Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fundamentals of Task-Agnostic Data Valuation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.12354 v1 pith:2DKXHJCF submitted 2022-08-25 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CYcs.ITmath.ITstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CYcs.ITmath.ITstat.ML
keywords datasellerbuyerdiversityqueriesrelevancevaluationavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study valuing the data of a data owner/seller for a data seeker/buyer. Data valuation is often carried out for a specific task assuming a particular utility metric, such as test accuracy on a validation set, that may not exist in practice. In this work, we focus on task-agnostic data valuation without any validation requirements. The data buyer has access to a limited amount of data (which could be publicly available) and seeks more data samples from a data seller. We formulate the problem as estimating the differences in the statistical properties of the data at the seller with respect to the baseline data available at the buyer. We capture these statistical differences through second moment by measuring diversity and relevance of the seller's data for the buyer; we estimate these measures through queries to the seller without requesting raw data. We design the queries with the proposed approach so that the seller is blind to the buyer's raw data and has no knowledge to fabricate responses to queries to obtain a desired outcome of the diversity and relevance trade-off.We will show through extensive experiments on real tabular and image datasets that the proposed estimates capture the diversity and relevance of the seller's data for the buyer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Data Reliability Scoring

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Gram-determinant score ranks dataset reliability without ground truth from auxiliary observations, and is the only experiment-agnostic ranking up to a monotone transform.

Pith tools