REVIEW 18 cited by
MMVU: Measuring Expert-Level Multi-Discipline Video Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce MMVU, a comprehensive expert-level, multi-discipline benchmark for evaluating foundation models in video understanding. MMVU includes 3,000 expert-annotated questions spanning 27 subjects across four core disciplines: Science, Healthcare, Humanities & Social Sciences, and Engineering. Compared to prior benchmarks, MMVU features three key advancements. First, it challenges models to apply domain-specific knowledge and perform expert-level reasoning to analyze specialized-domain videos, moving beyond the basic visual perception typically assessed in current video benchmarks. Second, each example is annotated by human experts from scratch. We implement strict data quality controls to ensure the high quality of the dataset. Finally, each example is enriched with expert-annotated reasoning rationals and relevant domain knowledge, facilitating in-depth analysis. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 32 frontier multimodal foundation models on MMVU. The latest System-2-capable models, o1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, achieve the highest performance among the tested models. However, they still fall short of matching human expertise. Through in-depth error analyses and case studies, we offer actionable insights for future advancements in expert-level, knowledge-intensive video understanding for specialized domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 18 Pith papers
-
Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization: Teacher in Prompts, Not Gradients
ZPPO improves distillation to small vision-language models by using binary and negative candidate prompts plus a replay buffer for hard questions, outperforming standard distillation and GRPO on a 31-benchmark suite w...
-
Video-Holmes: Can MLLM Think Like Holmes for Complex Video Reasoning?
Video-Holmes benchmark shows top MLLMs achieve at most 45% accuracy on tasks needing integration of multiple clues from suspense films, unlike existing perception-focused tests.
-
Video-R1: Reinforcing Video Reasoning in MLLMs
Video-R1 uses temporal-aware RL and mixed datasets to boost video reasoning in MLLMs, with a 7B model reaching 37.1% on VSI-Bench and surpassing GPT-4o.
-
Latent Visual Cache for Video Reasoning
A recurrent latent visual cache in the decoder, trained with contrastive key-frame alignment and a vision-grounded GRPO reward, improves video reasoning accuracy while shortening answers.
-
DELTAVID: Enhancing Fine-Grained Spatiotemporal Perception with Cross-Video Differences
Rule-reward training on controllable cross-video differences (Grounding + MCQ) improves Video MLLM local spatiotemporal evidence localization and transfers to general video QA benchmarks.
-
VTI-CoT: Visual-Textual Interleaved Chain of Thought for Video Reasoning
VTI-CoT proposes a visual-textual interleaved chain-of-thought method for video reasoning, built via automated annotation and OCR compression, claiming SOTA performance and better training efficiency on same-scale models.
-
Co-Evolving Policy Distillation
CoPD integrates multiple expert capabilities by running parallel RLVR training with bidirectional online policy distillation among experts, outperforming mixed RLVR and sequential OPD while surpassing domain-specific ...
-
Video-ToC: Video Tree-of-Cue Reasoning
Video-ToC adds tree-guided cue localization, demand-based RL rewards, and automated datasets to video LLMs, reporting better results than prior methods on six understanding benchmarks plus a hallucination test.
-
Video Reasoning without Training
An entropy-guided, inference-time value-cache controller improves video reasoning accuracy and cuts output tokens versus RL-trained baselines.
-
HumanPCR: Probing MLLM Capabilities in Diverse Human-Centric Scenes
A hierarchical benchmark for multimodal models on human-centric visual understanding finds frontier models average under 60% and miss question-uncued visual evidence, with test-time scaling helping only marginally.
-
VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models
VLM4D benchmarks spatiotemporal reasoning in VLMs and finds large gaps versus humans, with proposed methods showing partial improvement.
-
"Harmless to You, Hurtful to Me!": Investigating the Detection of Toxic Languages Grounded in the Perspective of Youth
The authors construct the first Chinese youth-toxicity dataset, show that youth and adult perceptions of toxic language diverge, and report that adding contextual meta information improves detection accuracy.
-
EgoCoT-Bench: Benchmarking Grounded and Verifiable Operation-Centric Chain of Thought Reasoning for MLLMs
EgoCoT-Bench provides 3,172 verifiable QA pairs across perception, anticipation, and reasoning tasks on egocentric videos, revealing that many MLLMs give answer-correct but evidence-inconsistent explanations.
-
Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence
Kimi K2.5 combines joint text-vision training with an Agent Swarm parallel orchestration framework to reach claimed state-of-the-art results on coding, vision, reasoning, and agent tasks while cutting latency up to 4.5 times.
-
Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report
Qwen2.5-VL reports a vision-language model family using native dynamic-resolution ViT and absolute time encoding that matches GPT-4o on document and diagram tasks while supporting hour-long videos with second-level lo...
-
EasyVideoR1: Easier RL for Video Understanding
EasyVideoR1 delivers an optimized RL pipeline for video understanding in large vision-language models, achieving 1.47x throughput gains and aligned results on 22 benchmarks.
-
Seed1.5-VL Technical Report
Seed1.5-VL is a compact multimodal model that sets new records on dozens of vision-language benchmarks and outperforms prior systems on agent-style tasks.
-
Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning
Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.