REVIEW 2 cited by
The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large pretrained models can be used as annotators, helping replace or augment crowdworkers and enabling distilling generalist models into smaller specialist models. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost: employing top-of-the-line models often requires paying thousands of dollars for API calls, while the resulting datasets are static and challenging to audit. To address these challenges, we propose a simple alternative: rather than directly querying labels from pretrained models, we task models to generate programs that can produce labels. These programs can be stored and applied locally, re-used and extended, and cost orders of magnitude less. Our system, Alchemist, obtains comparable to or better performance than large language model-based annotation in a range of tasks for a fraction of the cost: on average, improvements amount to a 12.9% enhancement while the total labeling costs across all datasets are reduced by a factor of approximately 500x.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stronger Than You Think: Benchmarking Weak Supervision on Realistic Tasks
On realistic, high-cardinality, imbalanced text tasks, weak supervision beats supervised learning until supervised training has over 1,000 labeled examples.
-
Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weights
A gradient alignment score against a reference model's weights selects and reweights training samples, improving data efficiency in image classification and CLIP pretraining.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.