REVIEW 2 cited by
Real-World Human-Robot Collaborative Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The intuitive collaboration of humans and intelligent robots (embodied AI) in the real-world is an essential objective for many desirable applications of robotics. Whilst there is much research regarding explicit communication, we focus on how humans and robots interact implicitly, on motor adaptation level. We present a real-world setup of a human-robot collaborative maze game, designed to be non-trivial and only solvable through collaboration, by limiting the actions to rotations of two orthogonal axes, and assigning each axes to one player. This results in neither the human nor the agent being able to solve the game on their own. We use deep reinforcement learning for the control of the robotic agent, and achieve results within 30 minutes of real-world play, without any type of pre-training. We then use this setup to perform systematic experiments on human/agent behaviour and adaptation when co-learning a policy for the collaborative game. We present results on how co-policy learning occurs over time between the human and the robotic agent resulting in each participant's agent serving as a representation of how they would play the game. This allows us to relate a person's success when playing with different agents than their own, by comparing the policy of the agent with that of their own agent.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Improving Human-Robot Teamwork in Urban Search and Rescue Through Episodic Memory of Prior Collaboration
Robots initialized with a single automatically selected episodic memory from prior collaborations raise rescue success from 25.7% to 41.3% and cut task time by 283 seconds across 160 rounds with 20 participants.
-
Mapping Human-Agent Co-Learning and Co-Adaptation: A Scoping Review
A scoping review of 77 papers on human-agent co-learning and co-adaptation finds that most work claims two-way adaptation, with reinforcement learning and decision-making or trust frameworks dominating.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.