Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 40 references

Spread of Entanglement in Generalized Kicked Ising Chain

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the q=3 kicked Potts chain at its dual-unitary point, the reduced density matrix of an N-qutrit block has flat spectrum $\{3^{-\min(2t,N)},0\}$, so all Rényi and von Neumann entropies equal $\min(2t,N)\log 3$.

desk verdict The q=3 exact entanglement formula is solid and worth publishing; the q≥5 nonexistence claim is not proven and the abstract overstates it. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09695 v1 pith:75PZ3CBN submitted 2026-08-10 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thnlin.CD

Tanay Pathak , Hiromi Ebisu , Tomaž Prosen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechhep-thnlin.CD
keywords kickedIsingchainPottsmodeldual-unitarityentanglemententropyRényitransfermatrixreplicatrickqudits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper generalizes the kicked Ising chain, the standard exactly solvable model of maximal entanglement growth in qubit systems, to local dimensions $q>2$. It shows that the special dual-unitary points, where the Floquet dynamics is unchanged by exchanging space and time, survive for $q=3$ and $q=4$, but fail for $q\ge 5$ because no single kick strength makes all kick-matrix elements have equal magnitude. For the $q=3$ kicked Potts model at such a point, and for three families of solvable initial states (denoted $T_1$, $T_2$, $T_3$), the paper derives the full spectrum of the reduced density matrix of a block of $N$ qutrits: $\mathrm{Spec}[\rho_A(t)] = \{3^{-\min(2t,N)},0\}$. A key consequence is that every Rényi entropy and the von Neumann entropy equal $\min(2t,N)\log 3$, so entanglement grows ballistically at a speed of two qutrits per kick until saturation. If correct, the result provides a rare exact, parameter-free benchmark for entanglement dynamics in non-qubit systems and delimits when space-time dual solvability is possible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dual-unitary gate, a Floquet operator $U_K U_I$ that stays unitary when space and time are exchanged. For $q=3$ this occurs when the kick strength satisfies $|1+2e^{3ib}|=|1-e^{3ib}|$, i.e. $b=2\pi/9,4\pi/9$, making all amplitudes of the kick matrix equal in modulus and the model self-dual. The calculation is carried by a transfer-matrix replica trick: the moments $\mathrm{tr}[\rho_A(t)^n]$ are written as a product of transfer matrices $T[h]$ acting on $2n$ copies of the space-time lattice, with a permutation operator $P$ sewing forward and backward replicas. For the solvable states the transfer matrix has spectrum $\{0,1\}$ with a unique eigenvalue-1 eigenvector $|1\rangle$, which reduces the finite-$N$ computation to counting products of projectors $P^{(Z)}$ and $C^{(X)}$ and yields the flat spectrum.

What would settle it

For $q=5$, solve the exact equal-modulus condition $\left|\sum_{k=0}^{4}\omega^{kr}e^{-2ib\cos(2\pi k/5)}\right| = \left|\sum_{k=0}^{4}\omega^{k}e^{-2ib\cos(2\pi k/5)}\right|$ for $r=2,3,4$; a single common $b$ would refute the claim that dual-unitary points are absent for $q\ge5$. For the $q=3$ spectrum, a direct simulation of an $L=18$, $N=6$ chain from $T_1$ at $b=2\pi/9$ should reproduce $S(t)=\min(2t,6)\log 3$ exactly, so any deviation falsifies the central formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central result is the exact reduced state for the $q=3$ kicked Potts chain at the dual-unitary point ($J=b=2\pi/9$ or $4\pi/9$) starting from the solvable states $T_1$, $T_2$, $T_3$: after $t$ kicks, an $N$-qutrit block has $3^{\min(2t,N)}$ nonzero Schmidt coefficients, each equal to $3^{-\min(2t,N)}$, and all remaining coefficients vanish. Consequently every Rényi entropy and the von Neumann entropy obey $S_A(t)=\min(2t,N)\log 3$, meaning entanglement grows linearly at two qutrits per time step until the block saturates. The paper also reports that the same linear-then-saturating law, with $\log 4$ in place of $\log 3$, is consistent with numerical data for the $q=4$ model. For $q\ge 5$ it argues that no dual-unitary point exists, using the fact that the equal-modulus condition would require $|J_0(2b)|=|J_r(2b)|$ for all $r$ in the large-$q$ Bessel approximation, which cannot hold for a single $b$. For generic (non-solvable) initial states, numerical results show growth whose slope depends on the state at finite times, but whose asymptotic slope approaches the maximal $2\log 3$ for nonzero longitudinal field.

Load-bearing premise

The broadest load-bearing step outside the exact $q=3$ calculation is the transfer of an asymptotic Bessel-function condition to the exact finite-$q$ dual-unitarity condition for $q\ge5$, which is asserted rather than proved; the main-text $q=4$ derivation additionally assumes equal off-diagonal kick elements that its own matrix display shows are unequal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $b=2\pi/9$ or $4\pi/9$, a block of $N$ qutrits in the $q=3$ kicked Potts chain has exactly $3^{\min(2t,N)}$ nonzero Schmidt coefficients after $t$ kicks, all equal, so all Rényi entropies coincide with the von Neumann entropy.
  • The linear growth $S_A(t)=2t\log 3$ for $t<N/2$ fixes the entanglement velocity at its maximal possible value of two qutrits per kicked period.
  • The block becomes maximally entangled after $\lceil N/2\rceil$ kicks, and the solvable $T_2$ and $T_3$ initial states simply follow the $T_1$ evolution shifted by one kick.
  • For generic initial states, the growth slope is state-dependent at finite times, but the paper's thermodynamic-limit data indicate that as $t\to\infty$ the slope approaches $2\log 3$ for nonzero field, and stays at or below this value in the integrable case.
  • For the $q=4$ model, numerical results are consistent with the same linear-then-saturating law with $\log 4$ replacing $\log 3$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • As a testable extension, perturbing the dual-unitary point with small longitudinal fields should interpolate between the flat-spectrum ramp and the oscillatory integrable behavior; the paper's weak-field numerics already show the oscillations shrinking as $h$ grows.
  • The large-$q$ Bessel obstruction suggests a general principle: dual-unitary solvability in kicked clock models may be confined to local dimensions $q=2,3,4$. A two-parameter kick, for example adding a diagonal phase to $X+X^\dagger$, could be the minimal way to test whether extra parameters restore dual-unitarity for $q\ge5$.
  • A rigorous bound on the difference between the exact finite-$q$ sums in the equal-modulus condition and their Bessel integrals would convert the absence claim for $q\ge5$ from an asymptotic and numerical statement into a theorem; that proof is not supplied in the paper.
  • Because the reduced state is exactly maximally mixed on a $3^{\min(2t,N)}$-dimensional subspace, the model could serve as a clean qutrit analogue of a fast scrambler for information-processing benchmarks, although the paper does not discuss applications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes the kicked Ising chain to local dimension q\geq 3 using a Z_q clock (kicked Potts) model. It claims that dual-unitary points exist for q=3 and q=4 but not for q\geq 5. For the q=3 case at the dual-unitary point, the authors derive, via a transfer-matrix and replica method, the exact reduced-density-matrix spectrum and conclude that all R\'enyi and von Neumann entropies grow as S(t)=\min(2t,N)\log 3 for a class of solvable initial states (T1, T2, T3). Numerical results for q=3 and q=4 are presented as supporting the linear growth. The paper's advertised headline has two parts: the exact q=3 entanglement result and the q\geq 5 nonexistence of dual-unitary points.

Significance. The q=3 exact result is a genuine strength: the derivation is parameter-free, the final spectrum is a closed form, and the numerics match the formula without fitting. The q=4 dual-unitary points, established via complex Hadamard matrices in Appendix B, are also a useful extension. However, the advertised q\geq 5 nonexistence claim is not proven by the arguments in Section III, and the general-q framework used for it is internally inconsistent for q\geq 4. The paper's value would remain substantial if the q\geq 5 claim were downgraded to a numerical/heuristic statement, but as written the abstract overstates what is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eqs. (21)-(24) and (30)] The statement below Eq. (22) that 'B(m\ensuremath{-}n) is independent on m\ensuremath{-}n' is false for q\geq 4, as the paper's own Eq. (21) shows: for q=4 at generic b, B(1)=B(3) but B(2) takes a different value (the off-diagonal entries are \frac{1}{4}e^{-2ib}(-1+e^{2ib})^2 for m-n=2 and -\frac{1}{4}e^{-2ib}(-1+e^{4ib}) for m-n=1,3). Consequently the single-exponential representation (24), the definition of k1 in Eq. (29), and the derived condition (30) do not follow for q\geq 4. Since the same general-q framework is used to support the q\geq 5 nonexistence claim, this is a load-bearing gap; the q=4 case is established only by the separate complex-Hadamard argument in Appendix B, which is not the argument presented in Section III.
  2. [Sec. III, Eqs. (33)-(36) and Table I] The large-q Bessel argument does not prove absence of solutions to Eq. (30) for any finite q. The identity (34) yields c^2+2\sum_{r=1}^{\infty} c^2=1 only if |J_0(2b)|=|J_r(2b)|=c for all r\geq 1, whereas Eq. (30) requires equality only for the finite set r=1,\ldots,q-1. Applied to a finite set, the identity gives (2q-1)c^2 \leq 1, which has solutions (e.g., c=1/3 for q=5); hence Eqs. (35)-(36) do not produce a contradiction for finite q. Table I reports isolated roots for each value of m-n and a numerical search, neither of which is a proof of absence of a common root. The abstract's claim that dual-unitary points do not exist for q\geq 5 is therefore not established by the present analysis.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (30)] The paper treats Eq. (30) as the dual-unitarity condition without proving its necessity for q\geq 5. Because the derivation of Eq. (24) already fails for q\geq 4, the link between 'all kick matrix elements have equal modulus' and 'the Floquet gate is dual-unitary' is not made for the regime in which the nonexistence claim is made. To prove the claim, one would need either an exact analysis of the full two-qudit gate for each q\geq 5, or a proof that dual-unitarity in this family forces a complex Hadamard kick matrix; neither is provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. II, Eqs. (6) and (13)] The definition of the Floquet operator is inconsistent: Eq. (6) sets U_{KI3}=U_K U_I, while Eq. (13) writes U_{KI3}=U_{HI} U_K. Please clarify the convention and use it consistently.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (20)] There is a typo 'matirx' in the sentence preceding Eq. (20); also, the paragraph after Eq. (21) would benefit from explicitly noting that for q=4 the two distinct off-diagonal values are B(1)=B(3) and B(2), since this directly contradicts the claim that B(m-n) is independent of m-n.
  3. [Sec. IV, Eq. (37)] The tensor product symbol in Eq. (37) is rendered as 'LO'; it should be \otimes.
  4. [Sec. IV, Eq. (55)] Eq. (55) writes \langle s|e^{ib(X+X^\dagger)}|r\rangle, but the correct factor is e^{-ib(X+X^\dagger)} as used in Eq. (A.2); the sign is inconsistent.
  5. [Sec. IV, Eq. (52)] The expression for \langle a,b|(U_{KI3}[h])^t|\psi\rangle contains a duplicated factor \langle a,b|U_{KI3}[h]|s_\tau\rangle in the product over \tau; the product should run over sequential intermediate states.
  6. [Sec. VI and Table I] In Fig. 2 and the surrounding text, 'Z_4 Ising model' is a misnomer; the model is a Z_4 kicked clock/Potts model. The caption of Table I should also specify what (m-n) labels mean for the q=10, 100, 1000 rows, where no bracket is given.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the q=3 exact entanglement result is derived from the model parameters and initial-state definitions; the q≥5 nonexistence proof has a logical gap but no circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central exact result, Spec[rho_A(t)]={3^{-min(2t,N)},0} (Eq. 87), is obtained from the transfer-matrix/replica construction in Sections IV–V and Appendices C–F. The solvable states T1–T3 are defined independently (Eqs. 38–40), the dual-unitary coupling b=2pi/9,4pi/9 is fixed by the modulus condition (Eq. 30/A.8), and the spectrum is evaluated exactly from the contraction in Eq. (82), not by fitting or by assuming Eq. (87). The use of [11] (Prosen is a co-author) supplies the transfer-matrix framework and elementary Bell-state identities, but the load-bearing properties are re-derived in the appendices, so the self-citation is not an unverified premise. The q≥5 nonexistence argument has a genuine logical gap: Eqs. (33)–(36) treat the finite condition r=1,...,q-1 as if it held for all r in N, and the parametrization preceding Eq. (30) assumes equal off-diagonal kick elements that the paper itself shows fail for q≥4. This is a correctness/proof deficiency, not a circular reduction of a prediction to its input. No step in the derivation chain equates the output with an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the transfer matrix and replica method inherited from [11], the definition of dual-unitarity via equal matrix moduli, and an asymptotic Bessel argument that is not made rigorous for finite q. No free parameters are fitted to data; the kick strength b and coupling J are fixed by the dual-unitarity condition.

free parameters (2)
  • kick strength b = 2*pi/9, 4*pi/9 (q=3); pi/4, 3*pi/4 (q=4)
    Chosen to satisfy the dual-unitarity modulus condition Eq. (30). Not fitted to data; it is the special point where exact results hold.
  • Ising-like coupling J = equal to k1 at the dual-unitary point (2*pi/9 for q=3)
    Set by requiring J=k1 so that space and time directions are exchangeable.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The kick operator e^{-ib(X+Xdagger)} must have matrix elements of equal modulus for dual-unitarity (Eq. 30)
    Adopted following the q=2 analysis of [4]; it is the condition used to define dual-unitary points in this model.
  • domain assumption The discrete sum S_r can be replaced by the Bessel integral q i^{-r} J_r(2b) in the large-q limit, with controllable error for finite q
    Used to argue the absence of dual-unitary points for q>=5; the exactness for finite q is not established.
  • standard math X^a Z^b with a,b in {0,1,2} span the full matrix algebra of qutrits
    Used in Appendix D with Schur's lemma to show the dominant left eigenvector of the transfer matrix is trivial.
  • standard math Bessel identity J0^2 + 2*sum_{r>=1} J_r^2 = 1
    Underpins the contradiction argument in the asymptotic absence proof.
  • standard math The replica trick and transfer matrix construction in Eq. (61) correctly computes tr[(rho_A)^n] for the q=3 model
    Adapted from [11]; the mapping is stated and used for all exact entanglement results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spread of Entanglement in Generalized Kicked Ising Chain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75PZ3CBN

@misc{pith2026260809695,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spread of Entanglement in Generalized Kicked Ising Chain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75PZ3CBN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09695}
}
abstract

We investigate the dynamics of entanglement in a generalized version of the kicked Ising chain, extending the model from the standard qubit case (local dimension $q=2$) to higher local dimensions ($q > 2$). We identify the existence of ''dual-unitary'' points where the model's space-time duality allows for exact analytical solutions. Our analysis reveals that while a few unique dual-unitary points exist analytically for systems with local dimensions $q=3$ and $q=4$, such points do not exist for $q \ge 5$ due to the lack of a unique kicking strength that satisfies the required matrix element conditions. Utilizing the transfer matrix method and a replica trick specifically adapted for higher dimensions, we derive exact expressions for the growth of entanglement entropy in the $q=3$ (kicked Potts-type) model starting from a class of solvable initial states. Our results demonstrate that at the dual-unitary point, both R\'enyi and von Neumann entanglement entropies grow linearly with time until reaching a maximum value determined by the subsystem size.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09695 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spread of entanglement for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Time evolution of von Neumann entanglement en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Time evolution of von Neumann entanglement en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time evolution of Renyi-2 entanglement entropy for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of R´enyi entropies, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quan- tum circuits,

    Lorenzo Piroli, Bruno Bertini, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quan- tum circuits,” Phys. Rev. B101, 094304 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    Exact time-correlation functions of quantum ising chain in a kicking transversal magnetic field: Spectral analysis of the adjoint propagator in heisenberg picture,

    Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Exact time-correlation functions of quantum ising chain in a kicking transversal magnetic field: Spectral analysis of the adjoint propagator in heisenberg picture,” Progress of Theoretical Physics Sup- plement139, 191–203 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [2]

    The geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue 1 is one. This means that maximum eigenvalue property can be saturated only whenλ max = 1 which is obtained for cos θ 2 = r 1 3 ,sin θ 2 cos χ 2 = r 1 3 , sin θ 2 sin χ 2 = r 1 3 (77) Using which we obtain one such state as cos θ 2 = r 1 3 ,sin θ 2 = r 2 3 , χ= π 2 .(78) 2 ConsiderZ|l⟩=ω l |l⟩then we haveP k |l...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Chaos and complexity of quantum mo- tion,

    Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Chaos and complexity of quantum mo- tion,” J. Phys. A40, 7881 (2007), arXiv:0704.2247 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2007

  5. [4]

    (also see [5] for a comprehensive review). This duality property can then be generalized to dual-unitary circuits allowing for the analytical calculation of various mea- sures of quantum chaos such as the correlation functions [6–10], the growth of entanglement [11–22], the spectral form factor [23–28]. In this work, we extend the study of the kicked Isin...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  6. [5]

    General relation between quantum er- godicity and fidelity of quantum dynamics,

    Tomaˇ z Prosen, “General relation between quantum er- godicity and fidelity of quantum dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E65, 036208 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [6]

    Particle- time duality in the kicked ising spin chain,

    M Akila, D Waltner, B Gutkin, and T Guhr, “Particle- time duality in the kicked ising spin chain,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49, 375101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    Exactly solvable many-body dynamics from space- time duality,

    Bruno Bertini, Pieter W. Claeys, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Exactly solvable many-body dynamics from space- time duality,” Rev. Mod. Phys.98, 025001 (2026), arXiv:2505.11489 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2026

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1 + 1 dimensions,

    Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Toma ˇ z Prosen, “Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1 + 1 dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    Exact local correlations in kicked chains,

    Boris Gutkin, Petr Braun, Maram Akila, Daniel Waltner, and Thomas Guhr, “Exact local correlations in kicked chains,” Phys. Rev. B102, 174307 (2020)

    2020

  3. [10]

    Ergodic and nonergodic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local hilbert space dimension,

    Pieter W. Claeys and Austen Lamacraft, “Ergodic and nonergodic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local hilbert space dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 100603 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Solvable models of many-body chaos from dual-koopman circuits,

    Arul Lakshminarayan, “Solvable models of many-body chaos from dual-koopman circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 170403 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Entan- glement spreading in a minimal model of maximal many- body quantum chaos,

    Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Entan- glement spreading in a minimal model of maximal many- body quantum chaos,” Phys. Rev. X9, 021033 (2019), arXiv:1812.05090 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Exact quench dynamics of the floquet quantum east model at the deterministic point,

    Bruno Bertini, Cecilia De Fazio, Juan P. Garrahan, and Katja Klobas, “Exact quench dynamics of the floquet quantum east model at the deterministic point,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 120402 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Uni- tary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels,

    Sarang Gopalakrishnan and Austen Lamacraft, “Uni- tary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels,” Phys. Rev. B100, 064309 (2019), arXiv:1903.11611 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Opera- tor Entanglement in Local Quantum Circuits I: Chaotic Dual-Unitary Circuits,

    Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Opera- tor Entanglement in Local Quantum Circuits I: Chaotic Dual-Unitary Circuits,” SciPost Phys.8, 067 (2020), arXiv:1909.07407 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Oper- ator Entanglement in Local Quantum Circuits II: Soli- tons in Chains of Qubits,

    Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Oper- ator Entanglement in Local Quantum Circuits II: Soli- tons in Chains of Qubits,” SciPost Phys.8, 068 (2020), arXiv:1909.07410 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Creating ensembles of dual unitary and maxi- mally entangling quantum evolutions,

    Suhail Ahmad Rather, S. Aravinda, and Arul Lakshmi- narayan, “Creating ensembles of dual unitary and maxi- mally entangling quantum evolutions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070501 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Entanglement barriers in dual-unitary circuits,

    Isaac Reid and Bruno Bertini, “Entanglement barriers in dual-unitary circuits,” Phys. Rev. B104, 014301 (2021), arXiv:2103.12794 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Maximal entangle- ment velocity implies dual unitarity,

    Tianci Zhou and Aram W. Harrow, “Maximal entangle- ment velocity implies dual unitarity,” Phys. Rev. B106, L201104 (2022), arXiv:2204.10341 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Growth of entan- glement of generic states under dual-unitary dynamics,

    Alessandro Foligno and Bruno Bertini, “Growth of entan- glement of generic states under dual-unitary dynamics,” Phys. Rev. B107, 174311 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Nonequilibrium dynamics of charged dual- unitary circuits,

    Alessandro Foligno, Pasquale Calabrese, and Bruno Bertini, “Nonequilibrium dynamics of charged dual- unitary circuits,” PRX Quantum6, 010324 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Mixed-State Entanglement in a Minimal Model of Quantum Chaos,

    Tanay Pathak, “Mixed-State Entanglement in a Minimal Model of Quantum Chaos,” (2026), arXiv:2603.14292 [quant-ph]

    2026

  16. [24]

    Exact Entanglement Dynamics Be- yond Nearest-Neighbor Dual-Unitary Floquet Systems,

    Tanay Pathak, “Exact Entanglement Dynamics Be- yond Nearest-Neighbor Dual-Unitary Floquet Systems,” (2026), arXiv:2606.11311 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Exact Spectral Form Factor in a Minimal Model of Many-Body Quantum Chaos,

    Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Exact Spectral Form Factor in a Minimal Model of Many-Body Quantum Chaos,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 264101 (2018), arXiv:1805.00931 [nlin.CD]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Random Matrix Spectral Form Factor of Dual-Unitary Quantum Circuits,

    Bruno Bertini, Pavel Kos, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Random Matrix Spectral Form Factor of Dual-Unitary Quantum Circuits,” Commun. Math. Phys.387, 597–620 (2021), arXiv:2012.12254 [math-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Statistics of the spectral form factor in the self-dual kicked ising model,

    Ana Flack, Bruno Bertini, and Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Statistics of the spectral form factor in the self-dual kicked ising model,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043403 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Local pairing of feyn- man histories in many-body floquet models,

    S. J. Garratt and J. T. Chalker, “Local pairing of feyn- man histories in many-body floquet models,” Phys. Rev. X11, 021051 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Structural stability hypothesis of dual unitary quantum chaos,

    Jonathon Riddell, Curt von Keyserlingk, Tomaˇ z Prosen, and Bruno Bertini, “Structural stability hypothesis of dual unitary quantum chaos,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033226 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Operator dynamics in floquet many-body systems,

    Takato Yoshimura, Samuel J. Garratt, and J. T. Chalker, “Operator dynamics in floquet many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. B111, 094316 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Floquet integrability and long-range entangle- ment generation in the one-dimensional quantum potts model,

    A. I. Lotkov, V. Gritsev, A. K. Fedorov, and D. V. Kurlov, “Floquet integrability and long-range entangle- ment generation in the one-dimensional quantum potts model,” Phys. Rev. B105, 144306 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Operator dy- namics and entanglement in space-time dual Hadamard lattices,

    Pieter W. Claeys and Austen Lamacraft, “Operator dy- namics and entanglement in space-time dual Hadamard lattices,” J. Phys. A57, 405301 (2024), arXiv:2406.03781 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Scalable quantum comput- ing with qudits on a graph,

    E. O. Kiktenko, A. S. Nikolaeva, Peng Xu, G. V. Shlyap- nikov, and A. K. Fedorov, “Scalable quantum comput- ing with qudits on a graph,” Phys. Rev. A101, 022304 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Parafermions in a kagome lattice of qubits for topo- logical quantum computation,

    Adrian Hutter, James R. Wootton, and Daniel Loss, “Parafermions in a kagome lattice of qubits for topo- logical quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. X5, 041040 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Topological phases with parafermions: theory and blueprints,

    Jason Alicea and Paul Fendley, “Topological phases with parafermions: theory and blueprints,” Ann. Rev. Con- densed Matter Phys.7, 119 (2016), arXiv:1504.02476 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Quantum computing with parafermions,

    Adrian Hutter and Daniel Loss, “Quantum computing with parafermions,” Phys. Rev. B93, 125105 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    A short introduction to fibonacci anyon models,

    Simon Trebst, Matthias Troyer, Zhenghan Wang, and Andreas WW Ludwig, “A short introduction to fibonacci anyon models,” Progress of Theoretical Physics Supple- ment176, 384–407 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Nonlocal (parafermion) currents in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and self-dual critical points inz n- symmetric statistical systems,

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Nonlocal (parafermion) currents in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory and self-dual critical points inz n- symmetric statistical systems,” Sov. Phys. JETP62, 215–225 (1985)

    1985

  31. [39]

    A Concise Guide to Complex Hadamard Matrices,

    Wojciech Tadej and Karol Zyczkowski, “A Concise Guide to Complex Hadamard Matrices,” Open Syst. Info. Dyn. 13, 133–177 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0512154. A. Particle time duality forq= 3Kicked Potts model In this section we focus dual-unitary inq= 3, KPM. For this model we have t...

    2006 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue 1 is one. This means that maximum eigenvalue property can be saturated only whenλ max = 1 which is obtained for cos θ 2 = r 1 3 ,sin θ 2 cos χ 2 = r 1 3 ,sin θ 2 sin χ 2 = r 1 3 .(C.11) Using which we obtain one such state as cos θ ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.