REVIEW 2 cited by
Does Black-box Attribute Inference Attacks on Graph Neural Networks Constitute Privacy Risk?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown promising results on real-life datasets and applications, including healthcare, finance, and education. However, recent studies have shown that GNNs are highly vulnerable to attacks such as membership inference attack and link reconstruction attack. Surprisingly, attribute inference attacks has received little attention. In this paper, we initiate the first investigation into attribute inference attack where an attacker aims to infer the sensitive user attributes based on her public or non-sensitive attributes. We ask the question whether black-box attribute inference attack constitutes a significant privacy risk for graph-structured data and their corresponding GNN model. We take a systematic approach to launch the attacks by varying the adversarial knowledge and assumptions. Our findings reveal that when an attacker has black-box access to the target model, GNNs generally do not reveal significantly more information compared to missing value estimation techniques. Code is available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Prompt-based Unifying Inference Attack on Graph Neural Networks
ProIA couples graph prompt pre-training with a disentanglement module to improve membership and attribute inference attacks on GNNs, with gains reported on five datasets.
-
Intellectual Property in Graph-Based Machine Learning as a Service: Attacks and Defenses
A systematic review that organizes graph-ML IP protection into model-level and data-level attacks and defenses, and ships a benchmark library, PyGIP.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.