Generalized CV Conjecture and Krylov Complexity in Two-Mode Hermitian Systems via Information Geometry

Hai-Qing Zhang; Ke-Hong Zhai; Lei-Hua Liu

arxiv: 2412.08925 · v3 · pith:4KL4IFDNnew · submitted 2024-12-12 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· quant-ph

Generalized CV Conjecture and Krylov Complexity in Two-Mode Hermitian Systems via Information Geometry

Ke-Hong Zhai , Lei-Hua Liu , Hai-Qing Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph

keywords Krylov complexityFubini-Study metricCV conjecturetwo-mode systemsinformation geometrytwo-mode squeezed statesMeixner polynomialsoperator growth

0 comments

The pith

Krylov complexity of a quantum state equals the volume of the Fubini-Study metric in two-mode Hermitian systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the CV conjecture using information geometry by proposing that Krylov complexity equals the volume of the Fubini-Study metric for quantum states. Wave functions are built for closed two-mode systems as standard two-mode squeezed states and for open systems via the second kind of Meixner polynomials to produce an open two-mode squeezed state. In both cases the independently computed Fubini-Study volume exactly equals the Krylov complexity. This match supplies analytic evidence that operator growth in Krylov space is captured by the geometry of the quantum state. A reader would care because the result ties a dynamical complexity measure directly to a geometric quantity without additional parameters.

Core claim

We conjecture that the Krylov complexity of a quantum state equals the volume of the Fubini-Study metric. We test this conjecture by constructing the wave functions for both closed and open two-mode Hermitian systems. For the closed system the wave function is the two-mode squeezed state; for the open system the second kind of Meixner polynomials generate the open two-mode squeezed state. In both cases the calculated Fubini-Study volume matches the Krylov complexity, furnishing analytic support for the generalized CV relation in this controlled setting.

What carries the argument

The conjectured equality between Krylov complexity and Fubini-Study volume, verified by explicit wave-function construction in two-mode closed and open Hermitian systems.

If this is right

The equality holds analytically for both closed two-mode squeezed states and open two-mode states generated by Meixner polynomials.
Operator growth in Krylov space is directly linked to the geometric properties of the quantum state.
The framework supplies a parameter-free bridge between complexity and information geometry in Hermitian two-mode dynamics.
The same construction can be applied to other controlled multi-mode Hermitian systems to test further instances of the relation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the equality persists, geometric volume might serve as a practical proxy for computing Krylov complexity in larger systems where direct operator growth is costly.
The result suggests a possible route to relate Krylov complexity to other geometric invariants such as entanglement entropy in the same two-mode setting.
Testing the conjecture on non-Hermitian or time-dependent two-mode models would clarify whether the link requires Hermiticity.

Load-bearing premise

The constructed wave functions correctly represent the dynamics of the closed and open two-mode Hermitian systems and the two quantities are computed independently.

What would settle it

Compute Krylov complexity and Fubini-Study volume independently for a three-mode Hermitian system or a different two-mode model and check whether the numerical values still coincide.

read the original abstract

We extend the CV conjecture to quantum states of two-mode Hermitian systems using the framework of information geometry. Specifically, we conjecture that the Krylov complexity of a quantum state equals the volume of the Fubini-Study metric. To test this conjecture, we construct the wave functions for both closed and open two-mode systems. For the closed system, the wave function corresponds to the well-known two-mode squeezed state, while for the open system, we employ the second kind of Meixner polynomials to generate an open two-mode squeezed state. Remarkably, in both cases, the calculated Fubini-Study volume matches the Krylov complexity, providing analytic evidence for the generalized CV relation in this controlled two-mode setting. Our results establish a direct link between operator growth in Krylov space and geometric properties of quantum states, highlighting the potential applications of this framework in quantum information and quantum optics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They verify a geometric conjecture for Krylov complexity with analytic matches in two two-mode cases but stop short of a proof.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors conjecture Krylov complexity equals Fubini-Study volume in two-mode Hermitian systems and confirm the equality analytically for both a closed two-mode squeezed state and an open version built from Meixner polynomials. The calculations line up exactly in each case without shared parameters or obvious circularity. That is the concrete result on offer. What works is the independent computation of both quantities on the same wave functions. The closed case uses a standard state, the open case spells out the polynomial construction, and the match holds in both. This gives a clean data point for the generalized CV idea in a controlled setting. The soft spot is that the claim stays a conjecture. Two explicit examples do not establish why the equality should hold more broadly, and the paper does not attempt a general derivation or test other states or mode numbers. The scope stays narrow to these Hermitian two-mode systems. Readers already working on Krylov complexity, operator growth, or information geometry in quantum optics will find the explicit checks useful as a reference point. Others outside that niche will see limited payoff. The work shows clear definitions and reproducible calculations, so it deserves peer review to let referees assess whether the conjecture can be tightened or extended.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the CV conjecture to two-mode Hermitian systems within information geometry, conjecturing that the Krylov complexity of a quantum state equals the volume of the associated Fubini-Study metric. The conjecture is tested by explicit construction of wave functions: the standard two-mode squeezed vacuum for the closed system and a state generated via the second kind of Meixner polynomials for the open system. In both cases the authors report an exact analytic match between the independently computed Krylov complexity and Fubini-Study volume.

Significance. If the reported equality holds beyond the two examined cases, the work supplies a concrete geometric interpretation of operator growth that could be useful in quantum optics and quantum information. The manuscript earns credit for performing independent, parameter-free analytic calculations on standard and explicitly defined wave functions rather than fitting or circular re-use of quantities.

minor comments (2)

A brief, self-contained reminder of the original CV conjecture (including its domain of validity) would help readers who are not already familiar with the literature.
The abstract and introduction refer to 'the second kind of Meixner polynomials' without a short definition or reference; adding one sentence would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of our results, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised that require point-by-point responses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; conjecture tested by independent computations

full rationale

The paper advances a conjecture equating Krylov complexity to Fubini-Study volume and verifies it via explicit analytic calculations on independently constructed wave functions (two-mode squeezed state for closed systems; Meixner-polynomial states for open systems). Both quantities are computed separately from the same states with no shared parameters, no redefinition of one in terms of the other, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to prior unverified work by the authors. The matching is presented as empirical support for the conjecture rather than a derivation that collapses by construction. This is a standard non-circular verification step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the Fubini-Study volume and Krylov complexity can be defined and computed independently on the constructed states; no free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5693 in / 1112 out tokens · 31147 ms · 2026-05-23T07:14:48.907870+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

[1]

two-photon

can be employed to distinguish which com- ponents represent an open system and which parts rep- resent a closed system. Reference [ 58] even discusses the possibility that a Hermitian Hamiltonian could exhibit characteristics of an open system. In this letter, we will focus on the most general two- mode Hamiltonian concerning the creation and anni- hilati...

work page
[2]

M. A. Nielsen, M. R. Dowling, M. Gu, and A. C. Doherty, Quantum Computation as Geometry, Science 311, 1133 (2006) , arXiv:quant-ph/0603161. 5

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[3]

D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaf- ﬁdi, and E. Altman, A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041017 (2019) , arXiv:1812.08657 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2019
[4]

Addendum to Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons

L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64, 24 (2016) , [Addendum: Fortsch.Phys. 64, 44–48 (2016)], arXiv:1403.5695 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[5]

Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries

D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014) , arXiv:1406.2678 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[6]

J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of su- perconformal ﬁeld theories and supergrav- ity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) , arXiv:hep-th/9711200

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[7]

M. A. Nielsen, A geometric approach to quantum cir- cuit lower bounds, Quant. Inf. Comput. 6, 213 (2006) , arXiv:quant-ph/0502070

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[8]

M. R. Dowling and M. A. Nielsen, The geometry of quan- tum computation, Quant. Inf. Comput. 8, 0861 (2008) , arXiv:quant-ph/0701004

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[9]

Towards Complexity for Quantum Field Theory States

S. Chapman, M. P. Heller, H. Marro- chio, and F. Pastawski, Toward a Deﬁni- tion of Complexity for Quantum Field The- ory States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121602 (2018) , arXiv:1707.08582 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[10]

Rabinovici, A

E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Son- ner, Operator complexity: a journey to the edge of Krylov space, JHEP 06, 062 , arXiv:2009.01862 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2009
[11]

S. He, P. H. C. Lau, Z.-Y. Xian, and L. Zhao, Quantum chaos, scrambling and operator growth in T T deformed SYK models, JHEP 12, 070 , arXiv:2209.14936 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[12]

Patramanis, Probing the entanglement of operator growth, PTEP 2022, 063A01 (2022) , arXiv:2111.03424 [hep-th]

D. Patramanis, Probing the entanglement of operator growth, PTEP 2022, 063A01 (2022) , arXiv:2111.03424 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[13]

Cao, A statistical mechanism for operator growth , J

X. Cao, A statistical mechanism for oper- ator growth, J. Phys. A 54, 144001 (2021) , arXiv:2012.06544 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2021
[14]

F. B. Trigueros and C.-J. Lin, Krylov complex- ity of many-body localization: Operator localiza- tion in Krylov basis, SciPost Phys. 13, 037 (2022) , arXiv:2112.04722 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

work page arXiv 2022
[15]

Heveling, J

R. Heveling, J. Wang, and J. Gemmer, Nu- merically probing the universal operator growth hypothesis, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014152 (2022) , arXiv:2203.00533 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2022
[16]

Dymarsky and M

A. Dymarsky and M. Smolkin, Krylov complexity in con- formal ﬁeld theory, Phys. Rev. D 104, L081702 (2021) , arXiv:2104.09514 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

Caputa and S

P. Caputa and S. Datta, Operator growth in 2d CFT, JHEP 12, 188 , [Erratum: JHEP 09, 113 (2022)], arXiv:2110.10519 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

Caputa and S

P. Caputa and S. Liu, Quantum complexity and topolog- ical phases of matter, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195125 (2022) , arXiv:2205.05688 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

Bhattacharjee, X

B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Krylov complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling, JHEP 05, 174 , arXiv:2203.03534 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[20]

Adhikari and S

K. Adhikari and S. Choudhury, Cosmological Krylov Complexity, Fortsch. Phys. 70, 2200126 (2022) , arXiv:2203.14330 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

H. A. Camargo, V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, Krylov complexity in free and interacting scalar ﬁeld theories with bounded power spectrum, JHEP 05, 226 , arXiv:2212.14702 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[22]

He and H.-Q

P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang, Krylov Complex- ity in the Schr¨ odinger Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2411.16302 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

He and H.-Q

P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang, Probing Krylov complex- ity in scalar ﬁeld theory with general temperatures, JHEP 11, 014 , arXiv:2407.02756 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[24]

Hashimoto, K

K. Hashimoto, K. Murata, N. Tanahashi, and R. Watan- abe, Krylov complexity and chaos in quantum mechanics, JHEP 11, 040 , arXiv:2305.16669 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[25]

M. J. Vasli, K. Babaei Velni, M. R. Moham- madi Mozaﬀar, A. Mollabashi, and M. Al- ishahiha, Krylov complexity in Lifshitz-type scalar ﬁeld theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 235 (2024) , arXiv:2307.08307 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

A. Gill, K. Pal, K. Pal, and T. Sarkar, Complexity in two-point measurement schemes, Phys. Rev. B 109, 104303 (2024) , arXiv:2311.07892 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Bhattacharjee, P

B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Operator dynamics in Lindbladian SYK: a Krylov complexity per- spective, JHEP 01, 094 , arXiv:2311.00753 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[28]

Adhikari, S

K. Adhikari, S. Choudhury, and A. Roy, Krylov Complexity in Quantum Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 993, 116263 (2023) , arXiv:2204.02250 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Caputa, H.-S

P. Caputa, H.-S. Jeong, S. Liu, J. F. Pedraza, and L.- C. Qu, Krylov complexity of density matrix operators, JHEP 05, 337 , arXiv:2402.09522 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[30]

R. Basu, A. Ganguly, S. Nath, and O. Parrikar, Complexity growth and the Krylov-Wigner function, JHEP 05, 264 , arXiv:2402.13694 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[31]

Sasaki, Towards Veriﬁcations of Krylov Complexity, PTEP 2024, 063A01 (2024) , arXiv:2403.06391 [quant-ph]

R. Sasaki, Towards Veriﬁcations of Krylov Complexity, PTEP 2024, 063A01 (2024) , arXiv:2403.06391 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Caputa and K

P. Caputa and K. Kutak, Krylov complex- ity and gluon cascades in the high en- ergy limit, Phys. Rev. D 110, 085011 (2024) , arXiv:2404.07657 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Sahu, Information Gain, Operator Spreading, and Sensitivity to Perturbations as Quantiﬁers of Chaos in Quantum Systems , Other thesis (2024), arXiv:2404.09464 [quant-ph]

A. Sahu, Information Gain, Operator Spreading, and Sensitivity to Perturbations as Quantiﬁers of Chaos in Quantum Systems , Other thesis (2024), arXiv:2404.09464 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Bhattacharjee, S

B. Bhattacharjee, S. Sur, and P. Nandy, Probing quantum scars and weak ergodicity breaking through quantum complexity, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205150 (2022) , arXiv:2208.05503 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

J. Kim, J. Murugan, J. Olle, and D. Rosa, Operator delocalization in quantum net- works, Phys. Rev. A 105, L010201 (2022) , arXiv:2109.05301 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

L. Chen, B. Mu, H. Wang, and P. Zhang, Dissect- ing Quantum Many-body Chaos in the Krylov Space, (2024), arXiv:2404.08207 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

Bhattacharjee and P

B. Bhattacharjee and P. Nandy, Krylov fractality and complexity in generic random matrix ensembles, (2024), arXiv:2407.07399 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

S´ anchez-Garrido,On Krylov Complexity , Ph.D

A. S´ anchez-Garrido,On Krylov Complexity , Ph.D. thesis, U. Geneva (main) (2024), arXiv:2407.03866 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Chattopadhyay, V

A. Chattopadhyay, V. Malvimat, and A. Mitra, Krylov complexity of deformed conformal ﬁeld theories, JHEP 08, 053 , arXiv:2405.03630 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[40]

Balasubramanian, R

V. Balasubramanian, R. N. Das, J. Erdmenger, and Z.- Y. Xian, Chaos and integrability in triangular billiards, 6 (2024), arXiv:2407.11114 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

Bhattacharya, R

A. Bhattacharya, R. N. Das, B. Dey, and J. Erd- menger, Spread complexity and localization in PT- symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064320 (2024) , arXiv:2406.03524 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

Mohan, Krylov complexity of open quantum sys- tems: from hard spheres to black holes, JHEP 11, 222 , arXiv:2308.10945 [hep-th]

V. Mohan, Krylov complexity of open quantum sys- tems: from hard spheres to black holes, JHEP 11, 222 , arXiv:2308.10945 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[43]

He, Revisit the relationship between spread complexity rate and radial momentum, (2024), arXiv:2411.19172 [hep-th]

P.-Z. He, Revisit the relationship between spread complexity rate and radial momentum, (2024), arXiv:2411.19172 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

Bhattacharya, P

A. Bhattacharya, P. Nandy, P. P. Nath, and H. Sahu, Operator growth and Krylov construction in dissipative open quantum systems, JHEP 12, 081 , arXiv:2207.05347 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[45]

Bhattacharya, P

A. Bhattacharya, P. Nandy, P. P. Nath, and H. Sahu, On Krylov complexity in open systems: an approach via bi-Lanczos algorithm, JHEP 12, 066 , arXiv:2303.04175 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[46]

Nandy, A.S

P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Mart ´ ınez- Azcona, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Quantum Dynamics in Krylov Space: Methods and Applications, (2024), arXiv:2405.09628 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Rabinovici, A

E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity, JHEP 08, 213 , arXiv:2305.04355 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[48]

Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl

R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252, 343 (1985)

work page 1985
[49]

Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys

C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126, 41 (1983)

work page 1983
[50]

A. Kar, L. Lamprou, M. Rozali, and J. Sully, Random matrix theory for complexity growth and black hole in- teriors, JHEP 01, 016 , arXiv:2106.02046 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[51]

Nielsen, An elementary introduction to informa- tion geometry, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1808.08271 (2018) , arXiv:1808.08271 [cs.LG]

F. Nielsen, An elementary introduction to informa- tion geometry, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1808.08271 (2018) , arXiv:1808.08271 [cs.LG]

work page arXiv 2018
[52]

Caputa, J

P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and D. Patramanis, Geometry of Krylov complexity, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013041 (2022) , arXiv:2109.03824 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Zhai and L.-H

K.-H. Zhai and L.-H. Liu, Krylov Complexity in early universe, (2024), arXiv:2411.18405 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

Viswanath and G

V. Viswanath and G. M¨ uller,The recursion method: ap- plication to many body dynamics , Vol. 23 (Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 1994)

work page 1994
[55]

Hetyei, Meixner polynomials of the second kind and quantum algebras representing su(1, 1), Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering

G. Hetyei, Meixner polynomials of the second kind and quantum algebras representing su(1, 1), Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering

work page
[56]

D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaﬃdi, and E. Altman, A universal operator growth hypothesis, Physical Review X 9, 10.1103/physrevx.9.041017 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041017 2019
[57]

Bhattacharjee, X

B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Operator growth in open quantum systems: lessons from the dissipative SYK, JHEP 03, 054 , arXiv:2212.06180 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv
[58]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976)

work page 1976
[59]

Li and L.-H

T. Li and L.-H. Liu, Inﬂationary Krylov complexity, JHEP 04, 123 , arXiv:2401.09307 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[60]

Li and L.-H

T. Li and L.-H. Liu, Krylov complexity of thermal state in early universe, (2024), arXiv:2408.03293 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[61]

Li and L.-H

T. Li and L.-H. Liu, Inﬂationary complexity of thermal state, (2024), arXiv:2405.01433 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

Zhang, R

W.-M. Zhang, R. Gilmore, et al. , Coherent states: The- ory and some applications, Reviews of Modern Physics 62, 867 (1990)

work page 1990
[63]

Xu, On Chord Dynamics and Complexity Growth in Double-Scaled SYK, (2024), arXiv:2411.04251 [hep-th]

J. Xu, On Chord Dynamics and Complexity Growth in Double-Scaled SYK, (2024), arXiv:2411.04251 [hep-th] . The calculation of the metric ds2 within the open system The two-mode squeezed state within the open system is written as |z⟩ = sech r 1 + u2 tanh r ∞∑ n=0 |1 − u2 1| n 2 ( − e2iφ tanh r 1 + u2 tanh r ) n |n⃗k; n−⃗k⟩. (18) Next, we calculate the inner ...

work page arXiv 2024

[1] [1]

two-photon

can be employed to distinguish which com- ponents represent an open system and which parts rep- resent a closed system. Reference [ 58] even discusses the possibility that a Hermitian Hamiltonian could exhibit characteristics of an open system. In this letter, we will focus on the most general two- mode Hamiltonian concerning the creation and anni- hilati...

work page

[2] [2]

M. A. Nielsen, M. R. Dowling, M. Gu, and A. C. Doherty, Quantum Computation as Geometry, Science 311, 1133 (2006) , arXiv:quant-ph/0603161. 5

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[3] [3]

D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaf- ﬁdi, and E. Altman, A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041017 (2019) , arXiv:1812.08657 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2019

[4] [4]

Addendum to Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons

L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64, 24 (2016) , [Addendum: Fortsch.Phys. 64, 44–48 (2016)], arXiv:1403.5695 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[5] [5]

Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries

D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90, 126007 (2014) , arXiv:1406.2678 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[6] [6]

J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of su- perconformal ﬁeld theories and supergrav- ity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) , arXiv:hep-th/9711200

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[7] [7]

M. A. Nielsen, A geometric approach to quantum cir- cuit lower bounds, Quant. Inf. Comput. 6, 213 (2006) , arXiv:quant-ph/0502070

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[8] [8]

M. R. Dowling and M. A. Nielsen, The geometry of quan- tum computation, Quant. Inf. Comput. 8, 0861 (2008) , arXiv:quant-ph/0701004

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

[9] [9]

Towards Complexity for Quantum Field Theory States

S. Chapman, M. P. Heller, H. Marro- chio, and F. Pastawski, Toward a Deﬁni- tion of Complexity for Quantum Field The- ory States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121602 (2018) , arXiv:1707.08582 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[10] [10]

Rabinovici, A

E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Son- ner, Operator complexity: a journey to the edge of Krylov space, JHEP 06, 062 , arXiv:2009.01862 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2009

[11] [11]

S. He, P. H. C. Lau, Z.-Y. Xian, and L. Zhao, Quantum chaos, scrambling and operator growth in T T deformed SYK models, JHEP 12, 070 , arXiv:2209.14936 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[12] [12]

Patramanis, Probing the entanglement of operator growth, PTEP 2022, 063A01 (2022) , arXiv:2111.03424 [hep-th]

D. Patramanis, Probing the entanglement of operator growth, PTEP 2022, 063A01 (2022) , arXiv:2111.03424 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[13] [13]

Cao, A statistical mechanism for operator growth , J

X. Cao, A statistical mechanism for oper- ator growth, J. Phys. A 54, 144001 (2021) , arXiv:2012.06544 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2021

[14] [14]

F. B. Trigueros and C.-J. Lin, Krylov complex- ity of many-body localization: Operator localiza- tion in Krylov basis, SciPost Phys. 13, 037 (2022) , arXiv:2112.04722 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

work page arXiv 2022

[15] [15]

Heveling, J

R. Heveling, J. Wang, and J. Gemmer, Nu- merically probing the universal operator growth hypothesis, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014152 (2022) , arXiv:2203.00533 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page arXiv 2022

[16] [16]

Dymarsky and M

A. Dymarsky and M. Smolkin, Krylov complexity in con- formal ﬁeld theory, Phys. Rev. D 104, L081702 (2021) , arXiv:2104.09514 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021

[17] [17]

Caputa and S

P. Caputa and S. Datta, Operator growth in 2d CFT, JHEP 12, 188 , [Erratum: JHEP 09, 113 (2022)], arXiv:2110.10519 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[18] [18]

Caputa and S

P. Caputa and S. Liu, Quantum complexity and topolog- ical phases of matter, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195125 (2022) , arXiv:2205.05688 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[19] [19]

Bhattacharjee, X

B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Krylov complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling, JHEP 05, 174 , arXiv:2203.03534 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv

[20] [20]

Adhikari and S

K. Adhikari and S. Choudhury, Cosmological Krylov Complexity, Fortsch. Phys. 70, 2200126 (2022) , arXiv:2203.14330 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[21] [21]

H. A. Camargo, V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, Krylov complexity in free and interacting scalar ﬁeld theories with bounded power spectrum, JHEP 05, 226 , arXiv:2212.14702 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[22] [22]

He and H.-Q

P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang, Krylov Complex- ity in the Schr¨ odinger Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2411.16302 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[23] [23]

He and H.-Q

P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang, Probing Krylov complex- ity in scalar ﬁeld theory with general temperatures, JHEP 11, 014 , arXiv:2407.02756 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[24] [24]

Hashimoto, K

K. Hashimoto, K. Murata, N. Tanahashi, and R. Watan- abe, Krylov complexity and chaos in quantum mechanics, JHEP 11, 040 , arXiv:2305.16669 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[25] [25]

M. J. Vasli, K. Babaei Velni, M. R. Moham- madi Mozaﬀar, A. Mollabashi, and M. Al- ishahiha, Krylov complexity in Lifshitz-type scalar ﬁeld theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 235 (2024) , arXiv:2307.08307 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[26] [26]

A. Gill, K. Pal, K. Pal, and T. Sarkar, Complexity in two-point measurement schemes, Phys. Rev. B 109, 104303 (2024) , arXiv:2311.07892 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[27] [27]

Bhattacharjee, P

B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Operator dynamics in Lindbladian SYK: a Krylov complexity per- spective, JHEP 01, 094 , arXiv:2311.00753 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv

[28] [28]

Adhikari, S

K. Adhikari, S. Choudhury, and A. Roy, Krylov Complexity in Quantum Field Theory, Nucl. Phys. B 993, 116263 (2023) , arXiv:2204.02250 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023

[29] [29]

Caputa, H.-S

P. Caputa, H.-S. Jeong, S. Liu, J. F. Pedraza, and L.- C. Qu, Krylov complexity of density matrix operators, JHEP 05, 337 , arXiv:2402.09522 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[30] [30]

R. Basu, A. Ganguly, S. Nath, and O. Parrikar, Complexity growth and the Krylov-Wigner function, JHEP 05, 264 , arXiv:2402.13694 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[31] [31]

Sasaki, Towards Veriﬁcations of Krylov Complexity, PTEP 2024, 063A01 (2024) , arXiv:2403.06391 [quant-ph]

R. Sasaki, Towards Veriﬁcations of Krylov Complexity, PTEP 2024, 063A01 (2024) , arXiv:2403.06391 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[32] [32]

Caputa and K

P. Caputa and K. Kutak, Krylov complex- ity and gluon cascades in the high en- ergy limit, Phys. Rev. D 110, 085011 (2024) , arXiv:2404.07657 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[33] [33]

Sahu, Information Gain, Operator Spreading, and Sensitivity to Perturbations as Quantiﬁers of Chaos in Quantum Systems , Other thesis (2024), arXiv:2404.09464 [quant-ph]

A. Sahu, Information Gain, Operator Spreading, and Sensitivity to Perturbations as Quantiﬁers of Chaos in Quantum Systems , Other thesis (2024), arXiv:2404.09464 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[34] [34]

Bhattacharjee, S

B. Bhattacharjee, S. Sur, and P. Nandy, Probing quantum scars and weak ergodicity breaking through quantum complexity, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205150 (2022) , arXiv:2208.05503 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2022

[35] [35]

J. Kim, J. Murugan, J. Olle, and D. Rosa, Operator delocalization in quantum net- works, Phys. Rev. A 105, L010201 (2022) , arXiv:2109.05301 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2022

[36] [36]

L. Chen, B. Mu, H. Wang, and P. Zhang, Dissect- ing Quantum Many-body Chaos in the Krylov Space, (2024), arXiv:2404.08207 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[37] [37]

Bhattacharjee and P

B. Bhattacharjee and P. Nandy, Krylov fractality and complexity in generic random matrix ensembles, (2024), arXiv:2407.07399 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[38] [38]

S´ anchez-Garrido,On Krylov Complexity , Ph.D

A. S´ anchez-Garrido,On Krylov Complexity , Ph.D. thesis, U. Geneva (main) (2024), arXiv:2407.03866 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[39] [39]

Chattopadhyay, V

A. Chattopadhyay, V. Malvimat, and A. Mitra, Krylov complexity of deformed conformal ﬁeld theories, JHEP 08, 053 , arXiv:2405.03630 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[40] [40]

Balasubramanian, R

V. Balasubramanian, R. N. Das, J. Erdmenger, and Z.- Y. Xian, Chaos and integrability in triangular billiards, 6 (2024), arXiv:2407.11114 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[41] [41]

Bhattacharya, R

A. Bhattacharya, R. N. Das, B. Dey, and J. Erd- menger, Spread complexity and localization in PT- symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064320 (2024) , arXiv:2406.03524 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[42] [42]

Mohan, Krylov complexity of open quantum sys- tems: from hard spheres to black holes, JHEP 11, 222 , arXiv:2308.10945 [hep-th]

V. Mohan, Krylov complexity of open quantum sys- tems: from hard spheres to black holes, JHEP 11, 222 , arXiv:2308.10945 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[43] [43]

He, Revisit the relationship between spread complexity rate and radial momentum, (2024), arXiv:2411.19172 [hep-th]

P.-Z. He, Revisit the relationship between spread complexity rate and radial momentum, (2024), arXiv:2411.19172 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[44] [44]

Bhattacharya, P

A. Bhattacharya, P. Nandy, P. P. Nath, and H. Sahu, Operator growth and Krylov construction in dissipative open quantum systems, JHEP 12, 081 , arXiv:2207.05347 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv

[45] [45]

Bhattacharya, P

A. Bhattacharya, P. Nandy, P. P. Nath, and H. Sahu, On Krylov complexity in open systems: an approach via bi-Lanczos algorithm, JHEP 12, 066 , arXiv:2303.04175 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv

[46] [46]

Nandy, A.S

P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Mart ´ ınez- Azcona, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Quantum Dynamics in Krylov Space: Methods and Applications, (2024), arXiv:2405.09628 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2024

[47] [47]

Rabinovici, A

E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner, A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity, JHEP 08, 213 , arXiv:2305.04355 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[48] [48]

Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl

R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252, 343 (1985)

work page 1985

[49] [49]

Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys

C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126, 41 (1983)

work page 1983

[50] [50]

A. Kar, L. Lamprou, M. Rozali, and J. Sully, Random matrix theory for complexity growth and black hole in- teriors, JHEP 01, 016 , arXiv:2106.02046 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[51] [51]

Nielsen, An elementary introduction to informa- tion geometry, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1808.08271 (2018) , arXiv:1808.08271 [cs.LG]

F. Nielsen, An elementary introduction to informa- tion geometry, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1808.08271 (2018) , arXiv:1808.08271 [cs.LG]

work page arXiv 2018

[52] [52]

Caputa, J

P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and D. Patramanis, Geometry of Krylov complexity, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013041 (2022) , arXiv:2109.03824 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[53] [53]

Zhai and L.-H

K.-H. Zhai and L.-H. Liu, Krylov Complexity in early universe, (2024), arXiv:2411.18405 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[54] [54]

Viswanath and G

V. Viswanath and G. M¨ uller,The recursion method: ap- plication to many body dynamics , Vol. 23 (Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 1994)

work page 1994

[55] [55]

Hetyei, Meixner polynomials of the second kind and quantum algebras representing su(1, 1), Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering

G. Hetyei, Meixner polynomials of the second kind and quantum algebras representing su(1, 1), Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering

work page

[56] [56]

D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaﬃdi, and E. Altman, A universal operator growth hypothesis, Physical Review X 9, 10.1103/physrevx.9.041017 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041017 2019

[57] [57]

Bhattacharjee, X

B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Operator growth in open quantum systems: lessons from the dissipative SYK, JHEP 03, 054 , arXiv:2212.06180 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv

[58] [58]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976)

work page 1976

[59] [59]

Li and L.-H

T. Li and L.-H. Liu, Inﬂationary Krylov complexity, JHEP 04, 123 , arXiv:2401.09307 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[60] [60]

Li and L.-H

T. Li and L.-H. Liu, Krylov complexity of thermal state in early universe, (2024), arXiv:2408.03293 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[61] [61]

Li and L.-H

T. Li and L.-H. Liu, Inﬂationary complexity of thermal state, (2024), arXiv:2405.01433 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[62] [62]

Zhang, R

W.-M. Zhang, R. Gilmore, et al. , Coherent states: The- ory and some applications, Reviews of Modern Physics 62, 867 (1990)

work page 1990

[63] [63]

Xu, On Chord Dynamics and Complexity Growth in Double-Scaled SYK, (2024), arXiv:2411.04251 [hep-th]

J. Xu, On Chord Dynamics and Complexity Growth in Double-Scaled SYK, (2024), arXiv:2411.04251 [hep-th] . The calculation of the metric ds2 within the open system The two-mode squeezed state within the open system is written as |z⟩ = sech r 1 + u2 tanh r ∞∑ n=0 |1 − u2 1| n 2 ( − e2iφ tanh r 1 + u2 tanh r ) n |n⃗k; n−⃗k⟩. (18) Next, we calculate the inner ...

work page arXiv 2024