Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.11004 v2 pith:766CQWYP submitted 2024-06-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelscostalchemistannotatorsdatasetslabelinglabelslarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large pretrained models can be used as annotators, helping replace or augment crowdworkers and enabling distilling generalist models into smaller specialist models. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost: employing top-of-the-line models often requires paying thousands of dollars for API calls, while the resulting datasets are static and challenging to audit. To address these challenges, we propose a simple alternative: rather than directly querying labels from pretrained models, we task models to generate programs that can produce labels. These programs can be stored and applied locally, re-used and extended, and cost orders of magnitude less. Our system, Alchemist, obtains comparable to or better performance than large language model-based annotation in a range of tasks for a fraction of the cost: on average, improvements amount to a 12.9% enhancement while the total labeling costs across all datasets are reduced by a factor of approximately 500x.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stronger Than You Think: Benchmarking Weak Supervision on Realistic Tasks

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On realistic, high-cardinality, imbalanced text tasks, weak supervision beats supervised learning until supervised training has over 1,000 labeled examples.

  2. Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weights

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A gradient alignment score against a reference model's weights selects and reweights training samples, improving data efficiency in image classification and CLIP pretraining.

Pith tools