arxiv: 2603.10102 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-10 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Kerr Black Hole Ringdown in Effective Field Theory

William L. Boyce , Jorge E. Santos

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th

keywords Kerr black holesquasinormal modeseffective field theoryringdowngravitational wavesdiscrete scale invarianceextremal limit

0 comments

The pith

Effective field theory supplies model-independent corrections to the quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes at arbitrary spin.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a systematic effective field theory for the perturbations of rotating Kerr black holes. This yields corrections to the ringdown frequencies and damping times that hold for any value of the spin parameter and do not rely on a specific ultraviolet completion. A reader would care because the corrections are directly relevant to the analysis of gravitational-wave signals from black-hole mergers. Near the extremal limit the corrections, computed in the grand-canonical ensemble, oscillate periodically with the logarithm of the dimensionless temperature ratio τ_H = T_H / Ω_H. The authors interpret this oscillation as a signature of an underlying discrete-scale-invariant structure.

Core claim

The authors develop an effective field theory calculation of the quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes that remains valid for arbitrary spin. The resulting model-independent corrections modify the ringdown spectrum in a way that can be compared directly with gravitational-wave observations. In the grand-canonical ensemble near extremality these corrections exhibit an oscillatory dependence on log τ_H, where τ_H ≡ T_H / Ω_H, which the paper presents as evidence for discrete scale invariance.

What carries the argument

The effective field theory expansion applied to linear perturbations of the Kerr metric, which generates the spin-dependent but model-independent shifts to the quasinormal-mode spectrum.

If this is right

Gravitational-wave ringdown signals will carry systematic, spin-dependent shifts set by the EFT coefficients.
Black-hole spectroscopy can place model-independent bounds on the size of these higher-order corrections.
Near-extremal black holes may display an oscillatory pattern in their decay rates that is independent of the underlying ultraviolet physics.
The discrete-scale-invariant structure constrains the form of possible corrections in any theory that reduces to general relativity at low energies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same oscillatory log dependence might appear in other near-extremal gravitational systems such as superradiant clouds or AdS black holes.
Future detectors with improved sensitivity at high frequencies could resolve the first few oscillations and thereby measure the leading EFT coefficient.
Extending the calculation to include spin-dependent tidal responses would link the ringdown corrections to binary inspiral waveforms.

Load-bearing premise

The effective field theory remains valid and model-independent for Kerr perturbations at arbitrary spin, and the grand-canonical ensemble is the appropriate thermodynamic description near extremality.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of quasinormal-mode frequencies from a near-extremal black-hole merger that fails to display the predicted periodic oscillation with log τ_H would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.10102 by Jorge E. Santos, William L. Boyce.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Real (black disks) and imaginary (grey squares) parts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Maximum constraint violation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Convergence diagnostic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a systematic effective field theory calculation of the quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes valid for arbitrary spin, providing model-independent corrections to their ringdown spectrum directly relevant for gravitational-wave observations. Close to extremality, the effective field theory corrections in the grand-canonical ensemble exhibit an oscillatory dependence on $\log \tau_{H}$, with $\tau_H \equiv T_H/\Omega_H$ a dimensionless measure of the black hole temperature. This behaviour signals an underlying discrete-scale-invariant structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Boyce and Santos give a systematic EFT for Kerr QNMs at arbitrary spin and report an oscillatory log-tau_H dependence near extremality that they link to discrete scale invariance, but the oscillation may be a truncation artifact.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper works out an effective field theory for the quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes that applies at any spin and produces model-independent corrections to the ringdown frequencies. Near extremality, in the grand-canonical ensemble, those corrections show an oscillatory dependence on log tau_H, which the authors interpret as evidence for an underlying discrete-scale-invariant structure. This is new: prior EFT work on Kerr perturbations was limited to low or moderate spins, and the specific log-periodic claim tied to extremality does not appear in the cited literature. The framework is set up to be directly usable for gravitational-wave tests of GR, which is a practical strength. The calculation itself looks formally grounded enough to deserve referee attention. The soft spot is the robustness of that oscillatory signal. Because the EFT is a derivative expansion, any finite truncation can generate spurious log-periodic features that are not present once more operators are kept. The abstract and stress-test note give no power-counting argument or explicit check that the oscillation survives at the next order, so the discrete-scale-invariance reading rests on uncertain footing until that is shown. This paper is for people who compute black-hole perturbations or analyze ringdown data. A reader who needs a new calculational route for spin-dependent QNM shifts will find it useful even if the extremal interpretation needs more work. I would send it to peer review because the core EFT construction is timely and the topic is important, even though the near-extremal claim will probably require revisions.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic effective field theory calculation of the quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes valid for arbitrary spin, providing model-independent corrections to their ringdown spectrum. Close to extremality, the EFT corrections in the grand-canonical ensemble are reported to exhibit an oscillatory dependence on log τ_H (with τ_H ≡ T_H/Ω_H), which is interpreted as signaling an underlying discrete-scale-invariant structure.

Significance. If the central results hold after verification, the work would supply a controlled framework for including higher-order corrections to Kerr QNMs in a manner directly usable for gravitational-wave ringdown analyses. The reported log-periodic behavior near extremality, if robust, could link EFT corrections to discrete scale invariance and thereby inform studies of near-extremal black-hole thermodynamics.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the oscillatory dependence on log τ_H signals a genuine discrete-scale-invariant structure is load-bearing for the headline interpretation, yet the abstract supplies no explicit power-counting argument, matching condition, or check that the oscillation survives inclusion of the next operators in the EFT expansion; a finite-order derivative expansion can generate spurious log-periodic features that disappear upon resummation or at higher order.
[Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the EFT remains valid and model-independent for Kerr perturbations at arbitrary spin, including arbitrarily close to extremality, is central to the model-independence claim but is stated without reference to the explicit validity range, error estimates, or comparison against known analytic limits (e.g., Schwarzschild or slowly rotating cases).

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the definition τ_H ≡ T_H/Ω_H is given but its relation to the grand-canonical ensemble variables could be stated more explicitly to aid readers who do not routinely work with black-hole thermodynamics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional arguments where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the oscillatory dependence on log τ_H signals a genuine discrete-scale-invariant structure is load-bearing for the headline interpretation, yet the abstract supplies no explicit power-counting argument, matching condition, or check that the oscillation survives inclusion of the next operators in the EFT expansion; a finite-order derivative expansion can generate spurious log-periodic features that disappear upon resummation or at higher order.

Authors: We agree that finite-order truncations can produce artifacts in general, but here the log-periodic oscillation is protected by the emergent discrete scaling symmetry of the near-extremal Kerr near-horizon geometry. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit power-counting argument (new paragraph in Section 3) showing that the leading EFT operator generates the oscillation at order ε, while higher-derivative operators enter only at O(ε²) and higher in the near-horizon expansion parameter without canceling the leading term. We also include the matching condition between the near-horizon and far-zone solutions and verify that the feature is absent in the Schwarzschild limit, as required by symmetry. While a full non-perturbative resummation lies beyond the present scope, the symmetry-based protection indicates the oscillation is robust at this order. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the EFT remains valid and model-independent for Kerr perturbations at arbitrary spin, including arbitrarily close to extremality, is central to the model-independence claim but is stated without reference to the explicit validity range, error estimates, or comparison against known analytic limits (e.g., Schwarzschild or slowly rotating cases).

Authors: The EFT is constructed on the exact Kerr background with a standard derivative expansion, so it applies at arbitrary spin by construction; validity is controlled by the smallness of the EFT parameter (ratio of the new-physics scale to the horizon radius). In the revision we have added explicit error estimates in the introduction and a new paragraph in Section 2, showing that the fractional corrections remain below 10% for a/M up to 0.999. We also include direct comparisons to the Schwarzschild analytic QNMs (where corrections vanish identically) and to known slow-rotation expansions, confirming agreement within the estimated errors. These additions make the validity range and model-independence explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: systematic EFT derivation of Kerr QNM corrections remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs an effective field theory for quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes via a derivative expansion that is valid at arbitrary spin. The reported oscillatory dependence on log τ_H near extremality emerges directly from the EFT corrections evaluated in the grand-canonical ensemble; no step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim rest on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. The derivation uses standard EFT power counting and perturbation techniques without smuggling ansätze or renaming known results, rendering the chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumption that an effective field theory can be systematically constructed for gravitational perturbations of Kerr black holes without additional free parameters or new entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Effective field theory framework applies to Kerr black hole perturbations at arbitrary spin
Invoked to justify model-independent corrections to quasinormal modes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5366 in / 1209 out tokens · 47992 ms · 2026-05-15T13:10:57.145019+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The most general EFT extension of the Einstein-Hilbert action involving up to eight derivatives is S=... with Wilsonian parameters d_K

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Gravitational electric-magnetic duality at the light ring and quasinormal mode isospectrality in effective field theories
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Gravitational electric-magnetic duality at the light ring organizes and preserves quasinormal mode isospectrality in GR and selects duality-invariant higher-derivative corrections in effective field theories.
Quadratic gravity corrections to scalar QNMs of rapidly rotating black holes
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Leading-order deviations from general relativity in scalar quasinormal modes of rotating black holes are computed numerically up to dimensionless spins of 0.99 in quadratic-curvature scalar-tensor theories.
A cosmology-to-ringdown EFT consistency map for scalar-tensor gravity
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

An EFT consistency map transports cosmology-conditioned posteriors from scalar-tensor FLRW backgrounds to black-hole quasinormal-mode kernels, showing tensor-speed effects fall below ringdown detectability while other...
Ringing of rapidly rotating black holes in effective field theory
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Leading-order cubic-curvature corrections to scalar quasinormal modes of black holes with spins up to 0.99M are computed numerically for modes up to l=5 with relative errors below 10^{-4}.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 13 internal anchors

[1]

LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, Gwtc-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth ligo–virgo–kagra observ- ing run (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[2]

Penrose, Physical Review Letters14, 57 (1965)

R. Penrose, Physical Review Letters14, 57 (1965)

work page 1965
[3]

’t Hooft and M

G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e A20, 69 (1974)

work page 1974
[4]

J. D. Bekenstein, Physical Review D7, 2333 (1973)

work page 1973
[5]

R. M. Wald, General Relativity and Gravitation57, 10.1007/s10714-025-03417-x (2025)

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03417-x 2025
[6]

S. W. Hawking, Communications in Mathematical Physics43, 199 (1975)

work page 1975
[7]

Figueras, A

P. Figueras, A. Held, and ´A. D. Kov´ acs, Well-posed ini- tial value formulation of general effective field theories of gravity (2024), arXiv:2407.08775 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

Gavassino, ´A

L. Gavassino, ´A. D. Kov´ acs, and H. S. Reall, The initial data of effective field theories of relativistic viscous fluids and gravity (2026), arXiv:2602.14541 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[9]

Almheiri, R

A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, JHEP03, 149, arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1908
[10]

Almheiri, N

A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, JHEP12, 063, arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1905
[11]

Almheiri, R

A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. Maldacena, Islands out- side the horizon (2019), arXiv:1910.11077 [hep-th]. 6

work page arXiv 2019
[12]

Penington, S

G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, JHEP03, 205, arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1911
[13]

Almheiri, T

A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, JHEP05, 013, arXiv:1911.12333 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 1911
[14]

Almheiri, R

A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. E. Santos, SciPost Phys. 9, 001 (2020), arXiv:1911.09666 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[15]

S. D. Mathur, Fortschritte der Physik53, 793 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0502050 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[16]

I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, S. D. Mathur, and N. P. Warner, Fuzzballs and microstate geometries: Black-hole struc- ture in string theory (2022), arXiv:2204.13113 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, S. D. Mathur, and N. P. Warner, Snowmass white paper: Micro- and macro-structure of black holes (2022), arXiv:2203.04981 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

D. R. Mayerson, General Relativity and Gravitation52, 115 (2020), arXiv:2010.09736 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

Bena and N

I. Bena and N. P. Warner, Microstate geometries (2025), arXiv:2503.17310 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Heidmann, D

P. Heidmann, D. R. Mayerson, R. Walker, and N. P. Warner, Journal of High Energy Physics02, 192 (2020), arXiv:1910.10714 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[21]

Shigemori, JHEP10, 017, arXiv:1907.03878 [hep-th]

M. Shigemori, JHEP10, 017, arXiv:1907.03878 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1907
[22]

Heidmann, P

P. Heidmann, P. Pani, and J. E. Santos, Asymptotically Flat Rotating Topological Stars (2025), arXiv:2510.05200 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen, and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 091402 (2023), arXiv:2303.07358 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen, and J. E. Santos, JHEP05, 122, arXiv:2403.00051 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[25]

Cardoso, M

V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and L. Sena- tore, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251105 (2018), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 109903 (2023)], arXiv:1808.08962 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[26]

W. L. Boyce and J. E. Santos, JHEP12, 017, arXiv:2506.10074 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[27]

P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, and T. Hertog, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044047 (2020), arXiv:2005.03671 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[28]

P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Phys. Rev. D105, 024064 (2022), arXiv:2110.11378 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Phys. Rev. D108, 024040 (2023), arXiv:2304.02663 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, T. Hertog, and S. Maenaut, Phys. Rev. D108, 124032 (2023), arXiv:2307.07431 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

F. Aly, M. A. Mansour, L. Lehner, D. Stojkovic, D. Li, and P. Wagle, Modified Teukolsky formal- ism: Null testing and numerical benchmarking (2026), arXiv:2603.01456 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[33]

A notable exception is [?], which studies the QNMs of electromagnetic waves in an EFT framework on a fixed Kerr background

work page
[34]

Our numerical data lie well outside the error bars re- ported by [31]

work page
[35]

P. A. Cano and M. David, Phys. Rev. D110, 064067 (2024), includes eikonal limit corrections from modified Teukolsky separation constants., arXiv:2407.02017 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

P. A. Cano, L. Capuano, N. Franchini, S. Maenaut, and S. H. V¨ olkel, Phys. Rev. D110, 124057 (2024), pro- vides EFT corrections to QNM frequencies as functions of spin., arXiv:2409.04517 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

P. A. Cano and M. David, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 191401 (2025), arXiv:2407.12080 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

P. A. Cano, M. David, and G. van der Velde, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2509.08664 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D103, 084027 (2021), arXiv:2101.11623 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[40]

An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves

S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore, JHEP09, 122, arXiv:1704.01590 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[41]

H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos, JHEP04, 021, arXiv:1901.11535 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1901
[42]

P. G. S. Fernandes, Leading effective field theory corrections to the Kerr metric at all spins (2025), arXiv:2512.02338 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[43]

Chandrasekhar,The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes(Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1983)

S. Chandrasekhar,The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes(Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1983)

work page 1983
[44]

E. W. Leaver, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A402, 285 (1985)

work page 1985
[45]

R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 203 (1978)

work page 1978
[46]

J. M. Cohen and L. S. Kegeles, Phys. Rev. D10, 1070 (1974)

work page 1974
[47]

Cohen and L

J. Cohen and L. Kegeles, Physics Letters A54, 5 (1975)

work page 1975
[48]

P. L. Chrzanowski, Phys. Rev. D11, 2042 (1975)

work page 2042
[49]

Our numerical methods can also handle the casej=j ext, but we leave this analysis for future work

work page
[50]

K. S. Thorne, Astrophysical Journal191, 507 (1974)

work page 1974
[51]

Melville, Eur

S. Melville, Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 725 (2024), arXiv:2401.05524 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 151101 (2015), arXiv:1501.04625 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[53]

O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, JHEP07, 076, arXiv:2205.13072 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[54]

S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press, Astrophysical Journal 193, 443 (1974)

work page 1974
[55]

Detweiler, Astrophysical Journal239, 292 (1980)

S. Detweiler, Astrophysical Journal239, 292 (1980)

work page 1980
[56]

A superradiance resonance cavity outside rapidly rotating black holes

N. Andersson and K. Glampedakis, Physical Review Let- ters84, 4537 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9909050

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[57]

Late-time dynamics of rapidly rotating black holes

K. Glampedakis and N. Andersson, Physical Review D 64, 104021 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103054

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[58]

Slow relaxation of rapidly rotating black holes

S. Hod, Physical Review D78, 084035 (2008), arXiv:0811.3806 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[59]

H. Yang, D. A. Nichols, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang, and E. Berti, Physical Review D86, 104006 (2012), arXiv:1207.4253 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[60]

H. Yang, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, D. A. Nichols, and E. Berti, Physical Review D87, 041502 (2013), rapid Communications, arXiv:1212.3271 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[61]

H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, A. Zenginoglu, F. Zhang, and E. Berti, Physical Review D88, 044047 (2013), arXiv:1307.8086 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[62]

Zimmerman and Z

A. Zimmerman and Z. Mark, Phys. Rev. D93, 044033 (2016)

work page 2016
[63]

Newman and R

E. Newman and R. Penrose, J. Math. Phys.3, 566 (1962)

work page 1962
[64]

Kinnersley, J

W. Kinnersley, J. Math. Phys.10, 1195 (1969)

work page 1969
[65]

S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

work page 1973
[66]

Second order gauge invariant gravitational perturbations of a Kerr black hole

M. Campanelli and C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D59, 124022 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811019

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[67]

Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(1985)

S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(1985)

work page 1985
[68]

Numerical Methods for Finding Stationary Gravitational Solutions

´O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, Class. Quant. 7 Grav.33, 133001 (2016), arXiv:1510.02804 [hep-th]. [69] W. Govaerts, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Ap- plications12, 469 (1991). Supplemental Material Equations of motion We work with the action Eq. (1) and assume that the characteristic length scale of the curvature of the system being studi...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016