Pith. sign in

REVIEW 34 cited by

Maximizing Confidence Alone Improves Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.22660 v4 pith:77G2FJQY submitted 2025-05-28 cs.LG cs.AI

Maximizing Confidence Alone Improves Reasoning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords learningrewardmodelmodelsreasoninganswersconfidenceentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has enabled machine learning models to achieve significant advances in many fields. Most recently, RL has empowered frontier language models to solve challenging math, science, and coding problems. However, central to any RL algorithm is the reward function, and reward engineering is a notoriously difficult problem in any domain. In this paper, we propose RENT: Reinforcement Learning via Entropy Minimization -- a fully unsupervised RL method that requires no external reward or ground-truth answers, and instead uses the model's entropy of its underlying distribution as an intrinsic reward. We find that by reinforcing the chains of thought that yield high model confidence on its generated answers, the model improves its reasoning ability. In our experiments, we showcase these improvements on an extensive suite of commonly-used reasoning benchmarks, including GSM8K, MATH500, AMC, AIME, and GPQA, and models of varying sizes from the Qwen, Mistral, and Llama families. The generality of our unsupervised learning method lends itself to applicability in a wide range of domains where external supervision is unavailable.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 34 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVR

    cs.AI 2025-06 accept novelty 8.0

    Spurious rewards in RLVR can produce large gains in mathematical reasoning for certain language models via GRPO's clipping bias amplifying pretraining behaviors like code reasoning.

  2. Depth-Entropy Guided Sampling for Training-Free LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 7.0

    Layer-wise entropy collapse depth is a weak per-candidate signal that, compounded inside MCMC power sampling, yields state-of-the-art training-free LLM reasoning accuracy.

  3. When Do Intrinsic Rewards Work for Code Reasoning? A Comprehensive Study

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Empirical evaluation on LiveCodeBench shows certainty-based RLIF yields early gains followed by output shortening and reasoning collapse, providing no advantage for RLVR initialization on code tasks.

  4. Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Control

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Entropy polarity from a first-order entropy change approximation enables Polarity-Aware Policy Optimization (PAPO) that preserves complementary polarity branches and outperforms baselines on math and agentic RL fine-t...

  5. Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Simple self-distillation—fine-tuning a code model on its own temperature-sampled, truncated outputs—raises LiveCodeBench pass@1 substantially without verifiers, teachers, or RL.

  6. What If Consensus Lies? Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning at Test Time

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SCRL adds selective positive pseudo-labeling and entropy-gated negative pseudo-labeling to test-time RL, reducing noise from weak consensus and improving LLM reasoning on benchmarks.

  7. H-OPD: Confidence Aware Heterogeneous Multi-Teacher Multimodal On-policy Distillation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Token-level confidence arbitration between VL and text teachers during on-policy distillation improves multimodal student reasoning over single-teacher OPD and GRPO.

  8. Cross-lingual Self-Consistency for Multilingual Reasoning with Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unsupervised RL enforces cross-lingual self-consistency to improve multilingual math reasoning by up to 21.7% on MGSM without gold answers or parallel data, with generalization to unseen languages.

  9. Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GRPO suffers advantage collapse on uniform-reward groups; ACR quantifies it and AVSPO adds virtual samples to restore gradients, yielding 4-6% accuracy gains on math benchmarks across 0.5B-14B models.

  10. Entropy Polarity in Reinforcement Fine-Tuning: Direction, Asymmetry, and Control

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Entropy polarity is a signed token-level quantity derived from a first-order approximation of entropy change that predicts whether RL updates expand or contract policy entropy in LLM fine-tuning, revealing an asymmetr...

  11. OracleTSC: Oracle-Informed Reward Hurdle and Uncertainty Regularization for Traffic Signal Control

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    OracleTSC introduces a reward hurdle and uncertainty regularization to stabilize LLM-based reinforcement learning for traffic signal control, delivering 75% lower travel time and 67% lower queue length on benchmarks p...

  12. Experience Sharing in Mutual Reinforcement Learning for Heterogeneous Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Mutual Reinforcement Learning allows heterogeneous LLMs to exchange experience through mechanisms like Peer Rollout Pooling, Cross-Policy GRPO Advantage Sharing, and Success-Gated Transfer, with outcome-level sharing ...

  13. Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The power distribution is the target of power sampling, the closed-form solution to self-reward KL-regularized RL, and the basis for power self-distillation that matches sampling performance at lower cost.

  14. Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs need metacognition to align expressed uncertainty with their actual knowledge boundaries, moving beyond knowledge expansion to reduce confident errors.

  15. Understanding and Mitigating Spurious Signal Amplification in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Math Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DDRL reduces spurious reward noise in test-time RL for math by excluding ambiguous samples, using fixed advantages, and adding consensus-based updates, outperforming prior TTRL methods on math benchmarks.

  16. Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A parameter-free sampling strategy called CUTS combined with Mixed-CUTS training prevents mode collapse in RL for saturated LLM reasoning tasks and raises AIME25 Pass@1 accuracy by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.

  17. ZeroCoder: Can LLMs Improve Code Generation Without Ground-Truth Supervision?

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Co-evolving coder and tester models via consensus over a self-generated pass matrix improves LLM code generation up to 14.5% label-free and 21.6% with a lightly calibrated Bayesian selector.

  18. ZeroCoder: Can LLMs Improve Code Generation Without Ground-Truth Supervision?

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ZeroCoder co-evolves coder and tester LLMs via self-generated code-test execution feedback to improve code generation up to 21.6% without ground-truth supervision.

  19. CPMobius: Iterative Coach-Player Reasoning for Data-Free Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    A cooperative Coach–Player RL loop, rewarded by Player validation-progress, lifts math reasoning by 2–5 points while the Player trains only on self-generated pseudo-labeled tasks.

  20. CPMobius: Iterative Coach-Player Reasoning for Data-Free Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    CPMobius uses iterative coach-player reinforcement learning to improve mathematical reasoning in LLMs without external training data, yielding +4.9 average accuracy gains on Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct.

  21. PRInTS: Reward Modeling for Long-Horizon Information Seeking

    cs.AI 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    A generative reward model that combines dense information-gain step scoring with recursive trajectory summarization improves best-of-n selection for long-horizon information-seeking agents.

  22. Beyond Reasoning Gains: Mitigating General-Capability Forgetting in Large Reasoning Models

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A dynamic replay and reweighting scheduler (RECAP) preserves general capabilities during RLVR while keeping reasoning performance at least as good as reasoning-only finetuning.

  23. LightReasoner: Can Small Language Models Teach Large Language Models Reasoning?

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LightReasoner distills supervision signals from SLM-LLM behavioral divergence to improve LLM reasoning on math benchmarks with up to 28.1% accuracy gains and 90-99% reductions in resources.

  24. Compute as Teacher: Turning Inference Compute Into Reference-Free Supervision

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Parallel inference rollouts aggregated into pseudo-references enable reference-free RL supervision that matches expert-annotated performance on health tasks while using 9x less test-time compute.

  25. GeoMin: Data-Efficient Semi-Supervised RLVR via Geometric Distribution Modeling

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GeoMin uses geometric distribution modeling on labeled data to assess self-reward reliability, enabling better performance in semi-supervised RLVR with only 10% of typical annotations.

  26. Trust Region On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.

  27. When Self-Belief Misleads: Active Label Acquisition for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RLAVR uses the Corrective Advantage Gap metric and CARE policy to actively acquire ground-truth labels for key samples, stabilizing RLVR training and boosting performance with limited annotation budgets.

  28. Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper shows that advantage collapse in GRPO causes training stagnation on math reasoning benchmarks and proposes AVSPO, which uses real-time monitoring to inject virtual reward samples and reduces collapse while i...

  29. D$^2$Evo: Dual Difficulty-Aware Self-Evolution for Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    D²Evo mines medium-difficulty anchors from the current model, trains a Questioner to generate matching questions, and jointly optimizes Solver and Questioner for progressive gains, outperforming baselines on math reas...

  30. StraTA: Incentivizing Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Strategic Trajectory Abstraction

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    StraTA improves LLM agent success rates to 93.1% on ALFWorld and 84.2% on WebShop by sampling a compact initial strategy and training it jointly with action execution via hierarchical GRPO-style rollouts.

  31. Free Energy-Driven Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Advantage Shaping for Unsupervised Reasoning in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    FREIA applies free energy principles and adaptive advantage shaping to unsupervised RL, outperforming baselines by 0.5-3.5 Pass@1 points on math reasoning with a 1.5B model.

  32. Can I Have Your Order? Monte-Carlo Tree Search for Slot Filling Ordering in Diffusion Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0

    Monte Carlo tree search can pick better slot-filling orders for masked diffusion language models, but the claimed advantage over autoregressive models depends on truncating the autoregressive baselines.

  33. VI-CuRL: Stabilizing Verifier-Independent RL Reasoning via Confidence-Guided Variance Reduction

    cs.LG 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    VI-CuRL stabilizes verifier-independent RL for LLM reasoning via confidence-guided curriculum that reduces action and problem variance, with a claimed proof of asymptotic unbiasedness and empirical gains over baselines.

  34. ECHO: Entropy-Confidence Hybrid Optimization for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0

    ECHO's entropy-confidence hybrid tree search plus confidence-adaptive clipping improves test-time RL accuracy by 1-5 points on several math and visual reasoning benchmarks.