REVIEW 2 cited by
Evaluating Privacy Leakage in Split Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Evaluating Privacy Leakage in Split Learning
read the original abstract
Privacy-Preserving machine learning (PPML) can help us train and deploy models that utilize private information. In particular, on-device machine learning allows us to avoid sharing raw data with a third-party server during inference. On-device models are typically less accurate when compared to their server counterparts due to the fact that (1) they typically only rely on a small set of on-device features and (2) they need to be small enough to run efficiently on end-user devices. Split Learning (SL) is a promising approach that can overcome these limitations. In SL, a large machine learning model is divided into two parts, with the bigger part residing on the server side and a smaller part executing on-device, aiming to incorporate the private features. However, end-to-end training of such models requires exchanging gradients at the cut layer, which might encode private features or labels. In this paper, we provide insights into potential privacy risks associated with SL. Furthermore, we also investigate the effectiveness of various mitigation strategies. Our results indicate that the gradients significantly improve the attackers' effectiveness in all tested datasets reaching almost perfect reconstruction accuracy for some features. However, a small amount of differential privacy (DP) can effectively mitigate this risk without causing significant training degradation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards Privacy-Preserving Large Language Model: Text-free Inference Through Alignment and Adaptation
PPFT enables text-free LLM inference by aligning client embeddings with server projection and LLM, then fine-tuning on noise-injected private embeddings to maintain near-baseline performance without exposing raw prompts.
-
A Survey on Split Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning: Models, Systems, and Privacy Optimizations
A survey that introduces a unified training pipeline and taxonomizes split learning approaches for LLM fine-tuning across model, system, and privacy dimensions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.