Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.03838 v2 pith:5VIYBJVZ submitted 2023-07-07 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords radarai-textllmsadversarialdetectiondetectorparaphraserrobust
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and the intensifying popularity of ChatGPT-like applications have blurred the boundary of high-quality text generation between humans and machines. However, in addition to the anticipated revolutionary changes to our technology and society, the difficulty of distinguishing LLM-generated texts (AI-text) from human-generated texts poses new challenges of misuse and fairness, such as fake content generation, plagiarism, and false accusations of innocent writers. While existing works show that current AI-text detectors are not robust to LLM-based paraphrasing, this paper aims to bridge this gap by proposing a new framework called RADAR, which jointly trains a robust AI-text detector via adversarial learning. RADAR is based on adversarial training of a paraphraser and a detector. The paraphraser's goal is to generate realistic content to evade AI-text detection. RADAR uses the feedback from the detector to update the paraphraser, and vice versa. Evaluated with 8 different LLMs (Pythia, Dolly 2.0, Palmyra, Camel, GPT-J, Dolly 1.0, LLaMA, and Vicuna) across 4 datasets, experimental results show that RADAR significantly outperforms existing AI-text detection methods, especially when paraphrasing is in place. We also identify the strong transferability of RADAR from instruction-tuned LLMs to other LLMs, and evaluate the improved capability of RADAR via GPT-3.5-Turbo.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Attacks on Machine-Text Detectors Retain Stylistic Fingerprints

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A style-aware paraphrasing attack evades all nine tested AI-text detectors at the single-document level, but multi-document analysis makes the attack detectable again.

  2. Performance Analysis and Optimization for Laser-Phase-Noise based Quantum Random Number Generation

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A validated physical model predicts power spectrum and raw-data distributions for laser-phase-noise QRNGs, enabling quantitative rate optimization and proactive photonic-integrated design.

  3. DEER: Disentangled Mixture of Experts with Instance-Adaptive Routing for Generalizable Machine-Generated Text Detection

    cs.CL 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DEER, a disentangled mixture-of-experts detector with RL-based instance routing, reports F1 gains of about 1.4 in-domain and 5.3 points out-of-domain over prior MGT detectors.

  4. Domain Gating Ensemble Networks for AI-Generated Text Detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DoGEN routes each input to the two most likely domain-specialist detectors and blends their scores, beating internally trained single models on in-domain MAGE and out-of-domain RAID AUROC.

  5. DAMAGE: Detecting Adversarially Modified AI Generated Text

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding humanizer-processed text to training data yields a detector that catches 98.26% of humanized AI essays at a 5% false-positive rate and stays robust to a detector-targeted attack.

  6. Computational Approaches to Understanding Large Language Model Impact on Writing and Information Ecosystems

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A compilation of three research programs showing that GPT detectors are biased against non-native writers, that population-level estimates place AI-modified text at up to 16.9% of AI-conference reviews and up to 24% i...

Pith tools