Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 54 references

This paper establishes that, near Minkowski spacetime, the metric-only vacuum branch of the Gravity from Entropy action has exactly the dynamics of a one-parameter quadratic-gravity model whose fixed coefficient ratio forces an additional s

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:10 UTC pith:FTLAAUFO

load-bearing objection A careful, honest calculation that fixes the Minkowski Hessian of the GfE metric-only branch to a specific quadratic-gravity ray and finds a locked tachyonic spin-2 pole; the math holds up, and the main caveat (analytic branch vs. positive-operator domain) is stated by the authors themselves.

arxiv 2607.18518 v1 pith:FTLAAUFO submitted 2026-07-20 gr-qc

Vacuum Gravity from Entropy: Stability, Spectra, and Exact Waves

David S. Pereira This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C0583C3583D05 PACS 04.20.-q04.30.-w04.50.Kd
keywords Gravity from Entropyquadratic gravityMinkowski stabilitytachyonic spin-2gravitational wavespp-wavesRicci-flat metricsmatrix logarithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Gravity from Entropy is an operator-based proposal in which the gravitational action is a trace-log of a direct-sum curvature operator. This paper establishes that, near Minkowski spacetime, the metric-only vacuum branch of that action has exactly the same local dynamics as a one-parameter quadratic-gravity model, A R + B Rμν Rμν, with A = 3β/ℓP⁴ and B = 5β²/(2ℓP⁴). Because the coefficients are locked to the same parameter that fixes the Einstein term, the standard spectral analysis produces a massless graviton, a massive scalar, and an additional spin-2 pole with negative mass squared and opposite residue. For β > 0—the sign required for ordinary attractive gravity—that additional spin-2 branch is tachyonic, so the Minkowski vacuum of the metric-only theory is linearly unstable, and no sign choice removes the obstruction. The same calculations show that all Ricci-flat metrics solve the local bulk equations through curvature-squared order and that Ricci-flat pp-waves are exact local vacuum solutions of the analytic logarithmic action, meaning the theory retains a GR-like exact wave sector even while its Minkowski spectrum is not GR-like.

Core claim

The complete local bulk Minkowski Hessian of the metric-only logarithmic action is exactly that of S = (1/ℓP⁴) ∫ √−g [3β R + (5β²/2) Rμν Rμν]. This follows from evaluating the curvature trace over the direct sum of zero-, one-, and two-forms: TrF R = 3R and TrF R² = R² + RμνRμν + RμνρσRμνρσ, then using the four-dimensional Euler identity to drop the topological density. The resulting spectrum is the standard quadratic-gravity one, but with coefficients locked by the entropy construction: m0² = 3/(5β) for the scalar and m2² = −6/(5β) = −2m0² for the additional spin-2 branch. For β > 0, required for conventional attractive Einstein normalization, the scalar is healthy and the spin-2 branch is

What carries the argument

The central object is the direct-sum curvature endomorphism R = R ⊕ Rμν ⊕ Rμνρσ acting on the 1 + 4 + 6 dimensional form space, and the principal matrix logarithm TrF Log(1 − βR). The trace identities TrF R = 3R and TrF R² = R² + RμνRμν + RμνρσRμνρσ produce the Einstein factor 3 and the full quadratic curvature combination; the four-dimensional Euler identity then reduces the local bulk action to A R + B RμνRμν with A = 3β/ℓP⁴ and B = 5β²/(2ℓP⁴). This same object, evaluated on square-zero pp-wave curvature, is what makes the logarithm terminate exactly, and the auxiliary G-field is introduced as its algebraic resolvent to provide an independent check of the coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is the choice of the analytic metric-only branch: the auxiliary G-field is eliminated algebraically and the matrix logarithm is defined by the principal analytic continuation, not by the original positive-operator entropy domain; if either choice is replaced—for instance by treating G as an independent variable with its own constraints—the derived pole spectrum need not hold, and the paper explicitly notes that no complete nonlinear constraint anal

What would settle it

Compute the second variation of the full coupled metric–G action about Minkowski without algebraic elimination and diagonalize the resulting Hessian: if no negative mass-squared eigenvalue appears, the tachyon is an artifact of the metric-only branch. Alternatively, run a well-posed numerical evolution of the fourth-order metric equation seeded with long-wavelength transverse-traceless data; the claimed instability predicts exponential growth at a rate set by μ2 = √(6/(5β)), so the absence of such growth would refute the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The metric-only vacuum branch contains a massless graviton, a massive scalar, and a spin-2 pole with negative mass squared; on Minkowski spacetime, long-wavelength spin-2 perturbations grow exponentially rather than oscillate.
  • No choice of the coupling sign removes the instability: positive β yields the tachyonic spin-2 mode, while negative β makes the scalar tachyonic and flips the sign of the Einstein term.
  • Every four-dimensional Ricci-flat metric solves the local bulk equations through curvature-squared order, so Schwarzschild and Kerr remain solutions at that order; the first possible generic correction is the cubic Weyl trace.
  • Ricci-flat pp-waves of arbitrary amplitude are exact local vacuum solutions of the analytic metric-only action, because their square-zero curvature makes the entire matrix-logarithm series terminate.
  • On the isolated massless transverse-traceless sector, the averaged quadratic flux has the standard general-relativistic normalization, so this sector reproduces ordinary gravitational-wave propagation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the analytic metric action is taken as fundamental rather than as a low-energy effective theory, the Planck-scale instability means Minkowski spacetime cannot function as the asymptotic vacuum of isolated systems; a matter-supported or otherwise different ground state would be required, which the paper identifies but does not construct.
  • The exactness of the pp-wave sector is a natural place for further study: because every analytic trace functional takes its Minkowski value on square-zero curvature, entropy-like measures built from eigenvalues alone would not distinguish the wave from empty spacetime, raising an open question about what physically observable distinguishes radiative from non-radiative curvature in this framework.
  • A genuinely independent-G phase space with different constraints could change the pole spectrum, and the paper itself notes that no complete nonlinear constraint analysis of that formulation exists; testing that option is the most direct route beyond the metric-only branch.
  • Although the paper fixes the mass relation for equal scalar and one-form weights, the appendix shows the sign obstruction persists for all nonnegative weights; a natural extension is to ask whether a negative weight in one sector could evade the tachyon while preserving the entropy interpretation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes the vacuum dynamics of the Gravity from Entropy (GfE) action about Minkowski spacetime, working on the analytic metric-only branch defined by the principal matrix logarithm. By explicitly evaluating traces over the zero-, one-, and two-form sectors, the authors show that the complete local bulk quadratic Hessian of the full logarithmic action coincides with that of the quadratic-gravity action A R + B R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu} with A=3\beta/\ell_P^4 and B=5\beta^2/(2\ell_P^4). From this they derive the standard quadratic-gravity spectrum, obtaining a massless graviton, a scalar with m_0^2=3/(5\beta), and an additional spin-2 pole with m_2^2=-6/(5\beta)=-2m_0^2. For the foundational sign \beta>0, the spin-2 pole is tachyonic. The paper also provides an independent linearized check using the auxiliary G-field, shows that diagonalizable curvature reductions leave the coefficients unchanged, proves that all four-dimensional Ricci-flat metrics solve the local bulk equations through quadratic order, and demonstrates that square-zero Ricci-flat pp-waves are exact local solutions of the logarithmic action. Gravitational-wave polarizations and the averaged flux of the isolated massless TT branch are computed.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a concrete and striking prediction for the GfE continuum action: in the analytic metric-only branch, Minkowski spacetime is linearly unstable for the parameter sign required by conventional Einstein normalization. The strength of the paper lies in its explicit, reproducible calculations: the two-form trace normalization is checked against constant-curvature geometry and documented in Appendix G; the linearized coefficient is re-derived independently from the auxiliary G-field formulation in Section VIII; and the exactness of the pp-wave sector is shown by direct variation using nilpotence of the curvature operator. The paper is also unusually transparent about its own scope: Section II.E states that the analytic continuation does not by itself establish membership in the positive-operator domain required by the entropy interpretation, and Section XII.F leaves open that an independent-G phase space could change the spectrum. This scoping is a genuine interpretive limitation, but it is explicitly acknowledged and does not undermine the internal consistency of the calculations.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'For the foundational choice \beta>0, conventional Einstein normalization therefore implies a tachyonic spin-2 instability' should carry an explicit qualifier such as 'in the analytic metric-only continuation', consistent with Sec. II.E and Sec. XII.F. As written, a reader could mistake this for a statement about the foundational positive-operator theory.
  2. [Section III.E] The sentence 'the first two curvature orders determine the complete local bulk Minkowski Hessian' is correct because R=O(h), but it could be phrased as 'the Hessian of the full logarithmic action' to avoid the impression that the action itself is being truncated rather than that higher orders contribute only at cubic or higher order in h.
  3. [Section V.C] The relation m_2^2 = -2 m_0^2 is derived for the equal-weight specialization a0=a1=1. Appendix E shows that the general relation is different. A parenthetical pointer to Eq. (E15) in the main text would prevent overgeneralization.
  4. [Section V.D] The three-fold distinction between eigenbasis representation, diagonal background after variation, and fixed diagonal-curvature ansatz before variation is illuminating. It would be even clearer to display the restriction δR_{AB}=0 (A≠B) explicitly at the start of the third item, matching Eq. (66).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found: the Minkowski Hessian and pole masses are derived from the stated GfE action by explicit trace evaluation, with no fitted parameter or self-citation serving as the load-bearing premise.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The paper starts from the metric-only logarithmic GfE action (Eq. 26), evaluates the direct-sum curvature traces explicitly (Eqs. 59 and 62), uses the four-dimensional Euler identity (Eq. 76) to obtain the bulk-equivalent quadratic action with A = 3β/ℓ_P^4 and B = 5β^2/(2ℓ_P^4) (Eq. 82), and then applies standard quadratic-gravity spectral formulas (Eqs. 99, 101, 108) to obtain m0^2 = 3/(5β) and m2^2 = -6/(5β). Each step is an algebraic or standard result; no quantity is fitted to data, and no 'prediction' is used to set the theory's parameters. The only inputs (β > 0, a0 = a1 = 1, the two-form normalization) come from the foundational GfE definition, not from the paper's own output. The paper is also explicit about the scope of its claim: Section II.E states that the analytic continuation does not by itself establish membership in the positive-operator domain required by the entropy interpretation, and Section XII.F notes that a different independent-G phase-space prescription could change the spectrum. These are transparent limitations of scope, not circular reasoning. The self-citations present ([17], [18], [21]) are to prior work by other authors (G. Bianconi) and are used as definitions and background, not as an unverified uniqueness theorem or ansatz smuggled in to force the conclusion. The Ricci-flat and pp-wave sections are checked against standard results in quadratic gravity and universal spacetimes, and the auxiliary G-field calculation (Section VIII) provides an independent consistency check of the coefficient 5/2. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the GfE action and its equal-weight normalization (β>0, a0=a1=1), plus standard results in matrix analysis and quadratic gravity. No new particles, forces, or entities are invented; the only auxiliary object (G-field) is inherited from the foundational theory. The main domain assumption—analytic metric-only continuation—is flagged by the authors as the branch on which all conclusions are drawn.

free parameters (2)
  • β = not fitted; foundational parameter (β>0); matched to G_N as β=ℓ_P²/(48π) only for numerical scales in Section III F
    Central masses depend on β; sign β>0 drives the tachyonic spin-2 conclusion. The value is not fitted to data in this paper.
  • a0, a1 (equal-weight specialization) = a0=a1=1
    Choice of scalar and one-form curvature weights from foundational GfE; central numerical mass relation m2²=-2m0² uses this. Appendix E shows the tachyonic sign persists for all nonnegative a0,a1.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption The physical theory is defined by the analytic principal-logarithm branch of the metric-only action on Lorentzian signature (Section II E).
    If the entropy-positive-operator domain or an independent-G phase-space prescription is the true definition, the pole structure can change; the paper flags this explicitly.
  • standard math Tr_F f(A) = Σ_i f(λ_i) for analytic f, with algebraic multiplicity (Eq. 43).
    Standard matrix analysis (Higham [37]); used throughout to evaluate trace-log and diagonalizable subcases.
  • standard math In four dimensions the Euler density E4 has vanishing local bulk variation (Gauss-Bonnet).
    Used to drop the Riem² combination and for Ricci-flat protection; see Eqs. (75)-(76).
  • standard math Standard quadratic-gravity flat-space spectrum and Barnes–Rivers projectors (Stelle [25,26], Hindawi et al [28], Salvio [29]).
    Used for pole masses, residues, and propagator in Section V and Appendix A.
  • standard math H(R²_ρσ)_{μν} vanishes on Ricci-flat backgrounds; four-dimensional Einstein metrics have vanishing Bach tensor.
    Used for Ricci-flat protection, Section III G, Eq. (88).
  • standard math Linearized contracted Bianchi identities on Minkowski (Eq. 95).
    Used in linearized equations and auxiliary G-field check.
  • domain assumption Algebraic vacuum G-field equation eG^{-1}=eI-βR and subsequent elimination reproduce metric-only dynamics (Section II D).
    Part of the GfE formulation from Ref [17]; if G is given independent phase space, spectrum may differ (Section XII F).
  • standard math For square-zero R, analytic functional calculus gives Log(I-βR)=-βR (Eq. 52).
    Used for exact pp-wave solutions; follows from nilpotence, with no diagonalizability required.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31574 in / 19160 out tokens · 206523 ms · 2026-08-01T15:10:07.934831+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyze the vacuum dynamics of Gravity from Entropy, including its algebraically constrained $G$-field formulation. Evaluating the curvature traces over zero-, one-, and two-form sectors, we show that the complete Minkowski Hessian is exactly that of the quadratic-gravity action $A R+B R_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}$, with $A=3\beta/\ell_{\rm P}^{4}$ and $B=5\beta^{2}/(2\ell_{\rm P}^{4})$. For diagonalizable curvature blocks, the same action reduces to a sum over eigenvalue logarithms and reproduces these coefficients exactly. A strict diagonal-curvature restriction on the perturbations is instead only a reduced subsector and excludes non-diagonalizable type-N wave curvatures. Linearizing the $G$-field equations and subsequently imposing the algebraic vacuum constraint reproduces the same reduced metric equation and covariant Minkowski Hessian. The spectrum contains the massless graviton, a scalar with $m_{0}^{2}=3/(5\beta)$, and an opposite-residue spin-2 branch with $m_{2}^{2}=-6/(5\beta)=-2m_{0}^{2}$. For the foundational choice $\beta>0$, conventional Einstein normalization therefore implies a tachyonic spin-2 instability. We also show that every four-dimensional Ricci-flat metric solves the local bulk equations through quadratic curvature order, while square-zero Ricci-flat pp-waves are exact local vacuum solutions of the analytic metric-only logarithmic branch. On the isolated massless transverse-traceless eigenspace, the quadratic translation current has the standard general-relativistic normalization.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 30 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The invariant quadratic coefficients, pole masses, and residues remain un- changed

    For diagonalizable curvature blocks, choosing an eigenbasis is merely an equivalent representation of the covariant trace-log. The invariant quadratic coefficients, pole masses, and residues remain un- changed

  2. [2]

    The situation is different when diagonality is imposed as a restriction on the allowed perturbations

    The diagonalizable eigenvalue representation neither generates an additional pole nor removes the tachyonic one. The situation is different when diagonality is imposed as a restriction on the allowed perturbations. A fixed diagonal ansatz may project out some of the five directions contained in the massive spin–2 projector, but this does not modify the po...

  3. [3]

    Unless an additional condition is introduced, the perturbations about that background remain unrestricted

    Imposing a diagonal background after varying the full covariant action is a legitimate specialization of the resulting field equations. Unless an additional condition is introduced, the perturbations about that background remain unrestricted

  4. [4]

    spin–2 ghost

    Imposing a fixed diagonal-curvature ansatz directly in the action before variation defines a reduced vari- ational problem. It discards off-diagonal curvature variations and probes only a restricted subsector of the full spectrum. In particular, such a trunca- tion excludes nonzero type-N massless waves and square-zero pp-wave curvature operators, which a...

  5. [5]

    the metric wave behaves as in GR

    For completeness, a formal continuation toβ <0 multiplies these signs by sgnβ; that continuation lies outside the parameter domain of the foundational proposal. We use R(1) 0i0j = 1 2 ∂i∂jψ− 1 2 δij∂2 0 ψ,(140) and obtain Exx =E yy = 1 2 ω2ψ,(141) Ezz = 1 2 (ω2 −k 2)ψ= 1 2 m2 0ψ,(142) Exy =E xz =E yz = 0.(143) An explicit component derivation of Eqs. (141...

    2025

  6. [6]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept.513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Extended Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rept.509, 167 (2011), arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cos- mology

    Y. Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cos- mology. An Update by the CANTATA Network, edited by E. N. Saridakis, R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, P. Vargas Moniz, S. Capozziello, J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, M. De Laurentis, and G. J. Olmo (Springer, 2021) arXiv:2105.12582 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models, Phys. Rept.505, 59 (2011), arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    Joyce, B

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model, Phys. Rept.568, 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    J. F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  13. [13]

    C. P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel.7, 5 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311082

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  14. [14]

    C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Rela- tivity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    Bertiet al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class

    E. Bertiet al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Koyama, Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity, Rept

    K. Koyama, Cosmological Tests of Modified Gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys.79, 046902 (2016), arXiv:1504.04623 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [17]

    Ishak, Testing General Relativity in Cosmology, Living Rev

    M. Ishak, Testing General Relativity in Cosmology, Living Rev. Rel.22, 1 (2019), arXiv:1806.10122 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, f(R) theories, Living Rev. Rel.13, 3 (2010), arXiv:1002.4928 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Di Valentinoet al.(CosmoVerse Network), The Cos- moVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics, Phys

    E. Di Valentinoet al.(CosmoVerse Network), The Cos- moVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics, Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025), arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Bianconi, Gravity from entropy, Phys

    G. Bianconi, Gravity from entropy, Phys. Rev. D111, 066001 (2025), arXiv:2408.14391 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Bianconi, The Quantum Relative Entropy of the Schwarzschild Black Hole and the Area Law, Entropy 27, 266 (2025), [Erratum: Entropy 27, 724 (2025)], arXiv:2501.09491 [gr-qc]

    G. Bianconi, The Quantum Relative Entropy of the Schwarzschild Black Hole and the Area Law, Entropy 27, 266 (2025), [Erratum: Entropy 27, 724 (2025)], arXiv:2501.09491 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Thattarampilly, Y

    U. Thattarampilly, Y. Zheng, and V. Kakkat, Spheri- cally symmetric black holes in gravity from entropy and spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. D113, 104002 (2026), arXiv:2602.13694 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Thattarampilly and Y

    U. Thattarampilly and Y. Zheng, Inflation from entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1433 (2025), arXiv:2509.23987 [gr-qc]. 26

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Bianconi, Thermodynamics of the gravity from entropy theory, Phys

    G. Bianconi, Thermodynamics of the gravity from entropy theory, Phys. Rev. D114, 024042 (2026), arXiv:2510.22545 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    R. J. Rivers, Lagrangian theory for neutral massive spin-2 fields, Nuovo Cim.34, 386 (1964)

    1964

  28. [28]

    K. J. Barnes, Lagrangian Theory for the Second-Rank Tensor Field, J. Math. Phys.6, 788 (1965)

    1965

  29. [29]

    Van Nieuwenhuizen, On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation, Nucl

    P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation, Nucl. Phys. B60, 478 (1973)

    1973

  30. [30]

    K. S. Stelle, Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quan- tum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D16, 953 (1977)

    1977

  31. [31]

    K. S. Stelle, Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives, Gen. Rel. Grav.9, 353 (1978)

    1978

  32. [32]

    Whitt, Fourth Order Gravity as General Relativity Plus Matter, Phys

    B. Whitt, Fourth Order Gravity as General Relativity Plus Matter, Phys. Lett. B145, 176 (1984)

    1984

  33. [33]

    Hindawi, B

    A. Hindawi, B. A. Ovrut, and D. Waldram, Consistent spin two coupling and quadratic gravitation, Phys. Rev. D53, 5583 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9509142

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  34. [34]

    Salvio, Quadratic Gravity, Front

    A. Salvio, Quadratic Gravity, Front. in Phys.6, 77 (2018), arXiv:1804.09944 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Hervik, V

    S. Hervik, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdova, Type III and N universal spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 215005 (2014), arXiv:1311.0234 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    Hervik, V

    S. Hervik, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a, Universal space- times in four dimensions, JHEP10, 028, arXiv:1707.00264 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, R. V. Wagoner, and C. M. Will, Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing relativistic gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.30, 884 (1973)

    1973

  38. [38]

    D. M. Eardley, D. L. Lee, and A. P. Lightman, Gravitational-wave observations as a tool for testing rela- tivistic gravity, Phys. Rev. D8, 3308 (1973)

    1973

  39. [39]

    M. E. S. Alves, Testing gravity with gauge-invariant po- larization states of gravitational waves: Theory and pul- sar timing sensitivity, Phys. Rev. D109, 104054 (2024), arXiv:2308.09178 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    R. A. Isaacson, Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. I. The Linear Approximation and Geometrical Optics, Phys. Rev.166, 1263 (1968)

    1968

  41. [41]

    R. A. Isaacson, Gravitational Radiation in the Limit of High Frequency. II. Nonlinear Terms and the Ef fective Stress Tensor, Phys. Rev.166, 1272 (1968)

    1968

  42. [42]

    Higham,Functions of Matrices: Theory and Compu- tation, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2008)

    N. Higham,Functions of Matrices: Theory and Compu- tation, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2008)

    2008

  43. [43]

    R. S. Palais, The principle of symmetric criticality, Com- mun. Math. Phys.69, 19 (1979)

    1979

  44. [44]

    M. E. Fels and C. G. Torre, The Principle of symmetric criticality in general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.19, 641 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0108033

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson,Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  46. [46]

    Bognar,Indefinite Inner Product Spaces, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete

    J. Bognar,Indefinite Inner Product Spaces, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 2. Folge (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1974)

    1974

  47. [47]

    Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J

    D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J. Math. Phys.12, 498 (1971)

    1971

  48. [48]

    Bueno, P

    P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, V. S. Min, and M. R. Visser, Aspects of general higher-order gravities, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044010 (2017), arXiv:1610.08519 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Fierz and W

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173, 211 (1939)

    1939

  50. [50]

    Pravda, A

    V. Pravda, A. Pravdova, A. Coley, and R. Milson, All space-times with vanishing curvature invariants, Class. Quant. Grav.19, 6213 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0209024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    H. W. Brinkmann, Einstein spaces which are mapped conformally on each other, Math. Ann.94, 119 (1925)

    1925

  52. [52]

    Podolsky, R

    J. Podolsky, R. Steinbauer, and R. Svarc, Gyratonic pp- waves and their impulsive limit, Phys. Rev. D90, 044050 (2014), arXiv:1406.3227 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    J. Z. Simon, Higher Derivative Lagrangians, Nonlocality, Problems and Solutions, Phys. Rev. D41, 3720 (1990)

    1990

  54. [54]

    Parker and J

    L. Parker and J. Z. Simon, Einstein equation with quan- tum corrections reduced to second order, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1339 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9211002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993