Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 75 references

Operator scrambling obeys a noisy FKPP equation fixed by strong-to-weak U(1) breaking and a contour duality on the OTOC path integral.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 05:43 UTC pith:PLRA5INS

load-bearing objection Symmetry-derived EFT that actually fixes the fermionic noisy-FKPP action (including noise–λ link) for Brownian large-N Majorana OTOCs, with a clean SYK saddle check. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24925 v1 pith:PLRA5INS submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-elhep-thquant-ph

Effective Field Theory of Operator Scrambling from Strong-to-Weak Symmetry Breaking

Bai-Lin Cheng , Shao-Kai Jian , Zhi-Cheng Yang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-elhep-thquant-ph
keywords operator scramblingOTOCstrong-to-weak symmetry breakingeffective field theorynoisy FKPPBrownian SYKoperator sizeLyapunov exponent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the growth of out-of-time-ordered correlators is not just a model-by-model kinetic fact but follows from a symmetry principle in operator space. In Brownian or short-time-correlated large-N Majorana systems, the four-contour representation of an OTOC has an emergent strong U(1) symmetry in a doubled Hilbert space even when the microscopic system conserves nothing ordinary; the conjugate density is local operator size. Interactions break that strong symmetry, and a duality that pairs time reversal with contour permutation fixes the low-order effective action so that the operator-size density obeys a noisy Fisher–Kolmogorov–Petrovsky–Piskunov equation. The same duality ties multiplicative noise to the Lyapunov exponent and makes positivity of that exponent a requirement of path-integral convergence. A Brownian SYK chain saddle reproduces the action, so early exponential growth, ballistic fronts, saturation, and stochastic front broadening sit in one symmetry-based hydrodynamics of operator size.

Core claim

For Brownian or short-time-correlated large-N Majorana systems, OTOC dynamics is controlled by an effective field theory for operator-size density n and response phase ϕ organized by strong-to-weak U(1) breaking. An emergent duality combining time reversal with contour permutation fixes the action up to quadratic order in ϕ, yields the noisy FKPP equation for n, relates noise strength directly to the Lyapunov exponent λ, and makes λ > 0 a consequence of real-time path-integral convergence. A direct saddle-point expansion of a Brownian SYK chain reproduces that action.

What carries the argument

Strong-to-weak U(1) symmetry breaking on the OTOC contour, together with the MT duality (time reversal composed with a four-contour permutation) that relates n and ϕ and fixes the minimal local action through O(ϕ²).

Load-bearing premise

The systems must be large-N Majorana models with Brownian or short-time-correlated couplings and no ordinary conserved quantities, so that the only slow modes on the OTOC contour are the strong-sector density and phase.

What would settle it

In a Brownian SYK chain (or another model in the stated class), extract the collective action for operator size by saddle-point expansion and check whether it matches λ ϕ n(1−n)(1−2n) + iλ ϕ² n(1−n)(1−2n+2n²) with λ set by the quartic coupling; mismatch of the noise–Lyapunov relation or of the fixed points at n=0,1 would falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Diffusive operator spreading in free Majorana systems and chaotic ballistic growth with saturation are the unbroken and broken phases of the same strong U(1).
  • The OTOC is the noise-averaged solution of a noisy FKPP equation with initial weight-m source, including front broadening and velocity shift at finite N.
  • Path-integral convergence forces λ > 0 once the duality relates noise to the mass term.
  • Higher-order response terms and ordinary hydro modes can be added systematically once the minimal duality-fixed action is in place.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If ordinary energy or charge conservation is restored, the same contour logic should couple operator size to standard hydrodynamic fields and produce long-time tails in OTOCs without rebuilding the kinetic equation from scratch.
  • Spin or bosonic operator algebras would likely change the saturation fixed points and the polynomial form of the reaction term, so the fermionic FKPP shape is not automatic outside Majorana systems.
  • The duality’s link between noise and λ offers a diagnostic: measured front diffusion and Lyapunov growth in large-N scrambling experiments should track the same microscopic scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a symmetry-based effective field theory for operator-size dynamics and OTOCs in Brownian or short-time-correlated large-N Majorana systems. On the four-fold Keldysh contour of the OTOC, reinterpreted as a two-fold contour in a doubled Hilbert space, quadratic (q=2) dynamics exhibits an emergent strong U(1) symmetry whose charge is the operator size; q≥4 interactions break it explicitly, generating a mass for the would-be Goldstone phase that plays the role of the Lyapunov exponent. A new duality combining time reversal with a contour permutation (Eq. 3.40), together with Schwinger-Keldysh consistency conditions (normalization, reflection, convergence) and the fixed points at n=0 and n=1, fixes the minimal local action up to O(ϕ²) (Eq. 3.45), yielding a noisy FKPP equation (Eq. 4.10) in which the multiplicative-noise strength is tied to the Lyapunov exponent and path-integral convergence enforces λ>0. The construction is checked against a direct saddle-point expansion of a Brownian SYK chain (reproducing the action with λ=J₄ and a microscopic D), against master-equation numerics in (0+1)d, and the clean SYK2 chain is treated separately as a nonlocal, integrable exception.

Significance. If it holds, this is a significant conceptual advance: it explains *why* operator-size hydrodynamics takes an FKPP form, rather than deriving that form model by model. The FKPP equation itself is not new, and the authors are appropriately careful to say so; the new content is the symmetry origin — the strong-to-weak U(1) breaking in operator space and the time-reversal/contour-permutation duality. The strengths are concrete: the duality map (3.40) is derived from microscopic contour structure (App. C), not postulated; the noise-to-Lyapunov-exponent relation and the positivity of λ are parameter-free consequences rather than fits; the Brownian SYK saddle expansion (§5.1, App. E) independently reproduces the quadratic action with λ=J₄ and an explicit D, with λ and D matched to microscopic couplings rather than fitted to OTOC curves; and the (0+1)d comparison with the independent master equation of Ref. [36] (Fig. 6) provides a quantitative external check. The construction also makes clear where it should fail — clean models with extra conservation laws (§5.3), non-Majorana operator algebras, higher noise cumulants — which gives it falsifiable boundaries.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Eq. (5.14) and App. E.3, Eq. (E.17)] The all-orders kernel is not obtained from the microscopic fluctuation expansion but is introduced as a 'reasonable modification' of the quadratic kernel, chosen to (a) reduce to Eq. (5.10) at quadratic order and (b) prevent J₂ from generating a mass. Since the agreement of Eq. (5.16) with the symmetry-based action (3.45) is presented as the central microscopic verification of the EFT, the manuscript should state explicitly which parts of that agreement are derived and which are input. As I read App. E, the on-site cubic and quartic terms (E.18)–(E.19) — and hence the nonlinear growth and noise coefficients at O(ϕ²) — are genuinely derived from F(G), while only the kernel piece is engineered. If so, the verification is still nontrivial, but the current phrasing overstates it. Ideally the modification should be justified within the microscopic calculation (e.g., by the argued effect of hi
  2. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.5)–(4.7) and §4.3, Eq. (4.10)] The Langevin equation with multiplicative noise requires a stochastic prescription (Itô vs. Stratonovich), which at O(1/N) produces drift corrections that can shift the effective growth rate — precisely the regime where the noise term is supposed to matter. The Hubbard–Stratonovich decoupling in Eq. (4.5) implicitly selects one discretization, but this is never stated. §5.2 notes that the master equation maps to 'an Ito process' whose FKPP equation matches (5.16), which suggests the saddle derivation is Itô, but this should be demonstrated rather than inferred, and the cutoff numerics (θ(n−1/N) multiplying both drift and noise) should be confirmed to use the same prescription. This is load-bearing for the claim that the noise strength is fixed to be λ at finite N, not just at the deterministic saddle.
  3. [§4.3, Eq. (4.13) and Fig. 4(f)] The (log N)^{-2} velocity shift and (log N)^{-3} front diffusion are quoted from Brunet–Derrida-type analyses, which were developed for cutoffs on the standard FKPP reaction term n(1−n). Here the deterministic term is the cubic n(1−n)(1−2n) with saturation at n=1/2, the noise has the specific n-dependence n(1−n)(1−2n+2n²), and the hard cutoff θ(n−1/N) is applied to both. Linear marginal stability near n=0 plausibly puts this front in the same pulled-front class, but the logarithmic scalings are not automatic for this reaction/noise structure. Either justify the carry-over analytically (e.g., mapping near n=0 onto the standard problem) or present Fig. 4(f) as numerical evidence for this specific equation, with the fits and N-range stated.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.26)–(3.27)] Convergence allows η≥0, while the duality (linearized, §3.4) sets η=0. It would help to note explicitly that the free-fermion diffusion is therefore noiseless at this order, and to comment on whether the microscopic q=2 saddle (Eq. 5.13) is consistent with η=0 — it appears to be, but this is not stated.
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (3.30)] The statement that the fixed-point condition 'forbids' the iη(∇ϕ)² term because it does not vanish at n=0,1 is a little quick: that term does not multiply n at all. Presumably the argument is that the fixed-point requirement applies to the full ϕ-dependent functional; please phrase this more precisely.
  3. [§4, Eq. (4.2) and App. D, Eq. (D.9)] The correction is O((N∆x)^{-1}), not O(N^{-1}) as written in Eq. (4.2). In a genuine continuum limit ∆x→0 at fixed N this is not uniformly small; the required regime N∆x≫1 should be stated alongside Eq. (4.2) rather than only in the appendix.
  4. [Eqs. (1.5)/(4.10)] Define the noise correlator ⟨ξ(x,t)ξ(x′,t′)⟩=δδ at first use in the introduction; it currently appears only in §4.3.
  5. [Fig. 4] Axis labels and legends are essentially illegible at the current resolution (in particular panels (e)–(f), which carry the scaling claims). Please label axes (x, n(x,t), t, log N, etc.) explicitly and state the fitted slopes in panel (f) against the dashed reference lines.
  6. [§3.4, Eq. (3.44)] The truncation logic (K=1 unphysical, K=2 minimal consistent with both fixed points) is clear, but it would be useful to state in one sentence what qualitatively new freedom enters at K=3, since this delimits the sense in which the action is 'fixed'.
  7. [General] Notation: the strong-sector index s is dropped after §3.3 'for convenience', but weak-sector fields reappear in App. A and C; a short reminder at the start of §4 that (n,ϕ)≡(n_s,ϕ_s) would prevent confusion. There are also several run-together words from typesetting (e.g., 'large-NMajorana', 'orderbyorder') that should be checked in the source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: symmetry-fixed EFT is independently reproduced by a microscopic SYK saddle, not assumed or fitted as input.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is constructive and self-contained. Emergent strong U(1) and the identification of n with local operator size follow from the doubled/quadrupled contour algebra (Secs. 2–3.1). The effective action is built from standard SK constraints plus a duality derived in-paper from time reversal combined with contour permutation (Sec. 3.4, App. C); fixed points n=0,1 and truncation to O(ϕ²) then fix Lint, relating noise strength to λ so that Im S≥0 enforces λ>0. That is parameter tying by symmetry, not a fit renamed as a prediction. OTOC = ⟨n e^{imϕ}⟩ is an identification used to read out dynamics, not a circular definition of the action. Verification is independent: a direct large-N saddle of the Brownian SYK chain (Sec. 5, App. E) reproduces the same action with λ=J₄ and D fixed by microscopic couplings, and (0+1)d moments match a prior master-equation approach without refitting OTOC curves. Self-citations supply background (operator-to-state map, related hydro work) but are not used as uniqueness theorems that force the target action. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own fitted input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Brownian/short-time large-N Majorana setting, Schwinger–Keldysh consistency, emergent strong U(1) at q=2, explicit breaking for q≥4, MT duality invariance of the averaged partition function, fixed points n=0 and n=1, truncation to local O(ϕ²) hydrodynamics, and large-N saddle dominance. Free parameters in applications are microscopic D and λ (or J₂,J₄,V); they are not fitted to the OTOC shape in the verification. Invented entities are mostly re-identifications (operator size as strong charge; MT duality) rather than new particles.

free parameters (3)
  • Diffusion constant D = model-dependent; e.g. set to 0.1 or 0.04 in FKPP numerics
    Coefficient of ∇² in the EFT; fixed by microscopic couplings in SYK (D=Γ(1+V²/Γ²)+J₄/2) but free in the general symmetry action.
  • Lyapunov / mass coefficient λ = J₄ in SYK; O(1) choices in figures
    Leading strong-symmetry-breaking coupling; identified with J₄ in Brownian SYK; free in the general EFT and set by hand in numerics (λ=1 or 8).
  • Finite-N cutoff scale 1/N (θ(n−1/N)) = θ(n−1/N) or θ(n−m/N)
    Phenomenological hard cutoff implementing operator-size discreteness in continuum FKPP simulations; not derived from the path integral.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Microscopic class: large but finite N Majorana flavors, arbitrary even-q couplings, Brownian or short-time-correlated J(t), no ordinary conserved charges.
    Stated as Assumptions 1–3 in the Introduction; defines the regime where only (n,ϕ) are slow.
  • domain assumption Schwinger–Keldysh constraints: S[ϕs=0]=0, S*[ϕs,ϕw]=−S[−ϕs,ϕw], Im S≥0.
    Standard SK effective-action consistency; derived/reviewed in Appendix B and §3.2.
  • domain assumption In the q=2 limit, HD on the doubled space has an emergent strong U(1) generated by total entangled-basis occupation, spontaneously broken strong-to-weak with Goldstone ϕ.
    §2.3; anchors the hydrodynamic starting point.
  • ad hoc to paper Averaged partition function is invariant under combined time reversal and contour permutation MT, inducing the duality n ↔ χ(n,ϕ) with t→−t.
    Core new symmetry input (§3.4, Appendix C); depends on P[J] depending on |t−t′| and the chosen contour permutation.
  • domain assumption Operator-size dynamics has invariant fixed points at n=0 (identity) and n=1 (fermion parity), and n=1/2 is equilibrium weight.
    Used in §3.3–3.4 to kill linear factors in growth and noise.
  • domain assumption Large-N saddle dominates the collective-field path integral; 1/N is the effective ℏ; O(ϕ³) noise cumulants neglected in the minimal action.
    §3.1 and §3.4; controls truncation to quadratic response field.
  • standard math Standard su(2) coherent-state / classical-symbol parametrization of strong-sector generators on the fixed-Casimir orbit.
    Appendix A; maps (Φs,Ns) to (n,ϕ).
invented entities (2)
  • Strong-sector operator-size hydro mode (n,ϕ) as Goldstone pair of emergent contour U(1) independent evidence
    purpose: Identify local operator size with strong charge density and build the SK effective action for OTOCs.
    Reinterpretation of known doubled-space occupation in symmetry language; purpose-built for the EFT.
  • MT duality map χ(n,ϕ)=i n sinϕ − (1/2)(e^{iϕ}−1) relating density and response field independent evidence
    purpose: Constrain symmetry-breaking vertices order by order and relate noise coefficient to λ.
    Derived from contour permutation plus time reversal on the averaged path integral; central new structural ingredient.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 43765 in / 4299 out tokens · 80921 ms · 2026-07-31T05:43:17.301131+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Operator scrambling is commonly diagnosed by the growth of out-of-time-ordered correlators (OTOCs), yet a general symmetry principle underlying their effective dynamics has remained elusive. For Brownian or short-time-correlated large-$N$ Majorana systems, we develop a symmetry-based effective field theory for operator scrambling, organized by a strong-to-weak U(1) symmetry breaking in operator space. The key observation is that, in the noninteracting fermion limit, the four-fold Keldysh contour representation of an OTOC admits an emergent strong U(1) symmetry in a doubled Hilbert-space description, even when the original system has no ordinary conserved quantity. The associated slow mode is the phase of the strong-charge creation operator, whose conjugate density is identified with the local operator size. Generic interactions explicitly break the strong symmetry and generate a mass term at lowest order for the would-be Goldstone mode, thereby converting diffusive operator spreading into chaotic growth. We further show that higher-order symmetry breaking terms are tightly constrained by an emergent duality that combines time reversal with contour permutation. This duality fixes the effective action up to quadratic order in the response field, relates the multiplicative noise strength directly to the Lyapunov exponent, and makes the positivity of the Lyapunov exponent a consequence of convergence of the real-time path integral. The resulting OTOC dynamics is governed by a noisy FKPP equation, which captures within a unified framework the early-time exponential growth, ballistic propagation, nonlinear saturation, and stochastic front broadening of operator scrambling. We verify this construction in a Brownian SYK chain, where a direct saddle-point expansion reproduces the symmetry-based effective action. Our results reveal a symmetry origin of operator-size hydrodynamics and scrambling.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. M. Deutsch,Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,Physical review a43 (1991) 2046

    1991

  2. [2]

    Srednicki,Chaos and quantum thermalization,Physical review e50(1994) 888

    M. Srednicki,Chaos and quantum thermalization,Physical review e50(1994) 888

    1994

  3. [3]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko and M. Olshanii,Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems,Nature452(2008) 854–858

    2008

  4. [4]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov and M. Rigol,From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics,Advances in Physics65(2016) 239–362

    2016

  5. [5]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. J. Suh,Entanglement tsunami: universal scaling in holographic thermalization, Physical review letters112(2014) 011601

    2014

  6. [6]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay and J. Haah,Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics,Physical Review X7(2017) 031016

    2017

  7. [7]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Vijay and J. Haah,Operator spreading in random unitary circuits,Physical Review X8(2018) 021014

    2018

  8. [8]

    Jonay, D

    C. Jonay, D. A. Huse and A. Nahum,Coarse-grained dynamics of operator and state entanglement,arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.00089(2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum,Entanglement membrane in chaotic many-body systems,Physical Review X10(2020) 031066

    2020

  10. [10]

    Rakovszky, F

    T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann and C. W. von Keyserlingk,Diffusive hydrodynamics of out-of-time-ordered correlators with charge conservation,Physical Review X8(2018) 031058

    2018

  11. [11]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann and S. L. Sondhi,Operator hydrodynamics, otocs, and entanglement growth in systems without conservation laws, Physical Review X8(2018) 021013

    2018

  12. [12]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath and D. A. Huse,Operator spreading and the emergence of dissipative hydrodynamics under unitary evolution with conservation laws,Phys. Rev. X8 (Sep, 2018) 031057

    2018

  13. [13]

    V. Alba, J. Dubail and M. Medenjak,Operator entanglement in interacting integrable quantum systems: The case of the rule 54 chain,Physical review letters122(2019) 250603

    2019

  14. [14]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi and E. Altman,A universal operator growth hypothesis,Physical Review X9(2019) 041017

    2019

  15. [15]

    Dowling, P

    N. Dowling, P. Kos and K. Modi,Scrambling is necessary but not sufficient for chaos, Physical Review Letters131(2023) 180403

    2023

  16. [16]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Swingle,Scrambling dynamics and out-of-time-ordered correlators in quantum many-body systems,PRX quantum5(2024) 010201

    2024

  17. [17]

    Sahu and B

    S. Sahu and B. Swingle,Information scrambling at finite temperature in local quantum systems,Physical Review B102(2020) 184303

    2020

  18. [18]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov,Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity, Sov Phys JETP28(1969) 1200–1205

    1969

  19. [19]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Black holes and the butterfly effect,Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014) 1–25. – 44 –

    2014

  20. [20]

    Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography,Entanglement in strongly-correlated quantum matter(2015) 38

    A. Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography,Entanglement in strongly-correlated quantum matter(2015) 38

    2015

  21. [21]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,Journal of High Energy Physics2016(2016) 106

    2016

  22. [22]

    Gärttner, J

    M. Gärttner, J. G. Bohnet, A. Safavi-Naini, M. L. Wall, J. J. Bollinger and A. M. Rey, Measuring out-of-time-order correlations and multiple quantum spectra in a trapped-ion quantum magnet,Nature Physics13(2017) 781–786

    2017

  23. [23]

    X. Mi, P. Roushan, C. Quintana, S. Mandra, J. Marshall, C. Neill et al.,Information scrambling in quantum circuits,Science374(2021) 1479–1483

    2021

  24. [24]

    Kitaev and S

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh,The soft mode in the sachdev-ye-kitaev model and its gravity dual, Journal of High Energy Physics2018(2018) 1–68

    2018

  25. [25]

    Lin and O

    C.-J. Lin and O. I. Motrunich,Out-of-time-ordered correlators in a quantum ising chain, Physical Review B97(2018) 144304

    2018

  26. [26]

    Braumüller, A

    J. Braumüller, A. H. Karamlou, Y. Yanay, B. Kannan, D. Kim, M. Kjaergaard et al., Probing quantum information propagation with out-of-time-ordered correlators,Nature Physics18(2022) 172–178

    2022

  27. [27]

    Gu, X.-L

    Y. Gu, X.-L. Qi and D. Stanford,Local criticality, diffusion and chaos in generalized sachdev-ye-kitaev models,Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017) 1–37

    2017

  28. [28]

    Qi and A

    X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher,Quantum epidemiology: operator growth, thermal effects, and syk, Journal of High Energy Physics2019(2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Y. Gu, A. Kitaev and P. Zhang,A two-way approach to out-of-time-order correlators, Journal of High Energy Physics2022(2022) 1–37

    2022

  30. [30]

    Zhang and Y

    P. Zhang and Y. Gu,Operator size distribution in large n quantum mechanics of majorana fermions,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023) 1–16

    2023

  31. [31]

    I. L. Aleiner, L. Faoro and L. B. Ioffe,Microscopic model of quantum butterfly effect: out-of-time-order correlators and traveling combustion waves,Annals of Physics375(2016) 378–406

    2016

  32. [32]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Swingle,Locality, quantum fluctuations, and scrambling,Physical Review X9 (2019) 031048

    2019

  33. [33]

    Chen and T

    X. Chen and T. Zhou,Quantum chaos dynamics in long-range power law interaction systems,Physical Review B100(2019) 064305

    2019

  34. [34]

    T. Zhou, S. Xu, X. Chen, A. Guo and B. Swingle,Operator lévy flight: Light cones in chaotic long-range interacting systems,Physical review letters124(2020) 180601

    2020

  35. [35]

    T. Zhou, A. Guo, S. Xu, X. Chen and B. Swingle,Hydrodynamic theory of scrambling in chaotic long-range interacting systems,Physical Review B107(2023) 014201

    2023

  36. [36]

    Agarwal and S

    L. Agarwal and S. Xu,Emergent symmetry in brownian syk models and charge dependent scrambling,Journal of High Energy Physics2022(2022) 1–57

    2022

  37. [37]

    Yao,Notes on solvable models of many-body quantum chaos,arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11123(2024)

    S. Yao,Notes on solvable models of many-body quantum chaos,arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11123(2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Xu,Dynamics of operator size distribution in q-local quantum brownian syk and spin models,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58(2025) 045301

    S. Xu,Dynamics of operator size distribution in q-local quantum brownian syk and spin models,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58(2025) 045301. – 45 –

    2025

  39. [39]

    Sünderhauf, L

    C. Sünderhauf, L. Piroli, X.-L. Qi, N. Schuch and J. I. Cirac,Quantum chaos in the brownian syk model with large finite n: Otocs and tripartite information,Journal of High Energy Physics2019(2019) 1–44

    2019

  40. [40]

    R. A. Fisher,The wave of advance of advantageous genes,Annals of Eugenics7(1937) 355–369

    1937

  41. [41]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, I. G. Petrovsky and N. S. Piskunov,Étude de l’équation de la diffusion avec croissance de la quantité de matière et son application à un problème biologique, Bulletin de l’Université d’État de Moscou, Série Internationale A1(1937) 1–26

    1937

  42. [42]

    Brunet, B

    E. Brunet, B. Derrida, A. H. Mueller and S. Munier,Phenomenological theory giving the full statistics of the position of fluctuating pulled fronts,Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics73(2006) 056126

    2006

  43. [43]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye,Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum heisenberg magnet,arXiv preprint cond-mat/9212030(1992)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  44. [44]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the sachdev-ye-kitaev model,Physical Review D 94(2016) 106002

    2016

  45. [45]

    Polchinski and V

    J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus,The spectrum in the sachdev-ye-kitaev model,Journal of High Energy Physics2016(2016) 1–25

    2016

  46. [46]

    Jian and B

    S.-K. Jian and B. Swingle,Note on entropy dynamics in the brownian syk model,Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2021) 42

    2021

  47. [47]

    X. Chen, Y. Gu and A. Lucas,Many-body quantum dynamics slows down at low density, SciPost Physics9(2020) 071

    2020

  48. [48]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A semiclassical ramp in syk and in gravity,arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.06840(2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and A. Streicher,Operator growth in the syk model,Journal of High Energy Physics2018(2018) 1–20

    2018

  50. [50]

    KELDYSH,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,SOVIET PHYSICS JETP 20(1965)

    L. KELDYSH,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,SOVIET PHYSICS JETP 20(1965)

    1965

  51. [51]

    Stanford, S

    D. Stanford, S. Vardhan and S. Yao,Scramblon loops,Journal of High Energy Physics2024 (2024) 1–32

    2024

  52. [52]

    Stanford, Z

    D. Stanford, Z. Yang and S. Yao,Subleading weingartens,Journal of High Energy Physics 2022(2022) 1–50

    2022

  53. [53]

    C. Choi, F. M. Haehl, M. Mezei and G. Sárosi,Effective description of sub-maximal chaos: stringy effects for syk scrambling,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023) 142

    2023

  54. [54]

    Glorioso and H

    P. Glorioso and H. Liu,The second law of thermodynamics from symmetry and unitarity, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.07705(2016)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso and H. Liu,Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017) 1–82

    2017

  56. [56]

    Physics at the Fundamental Frontier

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso,Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute Summer School 2017" Physics at the Fundamental Frontier", vol. 305, p. 008, Sissa Medialab, 2018. DOI

    2017

  57. [57]

    Baggioli, Y

    M. Baggioli, Y. Bu and V. Ziogas,U (1) quasi-hydrodynamics: Schwinger-keldysh effective field theory and holography,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023) 19. – 46 –

    2023

  58. [58]

    Gao and H

    P. Gao and H. Liu,An effective field theory for non-maximal quantum chaos,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023) 1–72

    2023

  59. [59]

    J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian and C. Xu,Quantum criticality under decoherence or weak measurement,PRX Quantum4(Aug, 2023) 030317

    2023

  60. [60]

    P. Sala, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Oshikawa and Y. You,Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open systems: Purification perspective,Physical Review B110(2024) 155150

    2024

  61. [61]

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng and C. Wang,Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking in mixed quantum states,PRX Quantum6(2025) 010344

    2025

  62. [62]

    Huang, M

    X. Huang, M. Qi, J.-H. Zhang and A. Lucas,Hydrodynamics as the effective field theory of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking,Physical Review B111(2025) 125147

    2025

  63. [63]

    D. Gu, Z. Wang and Z. Wang,Spontaneous symmetry breaking in open quantum systems: Strong, weak, and strong-to-weak,Phys. Rev. B112(Dec, 2025) 245123

    2025

  64. [64]

    L. Chen, N. Sun and P. Zhang,Strong-to-weak symmetry breaking and entanglement transitions,Physical Review B111(2025) L060304

    2025

  65. [65]

    Hauser, K

    J. Hauser, K. Su, H. Ha, J. Lloyd, T. G. Kiely, R. Vasseur et al.,Strong-to-weak symmetry breaking in open quantum systems: From discrete particles to continuum hydrodynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16045(2026)

    arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Jamiołkowski,Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators,Reports on mathematical physics3(1972) 275–278

    A. Jamiołkowski,Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators,Reports on mathematical physics3(1972) 275–278

    1972

  67. [67]

    Choi,Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices,Linear algebra and its applications10(1975) 285–290

    M.-D. Choi,Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices,Linear algebra and its applications10(1975) 285–290

    1975

  68. [68]

    Y. Gu, A. Lucas and X.-L. Qi,Spread of entanglement in a sachdev-ye-kitaev chain,Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017) 1–44

    2017

  69. [69]

    Maldacena and X.-L

    J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi,Eternal traversable wormhole,arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.00491 (2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    Cheng, S.-K

    B.-L. Cheng, S.-K. Jian and Z.-C. Yang,Hydrodynamic modes and operator spreading in a long-range center-of-mass-conserving brownian sachdev-ye-kitaev model,Physical Review Letters134(2025) 156301

    2025

  71. [71]

    Zhang, S.-K

    P. Zhang, S.-K. Jian, C. Liu and X. Chen,Emergent replica conformal symmetry in non-hermitian syk _2chains,Quantum5(2021) 579

    2021

  72. [72]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia and H. A. Rose,Statistical dynamics of classical systems,Phys. Rev. A8(Jul, 1973) 423–437

    1973

  73. [73]

    Brunet and B

    E. Brunet and B. Derrida,Shift in the velocity of a front due to a cutoff,Physical Review E 56(1997) 2597

    1997

  74. [74]

    Khemani, D

    V. Khemani, D. A. Huse and A. Nahum,Velocity-dependent lyapunov exponents in many-body quantum, semiclassical, and classical chaos,Physical Review B98(2018) 144304

    2018

  75. [75]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Swingle,Accessing scrambling using matrix product operators,Nature Physics 16(2020) 199–204. – 47 –

    2020