Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 8 cited by

Can the universe experience an AdS landscape since matter-radiation equality?

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a universe passing through two anti-de Sitter (negative cosmological constant) phases since matter-radiation equality—one near recombination and one at low redshift—is compatible with current cosmological data and…

desk verdict Combines AdS-EDE and low-redshift NCC into one scenario, but the two halves never meet: the fit is a null preference and the scalar potential is not shown to actually roll through both phases. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04306 v1 pith:4A77PQDA submitted 2025-06-04 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Hao Wang , Yun-Song Piao This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords anti-deSittervacuumnegativecosmologicalconstantearlydarkenergyHubbletensionevolutionDESIBAOstring-motivatedpotentialquintessence
topics Dark EnergyThe Hubble Tension
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the universe could have passed through more than one anti-de Sitter (AdS) phase—a period governed by a negative cosmological constant—since matter-radiation equality. It combines two previously separate ideas: early dark energy with an AdS vacuum around recombination (AdS-EDE, which can ease the Hubble tension) and a negative cosmological constant at low redshift coexisting with evolving positive dark energy. Using Planck 2018, DESI DR1 BAO, and Pantheon+SH0ES data, the authors show that the combined w0waCDM+AdSEDE+NCC model is compatible with observations, with a best-fit Hubble constant near 73 km/s/Mpc, although the negative cosmological constant is only marginally preferred (Δχ² ≈ −1.2). The paper then shows that a string-motivated scalar potential with multiple AdS minima can in principle host both phases, so the two AdS eras need not be separate add-ons but could come from one field. The claim is deliberately one of possibility, not preference: the authors stress the data do not require the extra AdS phase.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing theoretical object is the scalar potential of Eq. (8), a string-motivated sum of exponential terms that can host multiple AdS vacua depending on its coefficients; the paper shows that with four non-perturbative terms it can simultaneously satisfy the steepness condition needed for AdS-EDE near recombination and the shallow low-redshift AdS depth needed for the NCC. On the observational side, the machinery is the phenomenological w0waCDM+AdSEDE+NCC model, whose total dark-energy equation of state is the weighted combination of an evolving CPL component and a negative cosmological constant given in Eq. (2), fitted to Planck18, DESI DR1, and Pantheon+SH0ES.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the Klein-Gordon and Friedmann equations for the N = 4 potential of Fig. 6 from just before recombination to today and compare the resulting H(z) and dark-energy fraction to the best-fit w0waCDM+AdSEDE+NCC expansion history; if the field is trapped in the first AdS minimum, or the quintessence plateau is too short, or the late-time AdS crossing fails to give ΩΛ ≈ −0.002, the realizability claim collapses. On the observational side, future BAO or CMB data that push the 95% interval of ΩΛ to exclude negative values would rule out the low-redshift NCC branch.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, the central discovery is that a cosmological history with two AdS epochs since matter-radiation equality is not ruled out by current data and is theoretically realizable. The combined model, in which an AdS-EDE component around recombination is followed by a CPL-evolving quintessence component plus a negative cosmological constant at low redshift, yields H0 ≈ 73 km/s/Mpc with a best-fit ΩΛ ≈ −0.002, a fit improvement of Δχ² ≈ −1.2 over the model without the NCC. The widened H0–ΩΛ degeneracy is traced to the adjustable sound horizon from AdS-EDE. Theoretically, a potential of the form of Eq. (8), a sum of exponential terms motivated by non-perturbative string-theoretic effects, can be tuned with N = 4 terms to have a deep AdS minimum suitable for AdS-EDE and a second AdS minimum at the right depth for the low-redshift NCC, while the field is initially rolling from a point satisfying the required initial conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes, rather than computes, that a scalar field in the tuned multi-AdS potential rolls over the first AdS vacuum, dwells briefly on a quintessence-like plateau, and then approaches the second AdS vacuum in a way that reproduces the fitted w0waCDM+NCC background evolution from recombination to today.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • AdS-EDE can ease the Hubble tension while a low-redshift NCC remains allowed, so the two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive.
  • The low-redshift accelerating phase is temporary: the quintessence component is rolling toward a second AdS vacuum, implying a future collapse rather than eternal de Sitter expansion.
  • The model keeps the evolving dark-energy component quintessence-like (w0 + wa ≥ −1) within 2σ, in line with DESI's hint of evolving dark energy.
  • A single scalar field with a multi-AdS potential can supply both the recombination-era AdS-EDE and the low-redshift NCC, reducing the need for separate dark-energy sectors.
  • The combined model preserves ns ≈ 1 with a wider H0 range, altering the usual EDE–inflation connection and inviting further scrutiny of the spectral index.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper never integrates the scalar-field background equations from z ≈ 1100 to today; numerically evolving the N = 4 potential in Fig. 6 would directly test whether the assumed roll-over dynamics reproduces the fitted w0waCDM+NCC expansion history.
  • If the two-AdS scenario is realized, the universe's asymptotic fate is a second AdS collapse, and the timescale is set by the quintessence rolling—an observable-free but conceptually sharp departure from ΛCDM.
  • The widened H0–ΩΛ degeneracy suggests that an independent percent-level H0 measurement (for example from gravitational-wave standard sirens) could break the degeneracy and directly constrain the NCC amplitude.
  • The same multi-AdS potential could have left imprints during inflation if the field traversed AdS regions then, linking this scenario to multi-stage inflationary phenomenology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper asks whether the universe could have passed through multiple anti-de Sitter (AdS) vacuum phases since matter-radiation equality. It first fits a phenomenological w0waCDM+NCC+AdSEDE model to Planck18+DESI DR1+PantheonPlus+SH0ES data, reporting a best fit with Omega_Lambda about -0.002, H0 about 73.5 km/s/Mpc, and Delta chi^2 about -1.2 relative to the same model without the negative cosmological constant; this is interpreted, cautiously, as showing that the scenario is not ruled out. The paper then constructs a string-motivated multi-exponential scalar potential (Eq. 8) with two AdS minima and argues, by tuning coefficients, that the potential can satisfy the local conditions required for AdS-EDE at recombination and for a low-redshift quintessence-like component rolling toward a second AdS vacuum.

Significance. If the full background dynamics were demonstrated, the paper would provide a useful proof of possibility linking AdS-EDE and a low-redshift negative cosmological constant in a single scalar potential, and it would be a reasonable preliminary exploration of a string-motivated AdS landscape. The MCMC part is honest and uses standard public codes, and the paper correctly avoids claiming that the negative cosmological constant is preferred. The theoretical part identifies a plausible potential family, but it stops short of showing that one and the same scalar field actually traverses both AdS phases in a way that reproduces the fitted w0waCDM+NCC background; that gap is load-bearing for the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [III, Figs. 6-7] The central claim that Eq. (8) integrates AdS-EDE and low-redshift NCC into one model is not demonstrated. The paper checks only the local conditions (5)-(7) at selected field values, and Fig. 7 compares the potential of Fig. 6 with the original AdS-EDE for a single phase. No Friedmann-Klein-Gordon solution is presented showing the field starting near the first AdS at z~1100, rolling over the barrier, behaving as a quintessence-like component at low redshift, and approaching the second AdS minimum at z~0. The compatibility of the integrated scalar-field model with the fitted w0waCDM+NCC background is therefore assumed, not shown. This is load-bearing for the conclusion and should be added, or the conclusion should be explicitly restricted to the potential-level construction.
  2. [III, Eqs. (9)-(10), Fig. 6] The derivation of the curvature correction assumes a4 >> 1 and exp(-a4 sigma) << 1, while the displayed two-AdS potential in Fig. 6 uses a4 = 2*pi/10000, which is much smaller than 1, and the text also states that small A4 and a4 << 1 can satisfy conditions (6) and (7). No quantitative check of |d^2 V/dphi^2| ~ 9 H^2(z_c) is given for the Fig. 6 potential. Please show numerically the second derivative at the relevant field value, or clarify which regime (large or small a4) applies to the second-AdS implementation; as written the satisfaction of condition (6) is asserted rather than verified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [II.B, Table II] The text refers to 'see Table.6' where Table II is meant, and the Table II caption calls the model 'w0waCDM+CC+AdSEDE' while the text consistently uses NCC; please make the acronym uniform.
  2. [III, Eqs. (5)-(7)] Please state explicitly that phi in Eq. (8) is dimensionless and that the physical mass scale multiplying the potential is chosen by hand to satisfy V ~ (0.1 eV)^4 and the curvature condition; this normalization step is essential for interpreting the plots and the local conditions.
  3. [Fig. 7] The caption should identify which curve is the original AdS-EDE of Ref. [96] and which corresponds to the potential of Fig. 6, and it should state that this comparison covers only the early AdS-EDE phase, not the two-phase trajectory.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Observational compatibility is an external MCMC result and is not circular; the theoretical two-AdS construction is tuned to the target conditions, so the landscape possibility claim is partly by construction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III, Eqs. (5)-(7), Fig. 6 and Fig. 7]
    "It is necessary to list the conditions that the models integrating AdS-EDE and NCC at low redshift should satisfy. In the corresponding model, initially the field is AdS-EDE-like with V(φ_i)∼(0.1eV)^4, |∂^2_φV(φ_i)| ∼9H^2(z_c)∼ (0.1eV)^4/M_p^2 must be required before the recombination (z >1100), see e.g.Ref.[186], however, at low redshift (z≲5) it is rolling towards an AdS vacuum and is quintessence-like with V_Λ ∼(0.0001eV)^4."

    Eqs. (5)-(7) are the target AdS-EDE and low-redshift NCC phenomenology, not predictions of the potential. The coefficients of Eq. (8) are subsequently chosen so these conditions hold: 'The numerical result shows a_4 ∼2π/0.001 to satisfy (6), while for a small A_4 and a_4≪1 the potential could satisfy (6) and (7) simultaneously.' The later statement that the field 'could have similar evolution as the AdS-EDE in Ref.[96]' (Fig. 7) is therefore a check that the designed potential satisfies its design targets, not an independent derivation of AdS-EDE behavior. The multi-AdS landscape is effectively imposed by the parameter choice.

full rationale

The paper's strongest claim, that the phenomenological w0waCDM+AdSEDE+NCC model is compatible with Planck+DESI+PantheonPlus+SH0ES data with H0~73, rests on an external MCMC analysis and is not circular: it fits free parameters to real data and reports a modest Δχ² improvement. The theoretical Section III, however, constructs the string-motivated potential Eq. (8) by tuning A_i and a_i so that the local conditions (5)-(7) hold. Those conditions are exactly the properties one wants for AdS-EDE around recombination and for a low-redshift AdS-directed quintessence component. Showing afterwards that the tuned potential yields AdS-EDE-like evolution (Fig. 7) is a consistency check of the construction, not a prediction from first principles. This is a mild self-referential step in the theoretical 'landscape' part, but the paper openly labels the study as preliminary and as showing possibility rather than preference, and the observational compatibility is externally grounded. Thus the circularity score is moderate, not severe.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central observational claim rests on fitted DE parameters (w0, wa, Omega_Lambda), EDE parameters (f_ede, ln(1+z_c)), and an AdS depth alpha_ads imported from prior work. The theoretical landscape claim rests on hand-tuned potential coefficients and on several domain assumptions about the validity of the effective potential and the cosmological background. No new fundamental entity with independent evidence is introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • w0 = -0.848 mean, bestfit -0.887
    CPL equation-of-state parameter of the evolving positive DE component; drives low-redshift expansion history and H0.
  • wa = -0.563 mean, bestfit -0.509
    CPL running of the DE equation of state; changes w(z) at low redshift.
  • Omega_Lambda = bestfit -0.002, mean 0.071 +/- 0.122
    Negative cosmological constant density at low redshift; central to the low-redshift AdS phase and weakly constrained by data.
  • f_ede = 0.114 +/- 0.008
    Energy fraction of AdS-EDE when the field starts rolling; sets the EDE contribution to H0.
  • ln(1+z_c) = 8.178 +/- 0.076
    Log redshift where the AdS-EDE field starts rolling; determines the location of the pre-recombination AdS phase.
  • alpha_ads = 3.79e-4
    AdS depth relative to matter plus radiation density at z_c, fixed as an effective input in the MCMC following Ref.[96]; controls the depth of the AdS-EDE potential.
  • Multi-AdS potential coefficients {A1,A2,a1,a2,A4,a4} = A1=-0.176757079, A2=0.98015, a1=2pi/100, a2=2pi/80, A4=0.001, a4=2pi/10000; A3=-1.05 and a3=2pi/70 fixed
    Chosen by hand in Section III so the potential has two AdS minima with the desired energy scales and curvature, satisfying Eqs.(5)-(7).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The universe is described by a flat FLRW background with a homogeneous scalar field and standard radiation and matter components.
    Used throughout the MCMC and potential analysis; no spatial curvature or inhomogeneous field is considered.
  • domain assumption The phenomenological AdS-EDE potential V(phi) in Eq.(3), with alpha_ads fixed to 3.79e-4, is a valid effective description of pre-recombination EDE.
    Taken from Ref.[96]; the MCMC uses this potential rather than the multi-AdS potential of Section III.
  • domain assumption The string-motivated potential in Eq.(8), built from non-perturbative exponential terms, represents a physically relevant part of the string landscape.
    Adopted from Refs.[81,181,182]; the existence and stability of the AdS vacua described by this potential is assumed.
  • domain assumption SH0ES Cepheid distance calibration is valid and can be used as a prior on H0.
    The PantheonPlus+SH0ES dataset includes the SH0ES calibrator; this assumption is standard in the field but contested.
  • standard math MCMC chains converged with the Gelman-Rubin criterion R-1 < 0.01.
    Convergence criterion stated in Section II.A; if not met, the reported constraints and chi-square values would be unreliable.
invented entities (2)
  • Two-era AdS landscape (AdS-EDE at z~1100 plus low-redshift NCC)
    purpose: To accommodate the DESI hint of evolving dark energy while resolving the Hubble tension via EDE.
    The scenario is designed to match current data; no independent prediction beyond the fit is given, and the full dynamics linking the two phases is not computed.
  • Scalar field with multiple AdS minima (multi-AdS phi field)
    purpose: A single field realization that could sequentially produce AdS-EDE and low-redshift quintessence-like evolution toward an AdS vacuum.
    Built by tuning coefficients of the potential in Eq.(8); the paper shows the potential shape but does not compute the full field evolution or provide a falsifiable signature separate from the data used to set the scales.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can the universe experience an AdS landscape since matter-radiation equality?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4A77PQDA

@misc{pith2026250604306,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can the universe experience an AdS landscape since matter-radiation equality?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4A77PQDA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04306}
}
read the original abstract

Though an anti-de Sitter (AdS) vacuum, corresponding to a negative cosmological constant (NCC), can be not responsible for the acceleration of current universe, it might coexist with one evolving positive dark energy component at low redshift, as well as with early dark energy around the recombination to solve the Hubble tension. In this paper, we investigate the scenario with one AdS vacuum around the recombination and one at low redshift, and from both current observational and theoretical perspectives preliminarily explore the possibility that the universe experienced a landscape with multiple AdS vacua since matter-radiation equality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04306 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Alleviating the Hubble Tension with Smooth Sign-Switching Dark Energy: Full CMB Constraints with DESI and PantheonPlus

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Smooth ECDM dark energy remains compatible with Planck+ACT+SPT, DESI DR2 and Pantheon+/SH0ES while alleviating the Hubble tension through a controlled late-time density transition.

  2. Simple quintessence models in light of DESI-BAO observations

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Thawing quintessence with linear or quadratic potentials is favored over LambdaCDM only when the DESY5 supernova catalog is used; with Pantheon+ or Union3 the preference is mild.

  3. Background-level reconstruction of scalar-field potentials from dark-energy histories and comparison with analytic potential families

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    A background reconstruction maps prescribed ρ_de(z) histories to V(φ) and ranks analytic potentials by Bayesian evidence, with exponential preferred for CPL and shifted-tanh for sign-switching targets.

  4. Model-independent late-universe measurements of $H_0$ and $\Omega_K$ with the parametrization based on cosmic age-improved inverse distance ladder

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A cosmic-age-based inverse distance ladder with DESI DR2, DESY5, SGL, CC and GRB data gives H0=71.59±0.94 km/s/Mpc and ΩK=0.001±0.038.

  5. Exploring non-cold dark matter in a scenario of dynamical dark energy with DESI DR2 data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using DESI DR2, Planck, and supernova data, a nonzero dark matter equation of state is preferred at 2.8 to 3.3 sigma only when dark energy is assumed to have a constant equation of state.

  6. Imprint of swampland-inspired coupled early dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A swampland-inspired DM-EDE coupling is tested against DESI DR2 BAO data, showing the EDE potential construction affects late-time dark energy constraints.

  7. Observational constraints on early time non-phantom behaviour of dynamical dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Early scaling dark energy is constrained to be less than about one percent at matter-radiation equality and is disfavored by model selection, while late-time CPL dynamics show only a weak preference away from ΛCDM.

  8. Cosmological preference for a positive neutrino mass at 2.7$\sigma$: A joint analysis of DESI DR2, DESY5, and DESY1 data

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A joint fit of DESI DR2, CMB, DESY5 and DESY1 data gives total neutrino mass 0.098 (+0.016, -0.037) eV, a 2.7 sigma preference for positive mass in the w0waCDM model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

193 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], [arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]]

    M. Abdul Karimet al.[DESI], [arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Lodha, R

    K. Lodha, R. Calderon, W. L. Matthewson, A. Shafieloo, M. Ishak, J. Pan, C. Garcia- Quintero, D. Huterer, G. Valogiannis and L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez,et al.[arXiv:2503.14743 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Y. Cai, X. Ren, T. Qiu, M. Li and X. Zhang, [arXiv:2505.24732 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    A. G. Adameet al.[DESI], [arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Calderonet al.[DESI], [arXiv:2405.04216 [astro-ph.CO]]

    R. Calderonet al.[DESI], [arXiv:2405.04216 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Lodhaet al.[DESI], [arXiv:2405.13588 [astro-ph.CO]]

    K. Lodhaet al.[DESI], [arXiv:2405.13588 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Luongo and M

    O. Luongo and M. Muccino, [arXiv:2404.07070 [astro-ph.CO]]. 14

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Cortˆ es and A

    M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle, [arXiv:2404.08056 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

Show all 193 references
  1. [9]

    Carloni, O

    Y. Carloni, O. Luongo and M. Muccino, [arXiv:2404.12068 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M. G. Dainotti, S. Capozziello, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and D. Stojkovic, [arXiv:2404.08633 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes and E. Di Valentino, [arXiv:2404.15232 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Wang and Y

    H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2404.18579 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Y. Yang, X. Ren, Q. Wang, Z. Lu, D. Zhang, Y. F. Cai and E. N. Saridakis, [arXiv:2404.19437 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    C. G. Park, J. de Cruz Perez and B. Ratra, [arXiv:2405.00502 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Shlivko and P

    D. Shlivko and P. Steinhardt, [arXiv:2405.03933 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    B. R. Dinda, [arXiv:2405.06618 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Seto and Y

    O. Seto and Y. Toda, [arXiv:2405.11869 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bhattacharya, G

    S. Bhattacharya, G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala, [arXiv:2405.17396 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Roy, [arXiv:2406.00634 [astro-ph.CO]]

    N. Roy, [arXiv:2406.00634 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    H. Wang, Z. Y. Peng and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2406.03395 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Notari, M

    A. Notari, M. Redi and A. Tesi, [arXiv:2406.08459 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. J. Heckman, O. F. Ramadan and J. Sakstein, [arXiv:2406.04408 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    I. D. Gialamas, G. H¨ utsi, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, M. Vasar and H. Veerm¨ ae, [arXiv:2406.07533 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Orchard and V

    L. Orchard and V. H. C´ ardenas, [arXiv:2407.05579 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, [arXiv:2406.06389 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    H. Wang, G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2407.11263 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    T. N. Li, P. J. Wu, G. H. Du, S. J. Jin, H. L. Li, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, [arXiv:2407.14934 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    G. Ye, M. Martinelli, B. Hu and A. Silvestri, [arXiv:2407.15832 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Giar` e, M

    W. Giar` e, M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino and J. T. Firouzjaee, [arXiv:2407.16689 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    B. R. Dinda and R. Maartens, [arXiv:2407.17252 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    J. Q. Jiang, W. Giar` e, S. Gariazzo, M. G. Dainotti, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi, [arXiv:2407.18047 [astro-ph.CO]]. 15

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    A. C. Alfano, O. Luongo and M. Muccino, [arXiv:2408.02536 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    J. Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi, [arXiv:2408.02365 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    M. K. Sharma and M. Sami, [arXiv:2408.04204 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Ghosh and C

    B. Ghosh and C. Bengaly, [arXiv:2408.04432 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Rebou¸ cas, D

    J. Rebou¸ cas, D. H. F. de Souza, K. Zhong, V. Miranda and R. Rosenfeld, [arXiv:2408.14628 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Y. H. Pang, X. Zhang and Q. G. Huang, [arXiv:2408.14787 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, D. J. Bartlett and P. G. Ferreira, [arXiv:2408.17318 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Roy Choudhury and T

    S. Roy Choudhury and T. Okumura, [arXiv:2409.13022 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Arjona and S

    R. Arjona and S. Nesseris, [arXiv:2409.14990 [astro-ph.CO]]

  33. [41]

    W. J. Wolf, P. G. Ferreira and C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, [arXiv:2409.17019 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Giar` e, [arXiv:2409.17074 [astro-ph.CO]]

    W. Giar` e, [arXiv:2409.17074 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    H. Wang, G. Ye, J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2409.17879 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Alestas, M

    G. Alestas, M. Caldarola, S. Kuroyanagi and S. Nesseris, [arXiv:2410.00827 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Carloni and O

    Y. Carloni and O. Luongo, [arXiv:2410.10935 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bhattacharya, G

    S. Bhattacharya, G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala, [arXiv:2410.21243 [astro-ph.CO]]

  39. [47]

    Specogna, W

    E. Specogna, W. Giar` e and E. Di Valentino, [arXiv:2411.03896 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    T. N. Li, Y. H. Li, G. H. Du, P. J. Wu, L. Feng, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, [arXiv:2411.08639 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Ye, [arXiv:2411.11743 [astro-ph.CO]]

    G. Ye, [arXiv:2411.11743 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Y. H. Pang, X. Zhang and Q. G. Huang, [arXiv:2411.14189 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Akthar and M

    S. Akthar and M. W. Hossain, [arXiv:2411.15892 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, [arXiv:2412.12905 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    S. S. da Costa, Phys. Dark Univ.47(2025), 101791 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101791 [arXiv:2412.14290 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2025

  46. [54]

    C. G. Park and B. Ratra, [arXiv:2501.03480 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    M. A. Sabogal, E. Silva, R. C. Nunes, S. Kumar and E. Di Valentino, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) no.4, 043531 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043531 [arXiv:2501.10323 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    G. H. Du, T. N. Li, P. J. Wu, L. Feng, S. H. Zhou, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, 16 [arXiv:2501.10785 [astro-ph.CO]]

  49. [57]

    A. G. Ferrari, M. Ballardini, F. Finelli and D. Paoletti, [arXiv:2501.15298 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2501.16883 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Z. Y. Peng and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2502.04641 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    J. Q. Jiang, [arXiv:2502.15541 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    M. W. Hossain and A. Maqsood, [arXiv:2502.19274 [astro-ph.CO]]

  54. [62]

    L. Feng, T. N. Li, G. H. Du, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang, [arXiv:2503.10423 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Chakraborty, P

    A. Chakraborty, P. K. Chanda, S. Das and K. Dutta, [arXiv:2503.10806 [astro-ph.CO]]

  56. [64]

    Borghetto, A

    G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato and I. Zavala, [arXiv:2503.11628 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Pan and G

    J. Pan and G. Ye, [arXiv:2503.19898 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Y. H. Pang, X. Zhang and Q. G. Huang, [arXiv:2503.21600 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Wang and Y

    H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2503.23918 [astro-ph.CO]]

  60. [68]

    D. A. Kessler, L. A. Escamilla, S. Pan and E. Di Valentino, [arXiv:2504.00776 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Y. Yang, Q. Wang, X. Ren, E. N. Saridakis and Y. F. Cai, [arXiv:2504.06784 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa, T. Anton and P. G. Ferreira, [arXiv:2504.07679 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Roy Choudhury, [arXiv:2504.15340 [astro-ph.CO]]

    S. Roy Choudhury, [arXiv:2504.15340 [astro-ph.CO]]

  64. [72]

    Specogna, S

    E. Specogna, S. A. Adil, E. Ozulker, E. Di Valentino, R. C. Nunes, O. Akarsu and A. A. Sen, [arXiv:2504.17859 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ye and S

    G. Ye and S. J. Lin, [arXiv:2505.02207 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    Cheng, E

    H. Cheng, E. Di Valentino, L. A. Escamilla, A. A. Sen and L. Visinelli, [arXiv:2505.02932 [astro-ph.CO]]

  67. [75]

    J. L. Ling, G. H. Du, T. N. Li, J. F. Zhang, S. J. Wang and X. Zhang, [arXiv:2505.22369 [astro-ph.CO]]

  68. [76]

    W. J. Wolf and P. G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.10, 103519 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.103519 [arXiv:2310.07482 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calder´ on and T. Simon, [arXiv:2505.08051 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc ´ ıa-Garc ´ ıa and P. G. Ferreira, [arXiv:2502.04929 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Giar` e, T

    W. Giar` e, T. Mahassen, E. Di Valentino and S. Pan, [arXiv:2502.10264 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D68(2003), 046005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.046005 [arXiv:hep-th/0301240 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. D. Linde, JHEP12(2004), 004 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/12/004 17 [arXiv:hep-th/0411011 [hep-th]]

    2004 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B766(2007), 21-33 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.10.033 [arXiv:hep-th/0605264 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Obied, H

    G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, [arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Palti, Contemp

    E. Palti, Contemp. Phys.62(2022) no.3, 165-179 doi:10.1080/00107514.2022.2103275

    2022

  77. [85]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, E. McDonough and M. Scalisi, JHEP03(2019), 134 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)134 [arXiv:1901.02022 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, E. McDonough and M. Scalisi, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.4, 046006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.046006 [arXiv:1809.09018 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [87]

    G. N. Felder, A. V. Frolov, L. Kofman and A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D66(2002), 023507 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.023507 [arXiv:hep-th/0202017 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  80. [88]

    A. D. Linde, JCAP01(2007), 022 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/022 [arXiv:hep- th/0611043 [hep-th]]

    2007

  81. [89]

    H. H. Li, G. Ye, Y. Cai and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no.6, 063527 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063527 [arXiv:1911.06148 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [90]

    P. X. Lin, H. L. Huang, J. Zhang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B855(2024), 138768 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138768 [arXiv:2211.05265 [gr-qc]]

    2024

  83. [91]

    Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 087301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.087301 [arXiv:astro- ph/0502343 [astro-ph]]

    2005

  84. [92]

    Y. S. Piao and Y. Z. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B725(2005), 265-274 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.07.021 [arXiv:gr-qc/0407027 [gr-qc]]

    2005 arXiv

  85. [93]

    A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano, D. O. Jones, Y. Murakami, L. Breuval and T. G. Brink,et al.Astrophys. J. Lett.934, no.1, L7 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b [arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)] doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Di Valentinoet al.[CosmoVerse], [arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]]

    E. Di Valentinoet al.[CosmoVerse], [arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    Ye and Y

    G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D101, no.8, 083507 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083507 [arXiv:2001.02451 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Ye and Y

    G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D102, no.8, 083523 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083523 [arXiv:2008.10832 [astro-ph.CO]]. 18

    2020 arXiv

  90. [98]

    J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.10, 103524 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103524 [arXiv:2107.07128 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [99]

    G. Ye, J. Zhang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B839(2023), 137770 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137770 [arXiv:2107.13391 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023

  92. [100]

    Wang and Y

    H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B832(2022), 137244 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137244 [arXiv:2201.07079 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022

  93. [101]

    Karwal and M

    T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D94, no.10, 103523 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.103523 [arXiv:1608.01309 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2016 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, no.22, 221301 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221301 [arXiv:1811.04083 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [103]

    T. L. Smith, V. Poulin and M. A. Amin, Phys. Rev. D101, no.6, 063523 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063523 [arXiv:1908.06995 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Kaloper, Int

    N. Kaloper, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28(2019) no.14, 1944017 doi:10.1142/S0218271819440176 [arXiv:1903.11676 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Agrawal, F

    P. Agrawal, F. Y. Cyr-Racine, D. Pinner and L. Randall, [arXiv:1904.01016 [astro-ph.CO]]

    1904 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Alexander and E

    S. Alexander and E. McDonough, Phys. Lett. B797, 134830 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134830 [arXiv:1904.08912 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019

  99. [107]

    M. X. Lin, G. Benevento, W. Hu and M. Raveri, Phys. Rev. D100, no.6, 063542 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063542 [arXiv:1905.12618 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Sakstein and M

    J. Sakstein and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, no.16, 161301 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.161301 [arXiv:1911.11760 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Niedermann and M

    F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, Phys. Rev. D103, no.4, L041303 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L041303 [arXiv:1910.10739 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Braglia, M

    M. Braglia, M. Ballardini, W. T. Emond, F. Finelli, A. E. Gumrukcuoglu, K. Koyama and D. Paoletti, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no.2, 023529 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023529 [arXiv:2004.11161 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Braglia, M

    M. Braglia, M. Ballardini, F. Finelli and K. Koyama, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.4, 043528 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043528 [arXiv:2011.12934 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  104. [113]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith and T. Karwal, [arXiv:2302.09032 [astro-ph.CO]]. 19

    arXiv

  105. [114]

    Vagnozzi, Universe9(2023) no.9, 393 doi:10.3390/universe9090393 [arXiv:2308.16628 [astro-ph.CO]]

    S. Vagnozzi, Universe9(2023) no.9, 393 doi:10.3390/universe9090393 [arXiv:2308.16628 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  106. [115]

    McDonough, J

    E. McDonough, J. C. Hill, M. M. Ivanov, A. La Posta and M. W. Toomey, [arXiv:2310.19899 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  107. [116]

    G. Ye, J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2305.18873 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  108. [117]

    Gsponer, R

    R. Gsponer, R. Zhao, J. Donald-McCann, D. Bacon, K. Koyama, R. Crittenden, T. Simon and E. M. Mueller, [arXiv:2312.01977 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  109. [118]

    Chudaykin, D

    A. Chudaykin, D. Gorbunov and N. Nedelko, JCAP08(2020), 013 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2020/08/013 [arXiv:2004.13046 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  110. [119]

    Chudaykin, D

    A. Chudaykin, D. Gorbunov and N. Nedelko, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.4, 043529 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043529 [arXiv:2011.04682 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  111. [120]

    J. C. Hill, E. Calabrese, S. Aiola, N. Battaglia, B. Bolliet, S. K. Choi, M. J. Devlin, A. J. Duivenvoorden, J. Dunkley and S. Ferraro,et al.Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.12, 123536 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123536 [arXiv:2109.04451 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  112. [121]

    La Posta, T

    A. La Posta, T. Louis, X. Garrido and J. C. Hill, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.8, 083519 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083519 [arXiv:2112.10754 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  113. [122]

    Simon, P

    T. Simon, P. Zhang, V. Poulin and T. L. Smith, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.6, 063505 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063505 [arXiv:2208.05930 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  114. [123]

    Efstathiou, E

    G. Efstathiou, E. Rosenberg and V. Poulin, [arXiv:2311.00524 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  115. [124]

    D’Amico, L

    G. D’Amico, L. Senatore, P. Zhang and H. Zheng, JCAP05, 072 (2021) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2021/05/072 [arXiv:2006.12420 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  116. [125]

    Krishnan, E

    C. Krishnan, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, Ruchika, A. A. Sen, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang, Phys. Rev. D102, no.10, 103525 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103525 [arXiv:2002.06044 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  117. [126]

    R. C. Nunes and S. Vagnozzi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505, no.4, 5427-5437 (2021) doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1613 [arXiv:2106.01208 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  118. [127]

    J. C. Hill, E. McDonough, M. W. Toomey and S. Alexander, Phys. Rev. D102, no.4, 043507 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043507 [arXiv:2003.07355 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  119. [128]

    M. M. Ivanov, E. McDonough, J. C. Hill, M. Simonovi´ c, M. W. Toomey, S. Alexander and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D102, no.10, 103502 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103502 [arXiv:2006.11235 [astro-ph.CO]]. 20

    2020 arXiv

  120. [129]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. C. Hill, V. Irˇ siˇ c and B. D. Sherwin, [arXiv:2303.00746 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  121. [130]

    Vagnozzi, Phys

    S. Vagnozzi, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.6, 063524 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063524 [arXiv:2105.10425 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  122. [131]

    I. J. Allali, M. P. Hertzberg and F. Rompineve, Phys. Rev. D104, no.8, L081303 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L081303 [arXiv:2104.12798 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  123. [132]

    Alexander, H

    S. Alexander, H. Bernardo and M. W. Toomey, [arXiv:2207.13086 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  124. [133]

    S. J. Clark, K. Vattis, J. Fan and S. M. Koushiappas, [arXiv:2110.09562 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  125. [134]

    Reeves, L

    A. Reeves, L. Herold, S. Vagnozzi, B. D. Sherwin and E. G. M. Ferreira, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc.520, no.3, 3688-3695 (2023) doi:10.1093/mnras/stad317 [arXiv:2207.01501 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  126. [135]

    Y. H. Yao and X. H. Meng, [arXiv:2312.04007 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  127. [136]

    P3 i=1 Aiai exp(−aie √ 2/3ϕ) 6e √ 2/3ϕ + P3 i=1 Ai exp(−aie √ 2/3ϕ) 2e2 √ 2/3ϕ # , (9) δV ′′(ϕ) =A 4a3 4e−a4e √ 2/3ϕ

    for the impact on the search for primordial gravitational waves. 4 The sign-switching CC at low redshift has been combined with pre-recombination new physics in Ref.[143]. 3 II. COMP A TIBILITY WITH RECENT OBSER V A TIONS A. Data and Method To check the compatibility of post-r...

    2018

  128. [137]

    Ye and Y

    G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.4, 043536 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043536 [arXiv:2202.10055 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  129. [138]

    Akarsu, J

    ¨O. Akarsu, J. D. Barrow, L. A. Escamilla and J. A. Vazquez, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no.6, 063528 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063528 [arXiv:1912.08751 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  130. [139]

    Akarsu, S

    ¨O. Akarsu, S. Kumar, E. ¨Oz¨ ulker and J. A. Vazquez, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.12, 123512 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123512 [arXiv:2108.09239 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  131. [140]

    Akarsu, S

    O. Akarsu, S. Kumar, E. ¨Oz¨ ulker, J. A. Vazquez and A. Yadav, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 023513 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.023513 [arXiv:2211.05742 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  132. [141]

    Akarsu, E

    O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, S. Kumar, R. C. Nunes, J. A. Vazquez and A. Yadav, [arXiv:2307.10899 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  133. [142]

    E. A. Paraskevas, A. Cam, L. Perivolaropoulos and O. Akarsu, [arXiv:2402.05908 [astro- ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  134. [143]

    Akarsu, L

    ¨O. Akarsu, L. Perivolaropoulos, A. Tsikoundoura, A. E. Y¨ ukselci and A. Zhuk, [arXiv:2502.14667 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  135. [144]

    Y. Toda, W. Giar` e, E.¨Oz¨ ulker, E. Di Valentino and S. Vagnozzi, Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024), 101676 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101676 [arXiv:2407.01173 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024

  136. [145]

    L. A. Escamilla, ¨O. Akarsu, E. Di Valentino, E. ¨Oz¨ ulker and J. A. Vazquez, [arXiv:2503.12945 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  137. [146]

    Mukherjee, D

    P. Mukherjee, D. Kumar and A. A. Sen, [arXiv:2501.18335 [astro-ph.CO]]

  138. [147]

    Dutta, Ruchika, A

    K. Dutta, Ruchika, A. Roy, A. A. Sen and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020) 21 no.2, 15 doi:10.1007/s10714-020-2665-4 [arXiv:1808.06623 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  139. [148]

    Visinelli, S

    L. Visinelli, S. Vagnozzi and U. Danielsson, Symmetry11(2019) no.8, 1035 doi:10.3390/sym11081035 [arXiv:1907.07953 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  140. [149]

    Ruchika, S. A. Adil, K. Dutta, A. Mukherjee and A. A. Sen, Phys. Dark Univ.40(2023), 101199 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101199 [arXiv:2005.08813 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023

  141. [150]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Mukherjee and A. A. Sen, Entropy23(2021) no.4, 404 doi:10.3390/e23040404 [arXiv:2005.12587 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  142. [151]

    Calder´ on, R

    R. Calder´ on, R. Gannouji, B. L’Huillier and D. Polarski, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.2, 023526 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.023526 [arXiv:2008.10237 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  143. [152]

    A. A. Sen, S. A. Adil and S. Sen, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518(2022) no.1, 1098-1105 doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2796 [arXiv:2112.10641 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  144. [153]

    Malekjani, R

    M. Malekjani, R. M. Conville, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, [arXiv:2301.12725 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  145. [154]

    S. A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A. A. Sen and S. Vagnozzi, JCAP10(2023), 072 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/072 [arXiv:2307.12763 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  146. [155]

    Menci, S

    N. Menci, S. A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A. A. Sen and S. Vagnozzi, [arXiv:2401.12659 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  147. [156]

    Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641(2020), A5 doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201936386 [arXiv:1907.12875 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  148. [157]

    Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641(2020), A8 doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201833886 [arXiv:1807.06210 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  149. [158]

    Scolnic, D

    D. Scolnic, D. Brout, A. Carr, A. G. Riess, T. M. Davis, A. Dwomoh, D. O. Jones, N. Ali, P. Charvu and R. Chen,et al.Astrophys. J.938(2022) no.2, 113 doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/ac8b7a [arXiv:2112.03863 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  150. [159]

    Chevallier and D

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D10(2001), 213-224 doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc]]

    2001 arXiv

  151. [160]

    E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003), 091301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  152. [161]

    Audren, J

    B. Audren, J. Lesgourgues, K. Benabed and S. Prunet, JCAP02(2013), 001 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/001 [arXiv:1210.7183 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2013 arXiv

  153. [162]

    Brinckmann and J

    T. Brinckmann and J. Lesgourgues, Phys. Dark Univ.24(2019), 100260 22 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018.100260 [arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019

  154. [163]

    Lesgourgues, [arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM]]

    J. Lesgourgues, [arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM]]

    arXiv

  155. [164]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram, JCAP07(2011), 034 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2011/07/034 [arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2011 arXiv

  156. [165]

    G. Ye, B. Hu and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.6, 063510 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063510 [arXiv:2103.09729 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  157. [166]

    J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.10, 103514 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103514 [arXiv:2202.13379 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  158. [167]

    J. Q. Jiang, G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2210.06125 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  159. [168]

    T. L. Smith, M. Lucca, V. Poulin, G. F. Abellan, L. Balkenhol, K. Benabed, S. Galli and R. Murgia, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.4, 043526 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043526 [arXiv:2202.09379 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  160. [169]

    Z. Y. Peng and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2308.01012 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  161. [170]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.2, 023522 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.023522 [arXiv:2204.02425 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  162. [171]

    Braglia, W

    M. Braglia, W. T. Emond, F. Finelli, A. E. Gumrukcuoglu and K. Koyama, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) no.8, 083513 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083513 [arXiv:2005.14053 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  163. [172]

    G. Ye, J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.10, 103528 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103528 [arXiv:2205.02478 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  164. [173]

    J. Q. Jiang, G. Ye and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2303.12345 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  165. [174]

    Braglia, A

    M. Braglia, A. Linde, R. Kallosh and F. Finelli, JCAP04(2023), 033 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2023/04/033 [arXiv:2211.14262 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  166. [175]

    D’Amico, N

    G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper and A. Westphal, Phys. Rev. D105, no.10, 103527 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103527 [arXiv:2112.13861 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  167. [176]

    Giar` e, S

    W. Giar` e, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, W. Yang, J. de Haro and A. Melchiorri, JCAP09(2023), 019 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/09/019 [arXiv:2305.15378 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  168. [177]

    Giar` e, [arXiv:2404.12779 [astro-ph.CO]]

    W. Giar` e, [arXiv:2404.12779 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  169. [178]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, Y. Fantaye and A. Heavens, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) no.6, 063508 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063508 [arXiv:1808.09201 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2018 arXiv

  170. [179]

    Giar` e, F

    W. Giar` e, F. Renzi, O. Mena, E. Di Valentino and A. Melchiorri, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521(2023) no.2, 2911-2918 doi:10.1093/mnras/stad724 [arXiv:2210.09018 [astro-ph.CO]]. 23

    2023 arXiv

  171. [180]

    McDonough and M

    E. McDonough and M. Scalisi, JHEP10(2023), 118 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)118 [arXiv:2209.00011 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  172. [181]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Licheri, R. Mahanta, E. McDonough, F. G. Pedro and M. Scalisi, JHEP06 (2023), 052 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)052 [arXiv:2303.03414 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  173. [182]

    Bernardo, S

    H. Bernardo, S. Brahma, K. Dasgupta and R. Tatar, JHEP04(2021), 037 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)037 [arXiv:2009.04504 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  174. [183]

    Bernardo, S

    H. Bernardo, S. Brahma, K. Dasgupta and R. Tatar, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.8, 086016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.086016 [arXiv:2104.10186 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  175. [184]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, S. Prokushkin and M. Shmakova, Phys. Rev. D66(2002), 123503 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.123503 [arXiv:hep-th/0208156 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  176. [185]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. D. Linde, JCAP02(2003), 002 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/02/002 [arXiv:astro-ph/0301087 [astro-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  177. [186]

    Cardenas, T

    R. Cardenas, T. Gonzalez, Y. Leiva, O. Martin and I. Quiros, Phys. Rev. D67(2003), 083501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.083501 [arXiv:astro-ph/0206315 [astro-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  178. [187]

    Wang and Y

    H. Wang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Lett. B856(2024), 138914 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138914 [arXiv:2401.08812 [gr-qc]]

    2024

  179. [188]

    H. L. Huang, J. Q. Jiang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.10, 103540 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103540 [arXiv:2407.15781 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  180. [189]

    H. L. Huang, Y. T. Wang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2410.05891 [astro-ph.GA]]

    arXiv

  181. [190]

    H. L. Huang, J. Q. Jiang, J. He, Y. T. Wang and Y. S. Piao, [arXiv:2410.20663 [astro-ph.GA]]

    arXiv

  182. [191]

    H. L. Huang, Y. Cai, J. Q. Jiang, J. Zhang and Y. S. Piao, Res. Astron. Astrophys.24(2024) no.9, 091001 doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ad683d [arXiv:2306.17577 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  183. [192]

    H. L. Huang and Y. S. Piao, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.2, 023501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.023501 [arXiv:2312.11982 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  184. [193]

    Louiset al.[ACT], [arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]]

    T. Louiset al.[ACT], [arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  185. [194]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2021) no.3, 035002 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035002 [arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]]. 24

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.