Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep Learning Model Security: Threats and Defenses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.08969 v2 pith:2LIXIRM5 submitted 2024-12-12 cs.CR cs.LGcs.SE

Deep Learning Model Security: Threats and Defenses

classification cs.CR cs.LGcs.SE
keywords learningsecurityadversarialdeepdefensesmodelattackschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning has transformed AI applications but faces critical security challenges, including adversarial attacks, data poisoning, model theft, and privacy leakage. This survey examines these vulnerabilities, detailing their mechanisms and impact on model integrity and confidentiality. Practical implementations, including adversarial examples, label flipping, and backdoor attacks, are explored alongside defenses such as adversarial training, differential privacy, and federated learning, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Advanced methods like contrastive and self-supervised learning are presented for enhancing robustness. The survey concludes with future directions, emphasizing automated defenses, zero-trust architectures, and the security challenges of large AI models. A balanced approach to performance and security is essential for developing reliable deep learning systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A3M: Adaptive, Adversarial and Multi-Objective Learning for Strategic Bidding in Repeated Auctions

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A3M integrates adaptive DRL, adversarial opponent modeling, and multi-objective rewards to cut regret 30-40% versus baselines while remaining robust to strategy shifts in repeated auctions.

  2. FedCausal-Dyn: A Causal-Dynamic Paradigm for Federated Learning under Dynamic Feature Drift

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0

    A federated framework that adversarially separates causal vs. spurious features, reliability-weights class prototypes, and contrastively aligns them, reporting SOTA accuracy on Office-10, Digits, and PACS.