Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Distributed LLMs and Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey on Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.16585 v1 pith:6IVWGBNA submitted 2025-03-20 cs.CL cs.CVcs.DCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CVcs.DCcs.LG
keywords distributedlanguagemodelsllmssolutionscomputationaldatasetsfuture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models (LMs) are machine learning models designed to predict linguistic patterns by estimating the probability of word sequences based on large-scale datasets, such as text. LMs have a wide range of applications in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, including autocomplete and machine translation. Although larger datasets typically enhance LM performance, scalability remains a challenge due to constraints in computational power and resources. Distributed computing strategies offer essential solutions for improving scalability and managing the growing computational demand. Further, the use of sensitive datasets in training and deployment raises significant privacy concerns. Recent research has focused on developing decentralized techniques to enable distributed training and inference while utilizing diverse computational resources and enabling edge AI. This paper presents a survey on distributed solutions for various LMs, including large language models (LLMs), vision language models (VLMs), multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), and small language models (SLMs). While LLMs focus on processing and generating text, MLLMs are designed to handle multiple modalities of data (e.g., text, images, and audio) and to integrate them for broader applications. To this end, this paper reviews key advancements across the MLLM pipeline, including distributed training, inference, fine-tuning, and deployment, while also identifying the contributions, limitations, and future areas of improvement. Further, it categorizes the literature based on six primary focus areas of decentralization. Our analysis describes gaps in current methodologies for enabling distributed solutions for LMs and outline future research directions, emphasizing the need for novel solutions to enhance the robustness and applicability of distributed LMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FedShield-LLM: A Secure and Scalable Federated Fine-Tuned Large Language Model

    cs.CR 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    FedShield-LLM integrates pruning and FHE on LoRA parameters to support secure, scalable federated fine-tuning of LLMs such as Llama-2.

  2. DP-FedLoRA: Privacy-Enhanced Federated Fine-Tuning for On-Device Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    DP-FedLoRA clips and adds Gaussian noise to per-client LoRA matrices in federated LLM fine-tuning, claiming unbiased updates and bounded variance, but the privacy calibration and experiments have significant gaps.

Pith tools