REVIEW 3 cited by
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
read the original abstract
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
On the Sample Complexity of Differentially Private Policy Optimization
Differential privacy in policy optimization adds sample complexity costs that often appear as lower-order terms rather than dominating the bounds.
-
S2T-RLHF: Hierarchical Credit Assignment for Stable Preference-Based RLHF
S2T-RLHF splits each response-level RLHF reward into sentence shares and then token shares, via bargaining and Dirichlet weighting, yielding steadier training with competitive preference alignment.
-
Autonomy Reshapes How Personalization Affects Privacy Concerns and Trust in LLM Agents
A 3x3 between-subjects experiment finds that risk-contingent autonomy in LLM agents attenuates personalization's negative effects on privacy concerns and trust via increased perceived control.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.