Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 300 references

This paper establishes that, on a super-torsion-free super-spacetime, the lS^4-Bianchi identities for the C-field super-flux are equivalent to the full equations of motion of 11D supergravity, and that the theory's global infrared completio

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 10:10 UTC pith:OVKU7DKP

load-bearing objection A well-organized survey of the authors' own superspace-Bianchi program, with a few genuinely new extensions, but the load-bearing 11D theorem is cited elsewhere and the advertised computer check is not shipped—so the referee is really reviewing a chain of preprints, not just this text. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.20312 v1 pith:OVKU7DKP submitted 2026-07-22 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.ATmath.DGmath.MP

Higher Superspace Supergravity and its IR-Completions

Grigorios Giotopoulos , Hisham Sati , Urs Schreiber This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.ATmath.DGmath.MP MSC 83E5058A5081T3055P6255Q5581T7017B55
keywords 11D supergravitysuperspace Bianchi identitiesflux quantizationL∞-algebrasM-branesnonabelian cohomologyCohomotopydimensional reduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the entire on-shell content of 11D supergravity is encoded in the duality-symmetric Bianchi identities for the C-field flux on superspace. On a super-torsion-free super-spacetime, imposing the lS^4-Bianchi identities is equivalent to the full set of 11D equations of motion, with the odd-direction components determined by a rheonomic extension. If this is right, the main remaining freedom in defining the theory is global: the C-field must be completed by flux quantization in a differential nonabelian cohomology theory whose classifying space has the rational homotopy type of the 4-sphere. The same pattern propagates to dimensional reductions, to the M5-brane worldvolume, and to the charges of M-branes, including fractional brane species.

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.16: over a super-torsion-free (1,10|32) super-spacetime with C-field super-flux of the form (133), the lS^4-Bianchi identities dG4 = 0 and dG7 = 1/2 G4∧G4 hold if and only if the Einstein, Rarita-Schwinger, Maxwell-Chern-Simons, and duality equations of 11D supergravity hold rheonomically on superspace. Here lS^4 is the characteristic L∞-algebra with generators v3 and v6 and the single non-trivial bracket [v3,v3] = v6; it is the rational Whitehead algebra of the 4-sphere. Because these duality-symmetric Bianchi identities are equivalently closure conditions for L∞-valued differential forms, the paper turns them into global field data: a choice of classifying sp

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the characteristic L∞-algebra lS^4, presented with two generators v3 and v6 and the single relation that encodes the non-linear second Bianchi identity. This algebra converts the pair of dual flux Bianchis into the condition that (G4,G7) be a closed lS^4-valued differential form. The paper then lifts this local condition to global data via differential nonabelian cohomology: a classifying space A with rational Whitehead algebra lA ≃ lS^4 provides the charge data, a nonabelian character map relates it to closed forms, and gauge potentials arise as concordances. The same machinery, applied to cyclifications and toroidifications of lS^4, produces the superspace Bianch

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on assuming that the C-field super-flux has only bosonic components plus at most two gravitino legs, never an independent four-gravitino piece, together with the super-torsion-free condition and a chosen gauge for uniquely extending fields off spacetime; if any genuine solution needs such a four-gravitino term, or if the extension is not unique, the equivalence and the IR completions built on it would need to be modified.

What would settle it

Find a solution of the 11D supergravity equations of motion with non-vanishing gravitino field whose C-field super-flux, in any super-torsion-free coframe, necessarily has a four-gravitino component not determined by the ansatz (133), or exhibit two distinct rheonomic extensions of the same spacetime fields that both satisfy the lS^4-Bianchi identities.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • On-shell 11D supergravity is reduced to a cohomological condition: the lS^4-Bianchi identities on super-torsion-free superspace (Thm. 3.16).
  • Global IR completions of 11D supergravity are classified by spaces A with lA ≃ lS^4; the C-field is a cocycle in differential nonabelian A-cohomology, with integral and torsion charges determined by A.
  • Choosing A = S^4 (4-Cohomotopy) quantizes M2- and M5-brane charges integrally — Z for the M2 and Z⊕Z/12 for the M5 — and enforces shifted 1/4 p1 quantization and global consistency of the M5 topological term.
  • Dimensional reductions inherit the miracle: 10D IIA supergravity is on-shell iff the cyc(lS^4)-Bianchi identities hold, and 9D N=2 supergravity iff the tor(lS^4)-Bianchis hold.
  • The self-dual 3-form sector on M5-brane probes is on-shell iff the twisted relative l_{S^4}S^7-Bianchi identity holds; its minimal IR completion is classified by the quaternionic Hopf fibration S^7 → S^4.
  • Different global completions of the same equations of motion yield distinct physical theories, distinguished by their fractional brane charges.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the core equivalence holds, the distinction between 'equations of motion' and 'Bianchi identities' collapses for 11D supergravity: the theory is a cohomological condition, so flux quantization laws can be tested purely by matching rational Whitehead algebras.
  • The framework suggests a general recipe for any supergravity with non-linear duality-symmetric Bianchis: define its IR completion by rationally matching a classifying space to the characteristic L∞-algebra. This should extend to gauged and KK descendants, though not to theories with non-abelian 1-form gauge sectors such as heterotic supergravity.
  • The M5-brane geometric engineering of fractional quantum Hall order, if valid beyond the topological sector, makes topological quantum order a potential low-energy probe of IR-completed 11D supergravity; a concrete test would be looking for the predicted fractional or torsion charge patterns in engineered anyon systems.
  • The equivalence offers a computational shortcut: instead of solving coupled partial differential equations, one can search for closed lS^4-valued forms on super-torsion-free supermanifolds, an algebraic condition amenable to computer algebra verification.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper is a set of lecture notes arguing that higher-dimensional supergravity is put on-shell by Bianchi identities on superspace. The main conceptual claim is Thm 3.16: on a super-torsion-free (1,10|32)-supermanifold, C-field super-flux forms of the two-fermion avatar form (133) satisfy the lS^4-Bianchi identities iff the 11D supergravity equations of motion hold rheonomically. From this, the paper derives (or rather reviews) analogous statements for M5-brane worldvolumes (Prop 3.26), for 10D IIA via cyclification (Prop 3.24), and for 9D via toroidification (Prop 3.25). It then develops a framework for global IR completions by flux quantization in differential nonabelian cohomology, with admissibility defined by lA≃a (§1.3, (40)), and discusses examples: the homotopy fiber of the rationalized cup square, S^4 (Hypothesis H), and the SU(2) Chern-class fiber. The final section applies the framework to magnetized M5-branes on A_n singularities and proposes a geometric-engineering dictionary with fractional quantum Hall topological order.

Significance. If the central equivalence is valid, it is conceptually important: the content of 11D supergravity is repackaged as a purely cohomological constraint on superspace, which in turn makes the theory amenable to global flux quantization beyond abelian cohomology. The paper is careful about assumptions: it explicitly states torsion-freeness, the 1/2-BPS embedding condition, and notes (Rem 3.20) that ordinary spacetime fluxes do not satisfy the same Bianchi identities. The L∞-algebraic dimensional reduction formalism (Prop 3.23) is elegant, and the local gauge-potential analysis in §4.1 is a useful synthesis. However, the paper functions primarily as a review: its flagship theorem is not proved but cited to [GSS24b], with the accompanying computer-algebra verification [GSS24a] unavailable. The FQH application is suggestive but not yet a proof of topological order.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1.2, Thm 3.16; §3.1.4, eq. (149)] The central equivalence is not demonstrated in this manuscript. The displayed rheonomic recursion (149) is stated only for solutions with vanishing gravitino field strength, (∇Ψ)_ab=0. The C-field super-flux ansatz (133) contains no independent four-fermion component, and no argument is given that the odd-direction extension is unique or remains inside the ansatz when (∇Ψ)≠0. Since Thm 3.16 asserts an iff including the Rarita-Schwinger equation, this is a load-bearing gap. The proof is delegated to [GSS24b] and the computer-algebra verification [GSS24a] is not shipped, so the reader cannot check the central claim. Please state precisely which class of solutions (133) covers and reproduce the closure argument for ρ≠0, or soften the theorem accordingly.
  2. [§1.3, eqs. (40)–(43)] The statement that global IR completions of 11D SuGra are parameterized by classifying spaces A of the rational homotopy type of the 4-sphere is true by definition once admissibility is defined as lA≃a. The constructive content—that differential nonabelian A-cohomology yields global potentials, charges, and flux quantization—is nontrivial, but the parameterization claim itself is not a derived result. Moreover, Rem 3.20 shows that the ordinary spacetime fluxes (F4,F7) do not satisfy the lS4-Bianchi identities; the completion therefore applies to superspace super-fluxes. The relation between these IR-completed superspace solutions and the conventional spacetime formulation deserves a careful statement.
  3. [§3.2, Props. 3.24–3.25] The dimensional-reduction theorems are central to the narrative but are not proved here: Prop. 3.24 is a citation to [GS26, Thm. 3.4], and Prop. 3.25 is a sketch that inherits Thm. 3.16 and Prop. 3.23. Since the super-flux ansätze (173) and (175) are elaborate and the rheonomy step is exactly where the 11D proof is delicate, the review should either include the reduction proof or explicitly mark these as quoted results. As written, the paper oscillates between original-proof and review modes, which makes it hard to identify which claims are being established in this manuscript.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 3] The row p=0..9 and the decomposition into integral/fractional summands is hard to read; the notation with multiple ⊕ symbols across columns is ambiguous. Please present as a table of homotopy groups with explicit values.
  2. [Eq. (17)] The notation lA is used before it is defined in §4.2.2; give a forward reference or define it at first use.
  3. [§1.2] The claim that the computer check takes 'about 11 minutes' [GSS24a] is not verifiable because the code is not shipped. Please include an ancillary file or remove the quantitative claim.
  4. [Lem. 4.4/4.5] The λ-parameterized composition rule deserves a sign check; the displayed inverse (201) and the difference term in the proof should be re-derived carefully, as the notation d(C2C′2) could be misread.
  5. [§4.3, eq. (277)] The text says the configuration 'provably engineers FQH topological order'; what is shown is a reduction of equivariant charges to π0Map(Σ1,3,S2). The jump from charge structure to full topological order should be phrased as a dictionary or conjecture, not as a proof.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The IR-completion parameterization is made true by definition (admissibility ≡ lA≃lS4), and the central 11D equivalence is imported from the authors' own prior work, so the strongest claims rest on self-definition and self-citation rather than on a derivation exhibited in this text.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [§1.3, eq. (40)–(43); see also §4.2.2, eq. (244)–(247)]
    "thereby, a choice of classifying space A is admissible for duality-symmetric Bianchi identities characterized by a if lA≃a, in which case it defines globally completed gauge fields as the data embodied by dashed cones in the following diagram … The global IR completions of 11D SuGra are parameterized by classifying spaces A of the rational homotopy type of the 4-sphere, lA≃lS4."

    The set of 'admissible' completions is defined to be exactly the set of spaces A with lA≃a. Therefore the statement that completions are parameterized by such A is true by construction, not by a derived classification. The nontrivial step — that every such A actually gives a globally completed gauge field and that no other data are needed — is delegated to [FSS23], whose authors overlap with the present paper, rather than proved here.

  2. self citation load bearing [Thm. 3.16 and Rem. 3.17; §1.2, eq. (13)]
    "The full proof in [GSS24b, Thm. 3.1, Cor. 3.12] treats all required conditions and uses computer algebra [GSS24a] to verify the heavy combinatorial identities involved. … We follow [GSS24b; GSS24c; GSS25a; GS26]."

    The paper's central 'miracle' — 11D SuGra solutions ⇔ lS4-super-Bianchis — is not derived in the manuscript; it is asserted by citing the authors' own [GSS24b], with the only displayed verification being an 11-minute computer-algebra check [GSS24a] that is not shipped. Every subsequent claim (IIA/9D reductions, M5 equivalences, IR completions) is built on this cited theorem, so the load-bearing link in the derivation chain is a self-citation rather than a proof or reproduction provided to the reader.

full rationale

The paper is largely a review/streamlining of the authors' own research program, and much of it is legitimate exposition. However, two load-bearing moves reduce the advertised results to inputs. First, the global IR-completion parameterization is essentially definitional: 'admissible' is defined by lA≃a, so the slogan that 11D SuGra completions are parameterized by lA≃lS4 is a direct consequence of the construction, not an independent prediction. Second, the strongest scientific claim — Thm. 3.16, the iff equivalence between lS4-Bianchis on the two-fermion super-flux ansatz (133) and the full 11D equations of motion — is not proved in this text; it is quoted from [GSS24b], with a non-shipped computer check [GSS24a]. Since the dimensional-reduction propositions, the M5 statement, and the whole IR-completion edifice are built on that theorem, the central chain is carried by self-citation. There is also an internal support gap that is not, strictly, circularity: the only displayed rheonomic recursion (149) is stated for vanishing gravitino field strength, while Thm. 3.16 asserts an iff for general super-spacetimes; whether the extension stays inside ansatz (133) is not exhibited. The geometric-engineering dictionary of §4.3 is a specially chosen configuration that reproduces known FQH Hopfion/braiding data, so it reads as a fit/renaming rather than an independent derivation, but no numerical parameters are fitted, so I do not count it as fitted-input circularity. Overall, the paper has independent mathematical content if the cited theorem is correct, but within this manuscript the strongest results are either definitional or self-citational, giving a score of 4.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

No numeric free parameters are fitted in this mathematical physics paper. The load-bearing postulates are structural: the duality-symmetric superspace formulation of 11D SuGra, the restricted super-flux component ansatz, the definition of flux quantization through the admissibility condition lA ≃ a, Hypothesis H as a specific choice of classifying space, and the M5/FQH geometric-engineering dictionary. These are flagged as axioms because their independent evidence is partial or deferred to the cited literature.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption 11D SuGra equations of motion are equivalent to the duality-symmetric Bianchi identities (1) with G7 = ⋆G4 on super-torsion-free super-spacetime (Thm 3.16).
    This is the paper's central equivalence, but it is not proved in this manuscript; it is cited from [GSS24b] and a non-included computer-algebra check [GSS24a]. It is load-bearing for every IR-completion claim.
  • domain assumption The higher-gauge sector is captured by the duality-symmetric super-flux ansatz (133): C-field forms have at most two gravitino legs, with the rest encoded in bosonic components.
    Def. 3.15 restricts the component structure of super-fluxes; the equivalence theorem depends on this component ansatz plus super-torsion-freeness (Def. 3.14). No four-Ψ components are allowed.
  • ad hoc to paper Flux quantization is defined via differential nonabelian cohomology with a classifying space A satisfying lA ≃ a (eq. (40)-(43)).
    This is the framework's defining construction. The statement that 'IR completions are parameterized by such A' is true by definition of admissibility; the physical choice among admissible A (e.g., A = S^4) is a hypothesis, not a consequence.
  • ad hoc to paper The geometric-engineering dictionary: an IR-completed magnetized M5-brane probing the half-space of an A_n singularity, with twistorial Cohomotopy coefficients, reproduces FQH topological order (eq. (271)-(277)).
    The brane configuration and group actions are chosen specifically to match the known Hopfion charge structure and braiding phases of FQH systems. No underlying condensed-matter Hamiltonian is derived, so this is a postulated dictionary.
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the Wess-Zumino-Tsimpis gauge and the rheonomic recursion (149) for all relevant supergravity solutions.
    Needed to pass from super-Bianchi identities to ordinary spacetime equations of motion. The gauge result is cited from [Tsi04] and [GSS25a]; the paper explicitly relies on this gauge being always available.
invented entities (1)
  • Hypothesis H — C-field charge quantization in 4-Cohomotopy (classifying space S^4) independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the minimal global IR completion of 11D SuGra and predicts M2/M5 brane charge groups, including Z/12 torsion in π_7(S^4), and underlies the twistorial M5/FQH engineering.
    It gives falsifiable topological handles outside the paper: the 1/4 p1-shifted integral quantization matching Witten's argument, specific torsion charges (Table 3), and FQH braiding phases. These go beyond the input data, though none are experimentally confirmed as M-theoretic predictions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 70867 in / 17493 out tokens · 157455 ms · 2026-08-01T10:10:33.742631+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

It is an old idea that higher-dimensional super-gravity (SuGra) is put on-shell just by imposing Bianchi identities on super-field strengths over super-spacetimes subject to super-torsion constraints. We give a modernized, rigorous account and review recent developments, pointing out how this perspective lends itself to the construction of infrared completions of SuGra by electromagnetic flux quantization in differential nonabelian cohomology theories $\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm{dff}}$ lifting the coefficient $L_\infty$-algebra $\mathfrak{l}\mathcal{A}$ of the super-Bianchi identities. After surveying necessary background, we highlight: (1.) our recent proof that solutions of 11D SuGra are equivalent to the $\mathfrak{l}S^4$-Bianchi identities on super $C$-field flux over super-torsion-free 11D super-spacetimes, (2.) how from this the nonlinearly self-dual gauge sector on 6D M5-brane worldvolumes is equivalent to the $\mathfrak{l}_{S^4}S^7$-Bianchi identity on super $B$-field flux, (3.) and the recent complete discussion of superspace dimensional reduction of this situation to 10D IIA SuGra via $\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{Cyc}(S^4)$-Bianchi identities on super NS/RR-flux, together with its extension to further reduction to 9 SuGra via $\mathfrak{l}\mathrm{Tor}(S^4)$-Bianchis on the corresponding super-fluxes. We close by indicating how this implies consistent infrared completions of 11D SuGra by $C$-field flux quantization in 4-Cohomotopy, of 10D IIA SuGra by NS/RR-field flux-quantization in a form of twisted unstable K-theory, and of M5-brane worldvolumes by $B$-field flux-quantization in twisted (twistorial) relative Cohomotopy. The latter admits geometric engineering of experimentally relevant topological quantum orders.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hahner, Fabian and Saberi, Ingmar , title =. Sel. Math. New Ser. , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1007/s00029-025-01024-x , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00029-025-01024-x 2025

  2. [2]

    Cederwall, Martin , title =. Mod. Phys. Lett. A , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1142/S0217732310034407 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732310034407 2010

  3. [3]

    Han, Seung Kee and Koh, I. G. N=4 Remaining Supersymmetry in Kaluza-Klein Monopole Background in D=11 Supergravity Theory. Phys. Rev. D. 1985. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.2503 1985

  4. [4]

    Supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein reductions of M-waves and MKK-monopoles

    Figueroa-O'Farrill, Jos \' e and Sim \' o n, Joan. Supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein reductions of M-waves and MKK-monopoles. Class. Quant. Grav. 2002. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/23/315. arXiv:hep-th/0208108

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    Townsend, P. K. M-Theory from its superalgebra. Strings, Branes and Dualities. 1999. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4730-9_5. arXiv:hep-th/9712004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    , title =

    Goldin, Gerald A. , title =. SciPost Phys. Proc. , volume =. 2023 , doi =. 2212.12632 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    2602.18748 , archivePrefix =

    Sati, Hisham and Schreiber, Urs , year =. 2602.18748 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , volume =

    Ho, Pei-Ming and Matsuo, Yutaka , title =. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw075 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw075 2016

  9. [9]

    Chinese Journal of Physics , volume =

    Ho, Pei-Ming , title =. Chinese Journal of Physics , volume =. 2010 , month =. 0912.0445 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Physical Review D , volume =

    Ho, Pei-Ming and Kawai, Hikaru and Liao, Henry , title =. Physical Review D , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/hg29-jvx5 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/hg29-jvx5 2026

  11. [11]

    and Shibusa, Y

    Matsuo, Y. and Shibusa, Y. , title =. Journal of High Energy Physics , volume =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/02/006 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/02/006 2001

  12. [12]

    Nuclear Physics B , volume =

    Katagiri, So , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117516 , eprint =

    arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    International Journal of Modern Physics A , volume =

    Katagiri, So , title =. International Journal of Modern Physics A , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1142/S0217751X26500831 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x26500831 2026

  14. [14]

    and Iliopoulos, John , title =

    Floratos, Emmanuel G. and Iliopoulos, John , title =. Physics Letters B , volume =. 1988 , month =

    1988

  15. [15]

    Physics Letters A , volume =

    Hasebe, Kazuki , title =. Physics Letters A , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.071 , eprint =

    doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.09.071 2008

  16. [16]

    and Maldacena, Juan and Ooguri, Hirosi and Oz, Yaron , title =

    Aharony, Ofer and Gubser, Steven S. and Maldacena, Juan and Ooguri, Hirosi and Oz, Yaron , title =. Physics Reports , volume =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6 , eprint =

    doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00083-6 2000

  17. [17]

    and Klebanov, Igor R

    Herzog, Christopher P. and Klebanov, Igor R. , title =. Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics , publisher =. 2006 , pages =

    2006

  18. [18]

    Belhaj, Adil and Drissi, L. B. and Rasmussen, J. , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/23/002 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/23/002 2003

  19. [19]

    Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =

    Giveon, Amit and Kutasov, David , title =. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =. 1999 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.71.983 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.983 1999

  20. [20]

    Nuclear Physics B , volume =

    Katz, Sheldon and Vafa, Cumrun , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00283-6 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00283-6 1997

  21. [21]

    Nuclear Physics B , volume =

    Katz, Sheldon and Klemm, Albrecht and Vafa, Cumrun , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00282-4 , eprint =

    doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00282-4 1997

  22. [22]

    Nuclear Physics B , volume =

    Katz, Sheldon and Vafa, Cumrun , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00280-0 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(97)00280-0 1997

  23. [23]

    Super fiber bundles, connection forms and parallel transport

    Eder, Konstantin. Super fiber bundles, connection forms and parallel transport. J. Math. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1063/5.0044343. arXiv:2101.00924

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Super Bundles

    Carmeli, Claudio and Fioresi, Rita and Varadarajan, Veeravalli S. Super Bundles. Universe. 2018. doi:10.3390/universe4030046. arXiv:1801.07181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Introduction to Strings and Branes

    West, Peter. Introduction to Strings and Branes. 2012. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139045926

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139045926 2012

  26. [26]

    Dualities of Fields and Strings

    Polchinski, Joseph. Dualities of Fields and Strings. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.08.011. arXiv:1412.5704

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    The M-algebra completes the hierarchy of Super-Exceptional Tangent Spaces

    Giotopoulos, Grigorios and Sati, Hisham and Schreiber, Urs. The M-algebra completes the hierarchy of Super-Exceptional Tangent Spaces. Phys. Lett. B. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139199. arXiv:2411.03661

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Rosabal, J. A. Holographic partition function of democratic M-theory. J. High Energy Physics. 2026. arXiv:2512.21741

    arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    , title =

    Pal, Palash B. , title =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  30. [30]

    Golub, Nikita and Sati, Hisham and Schreiber, Urs , title =

  31. [31]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , volume =

    Coimbra, Andr. Journal of High Energy Physics , volume =. 2014 , doi =. 1212.1586 , archiveprefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    1997 , doi=

    Gajer, Pawel , journal=. 1997 , doi=

    1997

  33. [33]

    Journal of Geometry and Physics , volume =

    Baraglia, David , title =. Journal of Geometry and Physics , volume =. 2012 , doi =. 1101.0856 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , year =

    Cederwall, Martin and Gran, Ulf and Nilsson, Bengt and Tsimpis, Dimitrios , title =. Journal of High Energy Physics , year =. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/05/052 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/05/052 2005

  35. [35]

    2025 , doi=

    Grady, Daniel , journal=. 2025 , doi=. 2505.24696 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    and Witten, Edward , title =

    Diaconescu, Duiliu-Emanuel and Moore, Gregory W. and Witten, Edward , title =. 2000 , eprint =

    2000

  37. [37]

    and Witten, Edward , title =

    Diaconescu, Duiliu-Emanuel and Moore, Gregory W. and Witten, Edward , title =. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , volume =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2002.v6.n6.a2 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.4310/atmp.2002.v6.n6.a2 2003

  38. [38]

    2007 , series =

    Street, Ross , title =. 2007 , series =

    2007

  39. [39]

    2011 , doi =

    Abramsky, Samson and Tzevelekos, Nikos , title =. 2011 , doi =. 1102.1313 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [40]

    JHEP , volume =

    Lambert, Neil and Papageorgakis, Constantinos , title =. JHEP , volume =. 2010 , eprint =

    2010

  41. [41]

    Physics Reports , year =

    Fayet, Pierre and Ferrara, Sergio , title =. Physics Reports , year =

  42. [42]

    Problems of Theoretical Physics: I

    Golfand, Yuri and Likhtman, Evgeny , title =. Problems of Theoretical Physics: I. E. Tamm Memorial Volume , editor =. 1972 , pages =

    1972

  43. [43]

    , title =

    Freed, Daniel S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    1999

  44. [44]

    , title =

    Freed, Daniel S. , title =. 2006 , pages =

    2006

  45. [45]

    , title =

    Deligne, Pierre and Freed, Daniel S. , title =. 1999 , volume =. hep-th/9901094 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  46. [46]

    Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas , year =

    Hohnhold, Henning and Stolz, Stephan and Teichner, Peter , title =. Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas , year =

  47. [47]

    2011 , isbn =

    Carmeli, Claudio and Caston, Lauren and Fioresi, Rita , title =. 2011 , isbn =. 0710.5742 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    DeWitt, Bryce , title =

  49. [49]

    and Carmeli, C

    Balduzzi, L. and Carmeli, C. and Fioresi, R. , title =. Expositiones Mathematicae , year =. doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2009.09.005 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2009.09.005 2009

  50. [50]

    2008 , eprint =

    Sachse, Christoph , title =. 2008 , eprint =

    2008

  51. [51]

    , title =

    Molotkov, V. , title =. 1984 , number =

    1984

  52. [52]

    1998 , doi =

    Konechny, Anatoly and Schwarz, Albert , editor =. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  53. [53]

    , title =

    Schwarz, Albert S. , title =. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , year =

  54. [54]

    and Leites, Dimitry A

    Berezin, Felix A. and Leites, Dimitry A. , title =. Soviet Mathematics -- Doklady , year =

  55. [55]

    and Marinov, M

    Berezin, Felix A. and Marinov, M. S. , title =. Annals of Physics , volume =. 1977 , doi =

    1977

  56. [56]

    1997 , archivePrefix =

    Schmitt, Thomas , title =. 1997 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/9707104 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  57. [57]

    Reviews in Mathematical Physics , volume =

    Schmitt, Thomas , title =. Reviews in Mathematical Physics , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  58. [58]

    , editor =

    Berezin, Felix A. , editor =. 1987 , doi =

    1987

  59. [59]

    Manin, Yu. I. , title =. Arbeitstagung Bonn 1984 , series =. 1985 , doi =

    1984

  60. [60]

    2026 , url =

    Scholze, Peter , title =. 2026 , url =

    2026

  61. [61]

    , title =

    Musaev, Edvard T. , title =. 2026 , eprint =

    2026

  62. [62]

    Andrianopoli, Laura and Cremonini, C. A. and D'Auria, Riccardo and Grassi, Pietro A. and Matrecano, Riccardo and Noris, Ruggero and Ravera, Lucrezia and Trigiante, Mario , title =. Physical Review D , volume =. 2022 , doi =. 2206.06388 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    and Sorokin, Dmitri P

    Bandos, Igor A. and Sorokin, Dmitri P. , title =. 2023 , doi =. 2301.10668 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    , title =

    Bandos, Igor A. , title =. Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters , volume =. 2011 , doi =. 0912.2530 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  65. [65]

    AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =

    Sorokin, Dmitri , title =. AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =. 2001 , doi =. hep-th/0105102 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [66]

    1999 , doi =

    Bandos, Igor , title =. 1999 , doi =. hep-th/9807202 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    1998 , doi =

    Bandos, Igor and Pasti, Paolo and Sorokin, Dmitri and Tonin, Mario , title =. 1998 , doi =. hep-th/9705064 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  68. [68]

    and Sezgin, Ergin , title =

    Howe, Paul S. and Sezgin, Ergin , title =. Physics Letters B , volume =. 1997 , doi =. hep-th/9607227 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  69. [69]

    Howe, P. S. and Sezgin, E. , title =. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01672-3 , eprint =

    doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(96)01672-3 1997

  70. [70]

    and Muhammad, F

    Brooks, R. and Muhammad, F. and Gates, S. James, Jr. , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume =. 1986 , doi =

    1986

  71. [71]

    James, Jr

    Gates, S. James, Jr. and Nishino, Hitoshi , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume =. 1986 , doi =

    1986

  72. [72]

    1986 , doi =

    West, Peter , title =. 1986 , doi =

    1986

  73. [73]

    and Kuzenko, Sergei M

    Buchbinder, Ioseph L. and Kuzenko, Sergei M. , title =. 1995 , doi =

    1995

  74. [74]

    1992 , isbn =

    Wess, Julius and Bagger, Jonathan , title =. 1992 , isbn =

    1992

  75. [75]

    James, Jr

    Gates, S. James, Jr. and Lu, Liang and Oerter, Robert N. , title =. Physics Letters B , volume =. 1989 , doi =

    1989

  76. [76]

    and Gates, S

    Carr, James L. and Gates, S. James, Jr. and Oerter, Robert N. , title =. Physics Letters B , volume =. 1987 , doi =

    1987

  77. [77]

    James, Jr

    Gates, S. James, Jr. , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 1983 , doi =

    1983

  78. [78]

    Nuclear Physics B , volume =

    Howe, Paul , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 1982 , doi =

    1982

  79. [79]

    James, Jr

    Gates, S. James, Jr. and Stelle, Kellogg S. and West, Peter C. , title =. Nuclear Physics B , volume =. 1980 , doi =

    1980

  80. [80]

    Dereli, Tekin and. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. , volume =. 2024 , doi =. 2406.15834 , archivePrefix =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.