Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 74 references

This paper derives a finite-temperature quantisation condition that connects lattice energy levels to thermal scattering amplitudes, with a kinematic function that stays finite at all energies.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 05:03 UTC pith:INGWDEFJ

load-bearing objection The central quantization condition has an internal unitarity mismatch: Eq. (4.35) cannot hold for real energies at finite T, so Eq. (4.36) is not its real form. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22346 v1 pith:INGWDEFJ submitted 2026-07-24 hep-lat hep-phhep-thnucl-th

Resonances at finite temperature from the lattice

Jakob Hoffmann , Peter Lowdon , Owe Philipsen This is my paper
classification hep-lat hep-phhep-thnucl-th MSC 81T2581T28 PACS 11.10.Wx12.38.Gc
keywords thermoparticlesfinite-temperature lattice QCDquantisation conditionthermal scattering amplituderesonance mass and widthfinite-volume effectsK-matrixspectral functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to extend the vacuum finite-volume formalism—the approach that turns lattice energy levels into scattering information—to temperatures T>0. The central proposal is to build thermal scattering states from thermoparticles, thermally broadened but stable particle-like excitations. With those states the authors derive a unitarity relation for the thermal amplitude and a skeleton expansion of the finite-volume thermal correlator, obtaining a quantisation condition det[F⁻¹+M_TP]=0 whose kinematic function F is finite at all energies. If correct, lattice spectra on L_τ×L³ boxes would determine the temperature-dependent mass and width of resonances such as the rho, and would also quantify finite-temporal-size corrections in vacuum analyses.

Core claim

The authors show that thermal scattering cannot be defined with on-shell vacuum particles: a known theorem forces such an S-matrix to be trivial, and KMS symmetry introduces negative-energy hole states. They therefore define asymptotic states from thermoparticles and derive a thermal optical theorem with a two-thermoparticle phase space that has non-vanishing contributions below the vacuum threshold and at negative energies. Repeating the vacuum finite-volume logic with thermoparticle propagators, they find that the leading finite-volume corrections are contained in a kinematic function F(E,P;L,β) whose vacuum poles at non-interacting two-particle energies are regularised into finite peaks b

What carries the argument

The central object is the thermoparticle—a thermally damped, stable particle-like excitation whose spectral function ρ_TP(ω,p) has a broadened peak around the vacuum mass shell. Because ρ_TP vanishes below the vacuum mass threshold, thermoparticle propagators dominate the large-time behaviour of thermal correlators at low temperature. The derivation's engine is a skeleton expansion of the finite-volume thermal two-point function with thermoparticle propagators; the two-thermoparticle loop sum replaces the continuous energy integrals of the vacuum derivation, and its finite-volume part defines the kinematic function F(E,P;L,β). F is the finite-temperature analogue of the vacuum finite-volume

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation hangs on thermoparticle dominance: at the temperatures of interest the thermal spectral density must be dominated by one narrow thermoparticle peak, so that the effective partial-wave expansion and the suppression of Bethe-Salpeter kernel singularities both hold.

What would settle it

Measure the thermal spectral function of the relevant hadron at T roughly equal to its vacuum mass, or at the temperatures of interest. If the single-thermoparticle component no longer dominates—multiple comparable peaks, strongly momentum-dependent peak shifts, or a broad flat continuum—the skeleton expansion fails and Eq. (4.35) will not describe the finite-volume levels. A direct check in a scalar toy theory would compare the predicted finite peaks of F with energy levels from lattice simulation at several volumes.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Energy levels computed on a finite L_τ × L³ lattice constrain the two-thermoparticle scattering amplitude M_TP, making resonance mass and width at finite temperature, M_p(β) and Γ(β), extractable in principle.
  • Because F remains finite at all energies for T>0, the non-interacting two-particle pole singularities of the vacuum formalism disappear; the vacuum limit is approached smoothly as L_τ→∞.
  • The two-thermoparticle phase space contains thermal contributions below E=2m and for E<0, so the scattering amplitude is constrained by data in regions that have no vacuum analogue.
  • The same condition can be used to measure finite-temporal-size (finite-L_τ) corrections to vacuum lattice analyses, since any practical lattice simulation has T=1/L_τ>0.
  • Solving the condition frame by frame for different total momenta P gives independent constraints on the K-matrix, compensating for the loss of boost invariance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next check is to compute F using a damping factor extracted directly from lattice two-point correlators, rather than the illustrative exponential form, and verify quantitatively that the finite-peak structure persists.
  • If thermal spectral functions broaden or split into several comparable components, the single-thermoparticle approximation breaks down; a defining signature would be that energy levels stop obeying Eq. (4.35) with the assumed F—so the formalism itself provides a diagnostic for where thermal resonances cease to be well-defined.
  • For QCD, the rho meson is an obvious first target: the formalism predicts that its extracted mass and width shift with temperature, with kinematic broadening of F separable from genuine resonance pole movement only by comparing amplitudes across volumes and frames.
  • The framework could in principle be extended to resonances decaying to non-identical or spinful particles, and to three-particle channels, by adapting the same thermoparticle skeleton expansion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a finite-temperature generalization of the two-particle Lüscher quantization condition. It models asymptotic thermal states as thermoparticles, derives a thermal optical theorem and a two-thermoparticle phase space, then performs a skeleton expansion of the finite-volume thermal correlator on L_tau x L^3. The central result is Eq. (4.35), det[F^{-1} + M_TP] = 0, with F finite at all energies due to thermal broadening, and the claimed equivalent real form Eq. (4.36). The paper evaluates F_PV numerically for an exponential damping model and proposes a step-by-step procedure to extract temperature-dependent resonance mass and width from lattice data.

Significance. If valid, the framework would be a substantial step toward first-principles extraction of in-medium resonance properties and toward controlling finite-L_tau systematics in vacuum lattice analyses. The derivation chain is explicit, the optical theorem and phase-space calculation are worked out in detail, and the numerical evaluation of the kinematic function is a useful illustration. The paper also honestly identifies its main dynamical assumptions. However, the central quantization condition is internally inconsistent: it has no real solutions at finite temperature, so the proposed extraction procedure cannot be implemented as written. This prevents the result from being used and places the paper's main claim in doubt.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.4, Eqs. (4.35)-(4.36)] The central condition cannot be satisfied by real E. From Eq. (4.27), F = F_PV - i F_delta with F_delta = (1 - e^{-beta E}) rho_TP; from Eq. (3.16), M_TP = (K_TP^{-1} - i rho_TP)^{-1}. For real E and real K_TP, a single partial wave gives Im[F^{-1}+M_TP] = F_delta/(F_PV^2 + F_delta^2) + rho_TP/(K_TP^{-2} + rho_TP^2) > 0 whenever rho_TP != 0. Thus det[...] has no real zeros, while the finite-volume energies in Eq. (4.6) are real. Eq. (4.36) is not equivalent: equivalence would require Im F = +rho_TP, not -(1-e^{-beta E})rho_TP. This is an algebraic mismatch in the KMS/phase-space normalization, not a dynamical approximation; it also affects the beta -> infinity limit through the sign of Im F.
  2. [Sec. 4.4, Eq. (4.36)] Because Eq. (4.35) is not the correct pole condition, the paper must show directly that the finite-volume correlator C_{L,beta} in Eq. (4.34) has poles at the solutions of det[F_PV^{-1} + K_TP] = 0. The alternative form is merely stated. The geometric resummation in Eq. (4.30) organizes powers of F and M_TP; if [F^{-1}+M_TP] never vanishes, the pole mechanism is absent. A corrected derivation is needed before the real condition can be used for fits.
  3. [Secs. 3.3 and 4.3] The validity of the effective expansion (3.13) and of the subleading treatment of kernel singularities are assumed, with the paper itself stating that the first is "a purely dynamical question" and that the second "should also hold true at sufficiently small temperatures." Since these assumptions control which diagrams contribute at leading finite-volume order, the paper should specify the temperature range or provide a numerical/small-parameter check. Without this, the advertised extraction of M_rho(beta), Gamma(beta) is an approximation whose domain is undefined.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.2)] The notation fW(omega, p) is nonstandard; W appears to denote the Fourier transform of a Wightman function. Please define it explicitly or use a more transparent notation.
  2. [Sec. 3.4, Fig. 1] For gamma/m = 0 the spectral function is a delta function, so the plotted curve must be a limiting/schematic representation. State how the gamma=0 curve was produced.
  3. [Sec. 4.5] Typo: "rho_PT" should read "rho_TP" in the sentence defining the spectral function.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.1)] The principal-value regulator epsilon is fixed to 1e-6 after the integrals are evaluated numerically. A sensitivity study for epsilon, analogous to the Lambda_n study in Fig. 10, would support the claim that corrections are negligible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the quantization condition is a conditional skeleton-expansion derivation, and the cited self-papers only motivate the illustrative damping ansatz.

full rationale

The central relation det[F^{-1}+M_TP]=0 (Eq. 4.35) is derived from a standard skeleton expansion under an explicitly stated thermoparticle-dominance assumption, not by fitting a parameter to the quantity that is later called a prediction. The finiteness of F at finite T is presented transparently as a consequence of the smooth, broadened thermoparticle spectral function: the text states that the regularisation is 'a direct consequence of the thermoparticle states, whose spectral functions are broadened around the vacuum singularity' (Conclusions), and Sec. 4.6 similarly attributes the absence of poles to the off-real-axis propagator poles encoded in rho_TP. This is a conditional implication of the framework's input rather than a hidden identification of output with input. The thermoparticle framework is motivated by external axiomatic results (Bros-Buchholz, Narnhofer-Thirring), and the exponential damping ansatz is explicitly adopted from prior lattice studies, some of which are by the same authors; however, those citations only motivate the numerical illustrations and do not force the formal derivation. The algebraic/sign concern in the reader's take about real solutions of Eq. (4.35) is a potential correctness issue, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 8 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on eight stated or implicit premises: thermoparticle dominance (mostly supported by the authors' own prior lattice work), validity of the effective partial-wave expansion, sub-dominance of kernel singularities in the Matsubara sum, neglect of the left-hand cut, the axiomatic thermal spectral representation, existence of a single analytic propagator, n=2 truncation of unitarity, and the NRT triviality argument. The quantitative results further depend on three hand-set modeling choices (gamma=T, alpha=1, exponential D). No genuinely new entity is introduced by this paper; thermoparticles are imported and their scattering-state role is assumed, with only indirect testability so far.

free parameters (4)
  • gamma (thermal width parameter of the damping factor) = gamma = T
    Set equal to the temperature 'for simplicity' (Sec. 3.4). Controls the broadening of rho_TP and therefore the shape of every curve in Figs. 1-8; not extracted from lattice data.
  • alpha (amplitude of the damping factor) = alpha = 1
    Chosen by hand in Sec. 3.4; fixes the overall normalization of the spectral function.
  • Exponential form of D_{m,beta}(x) = alpha e^{-gamma |x|} = exponential functional form
    Motivated by lattice phi^4 studies [64,65] (same group); assumed without justification for QCD applications, determining the Breit-Wigner-like shape of Eq. (3.22).
  • |q_TP| (most-probable thermoparticle momentum) = not computed
    Defines the expansion point of the effective partial-wave expansion (Sec. 3.3); temperature and momentum dependence acknowledged as potentially requiring numerical computation, but never specified.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Thermoparticle dominance: at low T the thermal spectral density is dominated by the thermoparticle component delta(s - m^2) Dtilde_{m,beta}(u) (Eq. 2.4), so two-thermoparticle loops carry the leading finite-volume effects.
    Load-bearing for the skeleton expansion in Sec. 4.2; supported chiefly by the authors' own lattice analyses [64-69], not established inside this paper.
  • domain assumption The effective partial-wave expansion around the most-probable momentum |q_TP| (Eq. 3.13) is accurate enough for the unitarity relation and the kinematic function.
    Used in Eqs. (3.14) and (4.22)-(4.24); validity called 'a purely dynamical question' in Sec. 3.3.
  • domain assumption Endcap and Bethe-Salpeter kernel singularities are sub-leading in the Matsubara contour sum (Eq. 4.16).
    Sec. 4.3: 'this should also hold true at sufficiently small temperatures'; less controlled at finite T than in vacuum.
  • domain assumption Left-hand cut (t/u-channel exchange) contributions are negligible in the kernels.
    Explicitly assumed in footnote 9, citing the caveat of Ref [78].
  • domain assumption Bros-Buchholz thermal spectral representation (Eq. 2.3) and KMS structure, including negative-energy states.
    Background input from Refs [55-58,62]; accepted rather than re-derived.
  • domain assumption A single analytic thermoparticle propagator exists whose i*epsilon limits recover retarded and advanced propagators (footnote 4).
    Requires the spectral function to vanish on a non-vanishing energy-momentum region [62]; true for the exponential model (|omega|<m) but asserted generally.
  • domain assumption The thermal optical theorem is truncated to n = 2 thermoparticle intermediate states.
    Sec. 3.2, 'for simplicity'; neglects 3+ particle channels even above 3m.
  • domain assumption Narnhofer-Thirring: on-shell asymptotic thermal states give a trivial S-matrix, so off-shell thermoparticles are the correct scattering basis (Ref [72]).
    External theorem motivating the entire construction; the converse for off-shell thermoparticle states is assumed.
invented entities (1)
  • Thermoparticle scattering states (as applied here to two-particle scattering and finite volume) no independent evidence
    purpose: Define off-shell but stable asymptotic states that avoid the NRT trivial-S-matrix obstruction and underpin the thermal optical theorem, the two-thermoparticle phase space, and the quantization condition.
    The concept is borrowed from Refs [55-57] (external), but the paper's specific use — that thermoparticles dominate two-particle scattering observables — is assumed and supported mostly by the authors' own correlator analyses [64-69]. The paper provides an extraction procedure (Sec. 4.5) but no new falsifiable prediction or measurement within the paper itself.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29141 in / 23394 out tokens · 215004 ms · 2026-08-01T05:03:02.217487+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The properties of hadronic resonances at finite temperature constitute an important probe of the thermal QCD medium. In this work we use the concept of thermoparticles, which characterise thermally-modified but stable particle-like states, to define the notion of two-particle scattering at finite temperature, and establish a unitarity relation for the thermal scattering amplitude. We derive a finite-temperature generalisation of the vacuum two-particle quantisation condition via a skeleton expansion of the finite-volume correlation function. Solving this condition at the finite-volume energy levels of the system constrains the form of the thermal scattering amplitude, and hence the properties of resonances. In contrast to the vacuum case, the kinematic function containing the leading finite-volume corrections is finite at all energies, reflecting the fact that thermoparticles have broadened spectral peaks due to their interactions with the thermal medium. Since all lattice simulations involve a finite temporal extent, our approach can also be used to study finite-temporal size effects in vacuum analyses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22346 by Jakob Hoffmann, Owe Philipsen, Peter Lowdon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The thermoparticle spectral function ρTP(ω, ⃗p = 0) for an exponential damping factor Dm,β = e −γ|⃗x| at γ/m = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0 plotted on a non-logarithmic (left) and logarithmic (right) scale. where α and γ are temperature-dependent parameters. γ represents a thermal width-like param￾eter which also depends on the coupling of the system, but for simplicity we set γ = T and fix α = 1. In [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two-thermoparticle phase space ϱ(E) := ϱℓm;ℓm,TP(E) with an exponential damping factor Dm,β(⃗x) = e −γ|⃗x| , at γ/m = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 3.0. The left plot shows the total phase space, and the right plot shows the separate threshold (solid lines) and non-threshold (dotted lines) components. literature [5], where only above threshold E > 2m components exist at all temperatures. These differences stem fr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Thermoparticle skeleton expansion of the finite-volume correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The finite-volume two-thermoparticle loop. The double lines represent thermoparticle propagators, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Real part of the rest-frame kinematic function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In the below-threshold region there is an enhanced suppression relative to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Real part of the rest-frame kinematic function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real part of the rest-frame kinematic function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Real part of the rest-frame kinematic function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: ⃗k-sum and integral components of Eq. (4.39) for γ/m = 0.1, mL = 10, and the spherical cutoff Λk = 2πΛn mL m with Λn = 8, 10, 14. For each value of Λn we chose the number of integration steps for the q0 and r0 integrals such that the numerical fluctuations were suppressed for m ≤ E ≤ 3m, which is the region where the most relevant two-particle energy levels are expected to lie. The sum components displayed… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cutoff sensitivity |∆FPV, 00(E)| for γ/m = 0.1, mL = 10, Λn = 10, and ∆Λn = 2. therefore chose a larger number of integration steps for the contributions to the ⃗k-integral than for the finite-volume sum. Due to the higher computational costs for larger Λn we chose Λn based on the cutoff sensitivity criterion |∆F A + 1 PV, 00(E)| ≲ 10−2 max 2m≤E≤3m |F A + 1 PV, 00(E,Λn)|, (A.2) where F A + 1 PV, 00(E,Λn) … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 48 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-temperature Field Theory: Principles and applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2011

    2011

  2. [2]

    Urban, M

    M. Urban, M. Buballa, R. Rapp and J. Wambach,Modifications of the rho meson from the virtual pion cloud in hot and dense matter,Nucl. Phys. A673(2000) 357 [nucl-th/9910004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  3. [3]

    C. Jung, F. Rennecke, R.-A. Tripolt, L. von Smekal and J. Wambach,In-Medium Spectral Functions of Vector- and Axial-Vector Mesons from the Functional Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 036020 [1610.08754]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Dobado, A

    A. Dobado, A. Gomez Nicola, F. J. Llanes-Estrada and J. R. Pelaez,Thermal rho and sigma mesons from chiral symmetry and unitarity,Phys. Rev. C66(2002) 055201 [hep-ph/0206238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    G´ omez Nicola, J

    A. G´ omez Nicola, J. R. de Elvira and A. Vioque-Rodr ´ ıguez,The pion-kaon scattering amplitude and theK ∗ 0 (700)andK ∗(892)resonances at finite temperature,JHEP08(2023) 148 [2304.08786]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Gao and M

    F. Gao and M. Ding,Thermal properties ofπandρmeson,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1171 [2006.05909]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek and R. D. Young,Scattering processes and resonances from lattice QCD,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 025001 [1706.06223]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe,Lattice QCD and Three-particle Decays of Resonances,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 65 [1901.00483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    Mai, U.-G

    M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner and C. Urbach,Towards a theory of hadron resonances,Phys. Rept. 1001(2023) 1 [2206.01477]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    L¨ uscher,Volume dependence of the energy spectrum in massive quantum field theories

    M. L¨ uscher,Volume dependence of the energy spectrum in massive quantum field theories. ii. scattering states,Communications in Mathematical Physics105(1986) 153

    1986

  11. [11]

    L¨ uscher,Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nuclear Physics B354(1991) 531

    M. L¨ uscher,Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nuclear Physics B354(1991) 531

    1991

  12. [12]

    Rummukainen and S

    K. Rummukainen and S. A. Gottlieb,Resonance scattering phase shifts on a nonrest-frame lattice,Nuclear Physics B450(1995) 397

    1995

  13. [13]

    C. H. Kim, C. T. Sachrajda and S. R. Sharpe,Finite-volume effects for two-hadron states in moving frames,Nuclear Physics B727(2005) 218 [hep-lat/0510022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    S. He, X. Feng and C. Liu,Two particle states and the s-matrix elements in multi-channel scattering,Journal of High Energy Physics2005(2005) 011 [hep-lat/0504019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Fu,Rummukainen–gottlieb’s formula on two-particle system with different mass,Physical Review D85(2012) 014506

    Z. Fu,Rummukainen–gottlieb’s formula on two-particle system with different mass,Physical Review D85(2012) 014506. 29

    2012

  16. [16]

    Leskovec and S

    L. Leskovec and S. Prelovˇ sek,Scattering phase shifts for two particles of different mass and non-zero total momentum in lattice qcd,Physical Review D85(2012) 114507

    2012

  17. [17]

    G¨ ockeler, R

    M. G¨ ockeler, R. Horsley, M. Lage, U. Meißner, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Rusetsky, G. Schierholz and J. M. Zanotti,Scattering phases for meson and baryon resonances on general moving-frame lattices,Physical Review D86(2012) 094513

    2012

  18. [18]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe,Multiple-channel generalization of Lellouch-Luscher formula, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 016007 [1204.0826]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    R. A. Brice˜ nno,Two-particle multichannel systems in a finite volume with arbitrary spin, Physical Review D89(2014) 074507 [1401.3312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe,Relativistic, model-independent, three-particle quantization condition,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 116003 [1408.5933]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe,Expressing the three-particle finite-volume spectrum in terms of the three-to-three scattering amplitude,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 114509 [1504.04248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    M. Mai, B. Hu, M. Doring, A. Pilloni and A. Szczepaniak,Three-body Unitarity with Isobars Revisited,Eur. Phys. J. A53(2017) 177 [1706.06118]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Mai and M

    M. Mai and M. D¨ oring,Three-body Unitarity in the Finite Volume,Eur. Phys. J. A53 (2017) 240 [1709.08222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    D¨ oring, H

    M. D¨ oring, H. W. Hammer, M. Mai, J. Y. Pang,§. A. Rusetsky and J. Wu,Three-body spectrum in a finite volume: the role of cubic symmetry,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 114508 [1802.03362]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    T. D. Blanton, F. Romero-L´ opez and S. R. Sharpe,Implementing the three-particle quantization condition including higher partial waves,JHEP03(2019) 106 [1901.07095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    M. T. Hansen, F. Romero-L´ opez and S. R. Sharpe,Generalizing the relativistic quantization condition to include all three-pion isospin channels,JHEP07(2020) 047 [2003.10974]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    T. D. Blanton and S. R. Sharpe,Three-particle finite-volume formalism forπ +π+K+ and related systems,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 034509 [2105.12094]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Z. T. Draper, M. T. Hansen, F. Romero-L´ opez and S. R. Sharpe,Three relativistic neutrons in a finite volume,JHEP07(2023) 226 [2303.10219]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Z. T. Draper and S. R. Sharpe,Three-particle formalism for multiple channels: theηππ+ KKπsystem in isosymmetric QCD,JHEP07(2024) 083 [2403.20064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    S. M. Dawid, A. W. Jackura and A. P. Szczepaniak,Finite-volume quantization condition from the N/D representation,Phys. Lett. B864(2025) 139442 [2411.15730]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Schaaf and S

    W. Schaaf and S. R. Sharpe,Implementing the three-neutron quantization condition, 2512.24508

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    M. T. Hansen, F. Romero-L´ opez and S. R. Sharpe,Finite-volume formalism forN ππat maximal isospin,JHEP02(2026) 221 [2509.24778]. 30

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    S. M. Dawid, F. Romero-L´ opez and S. R. Sharpe,Comparison of integral equations used to studyT + cc for a stable D ∗,JHEP09(2025) 058 [2505.05466]

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    S. M. Dawid, Z. T. Draper, A. D. Hanlon, B. H¨ orz, C. Morningstar, F. Romero-L´ opez, S. R. Sharpe and S. Skinner,QCD Predictions for Physical Multimeson Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 021903 [2502.14348]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    R. A. Brice˜ no, M. T. Hansen, A. W. Jackura, R. G. Edwards and C. E. Thomas,Isotensor πππscattering with aρresonant subsystem from QCD,2510.24894. [36]Hadron Spectrumcollaboration,Energy dependence of theρresonance inππelastic scattering from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 034505 [1212.0830]

    arXiv 2013

  36. [37]

    D. J. Wilson, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards and C. E. Thomas,Resonances in coupledπK, ηK scattering from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 054008 [1411.2004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [38]

    D. J. Wilson, R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards and C. E. Thomas,Coupled ππ, K¯Kscattering inP-wave and theρresonance from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 094502 [1507.02599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [39]

    R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards and D. J. Wilson,Isoscalarππ, K K, ηηscattering and theσ, f0, f2 mesons from QCD,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 054513 [1708.06667]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [40]

    D. J. Wilson, R. A. Briceno, J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards and C. E. Thomas,The quark-mass dependence of elasticπKscattering from QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 042002 [1904.03188]. [41]Hadron Spectrumcollaboration,Isospin-1/2Dπscattering and the lightestD ∗ 0 resonance from lattice QCD,JHEP07(2021) 123 [2102.04973]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [42]

    Boyle, F

    P. Boyle, F. Erben, V. G¨ ulpers, M. T. Hansen, F. Joswig, M. Marshall, N. P. Lachini and A. Portelli,Physical-mass calculation ofρ(770)andK ∗(892)resonance parameters viaππ andKπscattering amplitudes from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 054510 [2406.19193]. [43]Hadron Spectrumcollaboration,D 1 andD 2 resonances in coupled-channel scattering amplitudes ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [44]

    B. Hu, R. Molina, M. D¨ oring, M. Mai and A. Alexandru,Chiral extrapolations of theρ(770) meson inN f = 2 + 1lattice QCD simulations,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 034520 [1704.06248]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [45]

    C. W. Andersen, J. Bulava, B. H¨ orz and C. Morningstar,ElasticI= 3/2p-wave nucleon-pion scattering amplitude and the∆(1232)resonance fromN f = 2 + 1lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 014506 [1710.01557]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [46]

    Bulava, A

    J. Bulava, A. D. Hanlon, B. H¨ orz, C. Morningstar, A. Nicholson, F. Romero-L´ opez, S. Skinner, P. Vranas and A. Walker-Loud,Elastic nucleon-pion scattering atm π = 200MeV from lattice QCD,Nucl. Phys. B987(2023) 116105 [2208.03867]. [47]Baryon Scattering (BaSc)collaboration,Lattice QCD study ofπΣ- ¯KNscattering and theΛ(1405)resonance,Phys. Rev. D109(202...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [49]

    Leskovec, C

    L. Leskovec, C. B. Lang, M. Padmanath and S. Prelovsek,A lattice QCD study of pion-nucleon scattering in the Roper channel,Few Body Syst.59(2018) 95 [1806.02363]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [50]

    Alexandrou, J

    C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer and M. Wagner,Shallow Bound States and Hints for Broad Resonances with Quark Content ¯b¯cudinB ¯DandB ∗ ¯D Scattering from Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 151902 [2312.02925]. [51]GWQCDcollaboration,Three-Body Dynamics of thea1(1260)Resonance from Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021)...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [52]

    H. Yan, M. Mai, M. Garofalo, U.-G. Meißner, C. Liu, L. Liu and C. Urbach,ωMeson from Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 211906 [2407.16659]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [53]

    S. M. Dawid, Z. T. Draper, A. D. Hanlon, B. H¨ orz, C. Morningstar, F. Romero-L´ opez, S. R. Sharpe and S. Skinner,Two- and three-meson scattering amplitudes with physical quark masses from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 014505 [2502.17976]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [54]

    N. P. Landsman,Nonshell Unstable Particles in Thermal Field Theory,Annals Phys.186 (1988) 141

    1988

  49. [55]

    Bros and D

    J. Bros and D. Buchholz,Particles and propagators in relativistic thermo field theory,Z. Phys. C55(1992) 509

    1992

  50. [56]

    Buchholz,On the manifestations of particles, inInternational Conference on Mathematical Physics Towards the 21st Century, 11, 1993,hep-th/9511023

    D. Buchholz,On the manifestations of particles, inInternational Conference on Mathematical Physics Towards the 21st Century, 11, 1993,hep-th/9511023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  51. [57]

    Bros and D

    J. Bros and D. Buchholz,Asymptotic dynamics of thermal quantum fields,Nucl. Phys. B 627(2002) 289 [hep-ph/0109136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  52. [58]

    R. Haag, N. M. Hugenholtz and M. Winnink,On the Equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics,Commun. Math. Phys.5(1967) 215

    1967

  53. [59]

    R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman,PCT, spin and statistics, and all that. Redwood City, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1989

    1989

  54. [60]

    Haag,Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras

    R. Haag,Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1992

    1992

  55. [61]

    N. N. Bogolyubov, A. A. Logunov, A. I. Oksak and I. T. Todorov,General Principles of Quantum Field Theory. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 1990

    1990

  56. [62]

    Bros and D

    J. Bros and D. Buchholz,Axiomatic analyticity properties and representations of particles in thermal quantum field theory,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.64(1996) 495 [hep-th/9606046]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  57. [63]

    V. P. Nair and R. D. Pisarski,Spectral functions at nonzero temperature,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 074022 [2504.05383]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [64]

    Lowdon and O

    P. Lowdon and O. Philipsen,On the (in)consistency of perturbation theory at finite temperature,JHEP08(2024) 167 [2405.02009]. 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [65]

    P. Ali, P. Lowdon and O. Philipsen,Towards a consistent perturbation theory at finite temperature,2606.14863

    arXiv

  60. [66]

    Lowdon and O

    P. Lowdon and O. Philipsen,Goldstone bosons at nonzero temperature,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) L061701 [2501.17120]

    arXiv 2025

  61. [67]

    Lowdon and O

    P. Lowdon and O. Philipsen,Goldstone bosons across thermal phase transitions,JHEP02 (2026) 090 [2507.14348]

    arXiv 2026

  62. [68]

    Lowdon and O

    P. Lowdon and O. Philipsen,Pion spectral properties above the chiral crossover of QCD, JHEP10(2022) 161 [2207.14718]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [69]

    D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, P. Lowdon, O. Philipsen and T. Ueding,Pseudo-scalar meson spectral properties in the chiral crossover region of QCD,JHEP05(2024) 332 [2310.13476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [70]

    Bros,Thermal aspects in quantum field theory,Annales Henri Poincare4(2003) S863

    J. Bros,Thermal aspects in quantum field theory,Annales Henri Poincare4(2003) S863

    2003

  65. [71]

    M. L. Bellac,Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 3, 2011

    2011

  66. [72]

    Narnhofer, M

    H. Narnhofer, M. Requardt and W. E. Thirring,Quasiparticles at Finite Temperatures, Commun. Math. Phys.92(1983) 247

    1983

  67. [73]

    Lorc´ e and P

    C. Lorc´ e and P. Lowdon,Universality of the Poincar´ e gravitational form factor constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 207 [1908.02567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [74]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995, 10.1201/9780429503559

    doi:10.1201/9780429503559 1995

  69. [75]

    Cubature: Adaptive Multidimensional Integration in C

    S. G. Johnson, “Cubature: Adaptive Multidimensional Integration in C.” https://github.com/stevengj/cubature, 2026

    2026

  70. [76]

    Montvay and G

    I. Montvay and G. Munster,Quantum fields on a lattice, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 3, 1997

    1997

  71. [77]

    M. T. Hansen and T. Peterken,Discretization effects in finite-volume2→2scattering, 2408.07062

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [78]

    A. B. a. Raposo and M. T. Hansen,Finite-volume scattering on the left-hand cut,JHEP08 (2024) 075 [2311.18793]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  73. [79]

    J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, M. J. Peardon, D. G. Richards and C. E. Thomas,Toward the excited meson spectrum of dynamical QCD,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 034508 [1004.4930]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [80]

    Lowdon,Euclidean thermal correlation functions in local QFT,Phys

    P. Lowdon,Euclidean thermal correlation functions in local QFT,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 045028 [2201.12180]. 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022