Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 57 references

A bilinear form lifts Schrödinger perturbation theory to black hole quasinormal modes, yielding frequency shifts to arbitrary order.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 12:34 UTC pith:2G7UKBLM

load-bearing objection Genuinely useful derivation of higher-order QNM frequency shifts with honest caveats; the "any order" claim rests on an explicit but unproven structural assumption, so it deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19492 v1 pith:2G7UKBLM submitted 2026-07-21 gr-qc hep-th

Schr\"odinger perturbation theory for black hole quasinormal modes

classification gr-qc hep-th MSC 83C5783C35 PACS 04.30.-w04.70.-s
keywords quasinormal modesblack hole spectroscopyTeukolsky equationbilinear formperturbation theoryringdownmodified gravityspectral decomposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to give black-hole spectroscopy the same tool that quantum mechanics has had for a century: a systematic perturbative expansion for how quasinormal-mode frequencies shift when physics departs from vacuum general relativity. Using a symplectic-current bilinear form under which quasinormal modes are orthogonal—despite being incomplete as a basis—the authors derive a formula for the frequency shift at any order in a small coupling, expressed in terms of lower-order mode shifts. They also derive a formal spectral decomposition of the first-order mode shift into projections onto unperturbed modes plus a continuous-spectrum integral, and show in two examples that the mode-only sum diverges. If correct, this removes the main obstacle to computing second- and higher-order ringdown frequency shifts for modified-gravity or environmental perturbations, which will matter as gravitational-wave observations sharpen.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that quasinormal-mode frequency shifts under small deformations of the Teukolsky equation can be computed to arbitrary order. The key formula gives the k-th-order frequency shift as a combination of matrix elements of source operators acting on lower-order mode shifts and of bilinear-form projections, so the hierarchy closes order by order. At first order it reproduces the known eigenvalue-perturbation formula; at second order it reproduces the exact Pöschl-Teller shift and the slow-spin Kerr shift. The paper also establishes that the first-order mode shift admits only a formal spectral decomposition: a sum over unperturbed QNMs plus a continuum piece, where the

What carries the argument

The central object is the bilinear form built from the Teukolsky symplectic current with t–φ reflection instead of complex conjugation, regularized on a complex radial contour. It makes quasinormal modes orthogonal, and its norm coincides with the derivative of the Wronskian. Combined with a modified Teukolsky equation of assumed binomial structure, the balance law yields the arbitrary-order frequency-shift formula. The mode-shift decomposition uses the Teukolsky Green's function and contour deformation into QNM poles, a branch cut, and a high-frequency arc, making the continuous spectrum explicit.

Load-bearing premise

The arbitrary-order formula rests on the unproven assumption that the k-th-order modified Teukolsky equation always takes the binomial form with linear, frequency-independent source operators acting on lower-order fields; if a real modification produces nonlinear or frequency-dependent sources, the all-orders formula does not follow.

What would settle it

Compute the third-order frequency shift for the Pöschl-Teller width perturbation by differentiating the exact frequency ω(ζ) and compare it with the third-order version of the paper's formula using numerically obtained mode shifts; a disagreement would falsify the claim that the formula holds to arbitrary order.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Second- and higher-order frequency shifts are now in principle computable once the first-order mode shift is obtained by solving the modified Teukolsky equation numerically or via the regularized Green's function.
  • The first-order frequency-shift formula coincides with the established eigenvalue-perturbation result, placing the new framework on known footing.
  • The QNM-only mode-shift expansion diverges in both worked examples, so the continuous-spectrum contribution is not a technicality; practical mode-shift computations must include it or use a representation that avoids the expansion.
  • The framework covers modified theories and environmental effects that can be cast as modified Teukolsky equations with linear source operators, including axisymmetry-breaking perturbations that mix different m-modes.
  • The degenerate case, where metric reconstruction mixes modes through complex conjugation, is left open but expected to generalize following the established treatment.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If QNM-sum divergence is generic, then regularization schemes that fold the branch-cut and high-frequency-arc continuum into the mode-shift expansion could turn the formal spectral decomposition into a practical computational tool; the paper hints at but does not demonstrate this.
  • The same bilinear-form perturbation theory should apply to boson-cloud quasibound states, where the nonrelativistic hydrogen analogy suggests the discrete sum may converge—a concrete next target.
  • The arbitrary-order claim could be stress-tested by deriving explicit source operators for a specific higher-derivative gravity and checking whether the binomial structure survives metric reconstruction; if it does not, the all-orders formula needs modification.
  • The time-dependent n' = n projection and secular term suggest that even the notion of 'mode shift' may need a freedom-fixing prescription at higher orders, since the second-order frequency shift was proven invariant under adding a multiple of the background mode.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The article develops a perturbation-theory framework for quasinormal-mode (QNM) frequency shifts of the Teukolsky equation, based on a conserved bilinear form under which Kerr QNMs are orthogonal. It derives the first-order frequency shift (36), the second-order shift (38), and a general k-th-order formula (40) in terms of lower-order mode shifts and linear source operators S^(j). It also constructs a formal spectral decomposition of the first-order mode shift, Eq. (60), into QNM projections plus a continuum contribution, and presents numerical evidence—in Pöschl–Teller and slowly spinning Kerr toy models—that the QNM-only sum diverges. The first- and second-order formulas are benchmarked against independent analytic and numerical results with no fitted parameters.

Significance. If the general formula is established, it closes an important gap: no systematic higher-order QNM perturbation theory currently exists. The paper has concrete strengths: the bilinear-form derivation of the first-order formula is explicit and reproduces the known eigenvalue-perturbation result; the second-order formula is checked against the exact Pöschl–Teller shift and against numerical Kerr data; and the divergence of the QNM sum is a sharp, testable manifestation of QNM incompleteness. The central caveat is that the advertised "any order" result rests on an unproved structural ansatz for the source operators, and the paper's own caveats limit the scope of the theorem.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III A, Eq. (29)] The "any order" formula (40) is derived from Eq. (29), but Eq. (29) is introduced as "expected" rather than derived. The text assumes each S^(j) is a linear, ζ-independent operator acting on ψ^(i), and no concrete construction of S^(2) or S^(3) is given for the modified-gravity/environment class discussed in the Introduction. The checks in Secs. V and VI use known full solutions to produce ψ^(1) and verify only k = 1, 2; they never exercise the binomial ansatz at k ≥ 3. Thus the central claim "frequency shifts to any order" is conditional on an unproved structural hypothesis. The authors should either prove Eq. (29) for a defined class of theories (e.g., when the modified equation is O†(ζ)ψ(ζ)=0, in which case S^(j)=O†(j) follows) or explicitly state the theorem with Eq. (29) as a hypothesis and provide an example that satisfies it at order 3.
  2. [Eq. (60)] In Eq. (57) the constant α ∈ C is left arbitrary. Replacing the sum over n′ ≠ n in Eq. (59) by the full sum over n′ in Eq. (60) subtracts the n′ = n term ⟨⟨ψ^(0)_n, ψ^(1)_n⟩⟩/⟨⟨ψ^(0)_n, ψ^(0)_n⟩⟩ ψ^(0)_n = (−iω^(1)_n t + α)ψ^(0)_n. After adding the explicit secular term −iω^(1)_n t ψ^(0)_n, an αψ^(0)_n term remains. Equation (60) is therefore an identity only after one sets α = 0, or explicitly absorbs αψ^(0)_n into the normalization of ψ^(1)_n. As written, the displayed spectral decomposition is not correct; this should be fixed and stated.
  3. [Sec. III A, after Eq. (27)] The framework is developed under the assumption that S^(1) is a linear operator acting on ψ^(0)_n alone, explicitly setting aside complex conjugation, mirror-mode coupling, and degenerate perturbation theory. These are not exotic: for real metric perturbations S^(1) maps ψ^(0)_lmnp to ψ^(0)_l,−m,n with frequency −ω* and the first-order problem is degenerate. Thus Eq. (40), and even Eq. (36) as presented, do not cover all of the physical applications cited in the Introduction (e.g., bGR theories with real metric perturbations). The authors should state this scope limitation in the abstract/conclusions or extend the derivation to the antilinear/mirror-mode case following Ref. [18].
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3] The caption says the true mode shift "only appears constant due to the plot scale"; please quantify the true value and the rate of divergence of the partial sums, so the reader can see the contrast quantitatively.
  2. [Sec. V B] The notation Jt is introduced as "simply reduces to Jt: t→−t," but the spin-weight action of J in the 1+1 toy model should be clarified, since in the main text J includes the GHP prime operation.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical artifacts: "P¨ oschl-Teller" with a misplaced dieresis, "l’Hˆ opital" in App. B, and inconsistent use of "Schr¨ odinger". These should be cleaned up.
  4. [Sec. II E] The equivalence to the Sturm-Liouville product is stated in Eq. (21) and then used heavily; it would help to explicitly mention that the limit ω2→ω1 reproduces Eq. (19), since this is used in deriving Eq. (36).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the frequency-shift formulas are derived from the balance law and tested against independent analytic/numerical results, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Equation (40) follows from the balance law (30) together with the assumed modified-Teukolsky form (29); the latter is explicitly labeled 'expected' rather than derived, so the arbitrary-order claim is conditional on a structural assumption, but that is an unsupported premise, not an equivalence of output to input. The first-order shift (36) is independently checked against the known eigenvalue-perturbation formula (37), and the Pöschl-Teller and slowly-spinning Kerr tests compare against analytic differentiation of the PT frequency and independent Leaver/finite-difference Kerr data. No free parameter is fitted to the target quantities. The only self-citation of note is the prior orthogonality theorem of Ref. [30], which the paper also sketches via the conserved-current argument (12); that theorem is prior published support rather than a re-labelled input or a self-citation chain forcing the conclusion. Concerns about the unproven higher-order structural ansatz in Eq. (29) are correctness risks, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the perturbation parameter zeta is the expansion parameter, not a fitted constant. The framework leans on three external inputs: bilinear-form orthogonality from Ref. [30], contour regularization that makes QNM integrals finite, and an assumed binomial structure for higher-order modified Teukolsky sources. The last is the weakest link and is explicitly described with 'expected' rather than proven.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption QNMs of the Teukolsky operator are orthogonal with respect to the bilinear form and their norms are nonzero.
    Taken from Ref. [30]; used to derive projection coefficients (55), frequency-shift formulas (36)-(40), and the norm identity (16).
  • domain assumption The bilinear form and its balance law extend to QNMs by deforming the radial integration contour C so that the modes decay at the endpoints.
    Sec. II B and Fig. 1; needed for finiteness of matrix elements and for applying Eq. (11) to QNMs.
  • ad hoc to paper A generic k-th-order modified Teukolsky equation has the binomial source structure of Eq. (29) with linear operators S^(j).
    Introduced as 'expected' in Sec. III A; underpins the claim that Eq. (40) gives shifts to arbitrary order.
  • domain assumption The first-order mode shift admits a formal decomposition into QNM projections plus a continuous-spectrum piece, Eq. (60), with the contour deformation of Fig. 2 valid.
    Derived via Green's function techniques in Sec. IV; the paper states no spectral theorem stands behind the QNM expansion and that the decomposition remains formal, and Sec. V E shows the QNM sum diverges.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28456 in / 14203 out tokens · 147135 ms · 2026-08-01T12:34:30.135842+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deviations from vacuum general relativity (such as modified theories or the presence of an environment) produce small shifts in black hole quasinormal mode (QNM) spectra. These effects are becoming increasingly relevant for gravitational wave astronomy as observations of ringdown spectra become more precise. The first-order frequency shift (in a small dimensionless coupling parameter) is now well understood, but no systematic framework exists to compute higher order corrections. The major obstacle is that QNMs do not form a complete basis due to the non-self-adjointness of the system. Nevertheless, it was recently shown that QNMs are orthogonal with respect to an appropriate bilinear form. In this work, we use the bilinear form to systematically lift Schr\"odinger perturbation theory to the black hole setting. We obtain a formula for quasinormal frequency shifts to any order, in terms of lower order mode shifts. We also provide a spectral decomposition of the first-order mode shift, which involves projections onto unperturbed QNMs along with continuous-spectrum contributions -- making incompleteness explicit. We illustrate the framework on slowly-spinning Kerr and P\"oschl-Teller examples, where we find that the QNM sum itself diverges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19492 by Jacopo Lestingi, Laura Sberna, Stephen R. Green.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Integration contour [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Complex contours featured in the derivation of Eqs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Real part of the QNM contribution to the mode shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class

    H.-P. Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav.16, R159 (1999)

  2. [2]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

  3. [3]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

  4. [4]

    Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, Class

    E. Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, Class. Quant. Grav.43, 123001 (2026), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

  5. [5]

    P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. V¨ olkel, Higher-derivative corrections to the Kerr quasinormal mode spectrum, Phys. Rev. D110, 124057 (2024), arXiv:2409.04517 [gr-qc]

  6. [6]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Quasinormal modes of rotating black holes in higher- derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, 124032 (2023), arXiv:2307.07431 [gr-qc]

  7. [7]

    A. K.-W. Chung, P. Wagle, and N. Yunes, Spectral method for metric perturbations of black holes: Kerr background case in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D109, 044072 (2024), arXiv:2312.08435 [gr-qc]

  8. [8]

    A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, Ringing Out General Rel- ativity: Quasinormal Mode Frequencies for Black Holes of Any Spin in Modified Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 181401 (2024), arXiv:2405.12280 [gr-qc]

  9. [9]

    A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, Quasinormal mode fre- quencies and gravitational perturbations of black holes with any subextremal spin in modified gravity through METRICS: The scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity case, Phys. Rev. D110, 064019 (2024), arXiv:2406.11986 [gr-qc]

  10. [10]

    A. K.-W. Chung, K. K.-H. Lam, and N. Yunes, Quasinor- mal mode frequencies and gravitational perturbations of spinning black holes in modified gravity through MET- RICS: The dynamical Chern-Simons gravity case, Phys. Rev. D111, 124052 (2025), arXiv:2503.11759 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    D. Li, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, and N. Yunes, Perturbations of spinning black holes in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity: Slow rotation quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D112, 044005 (2025), arXiv:2503.15606 [gr-qc]

  12. [12]

    F. Aly, M. A. Mansour, L. Lehner, D. Stojkovic, D. Li, and P. Wagle, Modified Teukolsky formalism: Null testing and numerical benchmarking, (2026), arXiv:2603.01456 [gr-qc]. 19

  13. [13]

    J. L. Blazquez-Salcedo, F. S. Khoo, B. Kleihaus, and J. Kunz, Quasinormal mode spectrum of rotating black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton theory, Phys. Rev. D111, 064015 (2025), arXiv:2412.17073 [gr-qc]

  14. [14]

    W. L. Boyce and J. E. Santos, Kerr Black Hole Ringdown in Effective Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2603.10102 [gr- qc]

  15. [15]

    Crescimbeni, X

    F. Crescimbeni, X. J. Forteza, S. Bhagwat, J. Wester- weck, and P. Pani, Theory-agnostic searches for non- gravitational modes in black hole ringdown, SciPost Phys. 20, 025 (2026), arXiv:2408.08956 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    Lestingi, G

    J. Lestingi, G. D’Addario, and T. P. Sotiriou, Fre- quency contamination from new fundamental fields in black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D112, 064070 (2025), arXiv:2505.18261 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    Crescimbeni, X

    F. Crescimbeni, X. J. Forteza, and P. Pani, Testing gravity with black hole ringdown amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D113, 044064 (2026), arXiv:2510.11782 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    D. Li, A. Hussain, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, N. Yunes, and A. Zimmerman, Isospectrality breaking in the Teukolsky formalism, Phys. Rev. D109, 104026 (2024), arXiv:2310.06033 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    D. Li, P. Wagle, Y. Chen, and N. Yunes, Perturbations of Spinning Black Holes beyond General Relativity: Modi- fied Teukolsky Equation, Phys. Rev. X13, 021029 (2023), arXiv:2206.10652 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Uni- versal Teukolsky equations and black hole perturbations in higher-derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, 024040 (2023), arXiv:2304.02663 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Dyson, T

    C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, and S. Dolan, Environmental Effects in Extreme-Mass- Ratio Inspirals: Perturbations to the Environment in Kerr Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211403 (2025), arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Dyson and D

    C. Dyson and D. J. D’Orazio, Spiral Density Waves and Torque Balance in the Kerr Geometry, (2026), arXiv:2601.19123 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    D. Li, C. Weller, P. Bourg, M. LaHaye, N. Yunes, and H. Yang, Extreme mass-ratio inspiral within an ultralight scalar cloud: Scalar radiation, Phys. Rev. D112, 084057 (2025), arXiv:2507.02045 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    Z. Mark, H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, and Y. Chen, Quasinor- mal modes of weakly charged Kerr-Newman spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D91, 044025 (2015), arXiv:1409.5800 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    Zimmerman, H

    A. Zimmerman, H. Yang, Z. Mark, Y. Chen, and L. Lehner, Quasinormal Modes Beyond Kerr, Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc.40, 217 (2015), arXiv:1406.4206 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Hussain and A

    A. Hussain and A. Zimmerman, Approach to computing spectral shifts for black holes beyond Kerr, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104018 (2022), arXiv:2206.10653 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. V¨ olkel, Parametrized quasinormal mode framework for modified Teukolsky equations, Phys. Rev. D110, 104007 (2024), arXiv:2407.15947 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    Weller, D

    C. Weller, D. Li, and Y. Chen, Spectroscopy of bumpy BHs: The nonrotating case, Phys. Rev. D111, 024064 (2025), arXiv:2405.20934 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    D. G. Wu, A. Hussain, and A. Zimmerman, Computing spectral shifts for Johannsen-Psaltis black holes, Phys. Rev. D113, 104059 (2026), arXiv:2512.14679 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    S. R. Green, S. Hollands, L. Sberna, V. Toomani, and P. Zimmerman, Conserved currents for a Kerr black hole and orthogonality of quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064030 (2023), arXiv:2210.15935 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    E. W. Leaver, Spectral decomposition of the perturbation response of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D34, 384 (1986)

  32. [32]

    Arnaudo, J

    P. Arnaudo, J. Carballo, and B. Withers, Beyond quasi- normal modes: A complete mode decomposition of black hole perturbations, Phys. Rev. D114, 024025 (2026), arXiv:2510.18956 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    J. Su, N. Khera, M. Casals, S. Ma, A. Chowdhuri, and H. Yang, Decomposition of the Schwarzschild Green’s func- tion, Phys. Rev. D113, 104013 (2026), arXiv:2601.22015 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Warnick, (In)completeness of Quasinormal Modes, Acta Phys

    C. Warnick, (In)completeness of Quasinormal Modes, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.15, 1 (2022)

  35. [35]

    Cannizzaro, L

    E. Cannizzaro, L. Sberna, S. R. Green, and S. Hol- lands, Relativistic Perturbation Theory for Black-Hole Boson Clouds, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 051401 (2024), arXiv:2309.10021 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Iuliano, S

    C. Iuliano, S. Hollands, S. R. Green, and P. Zimmerman, Extremal black hole weather, Phys. Rev. D111, 124038 (2025), arXiv:2412.02821 [gr-qc]

  37. [37]

    Cannizzaro, M

    E. Cannizzaro, M. Palleschi, L. Sberna, R. Brito, and S. R. Green, Excitation of scalar quasinormal modes from boson clouds, Phys. Rev. D113, 083039 (2026), arXiv:2512.15878 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

  39. [39]

    Berti and V

    E. Berti and V. Cardoso, Quasinormal ringing of Kerr black holes. I. The Excitation factors, Phys. Rev. D74, 104020 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0605118

  40. [40]

    E. W. Leaver, An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

  41. [41]

    De Amicis, E

    M. De Amicis, E. Cannizzaro, G. Carullo, and L. Sberna, Dynamical quasinormal mode excitation, Phys. Rev. D 113, 024048 (2026), arXiv:2506.21668 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Kuntz, Green function of the P¨ oschl-Teller potential, SciPost Phys.20, 120 (2026), arXiv:2510.17954 [gr-qc]

    A. Kuntz, Green function of the P¨ oschl-Teller potential, SciPost Phys.20, 120 (2026), arXiv:2510.17954 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    Arnaudo and B

    P. Arnaudo and B. Withers, Bouncing singularities in Schwarzschild: a geometric origin of the QNM convergence region, (2026), arXiv:2605.16489 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    De Amicis, E

    M. De Amicis, E. Cannizzaro, G. Carullo, A. Kuntz, and L. Sberna, Dynamical quasinormal mode excitation II: propagation and convergence in Schwarzschild, (2026), arXiv:2605.16492 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    P. T. Leung, S. Y. Liu, and K. Young, Completeness and orthogonality of quasinormal modes in leaky optical cavities, Phys. Rev. A49, 3057 (1994)

  46. [46]

    P. T. Leung, Y. T. Liu, W. M. Suen, C. Y. Tam, and K. Young, Quasinormal modes of dirty black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2894 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9903031

  47. [47]

    Ma and H

    S. Ma and H. Yang, Excitation of quadratic quasinormal modes for Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 104070 (2024), arXiv:2401.15516 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Minucci, R

    M. Minucci, R. Panosso Macedo, C. Pantelidou, and L. Sberna, Bilinear products and the orthogonality of quasinormal modes on hyperboloidal foliations, (2026), arXiv:2604.13182 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    L. T. London, Radial scalar product for Kerr quasi- normal modes, Phys. Rev. D113, 044008 (2026), arXiv:2312.17678 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Pezzella, K

    L. Pezzella, K. Destounis, A. Maselli, and V. Car- 20 doso, Quasinormal modes of black holes embedded in halos of matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 064026 (2025), arXiv:2412.18651 [gr-qc]

  51. [51]

    Della Rocca, T

    M. Della Rocca, T. F. M. Spieksma, F. Duque, L. Gualtieri, and V. Cardoso, Gravitational atom spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D113, 044043 (2026), arXiv:2511.13848 [gr-qc]

  52. [52]

    T. F. M. Spieksma, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. Della Rocca, and F. Duque, Black Hole Spectroscopy in Environments: Detectability Prospects, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 081402 (2025), arXiv:2409.05950 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    S. R. Green, S. Hollands, and P. Zimmerman, Teukolsky formalism for nonlinear Kerr perturbations, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 075001 (2020), arXiv:1908.09095 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    P. L. Chrzanowski, Vector Potential and Metric Pertur- bations of a Rotating Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D11, 2042 (1975)

  55. [55]

    L. S. Kegeles and J. M. Cohen, CONSTRUCTIVE PRO- CEDURE FOR PERTURBATIONS OF SPACE-TIMES, Phys. Rev. D19, 1641 (1979)

  56. [56]

    P. T. Leung, Y. T. Liu, W. M. Suen, C. Y. Tam, and K. Young, Logarithmic perturbation theory for quasi- normal modes, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General31, 3271–3286 (1998)

  57. [57]

    Guo, Q.-X

    Y.-D. Guo, Q.-X. Xu, R. Brito, and E. Cannizzaro, Rela- tivistic perturbation theory and environmental effects on superradiant instabilities (2026), to appear