Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Collision Probability Estimation Algorithm Used in the Space Debris Evolutionary Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.12335 v1 pith:6Z7MKOTR submitted 2019-03-29 physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM

A Collision Probability Estimation Algorithm Used in the Space Debris Evolutionary Model

classification physics.space-ph astro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
keywords modeldebrisspaceevolutioncollisionestimationlong-termprobability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

An in-depth analysis is performed on the problem that one parameter of the Cube model can affects the final simulation results of space debris long-term evolution model, which weakens the representativeness of the space debris evolution model. We made some improvements and proposed an Improved-Cube (I-Cube) model. By multiple Monte Carlo simulations, it is indicated that the I-Cube model offered a more accurate and more reasonable option for collision probability estimation in the space debris evolution process. The simulation results of space debris long-term evolution model are no longer sensitive to the collision probability estimation model parameters, thus improved the reliability of space debris long-term evolution model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond the Cube: Overlapping Grid Methods for Debris Collision Risk Assessment

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Double Cube recovers boundary-blind conjunctions at O(N) cost and a parameter-free Gaussian pair-distance correction calibrates the cube formula to ~0.08% residual on a controlled benchmark.