REVIEW 5 cited by
How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it
read the original abstract
Large language models learn and continually learn through the accumulation of gradient-based updates, but how individual pieces of new information affect existing knowledge, leading to both beneficial generalization and problematic hallucination, remains poorly understood. We demonstrate that when learning new information, LLMs exhibit a "priming" effect: learning a new fact can cause the model to inappropriately apply that knowledge in unrelated contexts. To systematically study this phenomenon, we introduce "Outlandish," a carefully curated dataset of 1320 diverse text samples designed to probe how new knowledge permeates through an LLM's existing knowledge base. Using this dataset, we show that the degree of priming after learning new information can be predicted by measuring the token probability of key words before learning. This relationship holds robustly across different model architectures (PALM-2, Gemma, Llama), sizes, and training stages. Finally, we develop two novel techniques to modulate how new knowledge affects existing model behavior: (1) a ``stepping-stone'' text augmentation strategy and (2) an ``ignore-k'' update pruning method. These approaches reduce undesirable priming effects by 50-95\% while preserving the model's ability to learn new information. Our findings provide both empirical insights into how LLMs learn and practical tools for improving the specificity of knowledge insertion in language models. Further materials: https://sunchipsster1.github.io/projects/outlandish/
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Can a Language Model Learn Facts Continually in Its Weights?
Facts written into LLM weights are stored but question-keyed; broad data creates usable knowledge while later writes destroy access rather than storage, leaving context more reliable than weights for composition and r...
-
Can a Language Model Learn Facts Continually in Its Weights?
Weight writes create question-keyed knowledge that later sequential writes redirect, so context—not weights—is the reliable channel for facts that must survive or be composed.
-
Understanding New-Knowledge-Induced Factual Hallucinations in LLMs: Analysis and Interpretation
Fine-tuning on new knowledge induces propagating hallucinations in LLMs by weakening attention to key entities, with mitigation via reintroducing known knowledge during later training stages.
-
Lethe: Purifying Backdoored Large Language Models with Knowledge Dilution
LETHE uses parameter-level model merging plus prompt-level word definitions to dilute backdoor behavior in LLMs, cutting attack success to below 7% in most tested settings.
-
Learning Facts at Scale with Active Reading
Training LLMs on self-generated, diverse 'active reading' materials improves factual recall by 160-312% and scales to a 1T-token Wikipedia expert model.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.