Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards identifying possible fault-tolerant advantage of quantum linear system algorithms in terms of space, time and energy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11239 v2 pith:4WU4GHTO submitted 2025-02-16 quant-ph cs.AIcs.LGmath.OC

classification quant-phcs.AIcs.LGmath.OC
keywords quantumfault-tolerantlinearpossibleadvantageadvantagesapproxclassical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Quantum computing, a prominent non-Von Neumann paradigm beyond Moore's law, can offer superpolynomial speedups for certain problems. Yet its advantages in efficiency for tasks like machine learning remain under investigation, and quantum noise complicates resource estimations and classical comparisons. We provide a detailed estimation of space, time, and energy resources for fault-tolerant superconducting devices running the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm, a quantum linear system solver relevant to linear algebra and machine learning. Excluding memory and data transfer, possible quantum advantages over the classical conjugate gradient method could emerge at $N \approx 2^{33} \sim 2^{48}$ or even lower, requiring ${O}(10^5)$ physical qubits, ${O}(10^{12}\sim10^{13})$ Joules, and ${O}(10^6)$ seconds under surface code fault-tolerance with three types of magic state distillation (15-1, 116-12, 225-1). Key parameters include condition number, sparsity, and precision $\kappa, s\approx{O}(10\sim100)$, $\epsilon\sim0.01$, and physical error $10^{-5}$. Our resource estimator adjusts $N, \kappa, s, \epsilon$, providing a map of quantum-classical boundaries and revealing where a practical quantum advantage may arise. Our work quantitatively determine how advanced a fault-tolerant quantum computer should be to achieve possible, significant benefits on problems related to real-world.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Pathway to Practical Quantum Advantage in Solving Navier-Stokes Equations

    quant-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A spectral-sparsity-based quantum solver is claimed to solve 2^80-cell Navier-Stokes problems in 42.6 days with 8.71 million physical qubits, a 1,100x speedup over a classical supercomputer.

  2. Benchmarking and Resource Analysis for Augmented-Lagrangian Quantum Hamiltonian Descent

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    AL-QHD benchmarks on nonconvex test functions and ACOPF power problems show useful accuracy at fixed qubit cost but require roughly 10^8 T gates for realistic instances.

Pith tools