Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Limitations of Deep Neural Networks: a discussion of G. Marcus' critical appraisal of deep learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.15754 v1 pith:57B35ZUN submitted 2020-12-22 cs.AI cs.CYcs.LG

Limitations of Deep Neural Networks: a discussion of G. Marcus' critical appraisal of deep learning

classification cs.AI cs.CYcs.LG
keywords deeplearningresearchmarcusnetworksneuralapplicationsappraisal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks have triggered a revolution in artificial intelligence, having been applied with great results in medical imaging, semi-autonomous vehicles, ecommerce, genetics research, speech recognition, particle physics, experimental art, economic forecasting, environmental science, industrial manufacturing, and a wide variety of applications in nearly every field. This sudden success, though, may have intoxicated the research community and blinded them to the potential pitfalls of assigning deep learning a higher status than warranted. Also, research directed at alleviating the weaknesses of deep learning may seem less attractive to scientists and engineers, who focus on the low-hanging fruit of finding more and more applications for deep learning models, thus letting short-term benefits hamper long-term scientific progress. Gary Marcus wrote a paper entitled Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal, and here we discuss Marcus' core ideas, as well as attempt a general assessment of the subject. This study examines some of the limitations of deep neural networks, with the intention of pointing towards potential paths for future research, and of clearing up some metaphysical misconceptions, held by numerous researchers, that may misdirect them.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LeLaR: The First In-Orbit Demonstration of an AI-Based Satellite Attitude Controller

    cs.RO 2025-12 conditional novelty 8.0

    First in-orbit demonstration of a DRL-trained AI satellite attitude controller that performs robust inertial pointing after sim-to-real transfer.

  2. CosmoUiT: A Vision Transformer-UNet Hybrid for Fast and Accurate Emulation of 21-cm Maps from the Epoch of Reionization

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A Vision Transformer-UNet hybrid emulates 3D EoR 21-cm cubes conditioned on reionization parameters, matching simulated large-scale power spectra with mild small-scale suppression.