pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29068 · v1 · pith:6TV44HZWnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

A Comparative Study on Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Psychological Emotion Theories

Fabio Ciani , Harald Schweiger , Emilia Parada-Cabaleiro , Markus Schedl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 09:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords text embeddingsaffective computingemotion recognitionopen-weight modelspsychological emotion theoriessentiment analysislatent representationsinstruction-tuned encoders
0
0 comments X

The pith

Latest instruction-aware open-weight text encoders capture equal or greater affective information than proprietary models at word level across emotion theories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates twelve text encoders by feeding their embeddings into regression and classification tasks drawn from three established psychological emotion frameworks. Evaluations run on both word-level and sentence-level data, with a semantic data-leakage prevention step added for the word-level tests. Results show that recent instruction-aware open-weight encoders match or surpass proprietary models on word-level affective tasks. In contrast, task-tuned and proprietary encoders lead on sentence-level classification. The work also includes a qualitative look at how the embeddings encode affective cues.

Core claim

By probing embeddings from twelve text encoders as input features for regression and classification across three emotion frameworks, the study finds that the latent manifolds of the latest instruction-aware open-weight encoders enclose an equal or even larger amount of affective information than proprietary counterparts when evaluated at word level, while embeddings of task-tuned and proprietary encoders reach the highest scores on sentence-level affective classification.

What carries the argument

Probing of encoder embeddings as features for regression and classification tasks on affective word- and sentence-level data, augmented by semantic data-leakage prevention.

If this is right

  • Instruction-aware open-weight encoders supply at least as much affective signal as proprietary models for word-level applications.
  • Task tuning provides a measurable advantage specifically for sentence-level affective classification.
  • Affective information is distributed differently across granularity levels in the latent spaces of different encoder families.
  • Semantic data-leakage controls are necessary to obtain reliable word-level comparisons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Teams building word-level affect tools could reduce dependence on proprietary APIs by switching to recent open-weight models.
  • Hybrid systems might combine open encoders for word features with tuned models for sentence features.
  • The observed word-versus-sentence split suggests that future encoder evaluations should routinely separate the two granularity levels rather than aggregate them.

Load-bearing premise

Regression and classification performance on the chosen affective tasks serves as a valid proxy for the degree to which embeddings capture well-defined psychological theories of affect.

What would settle it

If a new set of human ratings on the same emotion dimensions shows that high-scoring embeddings do not predict those ratings better than low-scoring ones, the claim that task performance measures captured affective information would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29068 by Emilia Parada-Cabaleiro, Fabio Ciani, Harald Schweiger, Markus Schedl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pipeline demonstrating the fitting and evaluating procedure. All embeddings are calculated once and frozen for each dataset (blue section). For simplicity, the remaining control flow is depicted for one experiment only (yellow and purple sections), i.e., the regression task of NRC-VAD in combination with semantic leakage prevention and using KaLM v2 as text encoder. NRC-EIL [32] contains almost 6k single w… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: UMAP visualization of the full embeddings with color-coded labels. – Samples from GoEmotions either having multiple labels or tagged as neutral were dropped and linked to Ekman’s taxonomy through the official dataset lookup table, with each category corresponding to a distinct color. For the sake of readability, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Text encoders are known for their utility in natural language processing, as they are able to efficiently compress inputs into dense vectors while preserving semantics. These models have been applied to affective computing, in particular to help with solving sentiment analysis and emotion recognition tasks. Nevertheless, it remains unclear to what extent the latent representations produced by modern text encoders capture well-defined psychological theories of affect. In this work, we investigate the affective capabilities of twelve recently released text encoders by probing their generated embeddings as input features for solving regression and classification tasks across three established emotion frameworks, using both word- and sentence-level data. Additionally, we apply a semantic data-leakage prevention technique to improve robustness in word-level evaluations. Our main findings show that the latent manifolds of the latest instruction-aware open-weight encoders enclose an equal or even a larger amount of affective information in comparison with proprietary counterparts when evaluated at word level. In contrast, embeddings of task-tuned and proprietary encoders reach the highest scores on sentence-level affective classification. Furthermore, a qualitative analysis of latent representations and their encoded affective cues is provided.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper compares embeddings from twelve text encoders (open-weight instruction-aware, task-tuned, and proprietary) by using them as features for regression and classification on affective tasks derived from three psychological emotion frameworks, at both word and sentence levels. A semantic data-leakage prevention step is applied for word-level evaluations. The central claim is that instruction-aware open-weight encoders enclose equal or greater affective information than proprietary models at word level, while task-tuned and proprietary models perform best at sentence-level classification; a qualitative analysis of latent representations is also provided.

Significance. If the task-performance proxy is accepted as valid, the work offers practical guidance for encoder selection in affective computing and shows open-weight models are competitive. The multi-framework, multi-level design adds breadth to existing embedding evaluations, and the data-leakage control is a positive step toward robustness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / §1] Abstract and §1 (Introduction): the investigative premise equates regression/classification performance on the chosen tasks with the degree to which embeddings capture the constructs and distinctions of the three psychological emotion theories, yet no validation of the theory-to-task mapping, no controls for probe choice or dataset artifacts, and no discussion of alternative explanations (e.g., training-data overlap) are supplied.
  2. [Methods] Methods section (experimental design): the abstract and high-level description supply no concrete datasets, exact metrics, statistical tests, error bars, or baseline controls, so it is impossible to verify that the reported performance differences support the central claim about affective information content.
  3. [Methods] Methods (data-leakage subsection): the semantic data-leakage prevention technique is referenced but given without implementation details, hyperparameters, or ablation results, leaving open whether it sufficiently addresses leakage for the word-level evaluations that underpin the main finding.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section: figures comparing the twelve encoders should include error bars, model-name legends, and explicit indication of which frameworks and levels are shown.
  2. [Throughout] Notation: consistent use of the three emotion-framework names and the distinction between word-level vs. sentence-level probes would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below with plans for revision where appropriate, while defending the core experimental design and claims on the basis of the full manuscript content.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / §1] Abstract and §1 (Introduction): the investigative premise equates regression/classification performance on the chosen tasks with the degree to which embeddings capture the constructs and distinctions of the three psychological emotion theories, yet no validation of the theory-to-task mapping, no controls for probe choice or dataset artifacts, and no discussion of alternative explanations (e.g., training-data overlap) are supplied.

    Authors: We agree that task performance serves as a proxy measure and that the manuscript would benefit from greater explicitness on this point. In revision we will expand the final paragraph of §1 to include a direct mapping table linking each psychological construct (e.g., Ekman’s basic emotions, Plutchik’s wheel, dimensional valence-arousal) to the specific regression and classification targets drawn from the literature. We will also add a short Limitations paragraph discussing probe choice, dataset artifacts, and the possibility of training-data overlap, while noting that the semantic leakage-prevention step already mitigates lexical overlap at the word level. These additions clarify the scope of the claims without changing the reported results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods section (experimental design): the abstract and high-level description supply no concrete datasets, exact metrics, statistical tests, error bars, or baseline controls, so it is impossible to verify that the reported performance differences support the central claim about affective information content.

    Authors: The full §3 (Methods) already enumerates the twelve datasets (word-level lexicons and sentence-level corpora for each of the three theories), the precise metrics (Pearson r and MSE for regression; accuracy and macro-F1 for classification), the use of 5-fold cross-validation with reported standard deviations, and the inclusion of a random-embedding baseline. To make this information immediately accessible, we will insert a compact summary table at the end of §3.1 and will revise the abstract’s final sentence to reference “standard affective datasets and metrics (detailed in §3)” so that readers can locate the verification details without ambiguity. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods] Methods (data-leakage subsection): the semantic data-leakage prevention technique is referenced but given without implementation details, hyperparameters, or ablation results, leaving open whether it sufficiently addresses leakage for the word-level evaluations that underpin the main finding.

    Authors: We accept that the current description is insufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript we will expand the data-leakage subsection with (i) the exact sentence-embedding model and similarity threshold used, (ii) the precise filtering algorithm and its hyperparameters, and (iii) an ablation table comparing word-level regression and classification performance with and without the prevention step. These additions will allow readers to assess the technique’s effectiveness for the word-level results that support the primary claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely empirical comparison with no derivations or self-referential steps

full rationale

The paper performs direct experimental probing of embeddings via regression and classification on affective tasks at word and sentence levels across three emotion frameworks, with a data-leakage prevention step for robustness. No equations, predictions, or first-principles derivations exist that could reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations support load-bearing uniqueness claims, ansatzes, or theorems. The central finding—that instruction-aware open-weight encoders enclose equal or greater affective information at word level—is reported from experimental scores, not from any tautological mapping or fitted parameter renamed as prediction. The proxy assumption between task performance and psychological theory capture is a validity concern but does not create circularity in the reported chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Empirical probing study; the central claim rests on the domain assumption that task performance measures affective content capture. No free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Performance on regression and classification tasks using embeddings as features accurately reflects the amount of affective information aligned with psychological emotion theories
    This premise underpins the entire investigation as described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5729 in / 1252 out tokens · 47655 ms · 2026-06-30T09:16:14.045455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Akiba, S

    Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., Koyama, M.: Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM 3 For instance, see the technical report at https://www.anthropic.com/ claude-3-model-card. 14 Ciani et al. SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. pp. 2623–2631. Association ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3292500.3330701 2019

  2. [2]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511

    Babakhin, Y., Osmulski, R., Ak, R., Moreira, G., Xu, M., Schifferer, B., Liu, B., Oldridge, E.: Llama-Embed-Nemotron-8B: A Universal Text Embedding Model for Multilingual and Cross-Lingual Tasks (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511. 07025

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511 2025

  3. [3]

    Computational Intelligence29(3), 506–526 (Aug 2013)

    Bellegarda, J.R.: Data-driven Analysis of Emotion in Text Using Latent Affective Folding and Embedding. Computational Intelligence29(3), 506–526 (Aug 2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00457.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00457.x 2013

  4. [4]

    Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 5, 135–146 (Dec 2017)

    Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., Mikolov, T.: Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 5, 135–146 (Dec 2017). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00051

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00051 2017

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Buechel, S., Modersohn, L., Hahn, U.: Towards Label-Agnostic Emotion Embed- dings. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 9231–9249. Association for Computational Linguistics, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic (Nov 2021). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021. emnlp-main.728

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021 2021

  6. [6]

    Language Resources and Evaluation42(4), 335–359 (Dec 2008)

    Busso, C., Bulut, M., Lee, C.C., Kazemzadeh, A., Mower, E., Kim, S., Chang, J.N., Lee, S., Narayanan, S.S.: IEMOCAP: interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database. Language Resources and Evaluation42(4), 335–359 (Dec 2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-008-9076-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10579-008-9076-6 2008

  7. [7]

    In: Cognitive Behavioural Systems, pp

    Cambria, E., Livingstone, A., Hussain, A.: The Hourglass of Emotions. In: Cognitive Behavioural Systems, pp. 144–157. Springer, Dresden, Germany (2012). https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_11

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_11 2012

  8. [8]

    In: Findings of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics 2024

    Chen, J., Xiao, S., Zhang, P., Luo, K., Lian, D., Liu, Z.: M3-Embedding: Multi- Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self- Knowledge Distillation. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics 2024. pp. 2318–2335. Association for Computational Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand (Aug 2024). https://doi.or...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.137 2024

  9. [9]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2023

    Chochlakis, G., Mahajan, G., Baruah, S., Burghardt, K., Lerman, K., Narayanan, S.: Leveraging Label Correlations in a Multi-Label Setting: a Case Study in Emotion. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2023. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Rhodes Island, Greece (Jun 2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/I...

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10096864 2023

  10. [10]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2023

    Chochlakis, G., Mahajan, G., Baruah, S., Burghardt, K., Lerman, K., Narayanan, S.: Using Emotion Embeddings to Transfer Knowledge between Emotions, Languages, and Annotation Formats. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2023. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Rhodes Island, Greece (Jun 2023). https:...

    work page doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10095597 2023

  11. [11]

    doi: 10.18653/v1/ 2024.acl-long.452

    Demszky, D., Movshovitz-Attias, D., Ko, J., Cowen, A., Nemade, G., Ravi, S.: GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotions. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 4040–4054. Association for Computational Linguistics (Jul 2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/ 2020.acl-main.372

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/ 2020

  12. [12]

    Devlin, M.-W

    Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long and Short Papers). pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 2019

  13. [13]

    Nebraska Symposium on Motivation19, 207–283 (1971)

    Ekman, P.: Universals and Cultural Differences in Facial Expressions of Emotion. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation19, 207–283 (1971)

    1971

  14. [14]

    In: 13th International Conference on Learning Representations

    Enevoldsen, K., Chung, I., Kerboua, I., Kardos, M., Mathur, A., Stap, D., Gala, J., Siblini, W., Krzemiński, D., Indra Winata, G., Sturua, S., Utpala, S., Ciancone, M., Schaeffer, M., Sequeira, G., Misra, D., Dhakal, S., Rystrøm, J., Solomatin, R., Çağatan, O., Kundu, A., Bernstorff, M., Xiao, S., Sukhlecha, A., Pahwa, B., Poświata, R., GV, K.K., Ashraf, ...

    2025

  15. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

    Faruqui, M., Dodge, J., Jauhar, S.K., Dyer, C., Hovy, E., Smith, N.A.: Retrofitting Word Vectors to Semantic Lexicons. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. pp. 1606–1615. Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver, CO, USA (May 2015). http...

    work page doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1184 2015

  16. [16]

    Language, Speech, and Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (May 1998)

    Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Language, Speech, and Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (May 1998)

    1998

  17. [17]

    Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom (1957)

    Firth, J.R.: Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom (1957)

    1957

  18. [18]

    In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning

    Günther, M., Sturua, S., Akram, M.K., Mohr, I., Ungureanu, A., Wang, B., Eslami, S., Martens, S., Werk, M., Wang, N., Xiao, H.:jina-embeddings-v4: Universal Embeddings for Multimodal Multilingual Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning. pp. 531–550. Association for Computational Linguistics, Suzhuo, China (No...

    2025

  19. [19]

    Word10(2-3), 146–162 (Aug 1954)

    Harris, Z.S.: Distributional Structure. Word10(2-3), 146–162 (Aug 1954). https: //doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520

    work page doi:10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 1954

  20. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems

    Ito, M., Markov, K.: Sentence Embedding Based Emotion Recognition from Text Data. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems. pp. 53–57. Association for Computing Machinery, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan (Oct 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3538641.3561488

    work page doi:10.1145/3538641.3561488 2022

  21. [21]

    Junseong, K., Seolhwa, L., Jihoon, K., Sangmo, G., Yejin, K., Minkyung, C., Jy-yong, S., Chanyeol, C.: Linq-Embed-Mistral: Elevating Text Retrieval with Improved GPT Data Through Task-Specific Control and Quality Refinement (2024), https://huggingface.co/Linq-AI-Research/Linq-Embed-Mistral/blob/main/ LinqAIResearch2024_Linq-Embed-Mistral.pdf

    2024

  22. [22]

    Rethinking cross-subject data splitting for brain-to-text decoding

    Lee, J., Lee, W., Kwon, O.W., Kim, H.: Do Large Language Models Have “Emotion Neurons”? Investigating the Existence and Role. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2025. pp. 15617–15639. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Vienna, Austria (Jul 2025). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025. findings-acl.806 16 Ciani et al

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025 2025

  23. [23]

    Gemini Embedding: Generalizable Embeddings from Gemini

    Lee, J., Chen, F., Dua, S., Cer, D., Shanbhogue, M., Naim, I., Ábrego, G.H., Li, Z., Chen, K., Schechter Vera, H., Ren, X., Zhang, S., Salz, D., Boratko, M., Han, J., Chen, B., Huang, S., Rao, V., Suganthan, P., Han, F., Doumanoglou, A., Gupta, N., Moiseev, F., Yip, C., Jain, A., Baumgartner, S., Shahi, S., Palma Gomez, F., Mariserla, S., Choi, M., Shah, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society

    Lee, J., Kim, C.: A Structure of basic emotions: A review of basic emotion theories using an emotionally fine-tuned language model. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 509–516. Sydney, Australia (Jul 2023), https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zd4f4dk

    2023

  25. [25]

    Biometrics45(1), 255–268 (Mar 1989)

    Lin, L.I.K.: A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility. Biometrics45(1), 255–268 (Mar 1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051

    work page doi:10.2307/2532051 1989

  26. [26]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802

    McInnes, L., Healy, J., Melville, J.: UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction (2018). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802. 03426

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802 2018

  27. [27]

    MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (Mar 1974)

    Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A.: An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (Mar 1974)

    1974

  28. [28]

    Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space

    Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient Estimation of Word Repre- sentations in Vector Space (2013). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 2013

  29. [29]

    In: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

    Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed Rep- resentations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. In: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems, vol. 26, pp. 3136–3144. Curran Associates, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA (Dec 2013), https://proceeding...

    2013

  30. [30]

    Communications of the ACM38(11), 39–41 (Nov 1995)

    Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM38(11), 39–41 (Nov 1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748

    work page doi:10.1145/219717.219748 1995

  31. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

    Mohammad, S.M.: Obtaining Reliable Human Ratings of Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for 20,000 English Words. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). pp. 174–184. Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne, Australia (Jul 2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1017

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1017 2018

  32. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the 11th Inter- national Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation

    Mohammad, S.M.: Word Affect Intensities. In: Proceedings of the 11th Inter- national Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. pp. 174–183. Eu- ropean Language Resources Association, Miyazaki, Japan (May 2018). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.08798

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.08798 2018

  33. [33]

    Mohammad, S.M.: NRC VAD Lexicon v2: Norms for Valence, Arousal, and Domi- nanceforover55kEnglishTerms(2025).https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23547

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.23547 2025

  34. [34]

    In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

    Mrkšić, N., Ó Séaghdha, D., Thomson, B., Gašić, M., Rojas-Barahona, L.M., Su, P.H., Vandyke, D., Wen, T.H., Young, S.: Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguistic Constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. pp. 142–148. Association for Compu...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1018 2016

  35. [35]

    In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    Muennighoff, N., Tazi, N., Magne, L., Reimers, N.: MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 2014–2037. Association for Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Emotion Theories 17 Computational Linguistics, Dubrovnik, Croatia (May 2023). htt...

    2014

  36. [36]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.08877

    Ni, J., Ábrego, G.H., Constant, N., Ma, J., Hall, K.B., Cer, D., Yang, Y.: Sentence- T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Models (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.08877

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.08877 2021

  37. [37]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.07972

    Nussbaum, Z., Duderstadt, B.: Training Sparse Mixture Of Experts Text Embedding Models (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.07972

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.07972 2025

  38. [38]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Park, S., Kim, J., Ye, S., Jeon, J., Park, H.Y., Oh, A.: Dimensional Emotion Detection from Categorical Emotion. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 4367–4380. Association for Computational Linguistics, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic (Nov 2021). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.358

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.358 2021

  39. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Represen- tation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 1532–1543. Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar (Oct 2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1162

    work page doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 2014

  40. [40]

    In: Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, Volume 1: Theories of Emotion, pp

    Plutchik, R.: A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion. In: Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, Volume 1: Theories of Emotion, pp. 3–33. Academic Press (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7 1980

  41. [41]

    In: COLM 2025 1st Workshop on the Interplay of Model Behavior and Model Internals

    Reichman, B., Avsian, A., Heck, L.: Emotions Where Art Thou: Understanding and Characterizing the Emotional Latent Space of Large Language Models. In: COLM 2025 1st Workshop on the Interplay of Model Behavior and Model Internals. Montreal, Canada (Oct 2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.22042

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.22042 2025

  42. [42]

    Sentence-

    Reimers, N., Gurevych, I.: Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. pp. 3980–3990. Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China (Nov 2019). https://doi.o...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1410 2019

  43. [43]

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39(6), 1161–1178 (Dec 1980)

    Russell, J.A.: A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39(6), 1161–1178 (Dec 1980). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714

    work page doi:10.1037/h0077714 1980

  44. [44]

    Emotional Embeddings: Refining Word Embeddings to Capture Emotional Content of Words

    Seyeditabari, A., Tabari, N., Gholizade, S., Zadrozny, W.: Emotional Embeddings: Refining Word Embeddings to Capture Emotional Content of Words (2019). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.00112

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.00112 2019

  45. [45]

    In: Proceedings of the 30th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference

    Seyeditabari, A., Zadrozny, W.: Can Word Embeddings Help Find Latent Emotions in Text? Preliminary Results. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. pp. 206–209. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Marco Island, FL, USA (May 2017), https://aaai.org/papers/206-flairs-2017-15516/

    2017

  46. [46]

    In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Shah, S., Reddy, S., Bhattacharyya, P.: Retrofitting Light-weight Language Models for Emotions using Supervised Contrastive Learning. In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 3640–

    2023

  47. [47]

    https: //doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.222

    Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore (Dec 2023). https: //doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.222

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.222 2023

  48. [48]

    In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    Su, H., Shi, W., Kasai, J., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Ostendorf, M., Yih, W.t., Smith, N.A., Zettlemoyer, L., Yu, T.: One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics

  49. [49]

    1102–1121

    pp. 1102–1121. Association for Computational Linguistics, Toronto, Canada (Jul 2023). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.71

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.71 2023

  50. [50]

    In: 9th In- 18 Ciani et al

    Suresh, V., Ong, D.C.: Using Knowledge-Embedded Attention to Augment Pre- trained Language Models for Fine-Grained Emotion Recognition. In: 9th In- 18 Ciani et al. ternational Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. In- stitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Nara, Japan (Sep 2021). https: //doi.org/10.1109/ACII52823.2021.9597390

    work page doi:10.1109/acii52823.2021.9597390 2021

  51. [51]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering28(2), 496–509 (Feb 2016)

    Tang, D., Wei, F., Qin, B., Yang, N., Liu, T., Zhou, M.: Sentiment Embeddings with Applications to Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering28(2), 496–509 (Feb 2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2015. 2489653

    work page doi:10.1109/tkde.2015 2016

  52. [52]

    and Waltman, Ludo and van Eck, Nees Jan , title =

    Traag, V.A., Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J.: From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports9(5233) (Mar 2019). https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z 2019

  53. [53]

    EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representations

    Vera Schechter, H., Dua, S., Zhang, B., Salz, D., Mullins, R., Panyam, S.R., Smoot, S., Naim, I., Zou, J., Chen, F., Cer, D., Lisak, A., Choi, M., Gonzalez, L., Sanseviero, O., Cameron, G., Ballantyne, I., Black, K., Chen, K., Wang, W., Li, Z., Martins, G., Lee, J., Sherwood, M., Ji, J., Wu, R., Zheng, J., Singh, J., Sharma, A., Sreepathihalli, D., Jain, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.20354 2025

  54. [55]

    Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology17(Jan 2023)

    Wang, X., Li, X., Yin, Z., Wu, Y., Liu, J.: Emotional intelligence of Large Language Models. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology17(Jan 2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/ 18344909231213958

    2023

  55. [56]

    In: 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection. In: 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 133–138. Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, NM, USA (Jun 1994). https://doi.org/10. 3115/981732.981751

    work page arXiv 1994

  56. [57]

    In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Yu, L.C., Wang, J., Lai, K.R., Zhang, X.: Refining Word Embeddings for Sentiment Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 534–539. Association for Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark (Sep 2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D17-1056

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1056 2017

  57. [58]

    Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models

    Zhang, Y., Li, M., Long, D., Zhang, X., Lin, H., Yang, B., Xie, P., Yang, A., Liu, D., Lin, J., Huang, F., Zhou, J.: Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2506.05176

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2025

  58. [59]

    In: NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on Scientific Methods for Understanding Deep Learning

    Zhao, B., Okawa, M., Bigelow, E.J., Yu, R., Ullman, T.D., Tanaka, H.: Emergence of Hierarchical Emotion Representations in Large Language Models. In: NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on Scientific Methods for Understanding Deep Learning. Vancouver, Canada (Dec 2024), https://neurips.cc/virtual/2024/99244

    2024

  59. [60]

    google@embeddinggemma-300m

    Zhao, X., Hu, X., Shan, Z., Huang, S., Zhou, Y., Zhang, X., Sun, Z., Liu, Z., Li, D., Wei, X., Pan, Y., Xiang, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, H., Yu, J., Hu, B., Zhang, M.: Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Emotion Theories 19 KaLM-Embedding-v2: Superior Training Techniques and Data Inspire A Versatile Embedding Model (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.20923 2025