Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Matching the 2HDM to the HEFT and the SMEFT: Decoupling and Perturbativity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.07689 v2 pith:2CIAEEU4 submitted 2023-05-12 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords heftsmeftexpansionperturbativityheavyapproachesconsiderconsistent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We consider the 2 Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM) and compare two effective field theory (EFT) approaches to it, according to whether the heavy degrees of freedom are integrated out before (SMEFT) or after (HEFT) spontaneous symmetry breaking. %We show that, in the HEFT, an inconsistent EFT is obtained if one considers an expansion simply in inverse powers of the heavy masses. %We consider a HEFT expansion consistent with perturbativity %We show that, if the HEFT approach is required to comply with perturbativity, it ends up obeying the same power counting as the SMEFT one. % By requiring decoupling and perturbativity in the 2HDM, we define a consistent EFT expansion in inverse powers of the heavy masses which is applied to both the SMEFT and the HEFT matchings to the 2HDM. We organize this expansion with a dimensionless parameter $\xi$, and investigate the tree-level scatterings $hh\rightarrow hh$ and $WW\rightarrow hh$ up to $\mathcal{O}(\xi^2)$. We find no differences between the HEFT and the SMEFT approaches at this order. We show scenarios where even including dimension-8 operators of the SMEFT is insufficient to obtain an accurate matching to the 2HDM.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SUSY meets SMEFT: Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM

    hep-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM onto SMEFT in the Warsaw basis, including all SUSY-governed correlations among Wilson coefficients.

  2. When Two Loops Matter: Electroweak Precision in the SMEFT

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A modification to the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling in SMEFT induces a two-loop shift in the W mass through a large anomalous dimension, providing a new indirect probe via electroweak precision observables.

  3. Running of neutrino mass parameters in the Zee model

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the Zee model, one-loop EFT running—not direct matching—generates the neutrino mass matrix, and 1% variations in fitted high-scale couplings shift neutrino observables beyond next-generation experimental precision.

  4. The Art of Counting: a reappraisal of the HEFT expansion

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    HEFT admits two consistent power counting schemes, one with a single low-energy scale v and one with two scales v < f, each allowing systematic truncation of operators and amplitudes for any normalization choice.

Pith tools