Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Preparing two ultracold molecules in the ro-vibrational pair (0,1)+(1,0) creates a strong repulsive van der Waals interaction that suppresses collisional loss by up to seven orders of magnitude and enables evaporative cooling of Fermi mixtu

desk verdict The ro-vibrational vdW interaction is a real and novel mechanism with solid coupled-channel support; the paper should be peer reviewed, but the abstract's evaporation claim goes beyond what is shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25774 v2 pith:3SZWU6W5 submitted 2026-07-28 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph

Kang Feng , Hanwei Yang , Hubert J. Jóźwiak , Tijs Karman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords ultracoldmoleculesro-vibrationalvanderWaalsinteractionrotation-vibrationcouplingdipole-dipolecollisionalshieldingevaporativecoolingFermimixturecoupled-channelscattering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper identifies a new kind of van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules that arises from the coupling of rotation and vibration. When one molecule sits in the vibrational ground state with one unit of rotation and the other sits in the first excited vibrational state with no rotation, the pair experiences a strong second-order dipolar force, repulsive in the upper channel, with a strength set by the simple formula C6 = de^4/(9αe). Because the rotation-vibration coupling constant αe is tiny (megahertz) compared to rotational or electronic energy gaps, this interaction is orders of magnitude stronger than previously known van der Waals forces. The repulsion suppresses inelastic collisions by several orders of magnitude (up to seven for NaK in its hyperfine ground state), making it possible to evaporatively cool a Fermi mixture of molecules without active shielding fields. If correct, the mechanism offers a new, field-free route to quantum gases of polar molecules and a versatile tuning knob for quantum simulation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rotation-vibration coupling constant αe of the Dunham expansion, which measures how much the rotational constant decreases when the molecule is vibrationally excited. Its small size (roughly 1–100 MHz for assembled ultracold molecules) sets the energy denominator for the virtual dipole-allowed transition between (0,1)+(1,0) and (0,0)+(1,1), producing the strong van der Waals coefficient C6 = de^4/(9αe). The paper's quantitative engine is a coupled-channel scattering calculation that includes vibrational states in the monomer Hamiltonian, with an absorbing boundary condition modeling sticky collisions; a minimal two-channel model captures the universal scaling.

What would settle it

Measure the two-body loss rate coefficient for fermionic NaK molecules in the (0,1)+(1,0) ro-vibrational pair at a few hundred gauss and temperatures around 1 µK, with both molecules in their lowest hyperfine states; the central claim predicts a loss rate near or below 10^-14 cm^3/s with an elastic-to-inelastic ratio of order 15. Finding loss rates orders of magnitude higher (e.g., close to universal s-wave loss) would falsify the repulsive-ro-vibrational-vdW picture. A complementary test is a direct measurement of the C6 coefficient, e.g., through the position of shape resonances or photoasso

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that a pair of molecules in the ro-vibrational states (v,j)+(v',j')=(0,1)+(1,0) is coupled by the dipole-dipole interaction to the nearly degenerate pair (0,0)+(1,1). The degeneracy is broken by rotation-vibration coupling: the rotational constant is slightly smaller in v=1 because the molecule's bond is stretched, so the energy defect is 2αe. This virtual transition produces a second-order interaction ±C6 R^-6 with C6 = de^4/(9αe), repulsive in the entrance channel of interest. For NaK the coefficient is 7×10^7 a.u. and for the ultrapolar species KAg it reaches 10^10 a.u., giving van der Waals lengths of 1700 and 7400 bohr. Coupled-channel calculations including full

Load-bearing premise

The application to evaporative cooling assumes that vibrationally excited molecules (v=1, j=0) can be prepared, held, and rethermalized within their ~10–100 ms spontaneous-emission lifetime, so that decay-induced heating does not outpace evaporative cooling; the paper states the lifetime but does not demonstrate a cooling trajectory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Direct evaporative cooling of Fermi mixtures of molecules can work without microwave or electric-field shielding; the computed elastic-to-inelastic ratios are on the order of tens at 1 µK and improve at lower temperature.
  • The interaction is universal: for any linear diatomic molecule, the scattering length in units of R_d depends only on αe/E_d, so predictions transfer from NaK and KAg to other species.
  • The ro-vibrational vdW force can be combined with double microwave shielding to simultaneously suppress losses in v=0+v=0, v=0+v=1, and v=1+v=1 collisions, enabling stable pseudo-spin 1/2 mixtures with tunable dipolar interactions.
  • Because the repulsion is orders of magnitude stronger than the rotational vdW repulsion used previously, it can raise the single-molecule loading fidelity in optical tweezers beyond the ~80% limit.
  • The same mechanism can stabilize fermionic molecules in optical lattices against pair loss and provides a state-dependent interaction resource for synthetic dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not simulate a full evaporative cooling trajectory; a natural next step is a master-equation study that includes the ~10–100 ms lifetime of v=1 and spontaneous-emission heating, to check whether the favorable γ ratios survive in a realistic cooling ramp.
  • Because the energy defect 2αe can be tuned by external fields (AC Stark or microwave dressing), the C6 coefficient might be continuously tunable, turning the ro-vibrational vdW interaction into a control knob rather than a fixed property of each molecule species.
  • The mechanism should also apply to mixtures of different molecular species with matching ro-vibrational spacings; if an interspecies energy defect can be engineered, one could create repulsive interspecies vdW interactions for dual-species quantum gas experiments.
  • The asymmetry noted for microwave shielding—a v=0 molecule appearing non-polar to other v=0 molecules but polar to v=1 impurities—suggests a direct experimental probe: measuring the momentum-resolved radio-frequency spectrum of a v=0 Fermi bath in the presence of v=1 impurities should reveal the predicted strongly interacting polaron.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and studies a ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules, arising from second-order dipole-dipole coupling between the pair (v,j)+(v',j')=(0,1)+(1,0) and (0,0)+(1,1). The rotation-vibration coupling constant α_e shifts the nominal degeneracy, producing an energy defect 2α_e and a state-dependent interaction ±C6/R^6, claimed to be repulsive in the upper channel with C6 = d_e^4/(9α_e). The authors tabulate α_e and related constants for bialkalis, laser-coolable molecules, and alkali-coinage-metal molecules; extend their coupled-channel methodology to include vibrational states; compute loss rates for NaK and KAg; demonstrate universal scaling of the scattering length as a function of α_e/E_d; and discuss applications, chiefly evaporative cooling of a Fermi mixture without active shielding and compatibility with double microwave shielding.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the ro-vibrational vdW interaction is a new and unusually strong state-dependent interaction resource, with C6 values up to 10^10 a.u. for KAg and vdW length scales of thousands of bohr. The main strengths are that the input molecular constants are independently tabulated from spectroscopy or potential-energy-curve fits, and the universal scaling is tested against full coupled-channel calculations for two representative molecules, including hyperfine structure and, in separate calculations, microwave fields. The central interaction mechanism is physically plausible and the numerical checks are substantial. The main weakness is the evaporative-cooling application, which is supported only by a γ≈15 rate-coefficient ratio at 1 μK and lacks the density, trap, and lifetime analysis needed to justify the abstract's unqualified word 'enables.'

major comments (3)
  1. [VII/Abstract] The claim that the mechanism 'enables evaporative cooling of Fermi mixtures ... without active shielding' is not supported by the evidence presented. For NaK at T=1 μK, Fig. 6(a) gives γ≈15 for the elastic s-wave cross-state collision rate relative to the inelastic p-wave same-state rate. This is below the ratio usually required for practical forced evaporation, and the paper provides no cooling trajectory, density, trap-depth, or loss budget to show that γ≈15 suffices. It also does not include the finite lifetime of the v=1 state or the heating accompanying its decay. The text of Sec. VII is appropriately cautious ('could enable'), so the abstract's unqualified 'enables' should either be backed by a quantitative model or tempered.
  2. [III, Eq. (3)] The central quantitative result C6 = d_e^4/(9α_e) is asserted rather than derived. The reader cannot verify the angular factor 9, the sign convention for α_e, or the statement that this is the isotropic s-wave coefficient. A short derivation from Eq. (3) and the dipole-dipole operator in Eq. (6), including the sums over magnetic quantum numbers and partial waves, should be included. This is load-bearing because all quantitative predictions—the C6 values for NaK and KAg, the length scales R6, and the universal scaling in Eqs. (14)–(15)—depend on this coefficient.
  3. [VI, Eqs. (14)–(15)] The analytic expression as/R6 ≈ 0.676 for the repulsive van der Waals potential is attributed to an unpublished 'in preparation' reference [88]. This is a standard zero-energy result, but it should be derived in the paper or cited to a published source. More importantly, Eq. (14) is used in the universal model for elastic properties while the inelastic part is obtained numerically; the paper should state why the adiabatic upper-channel expression is valid when inelastic channels are open. The agreement with full coupled-channel results in Fig. 5 is reassuring, but the derivation should be self-contained.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 8 caption] Typo: 'transtition' should be 'transition'.
  2. [VIII] The sentence 'The lifetime of vibrationally excited states is tens of milliseconds' appears in the infrared-shielding discussion and seems to refer to NH. Its relevance to the bialkali molecules used in the evaporative-cooling discussion should be clarified, and quantitative lifetimes for NaK/KAg should be given if known.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The gray adiabatic curves are not labeled by hyperfine state or partial wave in the caption. Please specify which hyperfine states and partial waves are shown.
  4. [IV] The statement that hyperfine and microwave fields are not included simultaneously should be restated near Fig. 7 so that the domain of the simultaneous-shielding calculation is unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ro-vibrational vdW coefficient is computed from independent molecular constants and the suppression claim is tested by coupled-channel dynamics, not refit from its own output.

full rationale

The central result, C6 = d_e^4/(9 alpha_e) for the (v,j)+(v',j') = (0,1)+(1,0) pair, is obtained from second-order perturbation theory, Eq. (3), using the energy denominator 2 alpha_e from the Dunham expansion and the rotational transition dipole d_e. These molecular constants (alpha_e, d_e, B_e, etc.) are taken from spectroscopy, potential-energy-curve fits, or ab initio calculations (Table I), not from the collisional loss rates the paper predicts. There is no fitted parameter that is later renamed as a prediction. The paper's quantitative claims about loss suppression are outputs of coupled-channel scattering calculations with an absorbing boundary condition; the universal minimal model in Sec. VI is explicitly compared with full coupled-channel calculations for NaK and KAg (Fig. 5), and agreement is used to verify universality rather than assumed. The self-citations to prior rotational/hyperfine vdW work [36,37] and to the coupled-channel methodology [32] provide background and method, not the target conclusion; the novel ro-vibrational mechanism is derived and computed within this paper. The only mildly notable self-citation is Eq. (14), attributed to an in-preparation work with overlapping authorship [88]; however, it is a standard zero-energy scattering-length formula for a repulsive C6 potential, it is not fitted to the present results, and its use in the universal scaling is corroborated by the numerical universal curves and by the full coupled-channel markers in Fig. 5. The evaporative-cooling discussion in Sec. VII, with gamma ~15 at 1 microkelvin, may be optimistic, but that is an application-sufficiency concern, not circularity of the derivation. Overall, the paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the collision data in this paper. All molecular inputs (α_e, d_e, B_e, ω_exe) come from independent spectroscopy or PEC fits. The universal scaling law's −2 exponent for the imaginary part of the scattering length is a numerical output of the minimal model, not an ad hoc input. Domain assumptions are the short-range capture model, the neglect of non-dipolar terms at long range, and the practicality of preparing and holding v=1 molecules.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Dunham expansion (Eq. 1) with constant αe accurately describes ro-vibrational energies for the manifolds used.
    Sec. II. Molecular constants come from spectroscopically accurate PECs, but Eq. (2c) is approximate and fails for LiK (Table I), so αe for coinage-metal molecules is uncertain.
  • domain assumption The dipole-dipole interaction (Eq. 6) is the only important long-range interaction; electronic vdW and higher multipoles are absorbed into the short-range capture boundary.
    Sec. IV. Standard for polar molecules at the distances where the repulsive barrier acts, but it is a model assumption.
  • domain assumption Absorbing boundary conditions at short range model universal collisional loss (sticky collisions).
    Sec. IV. Follows Idziaszek & Julienne [82]; all loss-suppression claims depend on this capture model.
  • standard math Second-order perturbation theory (Eq. 3) with non-degenerate states applies to the (0,1)+(1,0) channel.
    Sec. III. The energy defect 2αe is much larger than the dipole coupling energy, justifying perturbation theory; the C6 formula depends on this.
  • domain assumption Molecules can be prepared in v=1, j=0 with sufficient lifetime (tens of ms) for evaporative cooling and collision experiments.
    Sec. I and Sec. VIII. The evaporative-cooling claim requires v=1 molecules to survive many elastic collisions, which is not quantified in the paper.
  • domain assumption The vibrational transition dipole moment is weak enough to be neglected in the universal two-level model.
    Sec. VI. The authors test this by comparing the minimal model to full coupled-channel calculations that include the vibrational dipole term.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3SZWU6W5

@misc{pith2026260725774,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3SZWU6W5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25774}
}
read the original abstract

We describe the ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules. This interaction is strong, leading to fast elastic collisions and orders of magnitude suppression of collisional loss. This enables evaporative cooling of Fermi mixtures of molecules in different ro-vibrational states, without active shielding by applying external fields. The scheme is compatible with microwave shielding, where it enables controlled state dependent interactions, opening up new opportunities for quantum simulation and impurity physics. The interaction can also be used to stabilize fermionic molecules in optical lattices, to control interactions in synthetic dimensions, for enhanced tweezer loading, and direct infrared shielding.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25774 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deterministic loading of molecular arrays by microwave-assisted collisions

    physics.atom-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Shelving molecules in rotationally or vibrationally excited states and driving microwave-assisted collisions can suppress loss, eject one molecule deterministically, and yield predicted filling fractions up to 96%.

  2. Tunable state-dependent interactions in collisionally stable mixtures of polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Vibrational states v=0 and v=1 of microwave-shielded polar molecules form a collisionally stable pseudo-spin with tunable dipolar Ising, density-density, and spin-density interactions.

  3. Tunable two-component ultracold molecular gases with vibrational shielding

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Vibrational-state-dependent repulsive shielding can stabilize and independently tune two-component ultracold molecular mixtures.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [88]

    P´ erez, J

    K. P´ erez, J. W. Desroches, K. R. A. Hazzard, and T. Kar- man, Hubbard models with ultracold shielded molecules in optical lattices, in preparation

  2. [1]

    Karman, M

    T. Karman, M. Tomza, and J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, Nature Phys. 20, 722 (2024)

    2024

  3. [2]

    N. R. Cooper and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 155302 (2009)

    2009

  4. [3]

    A. V. Gorshkov, S. R. Manmana, G. Chen, J. Ye, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 115301 (2011)

    2011

  5. [4]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics 2, 341 (2006)

    2006

  6. [5]

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. Hazzard, Nature Physics20, 730 (2024)

    2024

  7. [6]

    DeMille, Phys

    D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 067901 (2002)

    2002

  8. [7]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Nature637, 827–832 (2025)

    2025

Show all 96 references
  1. [8]

    L. R. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsad- kan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Nature637, 821 (2025)

    2025

  2. [9]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, 13 Nature Physics20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  6. [13]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Nature Physics20, 702 (2024)

    2024

  7. [14]

    M. L. Wall and L. Carr, Phys. Rev. A82, 013611 (2010)

    2010

  8. [15]

    Trefzger, C

    C. Trefzger, C. Menotti, B. Capogrosso-Sansone, and M. Lewenstein, J. Phys. B.44, 193001 (2011)

    2011

  9. [16]

    Capogrosso-Sansone, C

    B. Capogrosso-Sansone, C. Trefzger, M. Lewenstein, P. Zoller, and G. Pupillo, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 125301 (2010)

    2010

  10. [17]

    Barnett, D

    R. Barnett, D. Petrov, M. Lukin, and E. Demler, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 190401 (2006)

    2006

  11. [18]

    A. N. Carroll, H. Hirzler, C. Miller, D. Wellnitz, S. R. Muleady, J. Lin, K. P. Zamarski, R. R. Wang, J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey,et al., Science388, 381 (2025)

    2025

  12. [19]

    Zhang, H

    W. Zhang, H. Liu, F. Deng, K. Chen, S. Yi, and T. Shi, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23820 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Langen, J

    T. Langen, J. Boronat, J. S´ anchez-Baena, R. Bomb ´ ın, T. Karman, and F. Mazzanti, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053001 (2025)

    2025

  14. [21]

    Ciardi, K

    M. Ciardi, K. R. Pedersen, T. Langen, and T. Pohl, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 153401 (2025)

    2025

  15. [22]

    Mukherjee, J

    B. Mukherjee, J. M. Hutson, and K. R. Hazzard, New. J. Phys.27, 013013 (2025)

    2025

  16. [23]

    Sundar, B

    B. Sundar, B. Gadway, and K. R. Hazzard, Scientific re- ports8, 3422 (2018)

    2018

  17. [24]

    C. Feng, H. Manetsch, V. G. Rousseau, K. R. Hazzard, and R. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. A105, 063320 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    De Marco, G

    L. De Marco, G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J. P. Covey, and J. Ye, Science363, 853 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    Valtolina, K

    G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J.-R. Li, L. De Marco, and J. Ye, Nature588, 239 (2020)

    2020

  20. [27]

    Matsuda, L

    K. Matsuda, L. De Marco, J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, G. Valtolina, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and J. Ye, Science370, 1324 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Kar- man, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Nature607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Nature631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  23. [30]

    Z. Shi, Z. Huang, F. Deng, W.-J. Jin, S. Yi, T. Shi, and D. Wang, Bose-einstein condensate of ultracold sodium- rubidium molecules with tunable dipolar interactions (2025), arXiv:2508.20518 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [31]

    W. Yuan, S. Zhang, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, C. Warner, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08773 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Karman, N

    T. Karman, N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, PRX Quantum6, 020358 (2025)

    2025

  26. [33]

    X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, S. Eppelt, R. Bause, M. Duda, S. Biswas, T. Karman, T. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Nature614, 59 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Yuan, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Nature651, 601–606 (2026)

    2026

  28. [35]

    Schindewolf, J

    A. Schindewolf, J. Hertkorn, I. Stevenson, M. Ciardi, P. Gross, D. Wang, T. Karman, G. Quemener, S. Will, T. Pohl,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14511 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  29. [36]

    E. F. Walraven and T. Karman, Phys. Rev. A109, 043310 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    E. F. Walraven and T. Karman, Phys. Rev. A112, 032810 (2025)

    2025

  31. [38]

    X. Ye, M. Guo, M. L. Gonz´ alez-Mart ´ ınez, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and D. Wang, Science advances4, eaaq0083 (2018)

    2018

  32. [39]

    Kozyryev and N

    I. Kozyryev and N. R. Hutzler, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 133002 (2017)

    2017

  33. [40]

    N. R. Hutzler, Quantum Science & Technology5, 044011 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    Anderegg, N

    L. Anderegg, N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, P. Robichaud, A. Jadbabaie, J. M. Doyle, and N. R. Hutzler, Science 382, 665 (2023)

    2023

  35. [42]

    L. D. Augustoviˇ cov´ a and J. L. Bohn, New. J. Phys.21, 103022 (2019)

    2019

  36. [43]

    N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, C. Hallas, J. Tao, L. An- deregg, G. K. Li, H. Lampson, L. D. Augustoviˇ cov´ a, J. L. Bohn, and J. M. Doyle, Phys. Rev. X16, 021001 (2026)

    2026

  37. [44]

    K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. De Miranda, A. Pe’Er, B. Neyenhuis, J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. Julienne, D. Jin, and J. Ye, Science322, 231 (2008)

    2008

  38. [45]

    Takekoshi, L

    T. Takekoshi, L. Reichs¨ ollner, A. Schindewolf, J. M. Hut- son, C. R. Le Sueur, O. Dulieu, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 205301 (2014)

    2014

  39. [46]

    P. K. Molony, P. D. Gregory, Z. Ji, B. Lu, M. P. K¨ oppinger, C. R. Le Sueur, C. L. Blackley, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 255301 (2014)

    2014

  40. [47]

    J. W. Park, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 205302 (2015)

    2015

  41. [48]

    M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vex- iau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Qu´ em´ ener, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  42. [49]

    Stevenson, A

    I. Stevenson, A. Z. Lam, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, and S. Will, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 113002 (2023)

    2023

  43. [50]

    Zhelyazkova, A

    V. Zhelyazkova, A. Cournol, T. E. Wall, A. Matsushima, J. J. Hudson, E. Hinds, M. Tarbutt, and B. Sauer, Phys. Rev. A89, 053416 (2014)

    2014

  44. [51]

    E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, and D. DeMille, Nature467, 820 (2010)

    2010

  45. [52]

    Rockenh¨ auser, F

    M. Rockenh¨ auser, F. Kogel, T. Garg, S. A. Morales- Ram ´ ırez, and T. Langen, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043161 (2024)

    2024

  46. [53]

    A. L. Collopy, S. Ding, Y. Wu, I. A. Finneran, L. An- deregg, B. L. Augenbraun, J. M. Doyle, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 213201 (2018)

    2018

  47. [54]

    Dunham, Phys

    J. Dunham, Phys. Rev.41, 721 (1932)

    1932

  48. [55]

    C. L. Pekeris, Phys. Rev.45, 98 (1934)

    1934

  49. [56]

    Kratzer, Zeits

    A. Kratzer, Zeits. f. Physik3, 289 (1920)

    1920

  50. [57]

    C. E. Burkhardt and J. J. Leventhal, Am. J. Phys.75, 686 (2007)

    2007

  51. [58]

    Docenko, M

    O. Docenko, M. Tamanis, R. Ferber, A. Pashov, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, Eur. Phys. J. D31, 205 (2004)

    2004

  52. [59]

    Docenko, M

    O. Docenko, M. Tamanis, R. Ferber, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, Phys. Rev. A

  53. [60]

    Pashov, O

    A. Pashov, O. Docenko, M. Tamanis, R. Ferber, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, Phys. Rev. A72, 062505 (2005)

    2005

  54. [61]

    Pashov, O

    A. Pashov, O. Docenko, M. Tamanis, R. Ferber, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, Phys. Rev. A76, 022511 (2007)

    2007

  55. [62]

    Steinke, H

    M. Steinke, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, Phys. Rev. A 85, 042720 (2012)

    2012

  56. [63]

    Ferber, I

    R. Ferber, I. Klincare, O. Nikolayeva, M. Tamanis, H. Kn¨ ockel, E. Tiemann, and A. Pashov, Phys. Rev. A 80, 062501 (2009)

    2009

  57. [64]

    Ivanova, A

    M. Ivanova, A. Stein, A. Pashov, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tie- mann, J. Chem. Phys.134, 024321 (2011)

    2011

  58. [65]

    Tiemann, H

    E. Tiemann, H. Kn¨ ockel, P. Kowalczyk, W. Jastrzebski, 14 A. Pashov, H. Salami, and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. A79, 042716 (2009)

    2009

  59. [66]

    ´Smia lkowski and M

    M. ´Smia lkowski and M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A103, 022802 (2021)

    2021

  60. [67]

    Aymar and O

    M. Aymar and O. Dulieu, J. Chem. Phys.122(2005)

    2005

  61. [68]

    Ladjimi and M

    H. Ladjimi and M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A109, 052814 (2024)

    2024

  62. [69]

    Koput, J

    J. Koput, J. Comput. Chem.36, 1286 (2015)

    2015

  63. [70]

    Radford and M

    H. Radford and M. Litvak, Chem. Phys. Lett.34, 561 (1975)

    1975

  64. [71]

    Wayne and H

    F. Wayne and H. Radford, Mol. Phys.32, 1407 (1976)

    1976

  65. [72]

    T¨ orring, W

    T. T¨ orring, W. Ernst, and S. Kindt, J. Chem. Phys.81, 4614 (1984)

    1984

  66. [73]

    Private communication from Luk´ aˇ s Paˇ steka and Anasta- sia Borshevsky, based on MRCI calculations similar to those reported in J. Chem. Phys.,151034302 (2019), but using a smaller basis set

    2019

  67. [74]

    K. P. Huber and G. Herzberg,Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure(Springer US, 1979)

    1979

  68. [75]

    Childs, G

    W. Childs, G. Goodman, and L. Goodman, J. Mol. Spectr.115, 215 (1986)

    1986

  69. [76]

    Y. Hao, L. F. Paˇ steka, L. Visscher, P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Boeschoten, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esajas, S. Hoekstra, K. Jungmann, V. R. Marshall, T. B. Meijknecht, M. C. Mooij, R. G. E. Timmermans, A. Touwen, W. Ubachs, L. Willmann, Y. Yin, A. Za- para, and N. eE...

    2019

  70. [77]

    M. A. Anderson, M. D. Allen, and L. M. Ziurys, Astro- phys. J.424, 503 (1994)

    1994

  71. [78]

    Ernst, J

    W. Ernst, J. K¨ andler, S. Kindt, and T. T¨ orring, Chem. Phys. Lett.113, 351 (1985)

    1985

  72. [79]

    R. D. Suenram, F. J. Lovas, G. T. Fraser, and K. Mat- sumura, J. Chem. Phys.92, 4724 (1990)

    1990

  73. [80]

    Staanum, A

    P. Staanum, A. Pashov, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, Phys. Rev. A75, 042513 (2007)

    2007

  74. [81]

    Hartmann, T

    T. Hartmann, T. A. Schulze, K. K. Voges, P. Gersema, M. W. Gempel, E. Tiemann, A. Zenesini, and S. Os- pelkaus, Phys. Rev. A99, 032711 (2019)

    2019

  75. [82]

    Idziaszek and P

    Z. Idziaszek and P. S. Julienne, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 113202 (2010)

    2010

  76. [83]

    Karman and J

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163401 (2018)

    2018

  77. [84]

    Anderegg, S

    L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, T. Karman, E. Chae, K.-K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Science 373, 779 (2021)

    2021

  78. [85]

    Bigagli, C

    N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, T. Karman, and S. Will, Nature Phys.19, 1579 (2023)

    2023

  79. [86]

    L. M. Janssen, A. van der Avoird, and G. C. Groenen- boom, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 063201 (2013)

    2013

  80. [87]

    Karman, J

    T. Karman, J. Phys. Chem. A127, 2194 (2023), arXiv:2212.03065

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Duda, X.-Y

    M. Duda, X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, J. von Milczewski, R. Schmidt, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Nature Physics19, 720 (2023)

    2023

  82. [90]

    J.-R. Li, W. G. Tobias, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, G. Val- tolina, L. De Marco, R. R. Wang, L. Lassabli` ere, G. Qu´ em´ ener, J. L. Bohn,et al., Nature Phys.17, 1144 (2021)

    2021

  83. [91]

    H. J. J´ o´ zwiak, H. Yang, E. Dizer, A. Christianen, and T. Karman, Tunable state-dependent interactions in collisionally stable mixtures of polar molecules (2026), arXiv:2607.25777 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2026 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Saffman and K

    M. Saffman and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 240502 (2009)

    2009

  85. [93]

    H. Yang, E. Dizer, H. J. J´ o´ zwiak, R. Schmidt, A. Chris- tianen, and T. Karman, Polarons in Microwave-Shielded Vibrational Mixtures of Ultracold Molecules, in prepara- tion

  86. [94]

    E. F. Walraven, M. R. Tarbutt, and T. Karman, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 183401 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Nature Phys.17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  88. [96]

    E. F. Walraven, K. Feng, J. Rodewald, M. R. Tar- butt, and T. Karman, Deterministic loading of molec- ular arrays by microwave-assisted collisions (2026), arXiv:2607.25783 [physics.atom-ph]

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.