Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Diversity Empowers Intelligence: Integrating Expertise of Software Engineering Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.07060 v1 pith:2TID572X submitted 2024-08-13 cs.SE cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords agentagentsresolvediversityengineeringliteratesoftware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents have shown great potential in solving real-world software engineering (SWE) problems. The most advanced open-source SWE agent can resolve over 27% of real GitHub issues in SWE-Bench Lite. However, these sophisticated agent frameworks exhibit varying strengths, excelling in certain tasks while underperforming in others. To fully harness the diversity of these agents, we propose DEI (Diversity Empowered Intelligence), a framework that leverages their unique expertise. DEI functions as a meta-module atop existing SWE agent frameworks, managing agent collectives for enhanced problem-solving. Experimental results show that a DEI-guided committee of agents is able to surpass the best individual agent's performance by a large margin. For instance, a group of open-source SWE agents, with a maximum individual resolve rate of 27.3% on SWE-Bench Lite, can achieve a 34.3% resolve rate with DEI, making a 25% improvement and beating most closed-source solutions. Our best-performing group excels with a 55% resolve rate, securing the highest ranking on SWE-Bench Lite. Our findings contribute to the growing body of research on collaborative AI systems and their potential to solve complex software engineering challenges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PatchIsland: Orchestration of LLM Agents for Continuous Vulnerability Repair

    cs.CR 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An orchestrated ensemble of LLM agents with patch-based deduplication patched 31 of 43 confirmed vulnerabilities in the AIxCC final and 84 of 92 in an internal benchmark.

  2. UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agents

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-turn agent benchmark shows that current LLMs elicit fewer than 30% of user preferences and reach full intent alignment only about 20% of the time.

  3. From Virtual Agents to Robot Teams: A Multi-Robot Framework Evaluation in High-Stakes Healthcare Context

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding a structured knowledge base raised a simulated CrewAI healthcare robot team's process score from 45.29% to 72.94%, but five failure modes, including false completion and poor recovery, persisted.

Pith tools