Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Perspectivist Paradigm Shift: Assumptions and Challenges of Capturing Human Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.05860 v1 pith:2CTK3J3T submitted 2024-05-09 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CY

The Perspectivist Paradigm Shift: Assumptions and Challenges of Capturing Human Labels

classification cs.LG cs.CLcs.CY
keywords assumptionsdisagreementperspectivistannotatorsapproacheschallengesdatalabeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Longstanding data labeling practices in machine learning involve collecting and aggregating labels from multiple annotators. But what should we do when annotators disagree? Though annotator disagreement has long been seen as a problem to minimize, new perspectivist approaches challenge this assumption by treating disagreement as a valuable source of information. In this position paper, we examine practices and assumptions surrounding the causes of disagreement--some challenged by perspectivist approaches, and some that remain to be addressed--as well as practical and normative challenges for work operating under these assumptions. We conclude with recommendations for the data labeling pipeline and avenues for future research engaging with subjectivity and disagreement.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Illusions of the Gold Standard: A Large-scale Analysis of Human Evaluation Protocols for Long-form Text Generation

    cs.CL 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    A systematic analysis of 284 manually reviewed papers plus 1.8k+ others from 2023-2025 reveals under-reporting of human evaluation study design details, creating ambiguity in what was measured and how.

  2. From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labeling

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A statistical framework decomposes human annotation outcomes into four interpretable variation sources and extends classical measurement-error models to handle both shared and individualized notions of truth.

  3. Mapping Data Labour Supply Chain in Africa in an Era of Digital Apartheid: a Struggle for Recognition

    cs.CY 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Data labour supply chain in Africa covers 43 countries via 17 firms with precarious short-term contracts and psychological stress, documented through participatory survey and desk research to highlight workers' demand...