Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 128 references

A slightly open universe lowers the spectral index and restores Starobinsky and Higgs inflation to agreement with CMB-plus-DESI data.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 07:08 UTC pith:POCQNSJV

load-bearing objection Solid joint fit showing free Ω_k lowers n_s enough to ease Starobinsky/Higgs tension; the inflationary-reconciliation claim still rests on treating the DESI–CMB tension as physical curvature. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28445 v1 pith:POCQNSJV submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Inflation, Open Universes, and Dark Energy

Anton Chudaykin , Mikhail M. Ivanov , Renata Kallosh , Andrei Linde , Oliver H. E. Philcox , Yusuke Yamada This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords spectral indexspatial curvatureα-attractorsStarobinsky inflationHiggs inflationdynamical dark energyDESIopen universe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Combined CMB and DESI measurements, when interpreted inside flat ΛCDM, push the scalar spectral index ns high enough that the classic single-field plateau models (Starobinsky, Higgs, and the simplest exponential α-attractors) look disfavored. This paper shows that the same data, once spatial curvature is freed, prefer a mildly open universe with Ωk ≃ 3 × 10^{-3}. That small negative curvature is anti-correlated with ns and pulls the preferred value down by about 1.8σ, restoring consistency with the plateau predictions at the 1.5–2.3σ level. Dynamical dark energy produces a similar but weaker shift. The tension with those inflationary models therefore exists only inside the flat-ΛCDM assumption and can be relieved by modest extensions of the late-time cosmology. The authors also sketch how open-universe inflation can arise from tunneling or non-trivial topology, and they introduce waterfall-modulated α-attractors that can dial ns continuously higher if future data demand it.

Core claim

In the joint CMB-SPA + DESI BAO + full-shape analysis, allowing free spatial curvature yields Ωk = (3.0 ± 1.1) × 10^{-3} and ns = 0.9692 ± 0.0035. This value is 1.8σ lower than the flat-ΛCDM result and brings Starobinsky and Higgs inflation back inside 2.3σ and 1.5σ, respectively. The same data therefore favor a slightly open universe at 2.7σ, and the apparent conflict with plateau inflation is an artifact of the flat-ΛCDM prior rather than a robust exclusion.

What carries the argument

The anti-correlation between Ωk and ns that appears once both parameters are varied jointly against the combined CMB and DESI full-shape likelihood. A positive Ωk (open universe) systematically lowers the inferred spectral index, moving it toward the plateau-model targets.

Load-bearing premise

That the present tension between CMB and DESI data inside flat ΛCDM is physical, so that adding curvature (or evolving dark energy) is the right resolution rather than an unrecognized systematic in the late-time measurements.

What would settle it

A future joint analysis of DESI DR2 full-shape clustering, Euclid BAO/lensing, and next-generation CMB data that returns Ωk consistent with zero while still preferring ns ≳ 0.974 would eliminate the curvature-driven reconciliation claimed here.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Starobinsky, Higgs, and simplest exponential α-attractors remain viable once a small open curvature is allowed.
  • The data’s 2.7σ preference for Ωk ≃ 3 × 10^{-3} lies inside the anthropic window previously suggested for open-bubble cosmologies.
  • Waterfall-modulated α-attractors can continuously raise ns along the universal relation r = 3α(1 − ns)^2, supplying new LiteBIRD targets up to ns ≈ 0.993.
  • Single-field α-attractor quintessence can simultaneously describe inflation and late-time acceleration, with the same waterfall mechanism available to tune ns.
  • Upcoming DESI-II, Euclid, SPHEREx, Rubin, and Roman data will decide whether the open-universe or dynamical-dark-energy solution is preferred.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the open-universe preference survives, the classic “Ω = 1 is a robust inflationary prediction” statement will have to be qualified by the duration of inflation and possible non-trivial topology.
  • The same curvature–ns degeneracy that rescues plateau models will also loosen constraints on the tensor-to-scalar ratio once B-mode experiments are combined with DESI-like BAO.
  • A confirmed Ωk ~ 10^{-3} would revive interest in compact open topologies whose residual large-scale anisotropy might still be detectable in the CMB.
  • Waterfall termination offers a single-field route to high ns that does not require multi-field hybrid constructions, simplifying model-building for next-generation surveys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper combines Planck, ACT, SPT CMB data with DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full-shape (power spectrum + bispectrum) measurements to constrain ns in extensions of ΛCDM that free spatial curvature (Ω_k) and/or dynamical dark energy (w0, wa). In the baseline CMB-SPA + BAO + Pℓ+B0 analysis they obtain Ω_k = (3.0 ± 1.1)×10^{-3} (2.7σ preference for an open universe) and ns = 0.9692 ± 0.0035, 1.8σ lower than the flat-ΛCDM value; this brings Higgs (N_*≈55) and Starobinsky (N_*≈51) inflation inside ~1.5σ and ~2.3σ respectively. Dynamical dark energy produces a milder downward shift in ns. The authors interpret the result as showing that tension with plateau models is specific to flat ΛCDM, review open-universe inflation (tunneling, compact topology), and sketch waterfall-modulated α-attractors and α-attractor quintessence that can accommodate a range of ns.

Significance. If the late-time extensions are physical, the work cleanly demonstrates that the recent upward pull on ns from DESI is degenerate with Ω_k (and, more weakly, w0–wa), restoring viability to the decade’s benchmark single-field plateau models without abandoning them for polynomial attractors or multi-field constructions. The observational pipeline is standard and reproducible (class-pt EFT, public likelihoods, reported Δχ²_MAP and AIC). The theoretical sections usefully reconnect a small positive Ω_k to existing open-inflation and landscape literature, and the waterfall-modulated targets (Fig. 4) give concrete, falsifiable LiteBIRD forecasts. These are genuine strengths even if future data reverse the curvature preference.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Abstract, §6] The headline claim (Abstract; §3.2; §6) that tension with Starobinsky/Higgs/simplest α-attractors “holds only for ΛCDM” rests on treating the ~3σ CMB–DESI discrepancy in Ω_m and r_d h as physical curvature (or DE). The paper cites methodological concerns [29–32] and notes in §6 that a statistical/systematic resolution would erase much of the ns shift, yet provides no quantitative robustness test (e.g., fixing Ω_m to the CMB-only value, marginalizing over alternative extensions such as N_eff, recombination, or Σm_ν, or splitting BAO vs full-shape). Without that, the restoration of plateau-model viability remains conditional on one particular reading of the tension. A short dedicated subsection or appendix quantifying how ns moves under these alternatives is needed to support the claim at the strength currently stated.
  2. [§3.2, Table 1, §4.1] Table 1 and §3.1–3.2 quote tensions with Starobinsky at N_*=51 and Higgs at N_*=55. Section 4.1 correctly notes that N is model- and reheating-dependent, and that α-attractors allow more freedom, but the open-universe posterior is compared only to these two fixed reference points. Because the open-universe ns = 0.9692 ± 0.0035 still sits ~2.3σ from the Starobinsky N=51 prediction, the paper should either (i) show the posterior on N implied by the data under each potential, or (ii) explicitly fold in the residual uncertainty on reheating/N when stating “consistency within Xσ.” As written, the σ-levels can be read as more decisive than the underlying N ambiguity warrants.
  3. [§5, Eqs. (5.1)–(5.3), Figs. 3–5] Section 5 presents waterfall-modulated single-field α-attractors and an α-attractor embedding of axion-dilaton quintessence as “preliminary results of work in progress” [124, 125], with potentials (5.1) and Fig. 3–5. These constructions are interesting and the r(ns)≈3α(1−ns)^2 persistence is a useful target, but the section currently mixes unpublished material with the main observational result. Either expand the analytic/slow-roll derivation enough for the claims (arbitrarily large ns; NEC-safe phantom mimicry) to be checkable from the text alone, or shorten §5 to a brief outlook that does not carry load-bearing statements about future DESI/Euclid/LiteBIRD relevance. As it stands, the section is neither fully self-contained nor clearly marked as optional.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2] Table 2 reports frequentist significances from Δχ²_MAP with extra parameters; a brief note on whether the same ranking holds under Bayesian evidence (or nested-sampling Δln Z) would help readers who discount AIC for correlated cosmological parameters.
  2. [§2] The omission of DR1 full-shape ↔ DR2 BAO cross-covariance is justified by citation to [40, 60], but those validations were performed mainly in ΛCDM. A one-sentence statement that the bias remains negligible in oΛCDM / w0waCDM (or a small sensitivity test) would close the loop.
  3. [Fig. 1] Figure 1 left panel: the vertical dashed lines for Starobinsky/Higgs would be clearer if the corresponding N_* values were stated in the caption, matching the text of §3.
  4. [§4.2] In §4.2 the anthropic window 4×10^{-4} ≲ Ω_k ≲ 2×10^{-2} from [89] is compared to the measured 3×10^{-3}; a short caveat that the window is assumption-dependent (landscape prior, galaxy-formation cutoff) would avoid over-reading the numerical coincidence.
  5. [§3.2, §5, References] Typos / notation: “theoΛCDM” → “the oΛCDM” (§3.2); consistent use of M_Pl vs M_p in §5; arXiv IDs in the reference list appear with future-dated years (2025–2026) that may need updating at proof stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: n_s and Ω_k are fitted to external CMB+DESI data; the downward n_s shift is a standard parameter degeneracy, not a quantity defined from the target inflationary predictions.

full rationale

The paper’s central observational result (Table 1, Fig. 1, §3.2) is a joint fit of free Ω_k (and/or w0–wa) together with the usual ΛCDM parameters to external Planck/ACT/SPT CMB and DESI BAO+full-shape data. The reported anti-correlation that lowers n_s when Ω_k > 0 is a well-known geometric degeneracy in the CMB+BAO likelihood, not a relation imposed by definition or by fitting a parameter and then re-predicting a quantity built from that same fit. The comparison targets (Starobinsky N_*≈51, Higgs N_*≈55, exponential α-attractors ns≃1−2/N) are independent theoretical predictions of those models; they are not inputs to the likelihood. Self-citations to the authors’ prior DESI full-shape pipeline and α-attractor papers supply methods and model-building context but do not force the n_s posterior. The Freivogel et al. anthropic Ω_k window is noted only after the fact as a numerical coincidence, not used as a prior. Section 5’s waterfall-modulated and quintessential α-attractors are constructive model-building for flexible ns, not claimed first-principles predictions that reduce to their own inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external data and external model benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The observational claim rests on standard flat/open FLRW cosmology, the CPL dark-energy parametrization, and one-loop EFT galaxy clustering, plus the conventional mapping from inflationary N and potential shape to n_s. Free parameters are the usual ΛCDM set plus Ω_k and (w0, wa). Invented or extended entities are the waterfall-modulated α-attractor potentials and the axion-dilaton α-attractor quintessence embedding; both are theoretical constructions without independent empirical handles yet.

free parameters (5)
  • Ω_k = (3.0 ± 1.1)×10^{-3} (CMB-SPA+BAO+Pℓ+B0)
    Spatial curvature density today; fitted freely in oΛCDM and ow0waCDM and is the main lever that lowers n_s.
  • w0, wa = w0 ≈ −0.84 to −0.86, wa ≈ −0.5 to −0.61
    CPL dark-energy equation-of-state parameters; fitted in w0waCDM / ow0waCDM and produce a milder downward pull on n_s.
  • n_s, A_s, ω_b, ω_c, H0, τ = n_s = 0.9692 ± 0.0035 in baseline oΛCDM
    Standard six ΛCDM parameters varied in every chain; n_s is the reported target.
  • α, φ_c, γ, Δφ (waterfall models) = illustrative: α=1, γ=1, Δφ=0.04 M_Pl, φ_c varied ~5–9
    Shape and location parameters of the waterfall-modulated T-model potential chosen by hand to illustrate flexible n_s; not fitted to the cosmological likelihood in this paper.
  • N (e-folds) = N_* ≈ 51 (Starobinsky), 55 (Higgs), 50–60 band for α-attractors
    Post-inflationary e-fold count used to convert plateau models into n_s predictions; reference values N_*=51 (Starobinsky) and 55 (Higgs) are chosen from reheating arguments, not fitted here.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption FLRW cosmology with possible constant spatial curvature and CPL dark energy w(a)=w0+wa(1−a) correctly describes the background expansion probed by BAO, SN, and CMB.
    Stated in §2 and used throughout the likelihood; standard but not derived.
  • domain assumption One-loop EFT of LSS (class-pt) with the stated bias, counterterm, and stochastic priors accurately models DESI DR1 P_ℓ and tree-level B0 on the chosen scale cuts.
    §2 and refs. [27,40,48]; central to the full-shape contribution that shifts n_s.
  • domain assumption Leading-order slow-roll prediction n_s ≃ 1−2/N (and r ≃ 12α/N^2) holds for exponential plateau models at the quoted N.
    §1 and §4.1; used to convert fitted n_s into tension with Starobinsky/Higgs/α-attractors.
  • domain assumption Reheating histories fix N≃51 for Starobinsky and N≃55 for Higgs, so those are the correct comparison points.
    §4.1 citing [68,73–75]; if N can be substantially larger the tension dissolves without curvature.
  • ad hoc to paper Omitting DR1 full-shape ↔ DR2 BAO cross-covariance does not bias the extended-model posteriors.
    Explicit choice in §2, justified by prior appendices; affects error bars on Ω_k and n_s.
invented entities (2)
  • Waterfall-modulated single-field α-attractor potentials (e.g. V ∝ tanh^2(φ/√6α)[1+γ tanh((φ−φ_c)/Δφ)]) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide a continuous knob on n_s along the universal r=3α(1−n_s)^2 line, including values up to n_s≈0.993, for future data and LiteBIRD forecasts.
    Introduced in §5.1 as work in progress [124,125]; generalizes hybrid α-attractors to a single-field step. No fit to current data; purely theoretical flexibility.
  • α-attractor axion-dilaton quintessence (hyperbolic-geometry embedding of the two-field model of Toomey et al.) no independent evidence
    purpose: Realize inflation plus dynamical dark energy, including an effective phantom-crossing illusion, inside α-attractor geometry.
    §5.2 reinterprets [131] as an α-attractor and sketches a waterfall-extended Exp-II quintessential model; not confronted with the paper’s own likelihood.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 29214 in / 4689 out tokens · 91714 ms · 2026-07-31T07:08:28.936473+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the impact of spatial curvature ($\Omega_k$) and dynamical dark energy (parametrized by $w_0$ and $w_a$) on the spectral index $n_s$ using a combination of cosmic microwave background datasets (Planck, SPT, and ACT), and spectroscopic galaxy samples from DESI, including both BAO and full-shape clustering measurements. We show that a small negative curvature, $\Omega_k\simeq 3\times 10^{-3}$, lowers the value of $n_s$, bringing it closer to predictions of the Starobinsky, Higgs, and simplest $\alpha$-attractor inflationary models. In particular, we find $n_s= 0.9667\pm0.0041$ (using Planck and DESI data) or $n_s= 0.9692\pm0.0035$ (adding ACT and SPT). Allowing for time-evolving dark energy also reduces the spectral index, leading to $n_s=0.9716\pm0.0032$ (from the combined dataset), or $n_s=0.9694\pm0.0035$ in combination with a small negative curvature. Our results demonstrate that the tension between current observational data and the Starobinsky, Higgs, and simplest $\alpha$-attractor models holds only for $\Lambda$CDM, and can be mitigated in extended cosmological models. We discuss implications of these findings for inflationary models in an open universe and/or with dynamical dark energy, including scenarios with quantum tunneling and non-standard topology. Furthermore, we briefly describe a special class of $\alpha$-attractor models, where one can make $n_s$ arbitrarily large, and we describe the $\alpha$-attractor quintessence model. Such models may be of particular relevance when future data from DESI, as well as DESI-II, SPHEREx, Euclid, Rubin, and Roman, becomes available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 92 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. 91B(1980) 99. – 21 –

    1980

  2. [2]

    Salopek, J.R

    D.S. Salopek, J.R. Bond and J.M. Bardeen,Designing Density Fluctuation Spectra in Inflation, Phys. Rev.D40(1989) 1753

    1989

  3. [3]

    Bezrukov and M

    F.L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,Phys. Lett.B659(2008) 703 [0710.3755]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,JHEP11(2013) 198 [1311.0472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Chang et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements White Paper,2203.07638

    C.L. Chang et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements White Paper,2203.07638. [6]LiteBIRDcollaboration,Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,PTEP2023(2023) 042F01 [2202.02773]. [7]Atacama Cosmology Telescopecollaboration,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spect...

    arXiv 2023

  6. [10]

    Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints on r and ns Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,2512.10613

    L. Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints on r and ns Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,2512.10613

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [11]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Hybrid cosmological attractors,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 023522 [2204.02425]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [12]

    Braglia, A

    M. Braglia, A. Linde, R. Kallosh and F. Finelli,Hybrid α-attractors, primordial black holes and gravitational wave backgrounds,JCAP04(2023) 033 [2211.14262]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [13]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,On the present status of inflationary cosmology,Gen. Rel. Grav.57 (2025) 135 [2505.13646]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [14]

    Stewart,Mutated hybrid inflation,Phys

    E.D. Stewart,Mutated hybrid inflation,Phys. Lett. B345(1995) 414 [astro-ph/9407040]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  11. [15]

    Dvali and S.H.H

    G.R. Dvali and S.H.H. Tye,Brane inflation,Phys. Lett. B450(1999) 72 [hep-ph/9812483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  12. [16]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, J.M. Maldacena, L.P. McAllister and S.P. Trivedi,Towards inflation in string theory,JCAP0310(2003) 013 [hep-th/0308055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [17]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Encyclopædia Inflationaris,Phys. Dark Univ.5-6(2014) 75 [1303.3787]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [18]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and Y. Yamada,Planck 2018 and Brane Inflation Revisited,JHEP01 (2019) 008 [1811.01023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [19]

    Galante, R

    M. Galante, R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Unity of Cosmological Inflation Attractors,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 141302 [1412.3797]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [20]

    Terada,Generalized Pole Inflation: Hilltop, Natural, and Chaotic Inflationary Attractors, Phys

    T. Terada,Generalized Pole Inflation: Hilltop, Natural, and Chaotic Inflationary Attractors, Phys. Lett. B760(2016) 674 [1602.07867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  17. [21]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,CMB targets after the latestPlanckdata release,Phys. Rev.D100 (2019) 123523 [1909.04687]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [22]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Polynomialα-attractors,JCAP04(2022) 017 [2202.06492]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [23]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,New Exponential and Polynomialξ-attractors,2605.04415

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [24]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Unification of polynomial and exponential cosmological attractors, 2607.07684

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [25]

    Ferreira, E

    E.G.M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox and A. Linde,BAO-CMB tension and implications for inflation,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 043524 [2507.12459]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [26]

    McDonough and E.G.M

    E. McDonough and E.G.M. Ferreira,The spectrum of ns constraints from DESI and CMB data, 2512.05108

    arXiv

  23. [28]

    Ivanov, J.M

    M.M. Ivanov, J.M. Sullivan, S.-F. Chen, A. Chudaykin, M. Maus and O.H.E. Philcox, Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 4. Percent-Level Cosmological Constraints from Combined Probes and Robust Evidence for the Normal Neutrino Mass Hierarchy,2601.16165

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [29]

    D.D.Y. Ong, D. Yallup and W. Handley,A Bayesian Perspective on Evidence for Evolving Dark Energy,2511.10631

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [30]

    Afroz and S

    S. Afroz and S. Mukherjee,Hint toward an inconsistency between BAO and supernovae datasets: The evidence of redshift evolving dark energy from DESI DR2 is absent,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 083514 [2504.16868]

    arXiv 2026

  26. [31]

    D.D.Y. Ong, D. Yallup and W. Handley,The Bayesian view of DESI DR2 with unimpeded: Evidence and tension in a combined analysis with CMB and supernovae across cosmological models,2603.05472

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [32]

    Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, P.G

    C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, P.G. Ferreira and W.J. Wolf,The Status of Single Scalar Field Dark Energy, 2607.07777

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [33]

    Chen and M

    S.-F. Chen and M. Zaldarriaga,It’s all Ok: curvature in light of BAO from DESI DR2,JCAP 08(2025) 014 [2505.00659]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [34]

    Yadav, A

    M. Yadav, A. Dixit, M.S. Barak and A. Pradhan,Constraints on spatial curvature and dark energy dynamics in the wCDM model from DESI DR1 and DR2,JHEAp50(2026) 100514 [2512.09486]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [35]

    Giar` e, D.H

    W. Giar` e, D.H. Lee and E. Di Valentino,Intertwined Constraints in Extended Cosmologies: Dark Energy, Curvature, Neutrinos, and Inflation,2607.01226

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [36]

    Pulido-Hern´ andez and J.L

    H. Pulido-Hern´ andez and J.L. Cervantes-Cota,Negative Masses and Spatial Curvature: Alleviating Neutrino Mass Tensions in LambdaCDM and Extended Cosmologies,2603.13208

    arXiv

  32. [37]

    D. Wang, O. Mena, S. Capozziello and D. Mota,Do low-redshift observations open the doors to an open universe?,2512.19565

    arXiv

  33. [38]

    da Costa,Impact of DESI BAO Data on Inflationary Parameters: Stability against late-time new physics,Phys

    S.S. da Costa,Impact of DESI BAO Data on Inflationary Parameters: Stability against late-time new physics,Phys. Dark Univ.47(2025) 101791 [2412.14290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [39]

    Wu and X

    P.-J. Wu and X. Zhang,Measuring cosmic curvature with non-CMB observations,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 063514 [2411.06356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [41]

    Philcox and M.M

    O.H.E. Philcox and M.M. Ivanov,BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology:ΛCDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 043517 [2112.04515]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [42]

    Ivanov, O.H.E

    M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonovi´ c, M. Takada and M. Zaldarriaga, Precision analysis of the redshift-space galaxy bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 063512 [2110.10161]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [43]

    Ivanov, M

    M.M. Ivanov, M. Simonovi´ c and M. Zaldarriaga,Cosmological Parameters from the BOSS Galaxy Power Spectrum,JCAP05(2020) 042 [1909.05277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [44]

    Chudaykin and M.M

    A. Chudaykin and M.M. Ivanov,Cosmological constraints from the power spectrum of eBOSS quasars,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 043518 [2210.17044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [45]

    Chudaykin, M.M

    A. Chudaykin, M.M. Ivanov and T. Nishimichi,Priors and scale cuts in EFT-based full-shape analyses,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063524 [2410.16358]

    arXiv 2026

  40. [46]

    S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah and M. White,A new analysis of galaxy 2-point functions in the BOSS survey, including full-shape information and post-reconstruction BAO,JCAP02(2022) 008 [2110.05530]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [47]

    D’Amico, J

    G. D’Amico, J. Gleyzes, N. Kokron, K. Markovic, L. Senatore, P. Zhang et al.,The Cosmological Analysis of the SDSS/BOSS data from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure,JCAP 05(2020) 005 [1909.05271]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [48]

    Chudaykin, M.M

    A. Chudaykin, M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox and M. Simonovi´ c,Nonlinear perturbation theory extension of the Boltzmann code CLASS,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063533 [2004.10607]. [49]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [50]

    Carron, M

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein and A. Lewis,CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps,JCAP09(2022) 039 [2206.07773]. [51]ACTcollaboration,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters,Astrophys. J.962(2024) 113 [2304.05203]. [52]ACTcollaboration,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spec...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [56]

    J.171 (2026) 285 [2503.14745]

    DESIcollaboration,Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,Astron. J.171 (2026) 285 [2503.14745]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [57]

    Chudaykin, M.M

    A. Chudaykin, M.M. Ivanov and O.H.E. Philcox,Reanalyzing DESI DR1. I.ΛCDM constraints from the power spectrum and bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063502 [2507.13433]. – 24 –

    arXiv 2026

  46. [58]

    Philcox and T

    O.H.E. Philcox and T. Fl¨ oss,Suite of optimal and efficient power spectrum and bispectrum estimators for large-scale structure analyses,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 063507 [2404.07249]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [59]

    Chudaykin, M.M

    A. Chudaykin, M.M. Ivanov and O.H.E. Philcox,Reanalyzing DESI DR1. II. Constraints on dark energy, spatial curvature, and neutrino masses,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 123506 [2511.20757]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [60]

    Forero-S´ anchez et al.,Cosmological constraints from a joint DESI DR1 Full-Shape and DR2 BAO,JCAP06(2026) 043 [2602.18761]

    D. Forero-S´ anchez et al.,Cosmological constraints from a joint DESI DR1 Full-Shape and DR2 BAO,JCAP06(2026) 043 [2602.18761]

    arXiv 2026

  49. [61]

    Bakx, M.M

    T. Bakx, M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox and Z. Vlah,One-Loop Galaxy Bispectrum: Consistent Theory, Efficient Analysis with COBRA, and Implications for Cosmological Parameters, 2507.22110

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [62]

    Philcox, M.M

    O.H.E. Philcox, M.M. Ivanov, G. Cabass, M. Simonovi´ c, M. Zaldarriaga and T. Nishimichi, Cosmology with the redshift-space galaxy bispectrum monopole at one-loop order,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) 043530 [2206.02800]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [63]

    D’Amico, Y

    G. D’Amico, Y. Donath, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and P. Zhang,The one-loop bispectrum of galaxies in redshift space from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure,JCAP07 (2024) 041 [2211.17130]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [64]

    Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys

    D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110 [2202.04077]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [65]

    Chudaykin, M

    A. Chudaykin, M. Kunz and J. Carron,Modified gravity constraints with the Planck ISW-lensing bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083537 [2503.09893]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [66]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,JETP Lett.33(1981) 532

    1981

  55. [67]

    Starobinsky,The Perturbation Spectrum Evolving from a Nonsingular Initially De-Sitter Cosmology and the Microwave Background Anisotropy,Sov

    A.A. Starobinsky,The Perturbation Spectrum Evolving from a Nonsingular Initially De-Sitter Cosmology and the Microwave Background Anisotropy,Sov. Astron. Lett.9(1983) 302

    1983

  56. [68]

    Bezrukov and D.S

    F.L. Bezrukov and D.S. Gorbunov,Distinguishing between R 2-inflation and Higgs-inflation,Phys. Lett. B713(2012) 365 [1111.4397]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [69]

    Akaike,A new look at the statistical model identification,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19(1974) 716

    H. Akaike,A new look at the statistical model identification,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19(1974) 716

    1974

  58. [70]

    Burnham and D.R

    K.P. Burnham and D.R. Anderson,Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer, New York, 2 ed. (2002), 10.1007/b97636. [71]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements,JCAP07(2025) 028 [2411.12022]. [72]DESIcollaboration,Extended Dark Energ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [73]

    Gorbunov and A.G

    D.S. Gorbunov and A.G. Panin,Scalaron the mighty: producing dark matter and baryon asymmetry at reheating,Phys. Lett. B700(2011) 157 [1009.2448]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [74]

    Garcia-Bellido, D.G

    J. Garcia-Bellido, D.G. Figueroa and J. Rubio,Preheating in the Standard Model with the Higgs-Inflaton coupled to gravity,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 063531 [0812.4624]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  61. [75]

    Bezrukov, D

    F. Bezrukov, D. Gorbunov and M. Shaposhnikov,On initial conditions for the Hot Big Bang, JCAP06(2009) 029 [0812.3622]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [76]

    Iacconi, S

    L. Iacconi, S. Bhattacharya, M. Fasiello and D. Wands,Closing in onα-attractors,JCAP06 (2026) 067 [2511.14673]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [77]

    Bucher, A.S

    M. Bucher, A.S. Goldhaber and N. Turok,An open universe from inflation,Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 3314 [hep-ph/9411206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  64. [78]

    Coleman and F

    S.R. Coleman and F. De Luccia,Gravitational Effects on and of Vacuum Decay,Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 3305

    1980

  65. [79]

    Linde,Particle physics and inflationary cosmology, Harwood Academic Publishers (1990), [hep-th/0503203]

    A.D. Linde,Particle physics and inflationary cosmology, Harwood Academic Publishers (1990), [hep-th/0503203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1990

  66. [80]

    Vilenkin,The Birth of Inflationary Universes,Phys

    A. Vilenkin,The Birth of Inflationary Universes,Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 2848

    1983

  67. [81]

    Linde,Eternally Existing Self-reproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Eternally Existing Self-reproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,Phys. Lett.B175 (1986) 395

    1986

  68. [82]

    Linde,A Toy model for open inflation,Phys

    A.D. Linde,A Toy model for open inflation,Phys. Rev.D59(1999) 023503 [hep-ph/9807493]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  69. [83]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation,Prog. Theor. Phys.99(1998) 763 [gr-qc/9801017]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  70. [84]

    Linde, M

    A.D. Linde, M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,CMB in open inflation,Phys. Rev.D59(1999) 123522 [astro-ph/9901135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  71. [85]

    Yamauchi, A

    D. Yamauchi, A. Linde, A. Naruko, M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Evolutionary effects in one-bubble open inflation for string landscape, inOn recent developments in theoretical and experimental general relativity, astrophysics and relativistic field theories. Proceedings, 12th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Paris, France, July 12-18, 2009. Vol. ...

    2009

  72. [86]

    Yamauchi, A

    D. Yamauchi, A. Linde, A. Naruko, M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Open inflation in the landscape, Phys. Rev.D84(2011) 043513 [1105.2674]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [87]

    Bousso, D

    R. Bousso, D. Harlow and L. Senatore,Inflation after False Vacuum Decay: observational Prospects after Planck,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 083527 [1309.4060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  74. [88]

    Contaldi, M

    C.R. Contaldi, M. Peloso, L. Kofman and A.D. Linde,Suppressing the lower multipoles in the CMB anisotropies,JCAP0307(2003) 002 [astro-ph/0303636]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  75. [89]

    Freivogel, M

    B. Freivogel, M. Kleban, M. Rodriguez Martinez and L. Susskind,Observational consequences of a landscape,JHEP03(2006) 039 [hep-th/0505232]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  76. [90]

    Linde,The Inflationary Universe,Rept

    A.D. Linde,The Inflationary Universe,Rept. Prog. Phys.47(1984) 925

    1984

  77. [91]

    Sakharov,Cosmological Transitions With a Change in Metric Signature,Sov

    A.D. Sakharov,Cosmological Transitions With a Change in Metric Signature,Sov. Phys. JETP 60(1984) 214

    1984

  78. [92]

    Weinberg,Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 2607

    1987

  79. [93]

    Hawking and N

    S.W. Hawking and N. Turok,Open inflation without false vacua,Phys. Lett. B425(1998) 25 [hep-th/9802030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  80. [94]

    Linde,Quantum creation of an open inflationary universe,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Quantum creation of an open inflationary universe,Phys. Rev.D58(1998) 083514 [gr-qc/9802038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

Showing first 80 references.