Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Causal Inference with Large Language Model: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.09822 v3 pith:5WTNY4LX submitted 2024-09-15 cs.CL cs.AI

Causal Inference with Large Language Model: A Survey

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords causalinferencelanguagellmsdifferentlargerecenttasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Causal inference has been a pivotal challenge across diverse domains such as medicine and economics, demanding a complicated integration of human knowledge, mathematical reasoning, and data mining capabilities. Recent advancements in natural language processing (NLP), particularly with the advent of large language models (LLMs), have introduced promising opportunities for traditional causal inference tasks. This paper reviews recent progress in applying LLMs to causal inference, encompassing various tasks spanning different levels of causation. We summarize the main causal problems and approaches, and present a comparison of their evaluation results in different causal scenarios. Furthermore, we discuss key findings and outline directions for future research, underscoring the potential implications of integrating LLMs in advancing causal inference methodologies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reasoning Consensus: Structural Ensembling of LLM Reasoning via Weighted DAG Aggregation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Combining multiple LLMs' reasoning traces into weighted DAGs gives an auditable consensus graph that matches self-consistency and modestly improves on majority voting.

  2. CounterBench: Evaluating and Improving Counterfactual Reasoning in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces CounterBench benchmark and CoIn iterative reasoning method showing LLMs perform near random on formal counterfactual tasks but improve substantially with guided backtracking.

  3. Deploying AI for Signal Processing education: Selected challenges and intriguing opportunities

    eess.SP 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    AI can be used to generate interactive signal processing courseware, but the paper offers no evidence that students learn better from it.