Asymptotic Safety in Gauge Theories beyond Four Dimensions: Perturbative Tests and Fixed-Point Mergers

Aldo Deandrea; Jie Liu; Roman Pasechnik; Yu-Bo Zhao; Zhi-Wei Wang

REVIEW

Asymptotic Safety in Gauge Theories beyond Four Dimensions: Perturbative Tests and Fixed-Point Mergers

Aldo Deandrea, Jie Liu, Roman Pasechnik, Zhi-Wei Wang, Yu-Bo Zhao

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 8 Oct 2026 · 33 references

Pith's verdict: Careful perturbative+fRG analysis of asymptotic safety in D=5 gauge theories, honestly presenting a merger candidate that appears at three-loop matching but disappears at four loops.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 9, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2610.12225 (version 1)

Pith IDWPNNMWWT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationAldo Deandrea, Jie Liu, Roman Pasechnik, Yu-Bo Zhao, Zhi-Wei Wang. "Asymptotic Safety in Gauge Theories beyond Four Dimensions: Perturbative Tests and Fixed-Point Mergers." arXiv:2610.12225 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WPNNMWWT

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This paper does two useful things. First, it defines a perturbative-control dimension D_pt from the ratio of successive loop increments in the ε expansion, and maps it over (N, N_f) for SU(N) with fundamental fermions. That map is new and gives a concrete diagnostic for where the unresummed loop expansion is losing hierarchy. Second, it constructs a rational beta function at D=5 – the improved fRG ansatz – matched to the MS series up to four loops, and uses it to search for a UV-IR fixed-point merger. The three-loop matched version gives a candidate asymptotic-safety boundary at N_f^cr ≃ 2.09 N, about 10% below the unresummed three-loop estimate. The authors are honest about the sensitivity: four-loop matching with the same denominator removes the merger entirely, leaving an interacting UV fixed point for all flavors studied. They do not overclaim – both scenarios are left open.

The paper is well-structured and the limitations are stated explicitly. The one-coupling F^2 truncation is acknowledged as insufficient to capture operator mixing, and the identification of the threshold-normalized fRG coupling with the MS coupling (sentence b157) is flagged without justification. The stress-test concern about scheme dependence is real: the denominator Q_k(a) is inherited from a threshold-normalized fRG calculation, but no scheme conversion is performed, so the merger coordinates could shift under a full transformation. The authors’ internal variations over k and threshold inputs probe some sensitivity but do not address this identification. Given that the central claim (a merger boundary) depends on that identification, this is the main soft spot. The four-loop result already casts doubt on the merger’s robustness, and the scheme issue adds another layer of conditionality.

That said, the paper is a serious piece of work. The D_pt map is a clean diagnostic, and the rational ansatz is a reasonable way to make matching-order dependence visible. The authors deserve credit for showing the four-loop counterexample in the same framework. The paper is for readers interested in extra-dimensional asymptotic safety, ε-expansion techniques, or fRG-guided resummations. It does not settle the existence of a merger, but it provides a concrete and testable candidate boundary with a clear list of caveats.

Recommendation: this paper deserves a serious referee. The referee should focus on the scheme-identification issue and the impact of the four-loop matching. It is not a desk reject, but it needs a revision that either justifies or removes the coupling identification, or at least quantifies the uncertainty it introduces. I would accept peer review.

Referee report

Major objections (2)

[Conformal window at D=5 from a fRG-informed resummation, Eq. (13) and surrounding text] The improved fRG ansatz uses a denominator Q_k(a)=1−Ca+kC^2 a^2 that is inherited from a threshold-normalized fRG calculation (Eq. (11) with C=19N/6), while the numerator is matched to the MS series. The authors state (b157) that they formally identify the threshold-normalized coupling with the MS coupling and that no explicit scheme conversion has been performed. However, because the denominator structure itself could change under a scheme transformation, the merger coordinates (N_f^cr, a_*) computed from this ansatz are scheme-dependent in a way that is not fully probed by the limited internal variations of k and the threshold input. Near a fixed point at finite coupling, even a one-loop scheme transformation could shift the beta-function coefficients beyond the matched orders, potentially altering the stabilization seen at low orders. I recommend that the authors discuss this scheme dependence more explicitly and, if possible, estimate the effect by comparing with a simple scheme change (e.g., a coupling redefinition that preserves the denominator form, or a leading-order conversion of the fRG beta function to the MS scheme). Without such an estimate, the claim of low-order stabilization may be an artifact of the mixed-scheme construction. The authors acknowledge this: “Be- cause the higher numerator coefficients are not rematched, this is a threshold-input variation, not a consistent higher- loop scheme conversion.”
[Perturbative-control dimension and Fig. 3] The D_pt map is based on the one-coupling F^2 truncation of the effective action. The authors acknowledge (b38-39) that canonical counting alone does not establish the validity of this truncation throughout 4<D<6 and that higher operators could affect the fixed-point structure. Since the ratio test uses loop increments from the one-coupling beta function, the D_pt boundaries are conditional on this truncation. I recommend adding an explicit statement in the description of Fig. 3 that the map is a diagnostic within the one-coupling projection and does not account for effects of higher operators, which could shift the boundaries. The authors acknowledge this: “Their canonical irrelevance at the four-dimensional Gaussian fixed point motivates this trunca- tion for sufficiently smallε[6].”

Minor objections (6)

[Fig. 4 caption] The caption already states the formal identification of couplings. It might be helpful to add a one-sentence reference to the discussion of scheme dependence in the text.
[Eq. (17) and Eq. (C1)] The definition of h_j in Eq. (17) could be written more explicitly along with the matching condition. Appendix C already gives the form; consider a brief comment in the main text that h_j = β_j − C β_{j-1} + (C^2/2) β_{j-2} ensures the expansion matches through L loops.
[Appendix C, Eq. (C2)] The notation for F_L differs between L=1,2,3 and later L=4 (Eq. C6). Consolidating the labels to a single pattern (e.g., F_L) would reduce potential confusion.
[Table I] The caption states that δ values are order shifts, not statistical uncertainties. It would be helpful to repeat this in the main text when discussing the table.
[Abstract and Conclusions] The phrase 'low-order stabilization' is used; given the four-loop result, qualifying it as 'low-order stabilization up to three-loop matching' would avoid any overstatement.
[Introduction, b38] The sentence 'Their canonical irrelevance at the four-dimensional Gaussian fixed point motivates this truncation for sufficiently small ε' could benefit from a reference to the canonical analysis (e.g., Morris 2005 or De Cesare et al. 2021).

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Three-loop matching suggests a flavor boundary for five-dimensional asymptotic safety, but four-loop matching extends the window.

The reading

This paper investigates whether non-Abelian gauge theories in five dimensions can have an interacting ultraviolet fixed point, which would make them asymptotically safe. Using the four-loop MS $\beta$ function continued to D=4+2ε, the authors define a perturbative-control dimension that maps where loop corrections remain hierarchical. At D=5, they construct a rational $\beta$ function inspired by the functional renormalization group, matched to perturbation theory up to three loops, and find a candidate merger of the UV and IR fixed points occurring near $N_f^{{cr}}$ ≈ 2.09 N at large N. Four-loop matching with the same rational denominator instead retains a UV fixed point with no merger for integer color numbers 2≤N≤15 and flavor ratios up to 11/2, leaving both a merger-limited and a merger-free scenario open. The results provide a color-flavor phase diagram that guides model building but underscore the sensitivity of the fixed-point structure to higher-order corrections and to the truncation of the effective action.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is a rational ansatz for the gauge anomalous dimension, η_g(a) = -2a (β_0 + b_1 a + b_2 $a^{2}$) / Q_k(a), where Q_k(a) = 1 - C a + k $C^{2}$ $a^{2}$ is a pole-regularized denominator with C = 19/6 for SU(N) and k = 1/2 as baseline. The numerator coefficients b_1, b_2 are determined by matching the weak-coupling expansion to the MS $\beta$-function coefficients up to three loops. This construction incorporates the leading regulator feedback from functional RG flows while removing the spurious pole, and allows a systematic test of how the UV-IR merger coordinates respond to each additional loop order.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that within a one-coupling $F^{2}$ projection of the effective action, the UV-IR fixed-point merger in five-dimensional SU(N) gauge theories with fundamental fermions exhibits low-order stabilization when the $\beta$ function is constructed by matching a fRG-inspired rational denominator to the MS series through one, two, and three loops. At large N, the three-loop rational construction yields a critical flavor ratio $N_f^{{cr}}$/N ≈ 2.09, about 10% below the unresummed three-loop estimate. However, four-loop matching with the same denominator eliminates the merger for all studied color and flavor values, instead giving a single interacting UV fixed point that persists to larger flavor numbers. The paper thus finds that the loop matching order determines whether fixed-point annihilation bounds the asymptotically safe region or allows a broader domain; both outcomes are possible within the current approximations.

Load-bearing premise

The one-coupling $F^{2}$ truncation of the effective action captures the fixed-point structure at D=5, and higher gauge operators do not qualitatively alter the $\beta$ function and the merger scenario.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the three-loop rational merger is taken as the upper flavor boundary, then asymptotically safe five-dimensional SU(N) gauge theories with fundamental fermions must satisfy N_f ≲ 2.09 N, narrowing the candidate matter content for extra-dimensional ultraviolet completions.
The persistence of the UV fixed point at four-loop matching suggests that the merger scenario is not robust within the one-coupling F^2 truncation; higher-loop or higher-operator effects could either restore or remove it, leaving the existence of the fixed point uncertain.
The perturbative-control map D_pt(N, N_f) provides a diagnostic for the reliability of epsilon-expansion results at any given color and flavor, usable as a preliminary check before investing in full functional RG or lattice studies.
The observed sensitivity to matching order implies that five-dimensional asymptotic safety cannot be settled by fixed-order perturbative tests alone; either a resummation or a non-perturbative method is needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The absence of a merger at four-loop matching may be a finite-order artifact: the known five-loop coefficient at the three-loop merger flavor gives an IR partner that reappears, hinting that the merger could oscillate with loop order rather than converge monotonically.
Because the rational ansatz fixes the denominator a priori, the merger coordinates and their stabilization may reflect the chosen resummation structure rather than the underlying dynamics; testing alternative denominators (e.g., with different k or higher polynomial order) would clarify the robustness of the N_f/N ≈ 2.09 boundary.
For model builders, the practical implication is that five-dimensional asymptotic safety in gauge-Yukawa theories with matter beyond the minimal content could explore flavor ratios near 2.1 N, but must cross-check the fixed-point existence with a more complete operator basis, especially including gauge-fermion interactions and four-fermion operators.
The D_pt map suggests that pure SU(2) Yang-Mills in D=5 lies outside the perturbative-control region, yet fRG and lattice studies indicate a fixed point may exist; this discrepancy highlights that the hierarchy test is a sufficient condition for perturbative reliability, not a necessary one for the existence of a fixed point.

Original abstract

Non-Abelian gauge theories above four dimensions may admit an interacting ultraviolet fixed point through the competition between canonical scaling and gauge-field antiscreening. Using the four-loop $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ beta function continued to $D=4+2\epsilon$, we determine the largest dimension $D_{\mathrm{pt}}=4+2\epsilon_{\mathrm{pt}}$ below which successive loop corrections to the fixed point remain hierarchically ordered under a specified ratio criterion, and map $D_{\mathrm{pt}}$ over color and flavor numbers for fermions in the fundamental representation of $SU(N)$. At $D=5$, we construct rational anomalous dimensions with a fixed, pole-regularized denominator inspired by the functional renormalization group (fRG). Matching to the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ series through one, two, and three loops produces progressively smaller shifts in the critical flavor number and coupling at the ultraviolet--infrared merger (the point where the infrared and ultraviolet fixed points coincide), yielding $N_f^{\mathrm{cr}}\simeq 2.09 \, N$ at large $N$ in the three-loop construction. This low-order stabilization, together with qualitative evidence from fRG flows including higher gauge operators, suggests a potential merger scenario that bounds the candidate asymptotically safe region in flavor number. The resulting color--flavor map provides guidance for five-dimensional model building by displaying both the baseline perturbative-control boundary and the candidate three-loop merger boundary. Four-loop matching, however, retains an interacting ultraviolet fixed point beyond the three-loop merger boundary, with no merger found for integer $2\le N\le15$ and $0\le N_f/N\le11/2$. The sensitivity of the fixed-point structure to higher-order terms leaves both scenarios open, highlighting fixed-point annihilation as a potential constraint on five-dimensional asymptotic safety.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-09: 1 request, 6,689 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.95 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Non-Abelian gauge theories above four dimensions may admit an interacting ultraviolet fixed point through the competition between canonical scaling and gauge-field antiscreening. Using the four-loop $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ beta function continued to $D=4+2\epsilon$, we determine the largest dimension $D_{\mathrm{pt}}=4+2\epsilon_{\mathrm{pt}}$ below which successive loop corrections to the fixed point remain hierarchically ordered under a specified ratio criterion, and map $D_{\mathrm{pt}}$ over color and flavor numbers for fermions in the fundamental representation of $SU(N)$. At $D=5$, we construct rational anomalous dimensions with a fixed, pole-regularized denominator inspired by the functional renormalization group (fRG). Matching to the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ series through one, two, and three loops produces progressively smaller shifts in the critical flavor number and coupling at the ultraviolet--infrared merger (the point where the infrared and ultraviolet fixed points coincide), yielding $N_f^{\mathrm{cr}}\simeq 2.09 \, N$ at large $N$ in the three-loop construction. This low-order stabilization, together with qualitative evidence from fRG flows including higher gauge operators, suggests a potential merger scenario that bounds the candidate asymptotically safe region in flavor number. The resulting color--flavor map provides guidance for five-dimensional model building by displaying both the baseline perturbative-control boundary and the candidate three-loop merger boundary. Four-loop matching, however, retains an interacting ultraviolet fixed point beyond the three-loop merger boundary, with no merger found for integer $2\le N\le15$ and $0\le N_f/N\le11/2$. The sensitivity of the fixed-point structure to higher-order terms leaves both scenarios open, highlighting fixed-point annihilation as a potential constraint on five-dimensional asymptotic safety.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Non-Abelian gauge theories above four dimensions may admit an interacting ultraviolet fixed point through the competition between canonical scaling and gauge-field antiscreening.	background 1.00	0.09	0.12	hedged possibility 1.00
s1	Using the four-loop $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ beta function continued to $D=4+2\epsilon$, we determine the largest dimension $D_{\mathrm{pt}}=4+2\epsilon_{\mathrm{pt}}$ below which successive loop corrections to the fixed point remain hierarchically ordered under a specified ratio criterion, and map $D_{\mathrm{pt}}$ over color and flavor numbers for fermions in the fundamental representation of $SU(N)$.	method 0.64	0.96	0.08	asserted 1.00
s2	At $D=5$, we construct rational anomalous dimensions with a fixed, pole-regularized denominator inspired by the functional renormalization group (fRG).	method 0.81	0.93	0.04	asserted 1.00
s3	Matching to the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ series through one, two, and three loops produces progressively smaller shifts in the critical flavor number and coupling at the ultraviolet--infrared merger (the point where the infrared and ultraviolet fixed points coincide), yielding $N_f^{\mathrm{cr}}\simeq 2.09 \, N$ at large $N$ in the three-loop construction.	result 0.98	0.93	0.19	asserted 1.00
s4	This low-order stabilization, together with qualitative evidence from fRG flows including higher gauge operators, suggests a potential merger scenario that bounds the candidate asymptotically safe region in flavor number.	interpretation 0.99	0.73	0.34	hedged possibility 1.00
s5	The resulting color--flavor map provides guidance for five-dimensional model building by displaying both the baseline perturbative-control boundary and the candidate three-loop merger boundary.	interpretation 0.77	0.89	0.17	asserted 0.75
s6	Four-loop matching, however, retains an interacting ultraviolet fixed point beyond the three-loop merger boundary, with no merger found for integer $2\le N\le15$ and $0\le N_f/N\le11/2$.	result 1.00	0.93	0.21	asserted 1.00
s7	The sensitivity of the fixed-point structure to higher-order terms leaves both scenarios open, highlighting fixed-point annihilation as a potential constraint on five-dimensional asymptotic safety.	interpretation 0.90	0.70	0.49	hedged possibility 0.78

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.55.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. Fixed-point couplings as functions of the extra-dimensional

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Perturbative-control dimension

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Gauge-coupling beta function at

**Figure 5.** FIG. 5. Effect of four-loop matching at

**Figure 6.** FIG. 6. Perturbative-control dimension

**Figure 7.** FIG. 7. Low-order stabilization of the rational merger at

**Figure 8.** FIG. 8. Gauge-coupling beta functions at

Showing 7 of the paper's 8 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.12225 by the authors.

References

Works cited (33)

[1]

S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, inGeneral relativity(1979) pp. 790–831

View on Pith 1979
[2]

M. E. Peskin, Critical point behavior of the Wilson loop, Phys. Lett. B94, 161 (1980)

View on Pith 1980
[3]

D. I. Kazakov, Ultraviolet Fixed Points in Gauge and SUSY Field Theories in Extra Dimensions (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0209100

View on Pith 2002
[4]

K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, GUT Precursors and Non-Trivial Fixed Points in Higher-Dimensional Gauge The- ories, Physical Review Letters91, 061601 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0210294

View on Pith 2003
[5]

H. Gies, Renormalizability of gauge theories in extra di- mensions, Physical Review D68, 085015 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0305208

View on Pith 2003
[6]

T. R. Morris, Renormalizable extra-dimensional models, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics2005, 002 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0410142

View on Pith 2005
[7]

F. De Cesare, L. Di Pietro, and M. Serone, Five-dimensional CFTs from theε-expansion, Phys. Rev. D104, 105015 (2021), we use arXiv version 3, revised 30 August 2024, arXiv:2107.00342 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[8]

A. Codello, K. Langæble, D. F. Litim, and F. Sannino, Confor- mal gauge–yukawa theories away from four dimensions, JHEP 2016(07), 118, arXiv:1603.03462 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[9]

A. Abdalgabar, M. O. Khojali, A. S. Cornell, G. Cacciapaglia, and A. Deandrea, Unification of gauge and Yukawa couplings, Physics Letters B776, 231 (2018), arXiv:1706.02313 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[10]

G. Cacciapaglia, C. Cot, A. Deandrea, and A. S. Cornell, Min- imal SU(5) Asymptotic Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. D104, 075012 (2021), arXiv:2012.14732 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[11]

G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, R. Pasechnik, and Z.-W. Wang, Asymptotic ultraviolet-safe unification of gauge and Yukawa 8 couplings: The exceptional case, Phys. Lett. B852, 138629 (2024), arXiv:2302.11671 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[12]

G.-X. Fang, Z.-W. Wang, and Y .-L. Zhou, Asymptotic grand unification in SO(10) with one extra dimension, JHEP2025 (08), 042, arXiv:2505.08068 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[13]

G. Cacciapaglia, W. Isnard, R. Pasechnik, and A. Preda, One loop renormalization of 5D gauge-Yukawa theories (2026), arXiv:2601.00453 [hep-th]

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[14]

A. Florio, J. M. V . P. Lopes, J. Matos, and J. Penedones, Searching for continuous phase transitions in 5D SU(2) lattice gauge theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 76 (2021), arXiv:2103.15242 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[15]

F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. V ogt, The five-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions, Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 90 (2017), arXiv:1701.01404 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[16]

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. K¨uhn, Five-Loop Run- ning of the QCD coupling constant, Physical Review Letters 118, 082002 (2017), arXiv:1606.08659 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[17]

D. B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Conformality lost, Phys. Rev. D80, 125005 (2009), arXiv:0905.4752 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009
[18]

´A. Pastor-Guti´errez and M. Yamada, On the phase structure of extra-dimensional gauge theories with fermions, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076018 (2024), arXiv:2401.07908 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[19]

F. Goertz, ´A. Pastor-Guti ´errez, and J. M. Pawlowski, Gauge- Fermion Cartography: From confinement and chiral symmetry breaking to conformality (2024), arXiv:2412.12254 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[20]

W. E. Caswell, Asymptotic behavior of non-abelian gauge theo- ries to two-loop order, Physical Review Letters33, 244 (1974)

View on Pith 1974
[21]

T. Banks and A. Zaks, On the phase structure of vector-like gauge theories with massless fermions, Nuclear Physics B196, 189 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[22]

C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective poten- tial, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[23]

T. R. Morris, The exact renormalisation group and approximate solutions, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A9, 2411 (1994), hep-ph/9308265

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[24]

J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Non-Perturbative Renormalization Flow in Quantum Field Theory and Statis- tical Physics, Physics Reports363, 223 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0005122

View on Pith 2002
[25]

J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the Functional Renormalisa- tion Group, Annals of Physics322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0512261

View on Pith 2007
[26]

H. Gies, Running coupling in Yang-Mills theory - a flow equa- tion study -, Physical Review D66, 025006 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0202207

View on Pith 2002
[27]

H. Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge theories, Lect. Notes Phys.852, 287 (2012), arXiv:hep- ph/0611146

View on Pith 2012
[28]

´A. Pastor-Guti´errez and M. Yamada, UV completion of extradi- mensional Yang-Mills theory for Gauge-Higgs unification, Sci- Post Phys.15, 101 (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[29]

K. Intriligator, D. R. Morrison, and N. Seiberg, Five- dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of calabi-yau spaces, Nuclear Physics B497, 56 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[30]

U. Ellwanger, M. Hirsch, and A. Weber, Flow equations for the relevant part of the pure yang-mills action, Z. Phys. C69, 687 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9506019

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[31]

F. Freire, D. F. Litim, and J. M. Pawlowski, Gauge invariance and background field formalism in the exact renormalisation group, Phys. Lett. B495, 256 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0009110

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[32]

H. Gies and J. Jaeckel, Chiral phase structure of QCD with many flavors, The European Physical Journal C46, 433 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0507171. APPENDIX Appendix A: Loop hierarchy, branch selection, and narrow passing bands For fixed(N,N f ), writeP L(a) =∑L−1n=0 βnan+1, so that the unresummed root equation isε=P L(a). At an interacting zero, ∂aβ (4+2ε) (a∗...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[33]

Lines connect discrete matching orders and do not represent an extrapolation. TABLE II. Unfiltered hierarchy at three-loop rational merger flavors (k=1/2). Ratios are evaluated atD=5;D pt uses the first crossing withθ=1/2. N N f R2 R3 R4 Dpt 3 6.379443 0.163 0.269 1.012 4.440 4 8.443701 0.160 0.279 0.553 4.897 5 10.519094 0.159 0.283 0.318 5.539 7 14.6837...

View on Pith

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, inGeneral relativity(1979) pp. 790–831

View on Pith 1979

[2] [2]

M. E. Peskin, Critical point behavior of the Wilson loop, Phys. Lett. B94, 161 (1980)

View on Pith 1980

[3] [3]

D. I. Kazakov, Ultraviolet Fixed Points in Gauge and SUSY Field Theories in Extra Dimensions (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0209100

View on Pith 2002

[4] [4]

K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, GUT Precursors and Non-Trivial Fixed Points in Higher-Dimensional Gauge The- ories, Physical Review Letters91, 061601 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0210294

View on Pith 2003

[5] [5]

H. Gies, Renormalizability of gauge theories in extra di- mensions, Physical Review D68, 085015 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0305208

View on Pith 2003

[6] [6]

T. R. Morris, Renormalizable extra-dimensional models, Jour- nal of High Energy Physics2005, 002 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0410142

View on Pith 2005

[7] [7]

F. De Cesare, L. Di Pietro, and M. Serone, Five-dimensional CFTs from theε-expansion, Phys. Rev. D104, 105015 (2021), we use arXiv version 3, revised 30 August 2024, arXiv:2107.00342 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

A. Codello, K. Langæble, D. F. Litim, and F. Sannino, Confor- mal gauge–yukawa theories away from four dimensions, JHEP 2016(07), 118, arXiv:1603.03462 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[9] [9]

A. Abdalgabar, M. O. Khojali, A. S. Cornell, G. Cacciapaglia, and A. Deandrea, Unification of gauge and Yukawa couplings, Physics Letters B776, 231 (2018), arXiv:1706.02313 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[10] [10]

G. Cacciapaglia, C. Cot, A. Deandrea, and A. S. Cornell, Min- imal SU(5) Asymptotic Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. D104, 075012 (2021), arXiv:2012.14732 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[11] [11]

G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, R. Pasechnik, and Z.-W. Wang, Asymptotic ultraviolet-safe unification of gauge and Yukawa 8 couplings: The exceptional case, Phys. Lett. B852, 138629 (2024), arXiv:2302.11671 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[12] [12]

G.-X. Fang, Z.-W. Wang, and Y .-L. Zhou, Asymptotic grand unification in SO(10) with one extra dimension, JHEP2025 (08), 042, arXiv:2505.08068 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[13] [13]

G. Cacciapaglia, W. Isnard, R. Pasechnik, and A. Preda, One loop renormalization of 5D gauge-Yukawa theories (2026), arXiv:2601.00453 [hep-th]

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[14] [14]

A. Florio, J. M. V . P. Lopes, J. Matos, and J. Penedones, Searching for continuous phase transitions in 5D SU(2) lattice gauge theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2021, 76 (2021), arXiv:2103.15242 [hep-lat]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[15] [15]

F. Herzog, B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and A. V ogt, The five-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions, Journal of High Energy Physics2017, 90 (2017), arXiv:1701.01404 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[16] [16]

P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. K¨uhn, Five-Loop Run- ning of the QCD coupling constant, Physical Review Letters 118, 082002 (2017), arXiv:1606.08659 [hep-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[17] [17]

D. B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Conformality lost, Phys. Rev. D80, 125005 (2009), arXiv:0905.4752 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2009

[18] [18]

´A. Pastor-Guti´errez and M. Yamada, On the phase structure of extra-dimensional gauge theories with fermions, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076018 (2024), arXiv:2401.07908 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[19] [19]

F. Goertz, ´A. Pastor-Guti ´errez, and J. M. Pawlowski, Gauge- Fermion Cartography: From confinement and chiral symmetry breaking to conformality (2024), arXiv:2412.12254 [hep-th]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[20] [20]

W. E. Caswell, Asymptotic behavior of non-abelian gauge theo- ries to two-loop order, Physical Review Letters33, 244 (1974)

View on Pith 1974

[21] [21]

T. Banks and A. Zaks, On the phase structure of vector-like gauge theories with massless fermions, Nuclear Physics B196, 189 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[22] [22]

C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective poten- tial, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[23] [23]

T. R. Morris, The exact renormalisation group and approximate solutions, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A9, 2411 (1994), hep-ph/9308265

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[24] [24]

J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Non-Perturbative Renormalization Flow in Quantum Field Theory and Statis- tical Physics, Physics Reports363, 223 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0005122

View on Pith 2002

[25] [25]

J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the Functional Renormalisa- tion Group, Annals of Physics322, 2831 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0512261

View on Pith 2007

[26] [26]

H. Gies, Running coupling in Yang-Mills theory - a flow equa- tion study -, Physical Review D66, 025006 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0202207

View on Pith 2002

[27] [27]

H. Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge theories, Lect. Notes Phys.852, 287 (2012), arXiv:hep- ph/0611146

View on Pith 2012

[28] [28]

´A. Pastor-Guti´errez and M. Yamada, UV completion of extradi- mensional Yang-Mills theory for Gauge-Higgs unification, Sci- Post Phys.15, 101 (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[29] [29]

K. Intriligator, D. R. Morrison, and N. Seiberg, Five- dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of calabi-yau spaces, Nuclear Physics B497, 56 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[30] [30]

U. Ellwanger, M. Hirsch, and A. Weber, Flow equations for the relevant part of the pure yang-mills action, Z. Phys. C69, 687 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9506019

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[31] [31]

F. Freire, D. F. Litim, and J. M. Pawlowski, Gauge invariance and background field formalism in the exact renormalisation group, Phys. Lett. B495, 256 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0009110

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[32] [32]

H. Gies and J. Jaeckel, Chiral phase structure of QCD with many flavors, The European Physical Journal C46, 433 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0507171. APPENDIX Appendix A: Loop hierarchy, branch selection, and narrow passing bands For fixed(N,N f ), writeP L(a) =∑L−1n=0 βnan+1, so that the unresummed root equation isε=P L(a). At an interacting zero, ∂aβ (4+2ε) (a∗...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[33] [33]

Lines connect discrete matching orders and do not represent an extrapolation. TABLE II. Unfiltered hierarchy at three-loop rational merger flavors (k=1/2). Ratios are evaluated atD=5;D pt uses the first crossing withθ=1/2. N N f R2 R3 R4 Dpt 3 6.379443 0.163 0.269 1.012 4.440 4 8.443701 0.160 0.279 0.553 4.897 5 10.519094 0.159 0.283 0.318 5.539 7 14.6837...

View on Pith