REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning Perturbations to Explain Time Series Predictions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Learning Perturbations to Explain Time Series Predictions
read the original abstract
Explaining predictions based on multivariate time series data carries the additional difficulty of handling not only multiple features, but also time dependencies. It matters not only what happened, but also when, and the same feature could have a very different impact on a prediction depending on this time information. Previous work has used perturbation-based saliency methods to tackle this issue, perturbing an input using a trainable mask to discover which features at which times are driving the predictions. However these methods introduce fixed perturbations, inspired from similar methods on static data, while there seems to be little motivation to do so on temporal data. In this work, we aim to explain predictions by learning not only masks, but also associated perturbations. We empirically show that learning these perturbations significantly improves the quality of these explanations on time series data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When, How Long and How Much? Interpretable Neural Networks for Time Series Regression by Learning to Mask and Aggregate
MAGNETS learns unsupervised, mask-based concepts to make time-series regression predictions additively interpretable, recovering ground-truth temporal rules on synthetic tasks and beating interpretable baselines on mo...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.