Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Renormalization-group approach to the Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity: Amplification of the pairing gap from $\ell^4$ to $\ell$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the Kohn-Luttinger pairing gap, long thought to scale as $e^{-c\ell^4}$, actually scales as $e^{-c'\ell}$ once the zero-sound contribution enters the RG flow.

desk verdict The zero-sound resummation idea is genuinely new and the calculation is explicit, but the partial-wave projection that produces the 1/(2ℓ+1) coefficient is wrong, so the claimed −ℓ gap exponent is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01169 v2 pith:7MWQCKZI submitted 2025-02-03 cond-mat.supr-con hep-phnucl-th

Yuki Fujimoto This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-conhep-phnucl-th
keywords Kohn-LuttingermechanismrenormalizationgroupBCSsuperconductivityKohnanomalypartial-waveexpansionpairinggaprepulsiveinteractionszero-sounddiagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the Kohn-Luttinger mechanism produces pairing gaps far larger than the classic estimate: instead of the exponent of the gap scaling as $-\ell^4$ with angular momentum $\ell$, it scales as $-\ell$. The difference comes from a subleading term in the renormalization-group $\beta$ function, the zero-sound contribution, which is usually discarded as an irrelevant operator but cannot be neglected before the BCS singularity forms. If this is right, superconductivity from purely repulsive interactions is exponentially easier to reach at high $\ell$, and the poorly convergent perturbative series for the $p$-wave gap is explained as a sign that the Kohn anomaly must be resummed separately from the BCS logarithm.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the zero-sound (ZS) diagram, a one-loop particle-hole diagram with momentum transfer $q=k_1-k_3$, evaluated with a hard cutoff $\Lambda$. Its partial-wave $\beta$ function is $\beta_{\mathrm{ZS},\ell}=-N(0)V^2(\pi)(\ln 2)/(2\ell+1)\,\Lambda/k_F$, obtained with the exact identity $\frac12\int_{-1}^{1}dz\,P_\ell(z)/q(z)=1/((2\ell+1)k_F)$; the $1/(2\ell+1)$ factor is what converts the $\ell^4$ law into $\ell$. Combined with the BCS $\beta$ function $-\frac{N(0)}{2}V_\ell^2$, the flow equation has a solution built from Bessel functions, and locating its pole gives the BCS singularity. The ZS term is formally irrelevant and renormalizes to zero, but the singularity occurs before the flow reaches the fixed point, so the term shifts where the instability happens.

What would settle it

Evaluate the two-loop skeleton integrals $\Pi^{(a)}_{\mathrm{ppph}}$ and $\Pi^{(c)}_{\mathrm{phph}}$ in odd partial waves, as proposed in Eq. (92): if the partial-wave projection scales as $1/\ell^4$ rather than $1/\ell$, the predicted exponent fails. A second test is to recompute the zero-sound $\beta$ function with a smooth cutoff; if the $\Lambda/q$ term with projection $1/(2\ell+1)$ disappears, the enhancement is a hard-cutoff artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Eq. (71): for large $\ell$, the pairing gap obeys $\ln(\Delta/\mu)\simeq -2(2\ell+1)/(V^2(\pi)\ln 2)$, so the BCS singularity occurs at RG time $t^*\propto (2\ell+1)$ and the gap is exponentially larger than the conventional $\ln\Delta\propto -\ell^4$. The paper argues that this follows once the zero-sound diagram's subleading contribution $\beta_{\mathrm{ZS},\ell}=-N(0)V^2(\pi)(\ln 2)/(2\ell+1)\,\Lambda/k_F$ is included in the $\beta$ function alongside the BCS term. It identifies the source of the old result as the $\Lambda^0/\ell^4$ term, which vanishes when differentiated with respect to the cutoff, while the $\Lambda/\ell$ term, previously dropped, controls the flow. The paper illustrates the mechanism with the spin-triplet $p$-wave gap from a repulsive $s$-wave contact interaction, where the RG result matches the next-to-leading-order perturbative result at moderate coupling.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the subleading $\Lambda/q$ zero-sound term being a genuine, scheme-independent contribution of the hard-cutoff calculation, and on the interaction vertex in the diagram being well approximated by its back-to-back value $V(\pi)$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For large $\ell$, the Kohn-Luttinger gap is exponentially larger than the classic $\ell^4$ estimate, making high-partial-wave pairing much more accessible in weak-coupling systems.
  • In the $p$-wave channel with repulsive $s$-wave contact interaction, the leading-order RG result reproduces the next-to-leading-order Bethe-Salpeter result at moderate coupling, so one-loop inputs effectively capture two-loop physics.
  • The poor convergence of the perturbative gap series is explained: diagrams containing both a BCS loop and a Kohn anomaly have divergent integrands that must be resummed together.
  • The RG approach provides a portable way to compute pairing gaps in nuclear and quark matter, where higher-partial-wave pairing such as $^3P_2$ may be amplified.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: if the $\ell$ scaling survives scrutiny, the $^3P_2$ pairing gap in neutron-star matter could be orders of magnitude larger than one-loop estimates, strengthening predicted neutron-star cooling rates.
  • Extension: the hard-cutoff dependence is not settled in the paper; recomputing the zero-sound beta function with a smooth cutoff would test whether the $\Lambda/q$ term is scheme-independent.
  • Extension: the same logic in two dimensions, where partial waves are $\cos(\ell\theta)$ and the angular measure differs, may give a different exponent; a 2D version of this calculation would be a direct next step.
  • Extension: the paper's identification of the divergent integrand suggests a practical diagnostic: a two-loop partial-wave coefficient enhanced by $1/\ell$ relative to one-loop signals that the Kohn anomaly must be resummed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the Kohn-Luttinger mechanism for superconductivity from repulsive interactions and proposes that, when the zero-sound (ZS) diagram is included in the one-loop RG beta function, the pairing-gap exponent changes from ln(Δ/μ) ∝ −ℓ^4 to ln(Δ/μ) ∝ −ℓ. After reviewing the standard KL argument and the RG setup, the author computes the ZS beta function with a hard cutoff in Sec. IV, projects it onto partial waves using an exact Legendre identity, solves the resulting Riccati equation in Sec. V, and extracts the new exponent. The paper then applies the formalism to the triplet p-wave gap from a repulsive s-wave contact interaction and compares with known perturbative results, arguing that the RG result effectively captures the poorly converging next-to-leading-order corrections. The central quantitative claim is Eq. (71), and the p-wave comparison in Sec. VI is presented as a consistency check rather than as a test of the large-ℓ exponent.

Significance. If the claimed result were established, it would be significant: replacing the extremely small KL gap exp(−cℓ^4) by the much larger exp(−c'ℓ) would change quantitative predictions for higher-partial-wave pairing in neutron-star matter, cold atoms, and other weakly coupled Fermi systems. The paper is self-contained and has genuine strong points: the RG equation is solved explicitly with no fitted parameters, the derivation produces a falsifiable prediction for the partial-wave projection of a two-loop diagram in Eq. (92), and the ℓ=1 comparison with available perturbative coefficients is a useful sanity check. However, the magnitude and even the sign of the central effect hinge on a subleading, cutoff-dependent term in the ZS beta function, and the projection step used to obtain that term has a technical flaw that must be repaired before the central claim is credible.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV, Eqs. (50)–(55)] The derivation of the partial-wave ZS beta function, Eq. (54), is not valid as written. Equation (52) is obtained under the assumption q̃ ≡ 2kF − q ≪ Λ, i.e. q ≈ 2kF, but the projection identity (55) is then used for all q. The statement immediately after Eq. (55) that the integral is dominated by z = −1 is incorrect in the large-ℓ regime. Writing z = cos θ, Eq. (55) becomes (1/kF)∫_0^π P_ℓ(cos θ) cos(θ/2) dθ / (2?) — more precisely the full integral is (1/kF)∫_0^π P_ℓ(cos θ) cos(θ/2) dθ, and for large ℓ the asymptotic P_ℓ(cos θ) ≈ J_0((ℓ+1/2)θ) gives ∫_0^π P_ℓ(cos θ) cos(θ/2) dθ ≈ 1/(ℓ+1/2), exactly the value claimed in Eq. (55). This contribution comes from θ ≈ 0, i.e. q → 0, where the weight cos(θ/2) is maximal; near z = −1 the weight cos(θ/2) vanishes. Therefore for large ℓ, the exact identity (55) is dominated by the q → 0 region, precisely the region where Eq. (52) is not valid: for q ≲ Λ the phase-space restrictions make I in Eq. (50) essentially q-independent, so Λ dI/dΛ is not −N0 Λ ln2/(2q). The coefficient 1/(2ℓ+1) in Eq. (54), and hence the −ℓ exponent in Eq. (71), are not established by the calculation presented.
  2. [§IV, Eq. (52) and comparison with Ref. [41]] The O(Λ/kF) term in Eq. (52) is a subleading term in an expansion of an irrelevant operator computed with a hard cutoff. Beta-function coefficients for irrelevant operators are generally scheme dependent, and the comparison with Shankar's soft-cutoff calculation in Sec. IV only addresses the O((Λ/kF)^0) contribution, which vanishes upon differentiation with respect to Λ. No argument is given that the coefficient ln2/(2ℓ+1) in Eq. (54) is independent of the regularization scheme, nor that the truncated RG flow with only this single irrelevant term produces a scheme-invariant physical gap. Because the central result in Eq. (71) is directly proportional to this coefficient, the paper needs either a scheme-independent derivation of the subleading ZS beta function or an explicit demonstration that the gap exponent is independent of the cutoff procedure.
  3. [§V, paragraph after Eq. (59)] The replacement V(π; t) ≈ V(π; 0) is an uncontrolled approximation. The ZS term is multiplied by e^{−t}, but the BCS pole in Eq. (69) occurs at t* ≈ 2(2ℓ+1)/(V^2(π) ln2), which grows linearly with ℓ. For large ℓ, t* can be much larger than 1, so the flow is not confined to a small neighborhood of t = 0. Since V(π; t) itself runs through the BCS and ZS couplings, the approximation could change the denominator in Eq. (71) and hence the coefficient, and potentially the ℓ-scaling, of the gap. At minimum, the paper should estimate the size of this correction or identify a parametric reason why it is negligible for large ℓ.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I, paragraph 5] The phrase "Bethe-Salpater equation" appears twice; it should read "Bethe-Salpeter equation."
  2. [Sec. II, paragraph 1] The sentence "The emergence of superconducting/superfluid pairing is associated with a singularity in the two-particle vertex function Γ in the particle-particle (BCS) channel ar zero total momentum and frequency" contains a typo: "ar" should be "at."
  3. [Sec. VI, paragraph after Eq. (86)] The sentence "Our intension here is to point out the issue..." contains a typo: "intension" should be "intention."
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The figure caption does not specify the horizontal-axis quantity or the values of λ used; the text says the plot range is λ > 0.35, but the axis labels are not visible in the manuscript text and should be given explicitly in the caption.
  5. [Eq. (78)] The denominator in Eq. (78) would be easier to read if the spin-channel combination in brackets were explicitly parenthesized, as it is in Eq. (84); as written, the reader must infer the intended grouping from the later equation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the −ℓ exponent follows from an independently computed one-loop beta function and standard perturbative inputs; the projection-domain issue is a correctness risk, not a circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central RG claim is not circular. The zero-sound beta-function coefficient in Eq. (54) is obtained by differentiating a hard-cutoff one-loop integral (Eqs. (47)–(52)) and then applying the exact partial-wave projection identity (55); no parameter is fitted to produce the 1/(2ℓ+1) term or the final −ℓ exponent in Eq. (71). The initial conditions for the p-wave example (Eqs. (79)–(83)) come from the standard Lindhard function and the tree-level s-wave contact interaction, and the comparison with the known perturbative coefficients in Eqs. (85)–(86) is a check against external results, not a fit. The only self-citation, Ref. [59], appears in the outlook and is not load-bearing. Two caveats should be flagged explicitly, but neither is circular: (i) the assertion after Eq. (55) that the projection integral is dominated by z = −1 is incorrect—the integrable q → 0 singularity at z = 1 dominates—so the stated a posteriori justification of the V(π) approximation fails, and the q ≈ 2k_F domain where Eq. (52) was derived does not cover the region controlling the partial-wave projection; this is a correctness/scheme-dependence concern rather than a reduction of the result to its inputs. (ii) Sec. VII itself states that the proposed two-loop projection in Eq. (92) 'can only be evaluated numerically' and is not carried out, which is an acknowledged open check. Neither caveat makes the derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a one-loop RG calculation with standard Fermi-surface kinematics plus several approximations specific to this paper (hard cutoff, V(π) vertex, neglect of V(π) running). No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The system is a spin-1/2 or spinless Fermi liquid in 3D with a short-range repulsive interaction, and the RG is restricted to a thin shell of width Λ around the Fermi surface (Sec. III A).
    The RG framework and the KL mechanism require this weak-coupling Fermi liquid setup.
  • ad hoc to paper The one-loop ZS diagram integral with a hard cutoff is evaluated under the approximations (kF+y)/(kF-x) ≃ 1, ~q = 2kF - q ≪ Λ, and the vertex factor V(π) taken out of the angular integral (Sec. IV, Eqs. 46-53).
    These approximations are specific to this paper's beta function calculation and are not derived from first principles.
  • ad hoc to paper The running of V(π; t) is neglected and V(π; t) is replaced by V(π; t=0) (Sec. V, paragraph after Eq. 59).
    The ZS term is centered at t∼0, so the t-dependence of V(π) is dropped without a quantitative error estimate.
  • domain assumption The initial condition for the RG flow, V_l(0), is taken from the one-loop Lindhard function at scale Λ=kF, and the p-wave example uses V(s)(π)=λ at leading order (Sec. VI A, Eqs. 79-83).
    The perturbative input defines the starting point of the RG flow.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Renormalization-group approach to the Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity: Amplification of the pairing gap from $\ell^4$ to $\ell$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7MWQCKZI

@misc{pith2026250201169,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Renormalization-group approach to the Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity: Amplification of the pairing gap from $\ell^4$ to $\ell$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7MWQCKZI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01169}
}
abstract

We revisit the renormalization group (RG) analysis of the Kohn-Luttinger (KL) mechanism for superconductivity. The KL mechanism leads to superconductivity in a system with a repulsive bare interaction. The key ingredient is the screening effect that renders the induced interaction attractive in channels with nonzero angular momentum $\ell \neq 0$, thereby triggering the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) instability. According to the original argument, the resulting gap is exponentially small, with its exponent scaling as $-\ell^4$. However, the KL mechanism was originally formulated within perturbation theory, where the series is known to converge poorly in certain cases -- most notably, for the p-wave paring gap induced by a repulsive s-wave contact interaction. This poor convergence may be attributed to a divergent integrand in a specific class of diagrams containing both the BCS logarithm and the Kohn anomaly, suggesting that one must resum the Kohn anomaly contributions separately from the BCS logarithm. In this work, we incorporate the Kohn anomaly contribution into the beta function of the RG equation governing the BCS instability near the Fermi surface. Our solution shows that the KL gap exponent is then proportional to $-\ell$, indicating a significant enhancement of the KL mechanism beyond the previously known result. To illustrate this, we study the spin-triplet p-wave pairing gap arising from a repulsive s-wave contact interaction and compare our RG-based results with those obtained from the Bethe-Salpeter equation in perturbation theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01169 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Top panel: The diagrammatic representation of the Bethe-Salpeter equation. The solution to this equation gives the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The skeleton one-loop diagrams that renormalize the quartic coupling. We write the loop momentum as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison of the gap evaluated in the perturbation theory and in the RG approach. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The skeleton diagrams that contribute to the two-loop order in the perturbation theory. There are also diagrams with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Renormalization group analysis of color superconductivity revisited

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An RG treatment with self-energy corrections reproduces the known O(g^0) color-superconducting gap and claims to fix its overall coefficient, implying a factor-two reduction.

  2. Classification of color superconductivity by one-gluon exchange helicity amplitudes and renormalization group equations

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In dense QCD, the most attractive quark pairing channel is classified by helicity amplitudes and renormalization group equations, with a new p-wave (1P1) channel favored for symmetric flavor and attraction found in th...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Kohn and J

    W. Kohn and J. M. Luttinger, New Mechanism for Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 524 (1965)

    work page 1965

  2. [2]

    (28) This is because when ˆk1 + ˆk2 − ˆk3 − ˆk4 ̸= 0, the argument of the second delta function in Eq

    (27) 6 In the last line, in order for the delta function δ(4)( l′ 1 s + l′ 2 s − l′ 3 s − l′ 4 s ) to scale as s2δ(4)(l′ 1 + l′ 2 − l′ 3 − l′ 4), the directions of the momenta have to fulfill the condition ˆk1 + ˆk2 − ˆk3 − ˆk4 = 0 . (28) This is because when ˆk1 + ˆk2 − ˆk3 − ˆk4 ̸= 0, the argument of the second delta function in Eq. (23) does not scale ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ¯ψ′(l′ 3)ψ′(l′ 2)ψ′(l′ 1)u′(l′ 1, l′ 2, l′ 3, l′ 4)(2π)4δ(4)(l′ 1 + l′ 2 − l′ 3 − l′

    work page

  4. [4]

    ¯ψ′(l′ 3)ψ′(l′ 2)ψ′(l′ 1)u( l′ 1 s , l′ 2 s , l′ 3 s , l′ 4 s )(2π)4s2δ(4)(l′ 1 + l′ 2 − l′ 3 − l′

    work page

  5. [5]

    (26), the renormalized coupling u′ is obtained: u′(l′ 1, l′ 2, l′ 3, l′

    (29) From Eq. (26), the renormalized coupling u′ is obtained: u′(l′ 1, l′ 2, l′ 3, l′

    work page

  6. [6]

    vFGbUYHKLX3FOO0/17bYLN5ZPDw=

    = u(l′ 1/s, l′ 2/s, l′ 3/s, l′ 4/s) + δuZS + δuZS′ + δuBCS + · · ·, (30) where δuZS,ZS′,BCS corresponds to the ZS, ZS’, and BCS diagrams, respectively. From this, one finds the RG equation du dt = dutree dt s=1 + dδuZS dt s=1 + dδuZS′ dt s=1 + dδuBCS dt s=1 + · · ·, ≡ βtree + βZS + βZS′ + βBCS + · · ·. (31) where we defined the scale parameter t ≡ ln s . ...

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    J. M. Luttinger, New mechanism for superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 150, 202 (1966)

    work page 1966

  8. [8]

    M. A. Baranov, A. V. Chubukov, and M. Y. Kagan, Superconductivity and Superfluidity in Fermi Systems with Repulsive Interactions, International Journal of Modern Physics B 6, 2471 (1992)

    work page 1992

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    M. Y. Kagan, Modern Trends in Superconductivity and Superfluidity , Vol. 874 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Maiti and A

    S. Maiti and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity from repulsive interaction, in Lectures on the Physics of Strongly Cor- related Systems XVII: Seventeenth Training Course in the Physics of Strongly Correlated Systems , American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1550, ...

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Fay and A

    D. Fay and A. Layzer, Superfluidity of low-density fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 187 (1968)

    1968

  4. [12]

    M. Y. Kagan and A. V. Chubukov, Possibility of a superfluid transition in a slightly nonideal Fermi gas with repulsion, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 47, 614 (1988)

    1988

  5. [13]

    Gonz´ alez, Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity in graphene, Phys

    J. Gonz´ alez, Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 78, 205431 (2008), arXiv:0807.3914 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Nandkishore, R

    R. Nandkishore, R. Thomale, and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity from weak repulsion in hexagonal lattice systems, Phys. Rev. B 89, 144501 (2014), arXiv:1401.5485 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. Y. Kagan, V. V. Val’kov, V. A. Mitskan, and M. M. Korovushkin, The Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity in idealized doped graphene, Solid State Communications 188, 61 (2014), arXiv:1411.3795 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    M. Y. Kagan, V. V. Val’kov, V. A. Mitskan, and M. M. Korovushkin, The Kohn-Luttinger effect and anomalous pairing in new superconducting systems and graphene, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 118, 995 (2014), arXiv:1411.6812 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Lin and R

    Y.-P. Lin and R. M. Nandkishore, Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity on two orbital honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 98, 214521 (2018), arXiv:1808.05270 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gonz´ alez and T

    J. Gonz´ alez and T. Stauber, Kohn-luttinger superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 026801 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    You and A

    Y.-Z. You and A. Vishwanath, Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity and intervalley coherence in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 105, 134524 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    T. Cea, P. A. Pantale´ on, V. T. Phong, and F. Guinea, Superconductivity from repulsive interactions in rhombohedral trilayer graphene: A Kohn-Luttinger-like mechanism, Phys. Rev. B 105, 075432 (2022), arXiv:2109.04345 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Herrera, G

    S. Herrera, G. Parra-Martinez, P. Rosenzweig, B. Matta, C. M. Polley, K. Kuster, U. Starke, F. Guinea, J. A. Silva-Guillen, G. G. Naumis, and P. A. Pantaleon, Electronic Structure and Kohn-Luttinger Superconductivity of Heavily-Doped Single- Layer Graphene, arXiv e-prints , ar...

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Qin, W.-X

    W. Qin, W.-X. Qiu, and F. Wu, Kohn-Luttinger Mechanism of Superconductivity in Twisted Bilayer WSe 2: Gate-Tunable Unconventional Pairing Symmetry, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2409.16114 (2024), arXiv:2409.16114 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024

  15. [23]

    Jahin and S.-Z

    A. Jahin and S.-Z. Lin, Enhanced Kohn-Luttinger topological superconductivity in bands with nontrivial geometry, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.09664 (2024), arXiv:2411.09664 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024

  16. [24]

    A. J. Leggett, A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid He-3, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 48, 357–357 (1976)]

    1975

  17. [25]

    D. M. Lee, The extraordinary phases of liquid He-3, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 645 (1997), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 70, 319–319 (1998)]

    1997

  18. [26]

    J. A. Sauls, The order parameter for the superconducting phases of UPt3, Advances in Physics 43, 113 (1994), arXiv:1812.09984 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    1994 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Baranov, Theoretical progress in many-body physics with ultracold dipolar gases, Physics Reports 464, 71 (2008)

    M. Baranov, Theoretical progress in many-body physics with ultracold dipolar gases, Physics Reports 464, 71 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Kanoda and R

    K. Kanoda and R. Kato, Mott Physics in Organic Conductors with Triangular Lattices, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2, 167 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    Kallin, Chiral p-wave order in Sr 2RuO4, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 042501 (2012), arXiv:1210.2992 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    C. Kallin, Chiral p-wave order in Sr 2RuO4, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 042501 (2012), arXiv:1210.2992 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Hoffberg, A

    M. Hoffberg, A. E. Glassgold, R. W. Richardson, and M. Ruderman, Anisotropic Superfluidity in Neutron Star Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 775 (1970)

    1970

  23. [31]

    Tamagaki, Superfluid State in Neutron Star Matter

    R. Tamagaki, Superfluid State in Neutron Star Matter. I. Generalized Bogoliubov Transformation and Existence of 3P2 Gap at High Density, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 905 (1970)

    1970

  24. [32]

    Schwenk and B

    A. Schwenk and B. Friman, Polarization contributions to the spin dependence of the effective interaction in neutron matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 082501 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0307089

    2004 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kumamoto and S

    M. Kumamoto and S. Reddy, Kohn-Luttinger effect in dense matter and its implications for neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 110, 025804 (2024), arXiv:2405.12243 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    D. Page, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer, and A. W. Steiner, Rapid Cooling of the Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A Triggered 18 by Neutron Superfluidity in Dense Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 081101 (2011), arXiv:1011.6142 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    P. S. Shternin, D. G. Yakovlev, C. O. Heinke, W. C. G. Ho, and D. J. Patnaude, Cooling neutron star in the Cassiopeia˜A supernova remnant: Evidence for superfluidity in the core, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 412, L108 (2011), arXiv:1012.0045 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Sch¨ afer, The Kohn-Luttinger effect in gauge theories, Phys

    T. Sch¨ afer, The Kohn-Luttinger effect in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 74, 054009 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0606026

    2006 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. V. Efremov, M. S. Mar’Enko, M. A. Baranov, and M. Y. Kagan, Superfluid Transition Temperature in a Fermi Gas with Repulsion Allowing for Higher Orders of Perturbation Theory, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 90, 861 (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0007334 [cond...

    2000 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Benfatto and G

    G. Benfatto and G. Gallavotti, Perturbation theory of the fermi surface in a quantum liquid. a general quasiparticle formalism and one-dimensional systems, Journal of Statistical Physics 59, 541 (1990)

    1990

  31. [39]

    Benfatto and G

    G. Benfatto and G. Gallavotti, Renormalization-group approach to the theory of the Fermi surface, Phys. Rev. B 42, 9967 (1990)

    1990

  32. [40]

    Benfatto and G

    G. Benfatto and G. Gallavotti, Renormalization group (Princeton University Press, 1996)

    1996

  33. [41]

    J. J. Feldman and E. Trubowitz, Perturbation theory for many fermion systems, Helvetica Physica Acta 63, 156 (1990)

    1990

  34. [42]

    J. J. Feldman and E. Trubowitz, The flow of an electron-phonon system to the superconducing state, Helvetica Physica Acta 64, 213 (1991)

    1991

  35. [43]

    J. J. Feldman, J. L. Magnen, V. Rivasseau, and E. Trubowitz, An infinite volume expansion for many fermion green’s functions, Helvetica Physica Acta 65, 679 (1992)

    1992

  36. [44]

    Feldman, J

    J. Feldman, J. Magnen, V. Rivasseau, and E. Trubowitz, An Intrinsic 1/N expansion for many fermion systems, EPL 24, 437 (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    Shankar, Renormalization group for interacting fermions in d >1, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 177, 530 (1991)

    R. Shankar, Renormalization group for interacting fermions in d >1, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 177, 530 (1991)

    1991

  38. [46]

    Shankar, Renormalization group approach to interacting fermions, Rev

    R. Shankar, Renormalization group approach to interacting fermions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 129 (1994), arXiv:cond- mat/9307009

    1994

  39. [47]

    Polchinski, Effective field theory and the Fermi surface, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles (1992) pp

    J. Polchinski, Effective field theory and the Fermi surface, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles (1992) pp. 0235–276, arXiv:hep-th/9210046

    1992 arXiv

  40. [48]

    P. W. Anderson and G. Yuval, Exact Results in the Kondo Problem: Equivalence to a Classical One-Dimensional Coulomb Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 89 (1969)

    1969

  41. [49]

    fermi-liquid

    P. Nozi` eres, A “fermi-liquid” description of the Kondo problem at low temperatures, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 17, 31 (1974)

    1974

  42. [50]

    K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Reviews of Modern Physics 47, 773 (1975)

    1975

  43. [51]

    H. R. Krishna-Murthy, J. W. Wilkins, and K. G. Wilson, Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1003 (1980); Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magn...

    1980

  44. [52]

    Schwenk, G

    A. Schwenk, G. E. Brown, and B. Friman, Low momentum nucleon-nucleon interaction and Fermi liquid theory, Nucl. Phys. A 703, 745 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0109059

    2002 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Schwenk, B

    A. Schwenk, B. Friman, and G. E. Brown, Renormalization group approach to neutron matter: Quasiparticle interactions, superfluid gaps and the equation of state, Nucl. Phys. A 713, 191 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0207004

    2003 arXiv

  46. [54]

    D. T. Son, Superconductivity by long range color magnetic interaction in high density quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 59, 094019 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9812287

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    N. J. Evans, S. D. H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, An Effective field theory approach to color superconductivity at high quark density, Nucl. Phys. B 551, 275 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9808444

    1999 arXiv

  48. [56]

    N. J. Evans, S. D. H. Hsu, and M. Schwetz, Nonperturbative couplings and color superconductivity, Phys. Lett. B 449, 281 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810514

    1999 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Sch¨ afer and F

    T. Sch¨ afer and F. Wilczek, High density quark matter and the renormalization group in QCD with two and three flavors, Phys. Lett. B 450, 325 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9810509

    1999 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Shankar, Luttinger Revisited—The Renormalization Group Approach, Journal of Statistical Physics 103, 485 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0009384 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    R. Shankar, Luttinger Revisited—The Renormalization Group Approach, Journal of Statistical Physics 103, 485 (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0009384 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2001 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Kohn, Image of the Fermi Surface in the Vibration Spectrum of a Metal, Phys

    W. Kohn, Image of the Fermi Surface in the Vibration Spectrum of a Metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 393 (1959)

    1959

  52. [60]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum theory of many-particle systems (1971)

    1971

  53. [61]

    L. P. Gor’kov and T. K. Melik-Barkhudarov, Contribution to the Theory of Superfluidity in an Imperfect Fermi Gas, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 13, 1018 (1961)

    1961

  54. [62]

    S. R. Beane, Z. Capatti, and R. C. Farrell, Universal corrections to the superfluid gap in a cold Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 111, 013309 (2025), arXiv:2407.20168 [nucl-th]

    2025 arXiv

  55. [63]

    A. V. Chubukov, Kohn-luttinger effect and the instability of a two-dimensional repulsive fermi liquid at t=0, Phys. Rev. B 48, 1097 (1993)

    1993

  56. [64]

    Fujimoto, K

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, and W. Weise, Continuity from neutron matter to two-flavor quark matter with 1S0 and 3P2 superfluidity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094009 (2020), arXiv:1908.09360 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.