pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27852 · v1 · pith:3NG4IJ7Rnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

Mass-Ratio Reversal as an Alternative to Hierarchical Mergers for GW241011

Rui-Chong Hu , Ying Qin , Bing Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 03:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords gravitational wavesbinary black holesmass ratio reversalhierarchical mergersGW241011stellar evolutionbinary interactionscommon envelope
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mass-ratio reversal in isolated binaries produces GW241011-like systems as an alternative to hierarchical mergers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

GW241011 combines an extreme mass ratio near 0.3 with high effective spin, features hierarchical mergers rarely achieve because second-generation black holes rarely match that mass ratio and often receive recoil kicks that eject them. The paper tests whether the mass-ratio reversal channel, in which mass transfer flips which star ends up as the heavier black hole, can generate matching systems inside isolated binary evolution. It maps the probability of success across different stellar-wind, mass-transfer, and common-envelope prescriptions to show under which conditions the channel works. A reader cares because the result offers an isolated-evolution route that avoids dynamical environments and supplies direct constraints on uncertain binary physics from a single observed event.

Core claim

The mass-ratio reversal channel in isolated binary evolution can generate binary black hole mergers with mass ratios around 0.3 and large effective spins matching GW241011, provided the models adopt particular prescriptions for stellar winds, mass transfer, and common-envelope evolution; this pathway therefore supplies a viable alternative to hierarchical mergers, which are disfavored by recoil and mass-ratio statistics.

What carries the argument

Mass-ratio reversal (MRR) channel, the process in which mass transfer reverses the initial mass ordering so the originally lighter star becomes the more massive black hole.

If this is right

  • MRR supplies a pathway for extreme mass-ratio high-spin BBHs without requiring dense dynamical environments.
  • Success of the channel depends on specific choices for stellar-wind strength and common-envelope efficiency.
  • The same models that produce GW241011-like systems also constrain the allowed range of binary-interaction parameters.
  • Hierarchical-merger explanations become less necessary once isolated channels are shown to reach the observed parameter space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If MRR operates efficiently, the fraction of isolated binaries contributing to the observed high-spin, extreme-ratio population may be larger than current estimates assume.
  • Future events with similar parameters but measured formation redshifts could distinguish MRR from hierarchical channels via delay-time distributions.
  • Refining population-synthesis codes to track mass reversal explicitly would allow direct comparison of predicted rates against the growing GW catalog.

Load-bearing premise

The population-synthesis models used accurately represent the dominant uncertainties in stellar winds, mass transfer, and common-envelope evolution without requiring post-hoc tuning to match the target event.

What would settle it

Detection of a statistically large sample of extreme-mass-ratio, high-spin mergers whose host environments or delay times are inconsistent with isolated binary evolution would falsify the MRR explanation for GW241011-like events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27852 by Bing Zhang, Rui-Chong Hu, Ying Qin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative evolutionary pathway of the MRR channel leading to the formation of GW241011-like event with χ1 = 0.74. The system undergoes stable Roche-lobe overflow initiated by the initially more massive star, result￾ing in mass-ratio reversal. The initially less massive star later initiates a CE phase, whose ejection dramatically reduces the orbital separation. Following the CE phase, strong tidal in￾t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Corner plot showing the 1D and 2D distributions of BBH properties produced through MRR channel in our binary population synthesis model with αCE = 5.0. The simulated BBH population is shown in gray, while the parameter space of GW241011 is shown in blue (90% credible regions). scription. This indicates that variations in mass-transfer efficiency alone are insufficient to form GW241011-like systems when the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distribution of the effective spin parameter (χeff ) as a function of the mass ratio (q) for MRR BBHs from our αCE = 5.0 model. The population is partitioned by binary evolutionary channel: SMT (blue) and CE (orange). The blue contour denotes the 90% credible region inferred for GW241011. 10 2 10 1 10 0 Z [Z ] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 NM R R /NB B H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Metallicity dependence of the MRR contribution to the BBH merger population. Points show the fraction NMRR/NBBH in logarithmic metallicity bins, with error bars indicating 95% Wilson confidence intervals. erarchical mergers (e.g., A. G. Abac et al. 2025; G.-P. Li & X.-L. Fan 2025), which provide a natural pathway for producing massive, rapidly rotating BHs. However, some recent studies have disfavored the … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mass-ratio (q) distributions of BBHs formed through the MRR channel for different binary-evolution models. Left: models with different common-envelope efficiencies, αCE. Middle: models with different mass-transfer prescriptions assuming αCE = 1.0. Right: same as the middle panel, but for αCE = 5.0. the conservative limit (β = 1) and in some cases as low as β ∼ 0.1 (e.g., J. Petrovic et al. 2005; Y. Shao & … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent gravitational-wave (GW) observations have revealed binary black hole (BBH) mergers with both extreme mass ratios and large effective spin parameters ($\chi_{\rm{eff}}$). GW241011 is a notable example that shows these properties. Although hierarchical mergers (second-generation + first-generation BHs) can naturally produce high spins, they rarely produce such an extreme mass ratio ($\sim 0.3$), and are further limited by gravitational recoil kicks that can eject the second-generation BH from the host environment. Moreover, recent studies have argued against a dynamical origin for GW241011. Here, we investigate the formation of GW241011-like systems through the mass-ratio reversal (MRR) channel in isolated binary evolution. By quantifying the probability of producing such systems across a range of binary-evolution models, we identify the key dependencies on stellar-evolution and binary-interaction physics. Our results demonstrate the conditions under which the MRR channel can provide a viable alternative to hierarchical mergers and place constraints on the physical processes governing binary evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the mass-ratio reversal (MRR) channel within isolated binary evolution as a formation pathway for GW241011-like binary black hole mergers, which exhibit an extreme mass ratio of ~0.3 and large effective spin. Using population-synthesis calculations across a range of binary-evolution models, the authors quantify formation probabilities, identify dependencies on stellar winds, mass transfer, and common-envelope evolution, and conclude that MRR provides a viable alternative to hierarchical mergers under certain conditions while constraining binary-evolution physics.

Significance. If the probability quantifications and model dependencies hold, the work supplies a concrete alternative channel for explaining GW events with extreme mass ratios that hierarchical mergers struggle to produce due to recoil kicks, thereby helping to constrain uncertain aspects of stellar and binary physics such as wind mass loss and envelope ejection efficiency.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract refers to 'quantifying the probability' and 'identifying key dependencies' but does not preview specific numerical results or model variants; adding a brief summary of the highest-probability model outcomes in the abstract would improve accessibility.
  2. Notation for effective spin (χ_eff) and mass ratio is introduced without an explicit definition or reference to the standard LIGO/Virgo conventions used in the GW241011 parameter estimation; a short footnote or sentence in §2 would clarify this.
  3. Figure captions (where population-synthesis results are shown) should explicitly state the number of simulated binaries per model and the selection criteria for 'GW241011-like' events to allow direct assessment of statistical robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report, so we have no specific points requiring response or revision at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's argument relies on running population-synthesis models drawn from prior literature to quantify formation probabilities for GW241011-like events under the MRR channel. No equation or result is shown to reduce by construction to a parameter fitted from the same target event, no self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem that forces the conclusion, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The central claim therefore remains an independent modeling exercise whose validity rests on the external fidelity of the adopted binary-evolution prescriptions rather than on any definitional loop internal to this manuscript.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all modeling details are absent.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5713 in / 964 out tokens · 41565 ms · 2026-06-29T03:10:30.371997+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G., et al

    Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 993, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54 2025

  2. [2]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2021, Physical Review X, 11, 021053, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 2021

  3. [3]

    2024, , 109, 022001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 022001, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.022001 2024

  4. [4]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 5008, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1149

    Antonini, F., Gieles, M., & Gualandris, A. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 5008, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1149

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1149 2019

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 2009

  6. [6]

    S., Zevin, M., & Fragos, T

    Bavera, S. S., Zevin, M., & Fragos, T. 2021, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 127, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ac053c

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac053c 2021

  7. [7]

    S., Fragos, T., Qin, Y., et al

    Bavera, S. S., Fragos, T., Qin, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936204

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936204 2020

  8. [8]

    Nature534, 512–515 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18322

    Belczynski, K., Holz, D. E., Bulik, T., & O’Shaughnessy, R. 2016, Nature, 534, 512, doi: 10.1038/nature18322 8

    work page doi:10.1038/nature18322 2016

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Belczynski, K., Klencki, J., Fields, C. E., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936528

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936528 2020

  10. [10]

    Bhattacharya, D., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1991, PhR, 203, 1, doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(91)90064-S

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90064-s 1991

  11. [11]

    S., Stevenson, S., & Thrane, E

    Broekgaarden, F. S., Stevenson, S., & Thrane, E. 2022, ApJ, 938, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8879

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8879 2022

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Broekgaarden, F. S., Berger, E., Neijssel, C. J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5028, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2716 de Kool, M. 1990, ApJ, 358, 189, doi: 10.1086/168974 de Mink, S. E., Pols, O. R., & Hilditch, R. W. 2007, A&A, 467, 1181, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20067007

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2716 2021

  13. [13]

    G., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., & Izzard, R

    Detmers, R. G., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., & Izzard, R. G. 2008, A&A, 484, 831, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809371

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809371 2008

  14. [14]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 989, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf286

    Disberg, P., & Mandel, I. 2025, ApJL, 989, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf286

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf286 2025

  15. [15]

    L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al

    Fryer, C. L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/91 2012

  16. [16]

    2019, Astrophys

    Fuller, J., & Ma, L. 2019, ApJL, 881, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b 2019

  17. [17]

    Harris and K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  18. [18]

    2026, ApJ, 999, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3fa3

    Hu, R.-C., & Zhang, B. 2026, ApJ, 999, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3fa3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3fa3 2026

  19. [19]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 163, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac573f

    Hu, R.-C., Zhu, J.-P., Qin, Y., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 163, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac573f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac573f 2022

  20. [20]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  21. [21]

    , eprint =

    Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x 2000

  22. [22]

    Classification of halo A-type stars

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002

  23. [23]

    ( year 2013 ), month Feb

    Ivanova, N., Justham, S., Chen, X., et al. 2013, A&A Rv, 21, 59, doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2 2013

  24. [24]

    1994, A&A, 290, 496

    Janka, H.-T., & Mueller, E. 1994, A&A, 290, 496

    1994

  25. [25]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.20965, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.20965

    Li, G.-P., & Fan, X.-L. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.20965, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.20965

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.20965 2025

  26. [26]

    Remnant recoil and host environments of GWTC-4.0 binary black-hole mergers

    Llobera-Querol, J., Hamilton, E., Singh, N., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.05492, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.05492

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05492 2026

  27. [27]

    The Astrophys- ical Journal952, 53 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74

    Ma, L., & Fuller, J. 2023, ApJ, 952, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74 2023

  28. [28]

    Implications of modern mass-loss rates for massive stars

    Merritt, J., Stevenson, S., Sander, A., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.17052, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.17052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.17052 2025

  29. [29]

    J., Vigna-G´ omez, A., Stevenson, S., et al

    Neijssel, C. J., Vigna-G´ omez, A., Stevenson, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 3740, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2840

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2840 2019

  30. [30]

    2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    Neumayer, N., Seth, A., & B¨ oker, T. 2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0 2020

  31. [31]

    2025, A&A, 695, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451564

    Nuijten, M., & Nelemans, G. 2025, A&A, 695, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451564

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451564 2025

  32. [32]

    2021, ApJL, 921, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f48 Olejak, A., Belczynski, K., & Ivanova, N

    Olejak, A., & Belczynski, K. 2021, ApJL, 921, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f48

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2f48 2021

  33. [33]

    Petrovic, J., Langer, N., & van der Hucht, K. A. 2005, A&A, 435, 1013, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042368

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042368 2005

  34. [34]

    Phinney, E. S. 1991, ApJL, 380, L17, doi: 10.1086/186163 Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W., & Gieles, M. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 431, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834

    work page doi:10.1086/186163 1991

  35. [35]

    2025, A&A, 699, A178, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554603

    Qi, S., Song, H., Meynet, G., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A178, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554603

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554603 2025

  36. [36]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics616, 28 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832839

    Qin, Y., Fragos, T., Meynet, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832839

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832839 2018

  37. [37]

    2023, A&A, 671, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244712

    Qin, Y., Hu, R.-C., Meynet, G., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244712

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244712 2023

  38. [38]

    2019, ApJL, 870, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b

    Qin, Y., Marchant, P., Fragos, T., Meynet, G., & Kalogera, V. 2019, ApJL, 870, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b 2019

  39. [39]

    2022, ApJ, 924, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3982

    Qin, Y., Wang, Y.-Z., Wu, D.-H., Meynet, G., & Song, H. 2022, ApJ, 924, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3982

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3982 2022

  40. [40]

    2023, ApJL, 942, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca4d3

    Renzo, M., Zapartas, E., Justham, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 942, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca4d3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca4d3 2023

  41. [41]

    2022, Astrophys

    Riley, J., Agrawal, P., Barrett, J. W., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac416c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac416c 2022

  42. [42]

    L., Zevin, M., Amaro-Seoane, P., et al

    Rodriguez, C. L., Zevin, M., Amaro-Seoane, P., et al. 2019, PhRvD, 100, 043027, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043027 2019

  43. [43]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/108

    Shao, Y., & Li, X.-D. 2016, ApJ, 833, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/108

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/108 2016

  44. [44]

    Massquerade: Impacts of Mass Ratio Reversals on Binary Black Hole Merger Rates and Mass Distributions

    Smith, T. B., Broekgaarden, F., Levina, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21580, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.21580

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21580 2026

  45. [45]

    Spruit, H. C. 1999, A&A, 349, 189, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9907138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9907138 1999

  46. [46]

    Spruit, H. C. 2002, A&A, 381, 923, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011465

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011465 2002

  47. [47]

    2017, Nature Communications, 8, 14906, doi: 10.1038/ncomms14906

    Stevenson, S., Vigna-G´ omez, A., Mandel, I., et al. 2017, Nature Communications, 8, 14906, doi: 10.1038/ncomms14906

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14906 2017

  48. [48]

    2021, in Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2021: Evolution Across All Dimensions (PEARC ’21) (New

    Strande, S., Cai, H., Tatineni, M., & et al. 2021, in Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2021: Evolution Across All Dimensions (PEARC ’21) (New

    2021

  49. [49]

    York, NY: ACM), doi: 10.1145/3437359.3465588

    work page doi:10.1145/3437359.3465588

  50. [50]

    Tauris, T. M. 2022, ApJ, 938, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac86c8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac86c8 2022

  51. [51]

    M., & van den Heuvel, E

    Tauris, T. M., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der

    2006

  52. [52]

    Formation and Evolution of Compact Stellar X-ray Sources

    Klis, Vol. 39, 623–665, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0303456 Team COMPAS: Mandel, I., Riley, J., Boesky, A., et al. 2025, ApJS, 280, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adf8d0 9 Team COMPAS: Riley, J., Agrawal, P., Barrett, J. W., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac416c

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0303456 2025

  53. [53]

    1973, Nauchnye Informatsii, 27, 70 van Son, L

    Tutukov, A., & Yungelson, L. 1973, Nauchnye Informatsii, 27, 70 van Son, L. A. C., Roy, S. K., Mandel, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 209, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada14a Vigna-G´ omez, A., Neijssel, C. J., Stevenson, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 4009, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2463

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada14a 1973

  54. [54]

    M., & Fishbach, M

    Vijaykumar, A., Farah, A. M., & Fishbach, M. 2026, ApJL, 999, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae4878

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae4878 2026

  55. [55]

    Vink, J. S. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 203, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094949

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094949 2022

  56. [56]

    Waskom, M. L. 2021, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3021, doi: 10.21105/joss.03021

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.03021 2021

  57. [57]

    Webbink, R. F. 1984, ApJ, 277, 355, doi: 10.1086/161701

    work page doi:10.1086/161701 1984

  58. [58]

    2013, A&A, 552, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220636

    Wongwathanarat, A., Janka, H.-T., & M¨ uller, E. 2013, A&A, 552, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220636

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220636 2013

  59. [59]

    2010a, ApJ, 716, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/114

    Xu, X.-J., & Li, X.-D. 2010a, ApJ, 716, 114, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/114

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/114

  60. [60]

    2010b, ApJ, 722, 1985, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1985

    Xu, X.-J., & Li, X.-D. 2010b, ApJ, 722, 1985, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1985

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/722/2/1985 1985

  61. [61]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.20054, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.20054

    Xu, X.-T., Langer, N., Klencki, J., Wang, C., & Li, X.-D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.20054, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.20054

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.20054 2025

  62. [62]

    S., Fishbach, M., Kremer, K., & Reina-Campos, M

    Ye, C. S., Fishbach, M., Kremer, K., & Reina-Campos, M. 2026, ApJ, 997, 267, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae317f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae317f 2026

  63. [63]

    Zaldarriaga, M., Kushnir, D., & Kollmeier, J. A. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 4174, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2577

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2577 2018

  64. [64]

    C., Fragione, G., Kimball, C., & Kalogera, V

    Zhang, R. C., Fragione, G., Kimball, C., & Kalogera, V. 2023, ApJ, 954, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace4c1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace4c1 2023