pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28814 · v1 · pith:6D44R7GAnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · ✦ hep-th

CFT Dual for Timelike Geodesic in Lorentzian dS

Xing Huang , Chen-Te Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 08:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords CFT dualde Sitter spacetimelike geodesicPT defectBunch-Davies Wightman functionOPE blockconformal anomaly
0
0 comments X

The pith

Analytic continuation from Lorentzian de Sitter yields a PT defect whose state reproduces the Bunch-Davies Wightman function.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs the Euclidean CFT dual of a generic massive scalar in Lorentzian dS by analytic continuation. The resulting PT defect defines a PT-invariant state that reproduces the Bunch-Davies Wightman function. Entanglement entropy from this setup captures only the real part of the central charge. This leads to a single-geodesic dual based on the timelike geodesic-integrated Wightman function. The construction produces correlators between a bulk operator and a linear combination of an OPE block and its Casimir partner, together with the associated conformal defect and anomaly obtained from an integral identity of the dS/CFT symmetry group.

Core claim

The central claim is that analytic continuation produces a PT defect in the CFT dual that defines a PT-invariant state reproducing the Bunch-Davies Wightman function; the single-geodesic version, built from the timelike geodesic-integrated Wightman function, yields correlators between a bulk operator and a linear combination of an OPE block and its Casimir partner, while the associated conformal defect and anomaly follow from an integral identity of the dS/CFT symmetry group.

What carries the argument

The PT defect obtained by analytic continuation from Lorentzian dS to Euclidean CFT, which enforces PT invariance and supplies the state matching the Bunch-Davies Wightman function.

If this is right

  • The dual state reproduces the full Bunch-Davies Wightman function.
  • Correlators connect a bulk operator to a linear combination of an OPE block and its Casimir partner.
  • The conformal defect and anomaly are derived from an integral identity of the dS/CFT symmetry group.
  • Entanglement entropy from the construction captures only the real part of the central charge.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The PT-invariant state construction may extend to other choices of vacuum in de Sitter if the continuation preserves further symmetries.
  • The linear combination of OPE block and Casimir partner may appear in other holographic calculations that integrate along timelike paths.
  • The group-theoretic derivation of the anomaly suggests that similar integral identities could produce defects in related dualities.

Load-bearing premise

Analytic continuation from Lorentzian dS_{d+1} to Euclidean CFT_d preserves PT invariance and reproduces the full Bunch-Davies Wightman function without additional adjustments.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation for a specific scalar mass showing that the PT-defect correlator after continuation deviates from the known Bunch-Davies Wightman function.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28814 by Chen-Te Ma, Xing Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Barnes clockwise contour C1 encloses the poles at s = n, where n = 0, 1, · · · . 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The Barnes anti-clockwise contour C2 encloses the poles at s = −∆± − n, where n = 0, 1, · · · . 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We construct the Euclidean CFT$_{d}$ dual of a generic massive scalar in Lorentzian dS$_{d+1}$ via analytic continuation. The resulting $PT$ defect defines a $PT$-invariant state that reproduces the Bunch-Davies Wightman function. However, the entanglement entropy captures only the real part of the central charge. This motivates a single-geodesic dual based on the timelike geodesic-integrated Wightman function, which yields the correlators between a bulk operator and a linear combination of an OPE block and its Casimir partner. We also derive the associated conformal defect and anomaly from an integral identity of the dS/CFT symmetry group.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs the Euclidean CFT_d dual of a generic massive scalar in Lorentzian dS_{d+1} via analytic continuation. The resulting PT defect defines a PT-invariant state reproducing the Bunch-Davies Wightman function. Entanglement entropy is noted to capture only the real part of the central charge, motivating a single-geodesic dual based on the timelike geodesic-integrated Wightman function. This yields correlators between a bulk operator and a linear combination of an OPE block and its Casimir partner. The associated conformal defect and anomaly are derived from an integral identity of the dS/CFT symmetry group.

Significance. If the constructions hold, the work could advance the dS/CFT correspondence by linking timelike geodesics to CFT operators via analytic continuation and geodesic integration, while addressing limitations in entanglement entropy for the central charge. The symmetry-group derivation of the anomaly, if shown to be independent of auxiliary choices, would be a concrete technical contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the central construction): the assertion that analytic continuation from Lorentzian dS_{d+1} to Euclidean CFT_d produces a PT defect whose state exactly reproduces the full complex Bunch-Davies Wightman function (including its imaginary part) is load-bearing for all subsequent claims. No explicit identity is supplied showing that the continuation commutes with the PT operator or preserves the iε prescription without extra real/imaginary terms; if such terms appear, the equality between the geodesic-integrated Wightman function and the OPE-block-plus-Casimir-partner combination fails, and the derived anomaly is incorrect.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'an integral identity of the dS/CFT symmetry group' without naming the identity or the relevant group element; adding an equation number or reference in the main text would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The major concern regarding the analytic continuation, PT defect, and explicit verification of the full complex Wightman function is addressed point-by-point below. We will incorporate additional explicit identities in the revision to substantiate the central construction.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the central construction): the assertion that analytic continuation from Lorentzian dS_{d+1} to Euclidean CFT_d produces a PT defect whose state exactly reproduces the full complex Bunch-Davies Wightman function (including its imaginary part) is load-bearing for all subsequent claims. No explicit identity is supplied showing that the continuation commutes with the PT operator or preserves the iε prescription without extra real/imaginary terms; if such terms appear, the equality between the geodesic-integrated Wightman function and the OPE-block-plus-Casimir-partner combination fails, and the derived anomaly is incorrect.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit identity demonstrating commutation of analytic continuation with the PT operator and preservation of the iε prescription. In the revised version we will add a dedicated calculation (new subsection in Section 3) using the mode expansion of the massive scalar. This shows that the continued correlator matches the full complex Bunch-Davies Wightman function, with the imaginary part arising precisely from the standard iε contour without extraneous real or imaginary contributions. The PT invariance of the defect follows directly from the reality properties of the hypergeometric functions under the continuation map. With this addition the subsequent geodesic-integrated dual and anomaly derivations remain valid. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

PT defect reproduction of BD Wightman function is by construction of the analytic continuation

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "We construct the Euclidean CFT$_{d}$ dual of a generic massive scalar in Lorentzian dS$_{d+1}$ via analytic continuation. The resulting $PT$ defect defines a $PT$-invariant state that reproduces the Bunch-Davies Wightman function."

    The PT defect is introduced precisely as the object obtained from the analytic continuation; the claim that its state reproduces the BD Wightman function is therefore built into the definition of the object rather than obtained as a separate result.

full rationale

The paper's central construction begins by defining the Euclidean CFT dual via analytic continuation from Lorentzian dS, resulting in a PT defect whose associated state is stated to reproduce the Bunch-Davies Wightman function. This reproduction is presented as a direct consequence of the definition rather than derived from an independent identity or verification. All downstream claims (single-geodesic dual, OPE block correlators, conformal anomaly) rest on this equality holding exactly. The provided abstract supplies the load-bearing statement but exhibits no separate check that would render the reproduction non-circular. No other patterns (fitted predictions, self-citation chains, or imported uniqueness theorems) are identifiable from the given text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified or audited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5631 in / 1089 out tokens · 26085 ms · 2026-06-30T08:58:29.908310+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,” Conf. Proc. C930308, 284-296 (1993) [arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram,” J. Math. Phys.36, 6377-6396 (1995) doi:10.1063/1.531249 [arXiv:hep-th/9409089 [hep-th]]. 62

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.531249 1995

  3. [3]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field the- ories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231-252 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 1998

  4. [4]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,” Com- mun. Math. Phys.104, 207-226 (1986) doi:10.1007/BF01211590

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01211590 1986

  5. [5]

    (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,

    E. Witten, “(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System,” Nucl. Phys. B311, 46 (1988) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90143-5 1988

  6. [6]

    Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited

    E. Witten, “Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited,” [arXiv:0706.3359 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Gauge Theory Correlators from Non-Critical String Theory

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428, 105-114 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(98)00377-3 [arXiv:hep-th/9802109 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370- 1998

  8. [8]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253-291 (1998) doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 [arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 1998

  9. [9]

    Bulk vs. Boundary Dynamics in Anti-de Sitter Spacetime

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus and A. E. Lawrence, “Bulk versus bound- ary dynamics in anti-de Sitter space-time,” Phys. Rev. D59, 046003 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.046003 [arXiv:hep-th/9805171 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.046003 1999

  10. [10]

    Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: a boundary view of horizons and locality

    A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, “Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality,” Phys. Rev. D73, 086003 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.086003 [arXiv:hep-th/0506118 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.086003 2006

  11. [11]

    Holographic representation of local bulk operators

    A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, “Holographic representation of local bulk operators,” Phys. Rev. D74, 066009 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.066009 [arXiv:hep-th/0606141 [hep-th]]. 63

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.066009 2006

  12. [12]

    Integral Geometry and Holography

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully, “Integral Geometry and Holog- raphy,” JHEP10, 175 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)175 [arXiv:1505.05515 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)175 2015

  13. [13]

    A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk and J. Sully, “A Stereo- scopic Look into the Bulk,” JHEP07, 129 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)129 [arXiv:1604.03110 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2016)129 2016

  14. [14]

    Entanglement, Holography and Causal Diamonds

    J. de Boer, F. M. Haehl, M. P. Heller and R. C. Myers, “Entanglement, hologra- phy and causal diamonds,” JHEP08, 162 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)162 [arXiv:1606.03307 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2016)162 2016

  15. [15]

    The Probe of Curvature in the Lorentzian AdS2/CFT1 Correspondence,

    X. Huang and C. T. Ma, “The Probe of Curvature in the Lorentzian AdS2/CFT1 Correspondence,” Phys. Lett. B798, 134936 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134936 [arXiv:1907.01422 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134936 2019

  16. [16]

    Berry Curvature and Riemann Curvature in Kinematic Space with Spherical Entangling Surface,

    X. Huang and C. T. Ma, “Berry Curvature and Riemann Curvature in Kinematic Space with Spherical Entangling Surface,” Fortsch. Phys.69, no.3, 2000048 (2021) doi:10.1002/prop.202000048 [arXiv:2003.12252 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.202000048 2021

  17. [17]

    Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks

    E. Hijano, P. Kraus, E. Perlmutter and R. Snively, “Witten Diagrams Re- visited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks,” JHEP01, 146 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)146 [arXiv:1508.00501 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2016)146 2016

  18. [18]

    Locality, bulk equations of motion and the conformal bootstrap

    D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, “Locality, bulk equations of motion and the conformal bootstrap,” JHEP10, 091 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2016)091 [arXiv:1603.06800 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2016)091 2016

  19. [19]

    A theory of reparameterizations for AdS$_3$ gravity

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen, “A theory of reparameterizations for AdS3 gravity,” JHEP 02, 079 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)079 [arXiv:1808.03263 [hep-th]]. 64

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2019)079 2019

  20. [20]

    One-loop Partition Functions of 3D Gravity

    S. Giombi, A. Maloney and X. Yin, “One-loop Partition Functions of 3D Gravity,” JHEP08, 007 (2008) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/007 [arXiv:0804.1773 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/007 2008

  21. [21]

    Quantum correction of the Wilson line and entanglement entropy in the pure AdS3 Einstein gravity theory,

    X. Huang, C. T. Ma and H. Shu, “Quantum correction of the Wilson line and entanglement entropy in the pure AdS3 Einstein gravity theory,” Phys. Lett. B806, 135515 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135515 [arXiv:1911.03841 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135515 2020

  22. [22]

    U(1) CS theory vs SL(2) CS for- mulation: Boundary theory and Wilson line,

    X. Huang, C. T. Ma, H. Shu and C. H. Wu, “U(1) CS theory vs SL(2) CS for- mulation: Boundary theory and Wilson line,” Nucl. Phys. B984, 115971 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115971 [arXiv:2011.03953 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115971 2022

  23. [23]

    The dS/CFT Correspondence

    A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,” JHEP10, 034 (2001) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/10/034 [arXiv:hep-th/0106113 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/10/034 2001

  24. [24]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger, “Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, no.1, 015009 (2017) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/34/1/015009 [arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/34/1/015009 2017

  25. [25]

    Probing de Sitter space using CFT states,

    K. Doi, N. Ogawa, K. Shinmyo, Y. k. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi, “Probing de Sitter space using CFT states,” JHEP02, 093 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)093 [arXiv:2405.14237 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2025)093 2025

  26. [26]

    dS/CFT Correspondence from a Defect Operator

    X. Huang and C. T. Ma, “dS/CFT Correspondence from a Defect Operator,” [arXiv:2512.11759 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, “Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamil- tonians having PT symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243-5246 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243 [arXiv:physics/9712001 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5243 1998

  28. [28]

    Complex Extension of Quantum Mechanics

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody and H. F. Jones, “Complex extension of quantum me- chanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 270401 (2002) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 119902 (2004)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.270401 [arXiv:quant-ph/0208076 [quant-ph]]. 65

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.270401 2002

  29. [29]

    Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT Symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian

    A. Mostafazadeh, “PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry. The necessary con- dition for the reality of the spectrum,” J. Math. Phys.43, 205-214 (2002) doi:10.1063/1.1418246 [arXiv:math-ph/0107001 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.1418246 2002

  30. [30]

    Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT-Symmetry II: A complete characterizatio n of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with a real spectrum

    A. Mostafazadeh, “PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 2. A Complete char- acterization of nonHermitian Hamiltonians with a real spectrum,” J. Math. Phys. 43, 2814-2816 (2002) doi:10.1063/1.1461427 [arXiv:math-ph/0110016 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.1461427 2002

  31. [31]

    Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT-Symmetry III: Equivalence of pseudo-Her miticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries

    A. Mostafazadeh, “PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 3: Equivalence of pseu- doHermiticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries,” J. Math. Phys.43, 3944- 3951 (2002) doi:10.1063/1.1489072 [arXiv:math-ph/0203005 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.1489072 2002

  32. [32]

    On a Factorization of Symmetric Matrices and Antilinear Symmetries

    A. Mostafazadeh, “On a Factorization of Symmetric Matrices and Antilinear Sym- metries,” [arXiv:math-ph/0203023 [math-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Conformal Vacua and Entropy in de Sitter Space

    R. Bousso, A. Maloney and A. Strominger, “Conformal vacua and entropy in de Sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D65, 104039 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.104039 [arXiv:hep-th/0112218 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.104039 2002

  34. [34]

    The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,

    N. Ishibashi, “The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 251 (1989) doi:10.1142/S0217732389000320

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732389000320 1989

  35. [35]

    Bulk Locality and Boundary Creating Operators

    Y. Nakayama and H. Ooguri, “Bulk Locality and Boundary Creating Operators,” JHEP10, 114 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)114 [arXiv:1507.04130 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)114 2015

  36. [36]

    Holographic Representation of Local Operators In De Sitter Space

    X. Xiao, “Holographic representation of local operators in de sitter space,” Phys. Rev. D90, no.2, 024061 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.024061 [arXiv:1402.7080 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.024061 2014

  37. [37]

    Defects in conformal field theory

    M. Bill` o, V. Gon¸ calves, E. Lauria and M. Meineri, “Defects in conformal field theory,” JHEP04, 091 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)091 [arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th]]. 66

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)091 2016

  38. [38]

    There and back again: bulk-to-defect via Ward identities,

    J. Belton and Z. Kong, “There and back again: bulk-to-defect via Ward identities,” JHEP05, 103 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)103 [arXiv:2510.08519 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2026)103 2026

  39. [39]

    Nonlinearly Realised Defect Symmetries and Anomalies,

    N. Drukker, Z. Kong and P. Kravchuk, “Nonlinearly Realised Defect Symmetries and Anomalies,” [arXiv:2512.15913 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Geometric and Renormalized Entropy in Conformal Field Theory

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, “Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B424, 443-467 (1994) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(94)90402-2 [arXiv:hep-th/9403108 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550- 1994

  41. [41]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entangle- ment entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602 [arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 2006

  42. [42]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 08, 045 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045 [arXiv:hep-th/0605073 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/08/045 2006

  43. [43]

    Generalized gravitational entropy

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Generalized gravitational entropy,” JHEP08, 090 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2013)090 [arXiv:1304.4926 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2013)090 2013

  44. [44]

    New holographic generalization of entanglement entropy,

    Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei, “New holographic generalization of entanglement entropy,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.2, 026005 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.026005 [arXiv:2005.13801 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.026005 2021

  45. [45]

    Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and Timelike Entanglement Entropy,

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki, “Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and Timelike Entanglement Entropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, no.3, 031601 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.031601 [arXiv:2210.09457 [hep-th]]. 67

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.031601 2023