pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.22545 · v4 · submitted 2025-10-26 · 🌀 gr-qc · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th· quant-ph

The Thermodynamics of the Gravity from Entropy Theory

Ginestra Bianconi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph
keywords Gravity from EntropyGeometric Quantum Relative EntropyFRW spacetimesthermodynamics of gravityemergent dark energymodified gravitycosmologyentropy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

GfE universes in FRW spacetimes admit a thermal description where total entropy increases over time while GQRE per volume does not.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that Gravity from Entropy (GfE) theory, defined via the Geometric Quantum Relative Entropy (GQRE) Lagrangian between the physical metric and the metric induced by matter and curvature, yields modified field equations with an emergent effective dark energy term. For homogeneous and isotropic FRW spacetimes, identifying the GfE energy density with this dark energy term allows a local thermal description using k-temperatures and k-pressures that obey a first law. In the low-energy small-curvature regime the solutions approximate standard Friedmann cosmologies with perfect-fluid matter and radiation. While the total GQRE per unit volume remains non-increasing, the total entropy of GfE universes is non-decreasing in time, offering a thermodynamic account of gravity that recovers Einstein equations in the appropriate limit.

Core claim

For homogeneous and isotropic FRW spacetimes, GfE universes admit a thermal description: locally, they are characterized by k-temperatures and k-pressures satisfying a first law of GfE thermodynamics. While the total GQRE per unit volume does not increase, the total entropy of GfE universes is non-decreasing in time. These results provide a thermodynamic interpretation of GfE cosmologies and of general relativity recovered in the low energy, small curvature limit of the theory.

What carries the argument

The Geometric Quantum Relative Entropy (GQRE) between the physical metric and the metric induced by matter and curvature, which defines the GfE Lagrangian and produces modified gravitational field equations containing an emergent dynamical effective dark energy term.

If this is right

  • GfE solutions with perfect-fluid matter and radiation are well approximated by Friedmann cosmologies in the low energy, small curvature regime.
  • The total GQRE per unit volume does not increase, consistent with its nature as a relative entropy.
  • The total entropy of GfE universes is non-decreasing in time.
  • This supplies a thermodynamic interpretation that reconciles local order with the global increase of entropy.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The non-decreasing entropy may link cosmic expansion directly to the relative entropy between the physical and matter-induced metrics.
  • Deviations from standard GR at higher curvatures could appear as thermodynamic corrections in the expansion history.
  • This framework might be extended to test whether observed dark-energy behavior matches the emergent term's thermodynamic properties.

Load-bearing premise

The central identification of the GfE energy density with the emergent effective dark energy term that appears in the modified field equations derived from the GQRE Lagrangian.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the time evolution of total entropy for a concrete GfE FRW solution that shows the entropy decreasing over some interval would falsify the non-decreasing claim.

read the original abstract

The Gravity from Entropy (GfE) action posits that gravity that is fundamentally given by the information encoded in the interplay between matter and geometry. The GfE Lagrangian is given by the Geometric Quantum Relative Entropy (GQRE) between the physical metric and the metric induced by matter and curvature, leading to modified gravitational field equations with an emergent dynamical effective dark energy term, which reduce to Einstein's equations in the low energy, small curvature limit. Adopting a thermodynamic viewpoint, we identify the GfE energy density with this emergent effective dark energy term. For homogeneous and isotropic FRW spacetimes, we show that GfE universes admit a thermal description: locally, they are characterized by $k$-temperatures and $k$-pressures satisfying a first law of GfE thermodynamics. In the low energy, small curvature regime with perfect-fluid matter and radiation, GfE solutions are well approximated by Friedmann cosmologies. While the total GQRE per unit volume does not increase, the total entropy of GfE universes is non-decreasing in time. We show that, while the total GQRE per unit volume does not increase, consistent with its nature as a relative entropy, the total entropy of GfE universes is non-decreasing in time. These results provide a thermodynamic interpretation of GfE cosmologies and of general relativity (GR) itself, recovered in the low energy, small curvature limit of the theory, offering a framework to reconcile local order and complexity with the global increase of entropy in the universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the Gravity from Entropy (GfE) theory, defined via the Geometric Quantum Relative Entropy (GQRE) Lagrangian between the physical metric and the matter-curvature-induced metric, yields modified field equations containing an emergent dynamical effective dark energy term that reduces to Einstein gravity at low curvature. By identifying the GfE energy density with this emergent term, the authors construct a thermodynamic description for homogeneous isotropic FRW spacetimes in which local k-temperatures and k-pressures satisfy a first law; they further report that total GQRE per unit volume is non-increasing while total entropy is non-decreasing, thereby supplying a thermodynamic interpretation of both GfE cosmologies and GR in the low-energy limit.

Significance. If the identification and the subsequent thermodynamic relations can be shown to follow from the GQRE action rather than being imposed by definition, the work would furnish an independent thermodynamic reading of a modified-gravity framework and of GR itself. The entropy-monotonicity result, if non-circular, would offer a concrete mechanism reconciling local order with global entropy growth in cosmology. The absence of explicit derivations, error estimates, or cross-checks against the modified field equations in the provided summary limits immediate assessment of these strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, paragraph 2] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central step that equates the GfE energy density to the emergent effective dark energy term appearing in the modified field equations is introduced without an explicit derivation from variation of the GQRE Lagrangian or from matching to standard GR thermodynamic identities (e.g., via surface terms or Killing vectors). This identification is load-bearing for the subsequent definitions of k-temperature and k-pressure and for the first-law and entropy-monotonicity claims; if the equality is imposed rather than obtained, the thermodynamic construction risks reducing to a re-statement of the original GfE equations.
  2. The manuscript states that total GQRE per unit volume does not increase while total entropy is non-decreasing, yet both quantities are defined in terms of the same GQRE functional. Without an independent derivation showing that the entropy increase follows from the field equations rather than by construction, it remains unclear whether the reported monotonicity constitutes a new result or a tautological consequence of the relative-entropy definition.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for k-temperature and k-pressure is introduced without a clear definition or relation to standard thermodynamic variables; a brief comparison table or explicit limiting expressions in the low-curvature regime would improve readability.
  2. The abstract asserts that GfE solutions are well approximated by Friedmann cosmologies in the low-energy regime, but supplies no quantitative error bounds or explicit matching conditions; these should be stated in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive report. The comments correctly identify areas where additional explicit derivations would strengthen the presentation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to clarify the derivations and distinctions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, paragraph 2] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central step that equates the GfE energy density to the emergent effective dark energy term appearing in the modified field equations is introduced without an explicit derivation from variation of the GQRE Lagrangian or from matching to standard GR thermodynamic identities (e.g., via surface terms or Killing vectors). This identification is load-bearing for the subsequent definitions of k-temperature and k-pressure and for the first-law and entropy-monotonicity claims; if the equality is imposed rather than obtained, the thermodynamic construction risks reducing to a re-statement of the original GfE equations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the identification requires clearer justification. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection deriving the equality directly from the variation of the GQRE Lagrangian. We will show that the emergent effective dark-energy term obtained from the field equations matches the energy density that enters the thermodynamic first law when the standard GR surface-term identities are applied to the FRW background. This step will be cross-checked against the low-curvature limit where the equations reduce to Einstein gravity, confirming that the thermodynamic quantities are not imposed by definition but follow from the action. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript states that total GQRE per unit volume does not increase while total entropy is non-decreasing, yet both quantities are defined in terms of the same GQRE functional. Without an independent derivation showing that the entropy increase follows from the field equations rather than by construction, it remains unclear whether the reported monotonicity constitutes a new result or a tautological consequence of the relative-entropy definition.

    Authors: We agree that the distinction must be made explicit. The non-increase of the GQRE density follows from the general properties of relative entropy between the physical and induced metrics. The total entropy, however, is the thermodynamic entropy of the matter fluid, whose evolution is governed by the continuity equation obtained from the modified field equations. In the revision we will add a derivation that integrates the first-law relation together with the GfE continuity equation to obtain dS/dt ≥ 0, demonstrating that the monotonicity is a dynamical consequence rather than a direct consequence of the GQRE definition. We will also include a brief comparison with the corresponding GR limit to show the result is non-trivial. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

GfE thermodynamics constructed via identification of energy density with emergent dark energy term from GQRE equations

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Adopting a thermodynamic viewpoint, we identify the GfE energy density with this emergent effective dark energy term. For homogeneous and isotropic FRW spacetimes, we show that GfE universes admit a thermal description: locally, they are characterized by k-temperatures and k-pressures satisfying a first law of GfE thermodynamics. ... While the total GQRE per unit volume does not increase, the total entropy of GfE universes is non-decreasing in time."

    The identification equates the GfE energy density (central to the thermodynamic quantities) directly to the effective dark energy term that appears by definition in the modified gravitational equations obtained from the GQRE Lagrangian. The first-law construction and entropy monotonicity are then shown for FRW spacetimes using this equality, so the thermodynamic relations reduce to the field-equation structure rather than providing an independent derivation from the GfE action or standard GR thermodynamic identities.

full rationale

The paper derives modified field equations from the GQRE Lagrangian, yielding an emergent effective dark energy term. It then adopts the identification of GfE energy density with this term to construct a thermal description for FRW spacetimes, including k-temperatures, k-pressures, and a first law. The non-increase of total GQRE per unit volume follows directly from relative entropy properties (independent of the identification), but the entropy non-decreasing result and overall thermodynamic interpretation rest on this adopted equality. This constitutes partial circularity: the first-law relations are not independently derived from the action or Killing vectors but follow by construction once the identification is imposed. The low-curvature limit recovery of GR is stated but does not independently validate the thermodynamic layer.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on the definition of the GfE action via GQRE and on the thermodynamic identification of energy density with the emergent dark-energy term; both are taken as given from the theory setup rather than derived from independent principles.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The GfE Lagrangian is given by the Geometric Quantum Relative Entropy between the physical metric and the metric induced by matter and curvature.
    This is the foundational postulate stated in the abstract that generates the modified field equations.
invented entities (1)
  • k-temperature and k-pressure no independent evidence
    purpose: To furnish a local thermodynamic description of GfE spacetimes satisfying a first law.
    These quantities are introduced in the thermodynamic viewpoint and lack independent empirical anchors outside the GfE construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5809 in / 1264 out tokens · 38196 ms · 2026-05-18T04:52:13.747452+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spherically symmetric black holes in Gravity from Entropy and spontaneous emission

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In the Gravity from Entropy framework, spherically symmetric black holes acquire r^{-4} corrections to Schwarzschild geometry, with large-mass evaporation at constant rate -β/24 and intermediate-mass loss following th...

  2. Emergence of Complex Web Structures

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Coarse-grained spatial ordering can increase during structure formation even as full phase-space entropy grows through nonlocal transport, Jacobian-governed density amplification, and activation of lower free-energy b...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Gravity from entropy.Physical Re- view D, 111(6):066001, 2025

    Ginestra Bianconi. Gravity from entropy.Physical Re- view D, 111(6):066001, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    The quantum relative entropy of the schwarzschild black hole and the area law.Entropy, 27(3):266, 2025

    Ginestra Bianconi. The quantum relative entropy of the schwarzschild black hole and the area law.Entropy, 27(3):266, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Black holes and entropy.Physical Review D, 7(8):2333, 1973

    Jacob D Bekenstein. Black holes and entropy.Physical Review D, 7(8):2333, 1973

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    Generalized second law of ther- modynamics in black-hole physics.Physical Review D, 9(12):3292, 1974

    Jacob D Bekenstein. Generalized second law of ther- modynamics in black-hole physics.Physical Review D, 9(12):3292, 1974

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    Particle creation by black holes

    Stephen W Hawking. Particle creation by black holes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 43(3):199– 220, 1975

    work page 1975

  6. [6]

    Introduction to black hole thermody- namics.The European Physical Journal Plus, 140(5):430, 2025

    Edward Witten. Introduction to black hole thermody- namics.The European Physical Journal Plus, 140(5):430, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with lambda.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 34(6):063001, 2017

    David Kubizˇ n´ ak, Robert B Mann, and Mae Teo. Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with lambda.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 34(6):063001, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation

    Gary W Gibbons and Stephen W Hawking. Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation. Physical Review D, 15(10):2738, 1977

    work page 1977

  9. [9]

    Quantum field theory in de sitter space: renormalization by point- splitting.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Timothy S Bunch and Paul CW Davies. Quantum field theory in de sitter space: renormalization by point- splitting.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 360(1700):117–134, 1978

    work page 1978

  10. [10]

    Quantum fields in curved space

    Nicholas David Birrell and Paul Charles William Davies. Quantum fields in curved space. 1984

    work page 1984

  11. [11]

    Conformal vacua and entropy in de sitter space

    Raphael Bousso, Alexander Maloney, and Andrew Stro- minger. Conformal vacua and entropy in de sitter space. Physical Review D, 65(10):104039, 2002

    work page 2002

  12. [12]

    Adventures in de Sitter space

    Raphael Bousso. Adventures in de sitter space.arXiv preprint hep-th/0205177, 2002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    Thermodynamics of spacetime: the Einstein equation of state.Physical Review Letters, 75(7):1260, 1995

    Ted Jacobson. Thermodynamics of spacetime: the Einstein equation of state.Physical Review Letters, 75(7):1260, 1995

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    What is the entropy in entropic gravity?Physical Review D, 93(12):124052, 2016

    Sean M Carroll and Grant N Remmen. What is the entropy in entropic gravity?Physical Review D, 93(12):124052, 2016

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Entanglement equilibrium and the Ein- stein equation.Physical Review Letters, 116(20):201101, 2016

    Ted Jacobson. Entanglement equilibrium and the Ein- stein equation.Physical Review Letters, 116(20):201101, 2016

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    On the origin of gravity and the laws of newton.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(4):1–27, 2011

    Erik Verlinde. On the origin of gravity and the laws of newton.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(4):1–27, 2011

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    On geometric entropy

    Curtis Callan and Frank Wilczek. On geometric entropy. Physics Letters B, 333(1-2):55–61, 1994

    work page 1994

  18. [18]

    Spacetime thermodynamics without hidden de- grees of freedom.Physical Review D, 90(4):044044, 2014

    Goffredo Chirco, Hal M Haggard, Aldo Riello, and Carlo Rovelli. Spacetime thermodynamics without hidden de- grees of freedom.Physical Review D, 90(4):044044, 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime: The role of gravitational dissipation.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Grav- itation, and Cosmology, 81(2):024016, 2010

    Goffredo Chirco and Stefano Liberati. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime: The role of gravitational dissipation.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Grav- itation, and Cosmology, 81(2):024016, 2010

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights.Reports on Progress in Physics, 73(4):046901, 2010

    Thanu Padmanabhan. Thermodynamical aspects of gravity: new insights.Reports on Progress in Physics, 73(4):046901, 2010

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    The holographic principle

    Gerard’t Hooft. The holographic principle. InBasics and Highlights in Fundamental Physics, pages 72–100. World Scientific, 2001

    work page 2001

  22. [22]

    The world as a hologram.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11):6377–6396, 1995

    Leonard Susskind. The world as a hologram.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36(11):6377–6396, 1995

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    Entanglement renormalization and holog- raphy.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravita- tion, and Cosmology, 86(6):065007, 2012

    Brian Swingle. Entanglement renormalization and holog- raphy.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravita- tion, and Cosmology, 86(6):065007, 2012

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Aspects of holo- graphic entanglement entropy.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2006(08):045, 2006

    Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi. Aspects of holo- graphic entanglement entropy.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2006(08):045, 2006

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Holographic entanglement entropy: an overview.Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 7 42(50):504008, 2009

    Tatsuma Nishioka, Shinsei Ryu, and Tadashi Takayanagi. Holographic entanglement entropy: an overview.Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 7 42(50):504008, 2009

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013(11):1–18, 2013

    Thomas Faulkner, Aitor Lewkowycz, and Juan Malda- cena. Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013(11):1–18, 2013

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    The area of a rough black hole.Physics Letters B, 808:135643, 2020

    John D Barrow. The area of a rough black hole.Physics Letters B, 808:135643, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Statistical mechanics in the con- text of special relativity.Physical review E, 66(5):056125, 2002

    Giorgio Kaniadakis. Statistical mechanics in the con- text of special relativity.Physical review E, 66(5):056125, 2002

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    Black hole thermodynamical entropy.The European Physical Jour- nal C, 73(7):2487, 2013

    Constantino Tsallis and Leonardo JL Cirto. Black hole thermodynamical entropy.The European Physical Jour- nal C, 73(7):2487, 2013

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    The entropy of disorder fields in euclidean schwarzschild black hole.Annals of Physics, page 170193, 2025

    GO Heymans, CD Rodr´ ıguez-Camargo, G Scorza, and NF Svaiter. The entropy of disorder fields in euclidean schwarzschild black hole.Annals of Physics, page 170193, 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Geometrothermodynamics.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48(1), 2007

    Hernando Quevedo. Geometrothermodynamics.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48(1), 2007

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    Information entropy and dark energy evolution.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 27(03):1850029, 2018

    Salvatore Capozziello and Orlando Luongo. Information entropy and dark energy evolution.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 27(03):1850029, 2018

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Thermodynamic parametrization of dark en- ergy.Physics of the Dark Universe, 36:101045, 2022

    Salvatore Capozziello, Rocco D’Agostino, and Orlando Luongo. Thermodynamic parametrization of dark en- ergy.Physics of the Dark Universe, 36:101045, 2022

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Black hole thermodynamics from logotropic fluids.The European Physical Journal C, 83(2):175, 2023

    Salvatore Capozziello, Rocco D’Agostino, Alessio Lap- poni, and Orlando Luongo. Black hole thermodynamics from logotropic fluids.The European Physical Journal C, 83(2):175, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Kaniadakis entropy in ex- treme gravitational and cosmological environments: a review on the state-of-the-art and future prospects.The European Physical Journal B, 97(6):80, 2024

    Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano. Kaniadakis entropy in ex- treme gravitational and cosmological environments: a review on the state-of-the-art and future prospects.The European Physical Journal B, 97(6):80, 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Barrow en- tropies in black hole thermodynamics.The European Physical Journal C, 85(2):200, 2025

    Salvatore Capozziello and Mehdi Shokri. Barrow en- tropies in black hole thermodynamics.The European Physical Journal C, 85(2):200, 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Relative entropy of states of von Neu- mann algebras.Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 11(3):809–833, 1975

    Huzihiro Araki. Relative entropy of states of von Neu- mann algebras.Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 11(3):809–833, 1975

    work page 1975

  38. [38]

    Oxford University Press, USA, 1999

    Huzihiro Araki.Mathematical theory of quantum fields. Oxford University Press, USA, 1999

    work page 1999

  39. [39]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    Masanori Ohya and D´ enes Petz.Quantum entropy and its use. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    Sorce,Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras,Rev

    Jonathan Sorce. Notes on the type classification of von Neumann algebras.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01958, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(12):1–89, 2023

    Kristan Jensen, Jonathan Sorce, and Antony J Speranza. Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(12):1–89, 2023

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    APS Medal for Exceptional Achieve- ment in Research: Invited article on entanglement prop- erties of quantum field theory.Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4):045003, 2018

    Edward Witten. APS Medal for Exceptional Achieve- ment in Research: Invited article on entanglement prop- erties of quantum field theory.Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4):045003, 2018

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    In- flation from entropy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23987, 2025

    Udaykrishna Thattarampilly and Yunlong Zheng. In- flation from entropy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23987, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Testing general relativity with present and future astro- physical observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(24):243001, 2015

    Emanuele Berti, Enrico Barausse, Vitor Cardoso, Leonardo Gualtieri, Paolo Pani, Ulrich Sperhake, Leo C Stein, Norbert Wex, Kent Yagi, Tessa Baker, et al. Testing general relativity with present and future astro- physical observations.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(24):243001, 2015

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Prospects for fundamental physics with LISA.General Relativity and Gravitation, 52:1–33, 2020

    Enrico Barausse, Emanuele Berti, Thomas Hertog, Scott A Hughes, Philippe Jetzer, Paolo Pani, Thomas P Sotiriou, Nicola Tamanini, Helvi Witek, Kent Yagi, et al. Prospects for fundamental physics with LISA.General Relativity and Gravitation, 52:1–33, 2020

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    The cosmo- verse white paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    Eleonora Di Valentino, Jackson Levi Said, Adam Riess, Agnieszka Pollo, Vivian Poulin, Adri` a G´ omez-Valent, Amanda Weltman, Antonella Palmese, Caroline D Huang, Carsten van de Bruck, et al. The cosmo- verse white paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics. Physics of the Dark Universe, 49:101965, 2025

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Quantum theory, gravity and higher order geometry.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10348, 2025

    Folkert Kuipers. Quantum theory, gravity and higher order geometry.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10348, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    The role of relative entropy in quan- tum information theory.Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1):197, 2002

    Vlatko Vedral. The role of relative entropy in quan- tum information theory.Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1):197, 2002

    work page 2002

  49. [49]

    Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2002

    H Goldstein, C Poole, J Safko, et al.Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2002

    work page 2002