Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16960 v2 pith:7DXGDARA submitted 2023-10-25 cs.LG cs.CR

Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.LG cs.CR
keywords alignmentaligninghumanlanguagelearningllmsmodelsprivacy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Sample Complexity of Differentially Private Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Differential privacy in policy optimization adds sample complexity costs that often appear as lower-order terms rather than dominating the bounds.

  2. S2T-RLHF: Hierarchical Credit Assignment for Stable Preference-Based RLHF

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    S2T-RLHF splits each response-level RLHF reward into sentence shares and then token shares, via bargaining and Dirichlet weighting, yielding steadier training with competitive preference alignment.

  3. Autonomy Reshapes How Personalization Affects Privacy Concerns and Trust in LLM Agents

    cs.HC 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    A 3x3 between-subjects experiment finds that risk-contingent autonomy in LLM agents attenuates personalization's negative effects on privacy concerns and trust via increased perceived control.