REVIEW 20 cited by
Robin: A multi-agent system for automating scientific discovery
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Robin: A multi-agent system for automating scientific discovery
read the original abstract
Scientific discovery is driven by the iterative process of background research, hypothesis generation, experimentation, and data analysis. Despite recent advancements in applying artificial intelligence to scientific discovery, no system has yet automated all of these stages in a single workflow. Here, we introduce Robin, the first multi-agent system capable of fully automating the key intellectual steps of the scientific process. By integrating literature search agents with data analysis agents, Robin can generate hypotheses, propose experiments, interpret experimental results, and generate updated hypotheses, achieving a semi-autonomous approach to scientific discovery. By applying this system, we were able to identify a novel treatment for dry age-related macular degeneration (dAMD), the major cause of blindness in the developed world. Robin proposed enhancing retinal pigment epithelium phagocytosis as a therapeutic strategy, and identified and validated a promising therapeutic candidate, ripasudil. Ripasudil is a clinically-used rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitor that has never previously been proposed for treating dAMD. To elucidate the mechanism of ripasudil-induced upregulation of phagocytosis, Robin then proposed and analyzed a follow-up RNA-seq experiment, which revealed upregulation of ABCA1, a critical lipid efflux pump and possible novel target. All hypotheses, experimental plans, data analyses, and data figures in the main text of this report were produced by Robin. As the first AI system to autonomously discover and validate a novel therapeutic candidate within an iterative lab-in-the-loop framework, Robin establishes a new paradigm for AI-driven scientific discovery.
Forward citations
Cited by 20 Pith papers
-
LQCDMaster: Agentic Scientific Computing for Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics Research
A tool-guided LLM agent generates lattice-QCD measurement workflows that reproduce expert implementations on 63/70 benchmark tasks at machine precision and enables new diagonal Wilson-line and multi-hadron computations.
-
TO-Agents: A Multi-Agent AI Pipeline for Preference-Guided Topology Optimization
A multi-agent pipeline iteratively refines topology optimization outputs to match natural language preferences for branched structures, achieving 60% success rate across replicates in cantilever and phone-stand tasks.
-
AgentForesight: Online Auditing for Early Failure Prediction in Multi-Agent Systems
AgentForesight trains a 7B model to perform online auditing of multi-agent LLM trajectories, detecting early decisive errors and outperforming larger models on custom and external benchmarks.
-
AgentForesight: Online Auditing for Early Failure Prediction in Multi-Agent Systems
AgentForesight introduces an online auditor model that predicts decisive errors in multi-agent trajectories at the earliest step using a coarse-to-fine reinforcement learning recipe on a new curated dataset AFTraj-2K.
-
RosettaSearch: Multi-Objective Inference-Time Search for Protein Sequence Design
RosettaSearch applies LLM-driven multi-objective search at inference time to improve backbone-conditioned protein sequences, recovering designs with 18-68% better structural fidelity and 2.5x higher success rates than...
-
VERITAS: A Multi-Agent Co-Scientist for Verifiable Image-Derived Hypothesis Testing
VERITAS is a multi-agent system for verifiable hypothesis testing on multimodal clinical MRI datasets that achieves 81.4% verdict accuracy with frontier models and introduces an epistemic evidence labeling framework.
-
Kosmos: An AI Scientist for Autonomous Discovery
Kosmos is an AI scientist that maintains coherence over hundreds of agent steps via a shared world model, executes thousands of code lines and reads thousands of papers per run, and produces traceable reports with 79....
-
Toward Auditable AI Scientists: A Hypothesis Evolution Protocol for LLM Agents
HEP externalizes hypothesis generation, evidence-driven belief updates, and lifecycle verdicts so LLM agents run an auditable hypothesis-test-evidence-belief cycle on materials research questions.
-
Evaluating and Guarding Citation Faithfulness in Agentic Scientific Synthesis
Citation-faithfulness metrics for AI science agents are verifier-dependent (3–18% on identical outputs), and a split-conformal guard provides a finite-sample catch-rate guarantee anchored on human gold.
-
Autonomous Scientific Discovery via Iterative Meta-Reflection
DiscoPER uses code generation, statistical validation, and second-order meta-reflection on accumulated discoveries to recover 8 of 9 known ecological patterns on a new benchmark at 72.7% support rate.
-
Testing Frontier Large Language Models' Physics Literacy in Parallel Physical Worlds
Introduces an auditable four-stage diagnostic for LLM physics reasoning in novel frameworks and applies it to three parallel worlds, yielding pass rates of 6/15, 6/15, and 0/15 on frontier models with noted qualitativ...
-
AutoScientists: Self-Organizing Agent Teams for Long-Running Scientific Experimentation
Decentralized AI agent teams self-organize around hypotheses, critique proposals, and share knowledge to outperform single-agent baselines on biomedical ML, language-model optimization, and protein fitness tasks.
-
EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective
EvoMemBench evaluates 15 memory methods for LLM agents and finds long-context baselines competitive with no single memory approach working consistently across settings.
-
PRL-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Capabilities in Frontier Physics Research
PRL-Bench evaluates frontier LLMs on 100 real physics research tasks and finds the best models score below 50, exposing a gap to autonomous discovery.
-
VERITAS: A Multi-Agent Co-Scientist for Verifiable Image-Derived Hypothesis Testing
A four-phase multi-agent co-scientist tests natural-language hypotheses on cardiac and glioma MRI and labels outcomes Supported, Refuted, Underpowered, or Invalid with an executable evidence trail.
-
DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
An agentic system produces traceable review packages and an un-finetuned 196B model using it covers more major issues than Gemini-3.1-Pro on 134 ICLR 2025 submissions while winning most blind comparisons to human committees.
-
SciFig: Towards Automating Editable Figure Generation for Scientific Papers
SciFig automatically generates editable methodology figures from scientific text and claims state-of-the-art quality on its own SciFig-Eval rubric-based benchmark.
-
Sibyl-AutoResearch: Autonomous Research Needs Self-Evolving Trial-and-Error Harnesses, Not Paper Generators
Sibyl-AutoResearch introduces self-evolving trial-and-error harnesses with auditable conversion units that link trial signals to updated research behaviors and harness repairs in autonomous systems.
-
VASP Agent: An Agentic Framework for Autonomous First-principles Calculations
An LLM-driven agent with predefined VASP workflows and parameter-checking tools completes DFT simulation tasks more reliably and accurately than standalone LLMs, with a new 80-task benchmark.
-
Claw AI Lab: An Autonomous Multi-Agent Research Team
Claw AI Lab presents an interactive multi-agent platform for autonomous AI research that supports customizable teams, real-time control, and a code harness for experiment integration and result integrity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.