) = ∫ d³p/(2π)³ g²ρ^b(p)ρ^b(−p)/p^{+2}, so the final diagonalized Hamiltonian through O(g²) is H0 − ∫ d³p/(2π)³ g²ρ^b(p)ρ^b(−p)/p^{+2}."

    The ρ² background energy is obtained by inserting the coefficient A fixed in Eq. (5.2) from the leading-order wave-function match. The 'only surviving correction' is A†A times the free dispersion, an identity after the fit, rather than a prediction independent of the construction. The diagonalization result does not test A; it merely restates its fitted norm.

full rationale

Most of the paper is an explicit LCPT matching computation: coefficients of the normal-ordered ansatz (4.1) are fixed by requiring Ω|0⟩, Ω|g⟩, Ω|gg⟩, Ω|ggg⟩ to reproduce wave functions computed from the Hamiltonian. That matching content is substantial and not circular. The circular element is the presentation of diagonalization as the outcome: since Ω is defined in Eqs. (3.6)–(3.9) as the unitary that maps free states to eigenstates, Ω†HΩ is diagonal by construction. The ρ² term in Eq. (6.10) is likewise just |A|² p²/2p^+ with A fitted in Eq. (5.2). The one place where the diagonalization claim could acquire independent content is Eq. (6.8), where the O(g²) C†C contribution is asserted to vanish after explicit evaluation; no evaluation is shown. If supplied, that cancellation would be a genuine check and would lower circularity; as written, the central claim rests on a definitional equivalence plus an unproven cancellation. Hence partial circularity, score 6.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the eikonal/Born-Oppenheimer approximations (domain assumptions standard in CGC) and on a truncation ansatz whose completeness is asserted. No free parameters fitted to data and no new invented entities.

axioms (5)
  • standard math Light-cone perturbation theory with operator-valued matrix elements
    Assumes the Rayleigh-Schrödinger expansion (Appendix E) is valid when ρ-dependent matrix elements do not commute.
  • domain assumption Eikonal approximation: 1/∂+ acting on valence fields is neglected
    Section 2.3 and Appendix C; without it additional interaction terms change the coefficients.
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation: valence charges are static background satisfying the SU(N_c) algebra
    Section 2.3, Eqs. (2.18)-(2.19); Ω acts on the soft Hilbert space with fixed ρ.
  • ad hoc to paper Truncation of the normal-ordered ansatz at the displayed operator structures
    Power-counting claim in Section 4; completeness is assumed, and Section 4.4 restricts diagrams further without proof.
  • standard math Scaleless transverse integrals vanish in dimensional regularization
    Eq. (4.79) sets ⟨Ψgg|Ψgg⟩ = 0; standard.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 41535 in / 35349 out tokens · 264004 ms · 2026-08-01T15:36:47.136696+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct the soft gluon light cone wave function of a fast moving hadron and the associated unitary evolution operator $\Omega$ up to $\mathcal{O}(g^{2})$ in pure Yang Mills theory $(N_{f} = 0)$, within the Color Glass Condensate (CGC) framework. Working in light cone gauge, we perform a Born Oppenheimer separation between fast valence and soft modes and implement the eikonal approximation, which allows $\Omega$ to be written as a fully normal ordered series in soft gluon creation and annihilation operators. The expansion coefficients are functionals of the non-commuting valence color charge density operators $\rho$. We fix the coefficients by using the unitarity and explicit diagrammatic calculations within light-cone perturbation theory (LCPT). As an application, we diagonalize the pure Yang Mills soft Hamiltonian through orders $g$ and $g^{2}$ and show that the off diagonal mixing elements between Fock sectors cancel leading to the coherent background field energy proportional to $\rho^{2}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 13 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Morreale and F

    A. Morreale and F. Salazar,Mining forGluonSaturation atColliders,Universe7(2021) 312

    2021

  2. [2]

    Albacete and C

    J. Albacete and C. Marquet,Gluon saturation and initial conditions for relativistic heavy ion collisions,Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics76(2014) 1–42

    2014

  3. [3]

    Blaizot,High gluon densities in heavy ion collisions,Reports on Progress in Physics80 (2017) 032301

    J.-P. Blaizot,High gluon densities in heavy ion collisions,Reports on Progress in Physics80 (2017) 032301

    2017

  4. [4]

    Mueller and J

    A. Mueller and J. Qiu,Gluon recombination and shadowing at small values ofx,Nuclear Physics B268(1986) 427

    1986

  5. [5]

    Gelis, E

    F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian and R. Venugopalan,TheColorGlassCondensate, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science60(2010) 463

    2010

  6. [6]

    Weigert,Evolution at small-x:TheColorGlassCondensate,Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics55(2005) 461–565

    H. Weigert,Evolution at small-x:TheColorGlassCondensate,Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics55(2005) 461–565

    2005

  7. [7]

    McLerran and R

    L.D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan,Gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei at small transverse momentum,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 3352 [hep-ph/9311205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  8. [8]

    McLerran and R

    L.D. McLerran and R. Venugopalan,Computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2233 [hep-ph/9309289]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  9. [9]

    Iancu, A

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L. McLerran,The renormalization group equation for theThe ColorGlassCondensate,Physics Letters B510(2001) 133–144

    2001

  10. [10]

    Iancu, A

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov and L. McLerran,Nonlinear gluon evolution in theTheColorGlass Condensate: I,Nuclear Physics A692(2001) 583–645

    2001

  11. [11]

    Weigert,Unitarity at smallBjorkenx,Nuclear Physics A703(2002) 823–860

    H. Weigert,Unitarity at smallBjorkenx,Nuclear Physics A703(2002) 823–860

    2002

  12. [12]

    Kovner, J.G

    A. Kovner, J.G. Milhano and H. Weigert,Relating different approaches to nonlinearQCD evolution at finite gluon density,Physical Review D62(2000) . – 52 –

    2000

  13. [13]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert,Wilson renormalization group for low -xphysics:Towards the high density regime,Physical Review D59(1998)

    1998

  14. [14]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner and H. Weigert,Wilson renormalization group for lowx physics:Gluon evolution at finite parton density,Physical Review D59(1998)

    1998

  15. [15]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert,TheBFKLequation from the Wilson renormalization group,Nuclear Physics B504(1997) 415–431

    1997

  16. [16]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, L. McLerran and H. Weigert,Intrinsic glue distribution at very small-x,Physical Review D55(1997) 5414–5428

    1997

  17. [17]

    Kovchegov,Unitarization of theBFKL Pomeron on a nucleus,Physical Review D61 (2000)

    Y.V. Kovchegov,Unitarization of theBFKL Pomeron on a nucleus,Physical Review D61 (2000)

    2000

  18. [18]

    Kovchegov,Small-xstructure function of a nucleus including multiplePomeron exchanges,Physical Review D60(1999)

    Y.V. Kovchegov,Small-xstructure function of a nucleus including multiplePomeron exchanges,Physical Review D60(1999)

    1999

  19. [19]

    Lublinsky and Y

    M. Lublinsky and Y. Mulian,High energyQCDatNLO: from light-cone wave function to JIMWLKevolution,Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017) 1

    2017

  20. [20]

    Kovner,Particle production and angular correlations at high energy.,Acta Physica Polonica B42(2011)

    A. Kovner,Particle production and angular correlations at high energy.,Acta Physica Polonica B42(2011)

    2011

  21. [21]

    Altinoluk, N

    T. Altinoluk, N. Armesto, A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Double and triple inclusive gluon production at mid rapidity: quantum interference inp−ascattering,The European Physical Journal C78(2018)

    2018

  22. [23]

    Iancu and Y

    E. Iancu and Y. Mulian,Forward dijets in proton-nucleus collisions at next-to-leading order: the real corrections,Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2021)

    2021

  23. [24]

    Dominguez, C

    F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, A.M. Stasto and B.-W. Xiao,Universality of multiparticle production inQCDat high energies,Physical Review D87(2013)

    2013

  24. [25]

    Iancu and Y

    E. Iancu and Y. Mulian,Dihadron production inDISatNLO: the real corrections,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023)

    2023

  25. [26]

    Levin and A.H

    E. Levin and A.H. Rezaeian,Gluon saturation and inclusive hadron production atLHC, Physical Review D82(2010)

    2010

  26. [27]

    Dumitru and J

    A. Dumitru and J. Jalilian-Marian,Two-particle correlations in high-energy collisions and the gluon four-point function,Physical Review D81(2010)

    2010

  27. [28]

    Iancu and Y

    E. Iancu and Y. Mulian,Forward trijet production in proton–nucleus collisions,Nuclear Physics A985(2019) 66–127

    2019

  28. [29]

    Iancu and D

    E. Iancu and D. Triantafyllopoulos,JIMWLKevolution for multi-particle production in Langevin form,Journal of High Energy Physics2013(2013)

    2013

  29. [30]

    Levin and M

    E. Levin and M. Siddikov,J /ψproduction in hadron scattering: three-pomeron contribution,The European Physical Journal C79(2019)

    2019

  30. [31]

    Gotsman, E

    E. Gotsman, E. Levin and U. Maor,CGC/saturation approach for soft interactions at high energy: long range rapidity correlations, 2015

    2015

  31. [32]

    Bartels, M

    J. Bartels, M. Salvadore and G. Vacca,Inclusive1-jet production cross section at small -x inQCD: multiple interactions,Journal of High Energy Physics2008(2008) 032–032. – 53 –

    2008

  32. [33]

    Altinoluk, A

    T. Altinoluk, A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Inclusive gluon production in theQCD Reggeon field theory:Pomeron loops included,Journal of High Energy Physics2009(2009) 110–110

    2009

  33. [34]

    The hybrid formalism

    T. Altinoluk and A. Kovner,Particle production at high energy and large transverse momentum: “The hybrid formalism” revisited,Physical Review D83(2011)

    2011

  34. [35]

    Gribov, E

    L. Gribov, E. Levin and M. Ryskin,Semihard processes inQCD,Physics Reports100 (1983) 1

    1983

  35. [36]

    Caucal, M.G

    P. Caucal, M.G. Morales and F. Salazar,Forward trijet production in proton-nucleus collisions: gluon initiated channel,2604.07509

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [37]

    Venugopalan,Introduction to light cone field theory and high energy scattering, inHadrons in Dense Matter and Hadrosynthesis, p

    R. Venugopalan,Introduction to light cone field theory and high energy scattering, inHadrons in Dense Matter and Hadrosynthesis, p. 89–112, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2007), DOI

    2007

  37. [38]

    Li and V.V

    M. Li and V.V. Skokov,First saturation correction in high energy proton-nucleus collisions. Part I. Time evolution of classical Yang-Mills fields beyond leading order,JHEP06(2021) 140 [2102.01594]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [39]

    Li and V.V

    M. Li and V.V. Skokov,First saturation correction in high energy proton-nucleus collisions. Part II. Single inclusive semi-hard gluon production,JHEP06(2021) 141 [2104.01879]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [40]

    Li and V.V

    M. Li and V.V. Skokov,First saturation correction in high energy proton-nucleus collisions. Part III. Ensemble averaging,JHEP01(2022) 160 [2111.05304]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [41]

    Kovchegov and M

    Y.V. Kovchegov and M. Li,Gluon double-spin asymmetry in the longitudinally polarized p + p collisions,JHEP05(2024) 177 [2403.06959]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [42]

    Kovner and M

    A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,In pursuit ofPomeron loops: TheJIMWLKequation and the Wess-Zumino term,Physical Review D71(2005)

    2005

  42. [43]

    Kovner, M

    A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky and V. Skokov,Exploring correlations in theCGCwave function: Odd azimuthal anisotropy,Physical Review D96(2017)

    2017

  43. [44]

    McLerran and V.V

    L. McLerran and V.V. Skokov,The Eccentric Collective BFKL Pomeron,Acta Phys. Polon. B46(2015) 1513 [1407.2651]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [45]

    collectivity

    A. Dumitru, L. McLerran and V. Skokov,Azimuthal asymmetries and the emergence of “collectivity” from multi-particle correlations in high-energy pA collisions,Phys. Lett. B743 (2015) 134 [1410.4844]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [46]

    McLerran and V

    L. McLerran and V. Skokov,Finite Numbers of Sources, Particle Correlations and the Color Glass Condensate,Nucl. Phys. A947(2016) 142 [1510.08072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [47]

    Kovchegov and E

    Y.V. Kovchegov and E. Levin,Quantum chromodynamics at high energy, Cambridge University Press (2013)

    2013

  47. [48]

    Munier,Unitary perturbation theory on the light cone using adiabatic switching, 2025

    S. Munier,Unitary perturbation theory on the light cone using adiabatic switching, 2025

    2025

  48. [49]

    Munier,Extracting light-cone wave functions from covariant amplitudes: a detailed study in scalar field theory,2512.22345

    S. Munier,Extracting light-cone wave functions from covariant amplitudes: a detailed study in scalar field theory,2512.22345

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [50]

    Lappi, R

    T. Lappi, R. Paatelainen and M. Sepp¨ al¨ a,Two-LoopDGLAPsplitting functions fromLight ConePerturbationTheory,2601.10374

    arXiv

  50. [51]

    Munier,Unitary perturbation theory on the light cone using adiabatic switching, 2510.05256

    S. Munier,Unitary perturbation theory on the light cone using adiabatic switching, 2510.05256

    arXiv

  51. [52]

    H¨ anninen, T

    H. H¨ anninen, T. Lappi and R. Paatelainen,One-loop corrections to light cone wave functions:The dipole pictureDIScross section,Annals of Physics393(2018) 358–412. – 54 –

    2018

  52. [53]

    Lappi and R

    T. Lappi and R. Paatelainen,The one loop gluon emission light cone wave function,Annals of Physics379(2017) 34–66

    2017

  53. [54]

    Lublinsky, R

    M. Lublinsky, R. Radhakrishnan and V. Skokov,Single gluon inclusive production in the mid rapidity regime at the next-to-leading-order,In preparation

  54. [55]

    Harindranath,AnIntroduction toLight-FrontDynamics forPedestrians, hep-ph/9612244

    A. Harindranath,AnIntroduction toLight-FrontDynamics forPedestrians, hep-ph/9612244

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [56]

    Burkardt,LightFrontQuantization, inAdvances in Nuclear Physics, p

    M. Burkardt,LightFrontQuantization, inAdvances in Nuclear Physics, p. 1–74, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1996), DOI

    1996

  56. [57]

    Pritchard and W

    D. Pritchard and W. Stirling,QCDcalculations in the light-cone gauge,Nuclear Physics B 165(1980) 237

    1980

  57. [58]

    Kovner,HighEnergyEvolution -TheWaveFunctionPoint ofView,hep-ph/0508232

    A. Kovner,HighEnergyEvolution -TheWaveFunctionPoint ofView,hep-ph/0508232

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [59]

    Kovner and M

    A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,Remarks on high energy evolution,Journal of High Energy Physics2005(2005) 001–001

    2005

  59. [60]

    Landau and E.M

    L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshits,Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, vol. v.3 of Course of Theoretical Physics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1991), 10.1016/C2013-0-02793-4

    doi:10.1016/c2013-0-02793-4 1991

  60. [61]

    Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics, Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    R. Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics, Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    2012

  61. [62]

    Kovner, M

    A. Kovner, M. Lublinsky and M. Serino,Entanglement entropy, entropy production and time evolution in high energyQCD,Physics Letters B792(2019) 4–15

    2019

  62. [63]

    Peskin,An Introduction to quantum field theory, CRC press (2018)

    M.E. Peskin,An Introduction to quantum field theory, CRC press (2018)

    2018

  63. [64]

    Kovner and M

    A. Kovner and M. Lublinsky,One gluon, two gluon: multigluon production via high energy evolution,Journal of High Energy Physics2006(2006) 083–083. – 55 –

    2006