Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Real-World Human-Robot Collaborative Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.01156 v2 pith:53QV6S7Y submitted 2020-03-02 cs.RO cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.LG
keywords agentgamereal-worldcollaborativehumanlearningresultsadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The intuitive collaboration of humans and intelligent robots (embodied AI) in the real-world is an essential objective for many desirable applications of robotics. Whilst there is much research regarding explicit communication, we focus on how humans and robots interact implicitly, on motor adaptation level. We present a real-world setup of a human-robot collaborative maze game, designed to be non-trivial and only solvable through collaboration, by limiting the actions to rotations of two orthogonal axes, and assigning each axes to one player. This results in neither the human nor the agent being able to solve the game on their own. We use deep reinforcement learning for the control of the robotic agent, and achieve results within 30 minutes of real-world play, without any type of pre-training. We then use this setup to perform systematic experiments on human/agent behaviour and adaptation when co-learning a policy for the collaborative game. We present results on how co-policy learning occurs over time between the human and the robotic agent resulting in each participant's agent serving as a representation of how they would play the game. This allows us to relate a person's success when playing with different agents than their own, by comparing the policy of the agent with that of their own agent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving Human-Robot Teamwork in Urban Search and Rescue Through Episodic Memory of Prior Collaboration

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Robots initialized with a single automatically selected episodic memory from prior collaborations raise rescue success from 25.7% to 41.3% and cut task time by 283 seconds across 160 rounds with 20 participants.

  2. Mapping Human-Agent Co-Learning and Co-Adaptation: A Scoping Review

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A scoping review of 77 papers on human-agent co-learning and co-adaptation finds that most work claims two-way adaptation, with reinforcement learning and decision-making or trust frameworks dominating.

Pith tools