Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 84 references

The self-force on static scalar and electric charges can tell a thin-shell gravastar from a black hole of the same mass.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

For charges held near a gravastar, the self-force carries information about the interior, giving explicitly computable differences from the black-hole case.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid first gravastar self-force calculation with credible closed-form results; the main regularity worry is a red herring, though the paper would be stronger with code and error bars.

arxiv 2608.00121 v2 pith:6WEVLBVJ submitted 2026-07-31 gr-qc hep-th

Self-Forces as Nonlocal Probes of Gravastar Interiors

Bokai Zhang , Yungui Gong , Anzhong Wang This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th
keywords self-forcegravastarthin-shell compact objectsmode-sum regularizationDetweiler–Whiting decompositionscalar chargeelectric chargede Sitter interior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper calculates the self-force—the force a body exerts on itself through its own retarded field—on static scalar and electric charges placed inside or outside a thin-shell gravastar, a horizonless compact object built from a de Sitter core joined to a Schwarzschild exterior. Its aim is to show that this force responds to the interior boundary condition even though the exterior geometry is identical to a Schwarzschild black hole's. Concretely, a scalar charge outside the gravastar feels a repulsive force 2/5 q² M R² / r₀⁵, where the black-hole force is exactly zero; an electric charge feels the universal e²M/r₀³ force plus a structure-dependent correction 4/5 e² M R² / r₀⁵. Inside the gravastar, both charges are pulled toward the centre and undergo harmonic oscillations about it. If the calculation is right, static self-force measurements offer a way to distinguish horizonless compact objects from black holes without ever touching the horizon.

Core claim

Mode by mode, the difference between the gravastar and a black hole is carried by a single matching coefficient E_l that encodes the reflection of the field off the thin shell; setting E_l to zero reproduces the black-hole boundary condition. With E_l nonzero, the scalar self-force outside the gravastar is repulsive and falls as 2/5 q² M R² / r₀⁵, the electric force is the universal e²M/r₀³ term plus 4/5 e² M R² / r₀⁵, and inside the gravastar both forces are first order in M/R, point toward the centre, vanish linearly at the centre, and produce harmonic oscillations with frequencies ω² = 2q²M/(mR⁴) for the scalar and ω² = e²M/(mR⁴) for the electric charge. The black-hole limit recovers the

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the shell reflection coefficient E_l, a dimensionless matching constant defined at the junction radius R in Eqs. (28), (42), (63), and (77) for the four configurations. It measures the admixture of the horizon-singular Legendre solution into the region between shell and charge; it vanishes for horizon absorption and is nonzero for the de Sitter core. Alongside this, the Detweiler–Whiting decomposition into singular and regular fields, with the mode-sum regularization parameters for static spherically symmetric spacetimes, turns divergent bare l-modes into a convergent self-force whose structure-sensitive part is proportional to E_l.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the standard singular-field subtraction, derived for smooth spherical spacetimes, still works when the metric's radial derivative jumps at the thin shell; if that jump changes the singular field near the charge, every quoted force shifts.

What would settle it

Recompute the large-l singular modes for the thin-shell junction directly from the local geometry, or numerically integrate the retarded Green function for a charge at r₀ = R/2 and compare the regularized force with Eqs. (34), (46), (68), and (83); disagreement would show the standard subtraction misses the shell's jump. A direct experimental probe would be detecting the predicted repulsive 2/5 q²MR²/r₀⁵ tail on a static scalar charge far outside an object with a Schwarzschild exterior.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A static scalar or electric charge can distinguish a gravastar from a Schwarzschild black hole of the same mass despite identical exterior geometry.
  • The exterior scalar self-force is a pure structure effect, scaling as M R²/r₀⁵, while the electric force separates into a mass-only universal term and a structure-dependent correction.
  • Inside the gravastar, both charges have a stable equilibrium at the centre and oscillate harmonically about it with the quoted frequencies.
  • The forces diverge logarithmically as the charge approaches the shell, an artifact of the zero-thickness idealization that a finite-thickness shell would cut off.
  • In the black-hole limit the construction reduces to the known vanishing scalar force and universal electric force, validating the regularization and matching.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same reflective shell controls the time-dependent problem, the mechanism computed here at zero frequency should also produce echo features in ringdown and conservative phase shifts in extreme-mass-ratio inspiral waveforms; the paper states the analogy but does not compute the radiative case.
  • The paper leaves the ultracompact limit R → 2M⁺ open because E_l has no elementary limit there; whether the self-force approaches the black-hole value in that limit is a separate calculation.
  • The leading-order equality of the scalar and electromagnetic reflection coefficients at weak compactness suggests the structure-dependent exterior force may be spin-independent at order M/R for all massless test fields, which could be checked for gravitational perturbations.
  • The distinct electric far-field coefficients (4/5 for the de Sitter core versus 2/3 for a hollow shell) provide a sharp discriminator between interior models that a measurement of the self-force could in principle settle.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the static, conservative self-force on minimally coupled scalar and electric test charges held at rest inside and outside a thin-shell gravastar, modeled as a de Sitter interior matched to a Schwarzschild exterior across a thin shell. Exact mode solutions are given in terms of hypergeometric and Legendre functions, matched across the shell and the particle, and the Detweiler-Whiting mode-sum regularization of Barack and Ori is used with the Casals-Poisson-Vega regularization parameters. The central results are that the exterior scalar self-force is nonzero and repulsive, with far-field form 2/5 q^2 M R^2/r0^5; the exterior electric force is the Smith-Will force plus 4/5 e^2 M R^2/r0^5; interior forces are first order in M/R, directed toward the center, and lead to harmonic oscillations about the center; and both forces diverge logarithmically as the charge approaches the shell. Known black-hole limits (Wiseman, Smith-Will/Copson-Linet) are recovered.

Significance. If correct, the paper gives a concrete, analytically controlled demonstration that the conservative self-force is sensitive to the interior boundary condition even when the exterior geometry is locally indistinguishable from Schwarzschild. It also supplies quantitative structure coefficients that could, in principle, distinguish a gravastar from a hollow shell or a black hole. The main strengths are the exact mode matching, the closed-form weak-field sums, the recovery of known black-hole results, and the numerical cross-checks of the analytic expansions at the percent level. I concur with the stress-test assessment that the distributional-shell concern about the regularization parameters does not land: the Detweiler-Whiting singular field is constructed locally in the smooth neighborhood of the charge, and the shell discontinuity enters only through the regular matching coefficient E_l. The paper is a useful, largely self-contained contribution to the ECO self-force literature.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III.B.1, Eq. (34)] As typeset, the bracket reads y - 3y^3/(1-y^2) - (1+3y^2) arctanh y, but summing the series in Eq. (33) with the partial-fraction decomposition in Eq. (B10) gives y - 2y^3/(1-y^2) - (1+3y^2) arctanh y. The coefficient 2 is also required for consistency with the near-center limit Eq. (35). Please correct Eq. (34) and any plotting code used for Fig. 1.
  2. [Sec. IV.B, Eqs. (58)-(63)] The exterior modes (r-2M)Q_l^(1)(r/M-1) and the quotient Q_l^(2)/Q_l^(1) are not defined at l=0. Since the exterior monopole is treated separately in Eq. (71), the same separation should be stated explicitly for the interior electromagnetic case, and the l=0 contribution to the weak-field sum (67) should be justified. As written, the domain of validity of Eq. (58) is unclear.
  3. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B11)-(B15)] The step from Eq. (64) to Eq. (67) should display the subtraction of the full singular modes rather than only the large-l constant (65). A reader who uses (65) for all l would find a spurious O(M/R) l=0 contribution; the vanishing of the l=0 term relies on l-dependent pieces of the full Casals-Poisson-Vega singular parameters. Please clarify this step.
  4. [Secs. III.C.2, IV.C.2] The claim of agreement 'at the percent level or better' would be easier to verify if a small table of relative differences and the chosen l_max/truncation parameters were provided. Without such data, the numerical validation is difficult to reproduce from the plots alone.
  5. [Sec. I, Ref. [17]] Reference [17] is a paper on shadows and light deflection by black holes, which appears unrelated to the self-force as a probe of internal structure. Consider replacing it with a self-force reference or removing it from the citation cluster.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the derivation is self-contained, with independent regularization inputs and external black-hole benchmarks.

full rationale

The central claim—that the static conservative self-force on scalar/electric charges in a thin-shell gravastar differs from the black-hole values—is obtained by exact mode matching in the de Sitter interior and Schwarzschild exterior, not by fitting to the quoted force coefficients. The only imported inputs are (i) the Visser–Wiltshire gravastar spacetime, an assumed model; (ii) the Detweiler–Whiting decomposition and Barack–Ori mode-sum scheme; and (iii) the local regularization parameters of Casals, Poisson, and Vega. Item (iii) is independent prior work, and the paper additionally re-derives the large-l singular limits directly from its bare modes (Eqs. (30), (65), (80)), so it does not rely on the cited constants as a black box. The shell discontinuity does not create circularity: the singular field is locally constructed in a neighbourhood of the particle, where the metric is smooth de Sitter (r0<R) or smooth Schwarzschild (r0>R); the shell's effect resides entirely in the regular field, encoded in the matching coefficient El, which is derived from junction conditions rather than chosen to match the output. The black-hole limit El=0 reproduces the independent results of Wiseman and Smith–Will, and the analytic weak-field sums (Eqs. (34), (46), (68), (83)) are validated numerically against exact mode sums. Self-citations to the authors' prior work (Refs. [17], [24]) appear only for background stability and as illustrative discussion; they are not load-bearing for the force calculation. The only explicit limitation, the ultracompact limit left to future work (Sec. III.C.2), affects completeness, not circularity. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; H is fixed by M and R through Eq. (4). All claims derive from the mode solutions and standard self-force formalism. The main domain assumptions are the thin-shell idealization and the applicability of standard regularization to a nonsmooth background, both flagged by the authors.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Visser-Wiltshire thin-shell gravastar is an adequate fixed background: de Sitter interior matched to Schwarzschild exterior with continuous f and a jump in f'.
    Used throughout Sec. II.A-II.B; defines the model under study.
  • domain assumption Scalar and electromagnetic fields obey standard junction conditions across the shell: modes and their radial derivatives are continuous.
    Sec. II.B and Eqs. (23), (58), (72); if the shell carried field sources, the matching would change.
  • domain assumption Casals-Poisson-Vega regularization parameters for static spherically symmetric spacetimes apply unchanged to the gravastar.
    Sec. II.D; needed to subtract singular modes at the particle. The shell is distributional, so this is an extrapolation from smooth spacetimes.
  • domain assumption Test-field approximation: the charge does not backreact on the background, and the self-force is O(q^2) or O(e^2).
    Stated in Sec. II.A; standard for leading-order self-force calculations.
  • standard math Properties and Wronskians of Gauss hypergeometric and Legendre functions used in Appendix A.
    Standard special-function identities invoked in mode matching and weak-field expansions.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-Forces as Nonlocal Probes of Gravastar Interiors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6WEVLBVJ

@misc{pith2026260800121,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-Forces as Nonlocal Probes of Gravastar Interiors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6WEVLBVJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00121}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Compact objects with the same exterior metric are locally indistinguishable to test particles, yet observables built from retarded fields can retain information about the spacetime outside the particle's immediate neighbourhood. The self-force acting on a particle in curved spacetime provides a unique probe of both the local geometry and the global structure of the background spacetime. We calculate the static, conservative self-force on minimally coupled scalar and electric charges in the simplest thin-shell gravastar: a de Sitter core matched to a Schwarzschild exterior. Weak-field expansions in the compactness $M/R$ are obtained analytically and summed in closed form. For a scalar charge outside the gravastar the self-force is nonzero---in contrast to the exactly vanishing result for a Schwarzschild black hole of the same mass---and behaves as $\tfrac{2}{5}q^2 M R^2/r_0^5$ at large distances, while for an electric charge the universal Smith--Will force $e^2M/r_0^3$ is corrected by a structure-dependent term $\tfrac{4}{5}e^2 M R^2/r_0^5$. Inside the gravastar the scalar self-force is directed toward the center at leading order in $M/R$, vanishes linearly at the center, and produces harmonic oscillations of the charge about the center; the electromagnetic self-force inside the gravastar behaves similarly. The results demonstrate explicitly that the self-force depends not only on the local curvature surrounding the particle but also on the global structure of spacetime: although the exterior geometry of a gravastar is identical to that of a Schwarzschild black hole, the interior boundary conditions modify the regular field and therefore produce distinct self-forces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00121 by Anzhong Wang, Bokai Zhang, Yungui Gong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Magnitude of the regularized radial self-force on a scalar charge held at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Regularized radial self-force on a scalar charge held at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnitude of the regularized radial self-force on an electric charge held at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Regularized radial self-force on an electric charge held at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Magnitude of the regularized radial self-force as a function of the charge position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Expanding the hypergeometric functions about z= 0 and the Legendre functions aboutX→ ∞[Eqs

    Weak-field expansion An instructive analytical limit is the weak-field (small-compactness) regimeM/R≪1, which impliesH 2r2 ≤H 2R2 = 2M/R≪1. Expanding the hypergeometric functions about z= 0 and the Legendre functions aboutX→ ∞[Eqs. (A5) and (A10)], the coefficient (28) becomes El = 3(l+ 1) (1−2l)(1 + 2l) M R +O M 2 R2 ,(32) as derived in detail in Appendi...

  2. [2]

    Two practical remarks are in order

    Numerical Implementation The regularized sums are evaluated numerically. Two practical remarks are in order. First, the hypergeometric and Legendre functions entering the coefficients are computed directly from their defining series and differential equations, with the Wronskian relations of Appendix A used as consistency checks. Second, the sums are trun...

    work page

  3. [3]

    At largelthe averaged bare modes approach thel-independent constant f s l =− q2 2r2 0 1−2H 2r2 0 1−H 2r2 0 ,(30) in agreement with the general regularization parameters of Ref

    + 2H2r2 0F (1) s− (H 2r2 0) io .(29) 11 Note the factor oflin the first bracket, which originates from the radial derivative of (Hr) l; it guarantees that thel= 0 mode contributes only through theC l term and that the force vanishes at the center, as required by spherical symmetry. At largelthe averaged bare modes approach thel-independent constant f s l ...

  4. [4]

    (42) and (77), are expanded along the same lines, using in additionP l(X) =d lX l 1 +O(X −2) withd l = (2l)!/ 2l(l!)2

    Charges outside The outside coefficients, Eqs. (42) and (77), are expanded along the same lines, using in additionP l(X) =d lX l 1 +O(X −2) withd l = (2l)!/ 2l(l!)2 . At leading order the numer- ators are dominated by the balance between theP l andP (1) l terms, which cancels atO(1) and leaves anO(ϵ) remainder, while the denominators are dominated by (R/M...

    work page

  5. [5]

    T. C. Quinn and R. M. Wald, An Axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved space-time, Phys. Rev. D56, 3381 (1997), arXiv:gr- qc/9610053

    arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Weak-field expansion Expanding Eq. (44) in powers ofM/R(see Appendix B for the expansion of the matching coefficients), the leading term is fr = q2 r2 0 M R ∞X l=0 3l(l+ 1) (1 + 2l)(3 + 2l) y−(2l+1) +O M 2 R2 ,(45) which can be summed to the closed form fr = q2 r2 0 M R 9y3 −3y 8(y2 −1) − 3 8 (3y2 + 1) arctanhy−1 +O M 2 R2 .(46) Thel= 0 mode does not cont...

    work page

  7. [7]

    The first is the center, r0 →0

    Two special limits Two limiting positions of the charge deserve a separate comment. The first is the center, r0 →0. Spherical symmetry requires the force to vanish there, and the weak-field result (35) 15 0 10 20 30 40 R/M 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 fr FIG. 2. Regularized radial self-force on a scalar charge held atr 0 = 2Routside the gravastar, in units ofq 2/r...

    work page

  8. [8]

    reflects

    The black-hole limit A valuable consistency check is obtained by replacing the de Sitter interior with a black- hole horizon. Regularity of the static field at the horizonr= 2Mselects the solution proportional toP l(r/M−1) alone in the region 2M < r < r0, sinceQ l diverges logarithmi- cally atx= 1; equivalently, the black-hole boundary condition amounts t...

    work page

  9. [9]

    +F v−(H 2r2 0) i × h 2H 2r2 0F (1) v+ (H 2r2

    work page

  10. [10]

    The averaged bare modes (64) approach thel-independent constant f s l = e2 2r2 0 1 1−H 2r2 0 (65) at largel, again in agreement with the general parameters of Ref

    +lF v+(H 2r2 0) i .(64) The regularized force follows from the mode sum (10) upon subtracting the singular modes. The averaged bare modes (64) approach thel-independent constant f s l = e2 2r2 0 1 1−H 2r2 0 (65) at largel, again in agreement with the general parameters of Ref. [62], and the remaining seriesf r = P l( ¯f bare l −f s l ) converges and is ev...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Weak-field expansion As in the scalar case, the weak-field regimeM/R≪1 admits a closed-form treatment. Expanding the coefficient (63) to leading order (Appendix B) gives El = 3l (2l−1)(2l+ 1) M R +O M 2 R2 ,(66) and the regularized force reduces to fr =− e2 r2 0 M R ∞X l=0 3l2 (2l−1)(2l+ 1) y2l+1 +O M 2 R2 ,(67) with the closed-form sum fr =− 3e2 8r2 0 M ...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Weak-field expansion Expanding the regularized force to leading order inM/R(Appendix B) gives fr = e2 r2 0 M R ∞X l=0 3(1 +l) 2 (1 + 2l)(3 + 2l) y−(2l+1) +O M 2 R2 ,(82) with the closed-form sum fr = e2 r2 0 3M 8R h y3 +y y2 −1 + (1−y 2) arctanhy −1 i +O M 2 R2 .(83) 22 0 10 20 30 40 R/M 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 fr FIG. 4. Regularized radial self-force on an elect...

    work page

  13. [13]

    and stellar surfaces [18]; the divergence is an artifact of the zero-thickness idealization. (v) In the black-hole limit, in which the interior boundary condition is replaced by regularity at the horizon, our formulas reproduce the known results—Wiseman’s vanishing scalar force

  14. [14]

    (72)–(77) amounts to imposing the black-hole boundary condition at the horizon

    The black-hole limit and the Copson–Linet solution As in the scalar case, settingE l = 0 in Eqs. (72)–(77) amounts to imposing the black-hole boundary condition at the horizon. The mode solution then reproduces, mode by mode, the classic closed-form solution for a point charge in the Schwarzschild spacetime, first obtained 23 by Copson [65] and corrected ...

    work page

  15. [15]

    Useful expansions For the Legendre function at the shell,X=R/M−1 andX −1 =ϵ(1 +ϵ+· · ·), so Eq. (A10) gives the logarithmic derivatives R M Ql ≡ R M Q(1) l (X) Ql(X) =−(l+ 1)(1 +ϵ) +O(ϵ 2),(B2) R M eQl ≡ R M Q(2) l (X) Q(1) l (X) =−(l+ 2)(1 +ϵ) +O(ϵ 2).(B3) The hypergeometric functions are expanded with Eq. (A5), F(a, b;c;z) = 1 + ab c z+O(z 2), F (1)(a, ...

    work page

  16. [16]

    (B2) and (B4) into the numerator of Eq

    Scalar charge inside For the scalar inside coefficient (28) we need ab c s− = (l+ 1)(l−2) 2(1−2l) , ab c s+ = l(l+ 3) 2(2l+ 3) .(B5) Inserting Eqs. (B2) and (B4) into the numerator of Eq. (28), Nl = l+ 1−(l+ 1)(1 +ϵ) 1 +O(ϵ) −4ϵ (l+ 1)(l−2) 2(1−2l) +O(ϵ 2) =ϵ h −(l+ 1)− 2(l+ 1)(l−2) 1−2l i +O(ϵ 2) = 3(l+ 1) 1−2l ϵ+O(ϵ 2),(B6) 31 while the denominator is D...

    work page

  17. [17]

    Electric charge inside For the electromagnetic coefficient (63), note that 1/(1−2M/R) = 1 + 2ϵ+O(ϵ 2) and ab c v− = l(l+ 1) 2(1−2l) , ab c v+ = l(l+ 1) 2(2l+ 3) .(B11) With Eq. (B3) the numerator becomes Nl = 1 +l+ 1 + 2ϵ−(l+ 2)(1 +ϵ) 1 +O(ϵ) −4ϵ l(l+ 1) 2(1−2l) +O(ϵ 2) =ϵ h −l− 2l(l+ 1) 1−2l i +O(ϵ 2) = 3l 2l−1 ϵ+O(ϵ 2),(B12) and the denominator Dl = l−1...

    work page

  18. [18]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Classical theory of radiating electrons, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A167, 148 (1938)

    work page 1938

  19. [19]

    B. S. DeWitt and R. W. Brehme, Radiation damping in a gravitational field, Annals Phys.9, 220 (1960)

    1960

  20. [20]

    Hobbs, A vierbein formalism of radiation damping, Annals of Physics47, 141 (1968)

    J. Hobbs, A vierbein formalism of radiation damping, Annals of Physics47, 141 (1968)

    work page 1968

  21. [21]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle motion, Phys. Rev. D55, 3457 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9606018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  22. [22]

    Visser and D

    M. Visser and D. L. Wiltshire, Stable gravastars: An Alternative to black holes?, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 1135 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310107

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  23. [23]

    Barack, Gravitational self force in extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Class

    L. Barack, Gravitational self force in extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 213001 (2009), arXiv:0908.1664 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Poisson, A

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011), arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    A. I. Harte, Motion in classical field theories and the foundations of the self-force problem, Fund. Theor. Phys.179, 327 (2015), arXiv:1405.5077 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Pound, Motion of small objects in curved spacetimes: An introduction to gravitational self-force, Fund

    A. Pound, Motion of small objects in curved spacetimes: An introduction to gravitational self-force, Fund. Theor. Phys.179, 399 (2015), arXiv:1506.06245 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group), Waveform modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev

    N. Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group), Waveform modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.28, 9 (2025), arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    S. L. Detweiler and B. F. Whiting, Selfforce via a Green’s function decomposition, Phys. Rev. 34 D67, 024025 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0202086

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  30. [30]

    L. M. Burko, Y. T. Liu, and Y. Soen, Selfforce on charges in the space-time of spherical shells, Phys. Rev. D63, 024015 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0008065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    T. D. Drivas and S. E. Gralla, Dependence of Self-force on Central Object, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 145025 (2011), arXiv:1009.0504 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    Self-force as probe of internal structure

    S. Isoyama and E. Poisson, Self-force as probe of internal structure, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 155012 (2012), arXiv:1205.1236 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Probing global aspects of a geometry by the self-force on a charge: Spherical thin-shell wormholes

    E. Rubin de Celis, O. P. Santill´ an, and C. Simeone, Probing global aspects of a geometry by the self-force on a charge: Spherical thin-shell wormholes, Phys. Rev. D88, 124012 (2013), arXiv:1309.7533 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    Kumar, S

    R. Kumar, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Wang, Shadow cast and deflection of light by charged rotating regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D100, 124024 (2019), arXiv:1912.05154 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    A. N. Seenivasan and S. R. Dolan, Self-force and the Schwarzschild star, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 185002 (2025), arXiv:2501.13176 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Cardoso and P

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report, Living Rev. Rel.22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Gravitational Condensate Stars: An Alternative to Black Holes, Universe9, 88 (2023), arXiv:gr-qc/0109035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Gravitational vacuum condensate stars, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101, 9545 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Y. V. Grats and P. A. Spirin, Electrostatic self-force in the field of an (n + 1)-dimensional black hole: Dimensional regularization, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.122, 96 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Cattoen, T

    C. Cattoen, T. Faber, and M. Visser, Gravastars must have anisotropic pressures, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 4189 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    Bounded excursion stable gravastars and black holes

    P. Rocha, A. Y. Miguelote, R. Chan, M. F. da Silva, N. O. Santos, and A. Wang, Bounded excursion stable gravastars and black holes, JCAP06, 025, arXiv:0803.4200 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    C. B. M. H. Chirenti and L. Rezzolla, How to tell a gravastar from a black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.24, 4191 (2007), arXiv:0706.1513 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  43. [43]

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, and R. Ruffini, Charged massive particle at rest in the field of a Reissner- Nordstr¨ om black hole. II. Analysis of the field lines and the electric Meissner effect, Phys. Rev. D77, 064020 (2008), arXiv:1408.4596 [gr-qc]. 35

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    W. G. Unruh, Selfforce on Charged Particles, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A348, 447 (1976)

    work page 1976

  45. [45]

    L. M. Burko, Selfforce on static charges in Schwarzschild space-time, Class. Quant. Grav.17, 227 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9911042

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  46. [46]

    Electromagnetic self-force on a static charge in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetimes

    J. Kuchar, E. Poisson, and I. Vega, Electromagnetic self-force on a static charge in Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 235033 (2013), arXiv:1307.8342 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Leaute and B

    B. Leaute and B. Linet, Selfinteraction of an electric or magnetic dipole in the Schwarzschild space-time, Class. Quant. Grav.1, 55 (1984)

    work page 1984

  48. [48]

    Self-force on a static particle near a black hole

    P. Krtouˇ s and A. Zelnikov, Self-force on a static particle near a black hole, Phys. Rev. D102, 024065 (2020), arXiv:1910.04290 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Lohiya, CLASSICAL SELFFORCE ON AN ELECTRON NEAR A CHARGED, ROTAT- ING BLACK HOLE, J

    D. Lohiya, CLASSICAL SELFFORCE ON AN ELECTRON NEAR A CHARGED, ROTAT- ING BLACK HOLE, J. Phys. A15, 1815 (1982)

    work page 1982

  50. [50]

    Leaute and B

    B. Leaute and B. Linet, Selfinteraction of a point charge in the Kerr space-time, J. Phys. A 15, 1821 (1982)

    work page 1982

  51. [51]

    L. M. Burko and Y. T. Liu, Selfforce on a scalar charge in the space-time of a stationary, axisymmetric black hole, Phys. Rev. D64, 024006 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  52. [52]

    M. J. S. Beach, E. Poisson, and B. G. Nickel, Self-force on a charge outside a five-dimensional black hole, Phys. Rev. D89, 124014 (2014), arXiv:1404.1031 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Static Self-Forces in a Five-Dimensional Black Hole Spacetime

    P. Taylor and ´E. ´E. Flanagan, Static Self-Forces in a Five-Dimensional Black Hole Space- time, Phys. Rev. D92, 084032 (2015), [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 92, 109904 (2015)], arXiv:1504.04622 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Linet, Force on a Charge in the Space-Time of a Cosmic String, Phys

    B. Linet, Force on a Charge in the Space-Time of a Cosmic String, Phys. Rev. D33, 1833 (1986)

    work page 1986

  55. [55]

    Electrostatic self-force in a static weak gravitational field with cylindrical symmetry

    B. Boisseau, C. Charmousis, and B. Linet, Electrostatic selfforce in a static weak gravitational field with cylindrical symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav.13, 1797 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9603003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  56. [56]

    Leaute and B

    B. Leaute and B. Linet, Selfinteraction and massive vector field in the Schwarzschild space- time, Gen. Rel. Grav.17, 783 (1985)

    work page 1985

  57. [57]

    N. R. Khusnutdinov, A. A. Popov, and L. N. Lipatova, Self-force of a point charge in the space-time of a massive wormhole, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 215012 (2010), arXiv:1005.4132 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Electrostatic interaction of a pointlike charge with a wormhole

    S. Krasnikov, Electrostatic interaction of a pointlike charge with a wormhole, Class. Quant. 36 Grav.25, 245018 (2008), arXiv:0802.1358 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  59. [59]

    N. R. Khusnutdinov and I. V. Bakhmatov, Self-force for charged particle in the wormhole space-time, Phys. Rev. D76, 124015 (2007), arXiv:0707.3396 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    Self-force on an arbitrarily coupled static scalar particle in a wormhole space-time

    P. Taylor, Self-force on an arbitrarily coupled static scalar particle in a wormhole space-time, Phys. Rev. D87, 024046 (2013), arXiv:1209.6088 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    V. B. Bezerra and N. R. Khusnutdinov, Self-force on a scalar particle in the wormhole space- time, Phys. Rev. D79, 064012 (2009), arXiv:0901.0480 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Probing global aspects of a geometry by the self-force on a charge; cylindical thin-shell wormholes

    E. Rubin de Celis, O. P. Santillan, and C. Simeone, Probing global aspects of a geometry by the self-force on a charge: cylindical thin-shell wormholes, Phys. Rev. D86, 124009 (2012), arXiv:1210.4149 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    bounded excursion

    and the Smith–Will force [64]—and all weak-field expansions are validated against the numerical mode sums at the percent level or better. The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we describe the gravastar spacetime, the junction conditions at the shell, and our setup; review the Detweiler–Whiting decomposition and the mode-sum regularization prescrip...

  64. [64]

    N. R. Khusnutdinov and V. B. Bezerra, Selfenergy and selfforce in the space-time of a thick cosmic string, Phys. Rev. D64, 083506 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0107026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  65. [65]

    E. R. Bezerra de Mello, V. B. Bezerra, and Y. V. Grats, Selfforces in the space-time of multiple cosmic strings, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 1915 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9801009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1915

  66. [66]

    C. R. Muniz and V. B. Bezerra, Self-force on an electric dipole in the spacetime of a cosmic string, Annals Phys.340, 87 (2014), arXiv:1310.4449 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    L. C. N. Santos and V. B. Bezerra, Electrostatic self-interaction of charged particles in the space-time of a cosmic string in the context of gravity’s rainbow, Gen. Rel. Grav.51, 145 (2019), arXiv:1911.01996 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Electrostatics in a Schwarzschild black hole pierced by a cosmic string

    B. Linet, Electrostatics in a Schwarzschild black hole pierced by a cosmic string, Class. Quant. Grav.16, 2947 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9904044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  69. [69]

    E. R. Bezerra de Mello and A. A. Saharian, Electrostatic self-interaction in the spacetime of a global monopole with finite core, Class. Quant. Grav.24, 2389 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  70. [70]

    Induced electrostatic self-interaction in the spacetime of a global monopole with inner structure

    D. Barbosa, J. Spinelly, and E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Induced electrostatic self-interaction in the spacetime of a global monopole with inner structure, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D18, 1085 (2009), [Erratum: Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 20, 119–120 (2011)], arXiv:0807.3919 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    Induced self-energy on a static scalar charged particle in the spacetime of a global monopole with finite core

    D. Barbosa, U. de Freitas, and E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Induced self-energy on a static scalar charged particle in the spacetime of a global monopole with finite core, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 065009 (2011), arXiv:1009.0195 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    E. R. Bezerra de Mello and A. A. Saharian, Scalar self-energy for a charged particle in global monopole spacetime with a spherical boundary, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 135007 (2012), 37 arXiv:1201.1770 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  73. [73]

    Linet and P

    B. Linet and P. Teyssandier, Point charge in a static, spherically symmetric Brans-Dicke field, Gen. Rel. Grav.10, 313 (1979)

    work page 1979

  74. [74]

    Vilenkin, SELFINTERACTION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN THE GRA VITA- TIONAL FIELD, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, SELFINTERACTION OF CHARGED PARTICLES IN THE GRA VITA- TIONAL FIELD, Phys. Rev. D20, 373 (1979)

    work page 1979

  75. [75]

    Carvalho, C

    J. Carvalho, C. Furtado, and F. Moraes, Self-interaction in the von Karman cosmic string street configuration, Eur. Phys. J. C58, 331 (2008)

    work page 2008

  76. [76]

    A. E. Zayats, Self-interaction in Bopp-Podolsky electrodynamics: Spacetimes with angular defects, Phys. Rev. D94, 105026 (2016), arXiv:1610.02720 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    J. P. Mecca and I. Vega, Self-force on a static scalar charge in traversable wormholes, (2026), arXiv:2606.29401 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Ori, Mode sum regularization approach for the selfforce in black hole space- time, Phys. Rev. D61, 061502 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9912010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  79. [79]

    Regularization of static self-forces

    M. Casals, E. Poisson, and I. Vega, Regularization of static self-forces, Phys. Rev. D86, 064033 (2012), arXiv:1206.3772 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  80. [80]

    A. G. Wiseman, The Selfforce on a static scalar test charge outside a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D61, 084014 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0001025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.