Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

ChartGemma: Visual Instruction-tuning for Chart Reasoning in the Wild

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.04172 v2 pith:3TN3MQE3 submitted 2024-07-04 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CV

ChartGemma: Visual Instruction-tuning for Chart Reasoning in the Wild

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CV
keywords chartchartgemmachartsdatamodelsacrossreasoningvisual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given the ubiquity of charts as a data analysis, visualization, and decision-making tool across industries and sciences, there has been a growing interest in developing pre-trained foundation models as well as general purpose instruction-tuned models for chart understanding and reasoning. However, existing methods suffer crucial drawbacks across two critical axes affecting the performance of chart representation models: they are trained on data generated from underlying data tables of the charts, ignoring the visual trends and patterns in chart images, and use weakly aligned vision-language backbone models for domain-specific training, limiting their generalizability when encountering charts in the wild. We address these important drawbacks and introduce ChartGemma, a novel chart understanding and reasoning model developed over PaliGemma. Rather than relying on underlying data tables, ChartGemma is trained on instruction-tuning data generated directly from chart images, thus capturing both high-level trends and low-level visual information from a diverse set of charts. Our simple approach achieves state-of-the-art results across $5$ benchmarks spanning chart summarization, question answering, and fact-checking, and our elaborate qualitative studies on real-world charts show that ChartGemma generates more realistic and factually correct summaries compared to its contemporaries. We release the code, model checkpoints, dataset, and demos at https://github.com/vis-nlp/ChartGemma.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TRON: Targeted Rule-Verifiable Online Environments for Visual Reasoning RL

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TRON supplies 520 rule-verifiable online visual reasoning environments across five ability buckets that generate unlimited training instances for RL post-training, yielding consistent gains on ten external multimodal ...

  2. Hierarchical Visual Agent: Managing Contexts in Joint Image-Text Space for Advanced Chart Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HierVA improves multi-step chart question answering by having a high-level manager maintain key joint contexts while specialized workers perform targeted reasoning with visual zoom-in.

  3. Chart-FR1: Visual Focus-Driven Fine-Grained Reasoning on Dense Charts

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Chart-FR1 uses Focus-CoT for linking reasoning to visual cues and Focus-GRPO reinforcement learning with efficiency rewards to outperform prior MLLMs on dense chart reasoning tasks.

  4. Routing-Based Continual Learning for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Routing architecture for MLLMs enables continual learning with constant compute, matching multi-task learning performance and supporting cross-modal transfer.

  5. AutoTool: Dynamic Tool Selection and Integration for Agentic Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-12 reject novelty 5.0

    AutoTool's two-phase SFT/RL plus ranking training lets 8B LLM agents beat larger fixed-tool agents across math, search, code, and vision benchmarks, though unseen-tool gains are asserted, not isolated.

  6. The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.