REVIEW 5 cited by
Prioritized Level Replay
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Prioritized Level Replay
read the original abstract
Environments with procedurally generated content serve as important benchmarks for testing systematic generalization in deep reinforcement learning. In this setting, each level is an algorithmically created environment instance with a unique configuration of its factors of variation. Training on a prespecified subset of levels allows for testing generalization to unseen levels. What can be learned from a level depends on the current policy, yet prior work defaults to uniform sampling of training levels independently of the policy. We introduce Prioritized Level Replay (PLR), a general framework for selectively sampling the next training level by prioritizing those with higher estimated learning potential when revisited in the future. We show TD-errors effectively estimate a level's future learning potential and, when used to guide the sampling procedure, induce an emergent curriculum of increasingly difficult levels. By adapting the sampling of training levels, PLR significantly improves sample efficiency and generalization on Procgen Benchmark--matching the previous state-of-the-art in test return--and readily combines with other methods. Combined with the previous leading method, PLR raises the state-of-the-art to over 76% improvement in test return relative to standard RL baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Bridging Performance and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning for Agile Flight
RL framework for agile drone racing combines task-aware switching and physically informed procedural track generation to achieve 7.4x better zero-shot generalization to unseen tracks while maintaining competitive speeds.
-
Robots Need More than VLA and World Models
The paper identifies four missing interfaces (data autolabelling, embodiment retargeting, physics-grounded world models, and video-based reward inference) as the central bottleneck beyond VLA scaling for robot intelligence.
-
Trading Human Curation for Synthetic Augmentation in RLVR
Gated synthetic augmentations of a 10-task human base substitute for ~87 extra human RLVR tasks on aggregate held-out pass@1, with cost-adjusted trade rate ρ_cost in [1.4×, 11.6×].
-
Trading Human Curation for Synthetic Augmentation in RLVR
Gated synthetic augmentations can substitute for additional human-authored RLVR tasks at a cost-adjusted trade rate of 1.4x-11.6x while retaining held-out generalization on ten benchmarks spanning code, instruction fo...
-
Learning to Reason at the Frontier of Learnability
A curriculum sampling questions with high variance in success rate improves reinforcement learning performance for LLM reasoning tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.