Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MultiTabQA: Generating Tabular Answers for Multi-Table Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12820 v2 pith:5PQZ2C6V submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CL cs.AI

MultiTabQA: Generating Tabular Answers for Multi-Table Question Answering

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords tabletabularanswersquestionstablesansweringmodelsmulti-table
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in tabular question answering (QA) with large language models are constrained in their coverage and only answer questions over a single table. However, real-world queries are complex in nature, often over multiple tables in a relational database or web page. Single table questions do not involve common table operations such as set operations, Cartesian products (joins), or nested queries. Furthermore, multi-table operations often result in a tabular output, which necessitates table generation capabilities of tabular QA models. To fill this gap, we propose a new task of answering questions over multiple tables. Our model, MultiTabQA, not only answers questions over multiple tables, but also generalizes to generate tabular answers. To enable effective training, we build a pre-training dataset comprising of 132,645 SQL queries and tabular answers. Further, we evaluate the generated tables by introducing table-specific metrics of varying strictness assessing various levels of granularity of the table structure. MultiTabQA outperforms state-of-the-art single table QA models adapted to a multi-table QA setting by finetuning on three datasets: Spider, Atis and GeoQuery.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Synthetic Contrastive Reasoning for Multi-Table Q&A

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Constructs synthetic contrastive reasoning-trace dataset for MMQA via heterogeneous LLMs and reports 9.7-16.3% absolute gains from CPO fine-tuning over standard SFT across three open LLMs.